Intrathecal Catheter for Chemotherapy in Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis From HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Most oncological treatments for leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) do not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). One therapeutic option is intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy. Both the brain-implanted Omaya reservoir and lumbar puncture (LP) are classic routes for IT chemotherapy delivery. An intrathecal catheter (IC) connected to a subcutaneous port is a recently developed option for the management of chemotherapy infusions. It is essential to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy infusion using such device. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study within Institut de cancerologie de l'Ouest at Angers, including all patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC) with LM implanted with an IT device for IT chemotherapy between January 2013 and May 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included surgical feasibility, patient safety, and progression-free survival (PFS). The catheter was inserted through an LP, the tip was positioned at the right level and connected to a subcutaneous port implanted under the skin of the anterior thoracic wall. IT chemotherapy is painless and easy for qualified nurses to administer on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: Thirty women underwent the implantation. No failures occurred during the procedure. A total of 77% of patients reported no complications after implantation. Only three complications required surgical treatment. The median number of IT chemotherapy courses per patient was 8 (range, 2-27). The tolerance profile for iterative IT chemotherapy was manageable in ambulatory care. With a median follow-up of 76.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-not available), the median OS was 158 days (95% CI, 87-235), and the median PFS was 116 days (95% CI, 58-174). CONCLUSION: Infusing chemotherapy using an implanted catheter is an efficient option for managing IT chemotherapy with a good tolerance profile. Patient-reported outcomes for the evaluation of IT chemotherapy toxicity are currently being developed.

Chemical Stability of Morphine, Ropivacaine, and Ziconotide in Combination for Intrathecal Analgesia.

Pain is the most feared symptom amongst individuals living with cancer. In 15% to 20% of patients, conventional analgesic therapy either fails to relieve pain or induces adverse effects. Intrathecal drug delivery systems may present an effective alternative for pain management. The Cancerology Center Paul Papin protocol includes an admixture of morphine, ropivacaine, and ziconotide in intrathecal preparations. These drugs are administered by a fully implantable or an external pump. Syringes or polyolefin infusion bags are prepared for refill just before use. Few centers in France use the method of intrathecal analgesia. Therefore, for those patients receiving intrathecal preparations, each filling requires that the patients be transported from their local hospital (or their home) to a referral center where the patients are monitored. They sometimes must travel up to a hundred kilometers to have a pump filled. The preparation and the analytical control of the mixture are carried out only by those centers meeting the proper criteria, which includes the proper equipment. To spare the patient this travel, a peripheral center may be subcontracted to manage the patient's pump refill. No data are available concerning the chemical stability of admixtures in syringes or polyolefin infusion bags. The aim of this study was to evaluate, with a new analytical method using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography, the chemical stability of these admixtures in syringes or in polyolefin infusion bags. Ziconotide 1 µg/mL was combined with ropivacaine (7.5 mg/mL) and morphine (3.5 mg/mL) in syringes at 5°C, 21°C, and 31°C, and in polyolefin infusion bags at 21°C. Assays were performed using ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography. In syringes stored at 21°C and 31°C, concentrations after 6 hours were not in the acceptable criterion of 10% variability. When syringes were stored at 5°C, the residual concentration of ziconotide after 3 days was 100.5% +/- 2.6% [92.7% to 108.4%]. In polyolefin infusion bags, the residual concentration of ziconotide after 14 days was 96.9% +/- 2.2% [90.1% to 103.6%]. This study demonstrates the chemical stability of this admixture in syringes stored at 5°C for 3 days and in polyolefin plastibags stored at 21°C for 14 days.

Rationale for Prospective Assays of Intrathecal Mixtures Including Morphine, Ropivacaine and Ziconotide: Prevention of Adverse Events and Feasibility in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Use of intrathecal admixtures is widespread, but compounding these is sometimes challenging and may result in errors and complications causing super-potency or sub potency adverse events in patients or malfunctions in the pump itself. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of compounding of intrathecal admixtures through a prospective, systematic quantitative analysis of each component of the mixture before delivery to patients. STUDY DESIGN: Observational follow up prospective study of intrathecal mixtures components concentrations before refills. SETTINGS: Assays were performed on all intrathecal admixtures produced by the ICO-Paul Papin compounding pharmacy between January 2013 and October 2014 using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (U.H.P.L.C.). In addition, pH levels of admixtures have been measured since June 2014. When measured concentrations were 15% above or below the required concentrations, the mixture was excluded and compounded again. RESULTS: 1729 mixtures were analyzed. Mean deviation from theoretical values was -1.17% ± 0.28% for morphine, -0.95% ± 1.07% for ropivacaine, and 4.82% ± 0.6% for ziconotide. Exclusion rates were 8.33% overall, but fell from 11.67% in 2013 to 4.97% in 2014. Most exclusions were caused by inaccuracy in the dose of ziconotide. Average mixture pH of the 603 tested admixtures was 4.83 ± 0.6%. LIMITATIONS: This study is monocentric and limitations include also its non-randomized nature with no clinical comparison of the rate of adverse events with a refill process without control of each component concentrations. CONCLUSION: Prospective assays provide benefits in ensuring accuracy of intrathecal mixture compounding and in preventing overdosing or sub dosing, most notably concerning Ziconotide.