Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 44(4): 737-50, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11521768

ABSTRACT

Gap detection is a commonly used measure of temporal resolution, although the mechanisms underlying gap detection are not well understood. To the extent that gap detection depends on processes within, or peripheral to, the auditory brainstem, one would predict that a measure of gap threshold based on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) would be similar to the psychophysical gap detection threshold. Three experiments were performed to examine the relationship between ABR gap threshold and gap detection. Thresholds for gaps in a broadband noise were measured in young adults with normal hearing, using both psychophysical techniques and electrophysiological techniques that use the ABR. The mean gap thresholds obtained with the two methods were very similar, although ABR gap thresholds tended to be lower than psychophysical gap thresholds. There was a modest correlation between psychophysical and ABR gap thresholds across participants. ABR and psychophysical thresholds for noise masked by temporally continuous, high-pass, or spectrally notched noise were measured in adults with normal hearing. Restricting the frequency range with masking led to poorer gap thresholds on both measures. High-pass maskers affected the ABR and psychophysical gap thresholds similarly. Notched-noise-masked ABR and psychophysical gap thresholds were very similar except that low-frequency, notched-noise-masked ABR gap threshold was much poorer at low levels. The ABR gap threshold was more sensitive to changes in signal-to-masker ratio than was the psychophysical gap detection threshold. ABR and psychophysical thresholds for gaps in broadband noise were measured in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss and in infants. On average, both ABR gap thresholds and psychophysical gap detection thresholds of listeners with hearing loss were worse than those of listeners with normal hearing, although individual differences were observed. Psychophysical gap detection thresholds of 3- and 6-month-old infants were an order of magnitude worse than those of adults with normal hearing, as previously reported; however, ABR gap thresholds of 3-month-old infants were no different from those of adults with normal hearing. These results suggest that ABR gap thresholds and psychophysical gap detection depend on at least some of the same mechanisms within the auditory system.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Noise , Time Perception , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Electrophysiology/methods , Humans , Infant , Perceptual Masking/physiology , Psychophysics , Time Factors
2.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 348-56, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This article describes the design of a multicenter study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brain stem responses) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The influences of the infant's medical status, the test environment, and test and response parameters on test performance were examined. DESIGN: Seven institutions participated in this study. There were 7179 infants evaluated in the perinatal period. All graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit (4478) and well babies with one or more risk factor for hearing loss (353) were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Well babies without any risk indicators (N = 2348) were not targeted for follow-up VRA testing. However, 80 of these well babies did not pass the screening protocol and thus were targeted for follow-up VRA testing as well. Perinatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the "gold standard." RESULTS: The results of this study are described in a series of 11 articles following this introductory article. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of newborn hearing tests required a longitudinal study in which newborn test results were compared with a gold standard based on behavioral audiometric assessment. Such an evaluation was possible because all newborns, passes as well as refers, were followed up long enough to permit reliable behavioral measurements. In addition, prenatal, perinatal, and maternal history information, test environment, and test parameter information were collected to provide data that led to a complete description of factors affecting test outcomes. All of these data were obtained in a sample of sufficient ethnic, medical, and geographic diversity in efforts to increase the generalizability of the results. Finally, the data were combined in a relational data base to examine the factors that influence test performance. Specific information related to these issues is presented in the articles that follow.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/etiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Software
3.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 357-72, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059698

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this article are to describe the overall protocol for the Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment (INHI) project and to describe the management of the data collected as part of this project. A well-defined protocol and database management techniques were needed to ensure that data were 1) collected accurately and in the same way across sites; 2) maintained in a database that could be used to provide feedback to individual sites regarding enrollment and the extent to which the protocol was complete on individual subjects; and 3) available to answer project questions. This article describes techniques that were used to meet these needs. DESIGN: This study was a prospective, randomized study that was designed to evaluate auditory brain stem responses, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions as hearing-screening tools, and to relate neonatal test findings to hearing status, defined by visual reinforcement audiometry at 8 to 12 mo of age. Measures of middle-ear function also were obtained at some sites as part of the neonatal test battery. In addition, other clinical and demographic data were gathered to determine the extent to which factors, other than auditory status, influenced test behavior. Three groups were evaluated: neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants (those who spent 3 or more days in a NICU), well babies with risk factors for hearing loss, and well babies without risk factors. Six centers participated in the trial. The testers for the project included audiologists, technicians, audiology graduate students, and medical research staff. The same computerized neonatal test program was applied at each center. This program generated the neonatal test database automatically. Clinical and demographic data were collected by means of concise data collection forms and were entered into a database at each site. After the neonatal test, subjects from the NICU and at-risk well babies were evaluated with visual reinforcement audiometry starting at 8 to 12 mo of age. All data were electronically transmitted to the core site where they were merged into one overall database. This database was exercised to provide feedback and to identify discrepancies throughout the course of the study. In its final form, it served as the database on which all analyses were performed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The protocol was a departure from typical hearing screening procedures in terms of 1) its regimented application of three screening measures; 2) the detailed information that was obtained regarding subject clinical and demographic factors; and 3) its application of the same procedures across six centers having diverse geographic location and subject demographics. A learning curve for successfully executing the study protocols was observed. Throughout the study, monthly reports were generated to monitor subject enrollment, check for data completeness, and to perform data integrity checks. In combination with monthly data reports and checks that occurred throughout the progression of the study, miscellaneous data audits were performed to check accuracy of neonatal testing programs and to cross-check information entered in the clinical and demographic database. The data management techniques used in this project helped to ensure the quality of the data collection process and also allowed for detailed analyses once data were collected. This was particularly important because it enabled us to evaluate not only the performance of individual measures as screening tools, but also permitted an evaluation of the influence of other variables on screening test results.


Subject(s)
Databases as Topic , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Acoustic Stimulation , Clinical Protocols , Cochlea/physiology , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 400-24, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059701

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a wide range of frequencies and two stimulus levels in neonates and infants. 2) To describe the relations between these DPOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time. DESIGN: DPOAEs were measured in 2348 well babies without risk indicators, 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). DPOAE and noise levels were measured at f2 frequencies of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, and for primary levels (L1/L2) of 65/50 dB SPL and 75/75 dB SPL. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response was at least 3 dB above the mean noise floor + 2 SDs (SNR) for at least four of five test frequencies. The test would terminate, however, if these criteria were not met after 360 sec. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of each test. RESULTS: DPOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for well babies without risk indicators, well babies with risk indicators, and NICU graduates. There was a tendency for larger responses at f2 frequencies of 1.5 and 2.0 Hz, compared with 3.0 and 4.0 kHz; however, the noise levels systematically decreased as frequency increased, resulting in the most favorable SNRs at 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. Response levels were least and noise levels highest for an f2 frequency of 1.0 kHz. In addition, test time to achieve automatic stopping criteria was greatest for 1.0 kHz. With the exception of "active/alert" and "crying" babies, baby state had little influence on DPOAE measurements. Additionally, test environment had little impact on these measurements, at least for the environments in which babies were tested in this study. However, the lowest SNRs were observed for infants who were tested in functioning isolettes. Finally, there were some subtle age affects on DPOAE levels, with the infants born most prematurely producing the smallest responses, regardless of age at the time of test. CONCLUSIONS: DPOAE measurements in neonates and infants result in robust responses in the vast majority of ears for f2 frequencies of at least 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. SNRs decrease as frequency decreases, making the measurements less reliable at 1.0 kHz. When considered along with test time, there may be little justification for including an f2 frequency at 1.0 kHz in newborn screening programs. It would appear that DPOAEs result in reliable measurements when tests are conducted in the environments in which babies typically are found. Finally, these data suggest that babies can be tested in those states of arousal that are most commonly encountered in the perinatal period.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/physiology , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Age Factors , Ear, Middle/physiology , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Noise , Risk Factors , Time Factors
5.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 373-82, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic data, medical status, and incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well-baby populations in a multicenter prospective study designed to assess neonatal hearing impairment and to evaluate factors that might affect neonatal hearing test performance. DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brain stem response, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening. Research staff at each site obtained informed consent and detailed demographic and medical data, including information on established risk factors for hearing loss on 4478 high-risk infants cared for in the NICU, 2348 infants from the well-baby nurseries with no risk factor, and 353 infants from the well-baby nurseries with risk factors. For follow-up purposes the sample was divided further to include a subgroup called selects. Selects were either infants from the well-baby nursery who had an established risk factor for hearing impairment (N = 353) or did not pass the neonatal hearing screen protocol (N = 80). In this study, we focus on the distribution of infants by nursery and risk factors only. Particular effort was made to enroll infants with risk factors for hearing loss in both the NICU and well-baby nurseries. Descriptive analyses are used to describe characteristics of this sample. RESULTS: All 10 of the risk factors established by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 1994 were identified in the NICU population. The four most common were ototoxic medications (44.4%), very low birth weight (17.8%), assisted ventilation > 5 days (16.4%), and low Apgar scores at 1 or 5 min (13.9%). In contrast, only six risk factors were present in the well-baby nurseries: family history (6.6%), craniofacial abnormalities (3.4%), low Apgar scores (2.8%), syndromes (0.5%), ototoxic medications (0.2%), and congenital infection (0.1%). CONCLUSION: These descriptive risk factor data reflect both the newborn populations at the study sites and the bias for enrolling infants at risk for hearing loss. The high-risk NICU sample reflects the characteristics typically found in graduates of the NICU. The data summarized in this study will be used to assess the relationships between risk factor and hearing test outcome.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatal Screening , Nurseries, Infant , Adult , Female , Health Status , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/etiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 425-42, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059702

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a range of frequency bands in three groups of neonates who were tested as a part of the Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment multi-center consortium project. 2) To describe the relations between these TEOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time. DESIGN: TEOAEs were measured in 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 2348 well babies without risk factors. TEOAE and noise levels were measured for frequency bands centered at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz for a click stimulus level of 80 dB SPL. For those ears not meeting "passing" stopping criteria at 80 dB pSPL, a level of 86 dB pSPL was included. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response revealed a criterion SNR in four out of five frequency bands or no response occurred after a preset number of averages. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of test. RESULTS: TEOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for NICU graduates, well babies with risk factors and well babies without risk factors. There were no consistent differences in response quality as a function of test environment, i.e., private room, unit, open crib, nonworking isolette, or working isolette. Noise level varied little across risk group, test environment, or infant state other than crying, suggesting that the primary source of noise in TEOAE measurements is infant noise. The most significant effect on response quality was center frequency. Responses were difficult to measure in the half-octave band centered at 1.0 kHz, compared with higher frequencies. Reliable responses were measured routinely at frequencies of 1.5 kHz and higher. CONCLUSIONS: TEOAEs are easily measured in both NICU graduates and well babies with and without risk factors for hearing loss in a wide variety of test environments. Given the difficulties encountered in making reliable measurements for a frequency band centered at 1.0 kHz, its inclusion in a screening program may not be justified.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Age Factors , Arousal/physiology , Cochlea/physiology , Gestational Age , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Noise , Time Factors
7.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 383-99, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059700

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the auditory brain stem response (ABR) measurement system and optimized methods used for study of newborn hearing screening. 2) To determine how recording and infant factors related to the screening, using well-defined, specific ABR outcome measures. DESIGN: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-nine infants, 4478 from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the remaining from the well-baby nursery, were evaluated with an automated ABR protocol in each ear. Two channel recordings were obtained (vertex to mastoid or channel A and vertex to nape of neck or channel B) in response to click stimuli of 30 and 69 dB nHL in all infants as well as 50 dB nHL in infants who did not meet criteria for response at 30 dB. Criteria for response included F(SP) > or =3.1 and a tester-judgment of response. Criteria could be met in the first or repeat test with a maximum of 6144 accepted sweeps per test. RESULTS: More than 99% of infants could complete the ABR protocol. More than 90% of NICU and well-baby nursery infants "passed" given the strict criteria for response, whereas 86% of those with high risk factors met criterion for ABR response detection. The number of infants who did not meet ABR response criteria in one or both ears was systematically related to stimulus level with the largest group not meeting criteria at 30 dB followed by 50 and 69 dB nHL. Meeting criteria on the ABR was positively correlated with the amplitude of wave V, with low noise and low electrode impedance. Factors that predicted how many sweeps would be needed to reach criterion F(SP) included noise level of the test site, state of the baby (for example, quiet sleep versus crying), recording noise, electrode impedance and response latency. Channel A (vertex to mastoid) reached criterion more often than channel B (vertex to nape of neck) due to higher noise in channel B. Average total test time for 30 dB nHL screening in both ears was under 8 minutes. Well babies with risk factors took slightly longer to evaluate than other groups with this automated ABR procedure and have higher noise levels. CONCLUSIONS: ABR implemented with an automated detection algorithm using a 30 dB nHL click stimulus is reliable technique for rapid assessment of auditory status in newborns. Factors other than hearing loss that influenced the test result include infant state, electrode location and impedance, testing site, and infant risk status. Even so, ABRs were reliably recorded in the vast majority of babies under circumstances in which most babies are found in the perinatal period.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Algorithms , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Learning/physiology , Noise/adverse effects
8.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 443-61, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059703

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe broad bandwidth measurements of acoustic admittance (Y) and energy reflectance (R) in the ear canals of neonates. 2) To describe a means for evaluating when a YR response is valid. 3) To describe the relations between these YR measurements and age, gender, left/right ear, and selected risk factors. DESIGN: YR responses were obtained at four test sites in well babies without risk indicators, well babies with at least one risk indicator, and graduates of neonatal intensive care units. YR responses were measured using a chirp stimulus at moderate levels over a frequency range from 250 to 8000 Hz. The system was calibrated based on measurements in a set of cylindrical tubes. The probe assembly was inserted in the ear canal of the neonate, and customized software was used for data acquisition. RESULTS: YR responses were measured in over 4000 ears, and half of the responses were used in exploratory data analyses. The particular YR variables chosen for analysis were energy reflectance, equivalent volume and acoustic conductance. Based on the view that unduly large negative equivalent volumes at low frequencies were physically impossible, it was concluded that approximately 13% of the YR responses showed evidence of improper probe seal in the ear canal. To test how these outliers influenced the overall pattern of YR responses, analyses were conducted both on the full data set (N = 2081) and the data set excluding outliers (N = 1825). The YR responses averaged over frequency varied with conceptional age (conception to date of test), gender, left/right ear, and selected risk factors; in all cases, significant effects were observed more frequently in the data set excluding outliers. After excluding outliers and controlling for conceptional age effects, the dichotomous risk factors accounting for the greatest variance in the YR responses were, in rank order, cleft lip and palate, aminoglycoside therapy, low birth weight, history of ventilation, and low APGAR scores. In separate analyses, YR responses varied in the first few days after birth. An analysis showed that the use of a YR test criterion to assess the quality of probe seal may help control the false-positive rate in evoked otoacoustic emission testing. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of wideband YR responses in neonates. Data were acquired in a few seconds, but the responses are highly sensitive to whether the probe is fully sealed in the ear canal. A real-time acoustic test of probe fit is proposed to better address the probe seal problem. The YR responses provide information on middle-ear status that varies over the neonatal age range and that is sensitive to the presence or absence of risk factors, ear, and gender differences. Thus, a YR test may have potential for use in neonatal screening tests for hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Ear Canal/anatomy & histology , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Acoustics , Auditory Perception/physiology , Female , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Risk Factors
9.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 462-70, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059704

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the recruitment and retention strategies as well as the sample demographics for families with infants completing the neonatal examination and returning for follow-up. These data are compared to those infants inactivated from the study. DESIGN: This study was a prospective, randomized clinical study. All infants who were confined to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well babies with at least one risk indicator were targeted for behavioral audiometric follow-up testing. In addition, infants without risk factors from the well-baby nursery, but who failed a newborn test, were also followed. Several variables were evaluated to determine those factors, if any, that might predict which families returned for follow-up testing. RESULTS: Recruitment was achieved as per study design with 4911 high-risk infants and 2348 well-baby nursery infants (without risk indicators for hearing) enrolled. Of the 4911 high-risk infants enrolled, 64% were successfully recruited into the follow-up portion of the study. This was less than the projected rate of 80%. Factors predicting noncompliance with the study protocol for follow-up were predominantly sociodemographic and included nonwhite race, no insurance, substance abuse, young maternal age, more than two children at home, and late onset of prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: Factors related to low socioeconomic status and increased social risk were the strongest predictors of poor study protocol compliance. Despite retention challenges, 64% of the targeted, high-risk infants subsequently returned for the 8-to 12-mo behavioral hearing assessment protocols for validation purposes.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Demography , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Prospective Studies , Recruitment Detection, Audiologic
10.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 471-87, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059705

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the hearing status of the at-risk infants in the National Institutes of Health-Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment study sample at 8 to 12 mo corrected age (chronologic age adjusted for prematurity). 2) To describe the visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) protocol that was used to obtain monaural behavioral data for the sample. DESIGN: All neonatal intensive care unit infants and well babies with risk factors (including well babies who failed neonatal tests) were targeted for follow-up behavioral evaluation once they had reached 8 mo corrected age. Three thousand one hundred and thirty-four (64.4%) of the 4868 surviving infants returned for at least one behavioral hearing evaluation, which employed a well-defined VRA protocol. VRA thresholds or minimum response levels (MRLs) were determined for speech and pure tones of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz for each ear using insert earphones. RESULTS: More than 95% of the infants were reliably tested with the VRA protocol; 90% provided complete tests (four MRLs for both ears). Ninety-four percent of the at-risk infants were found to have normal hearing sensitivity (MRLs of 20 dB HL) at 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz in both ears. Of the infants, 2.2% had bilateral hearing impairment, and 3.4% had impairment in one ear only. More than 80% of the impaired ears had losses of mild-to-moderate degree. CONCLUSIONS: This may be the largest study to attempt to follow all at-risk infants with behavioral audiometric testing, regardless of screening outcome, in an effort to validate the results of auditory brain stem response, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and transient evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the newborn period. It is one of only a few studies to report hearing status of infants at 1 yr of age, using VRA on a clinical population. Successful testing of more than 95% of the infants who returned for the VRA follow-up documents the feasibility of obtaining monaural behavioral data in this population.


Subject(s)
Audiometry , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Photic Stimulation , Age Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
11.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 488-507, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059706

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the audiologic findings and medical status of infants who were found to have hearing loss, detected as part of the Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment (INHI) project. In addition, the neonatal and maternal health variables for the group of infants who could not be tested with visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) due to developmental and visual disability are presented. DESIGN: The overall goal of the INHI project was to evaluate the test performance of auditory brain stem response and evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) tests given in the newborn period. These tools were evaluated on the basis of the infants' hearing when tested behaviorally with VRA at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The neonatal test results, VRA results, medical history information and a record of intercurrent events occurring between the neonatal period and the time of VRA were collated and reviewed. The purpose of this article is to review the characteristics of those infants who were found to have hearing loss. RESULTS: Of 2995 infants who had VRA tests judged to be of good or fair reliability, 168 had a finding of hearing loss for at least one ear, an incidence of 5.6%. Sixty-six infants had bilateral losses, an incidence of 2%, and 22 infants had bilateral hearing losses in the moderate to profound range, an incidence 0.7%. The prevalence of middle ear problems was greater than 50% among these infants with hearing loss. From the larger group of 168 infants with hearing loss, a group of 56 infants (86 ears) was chosen as those with a low probability that the hearing loss was due to transient middle ear pathology and was more likely hearing loss of a permanent nature. These were the infants used for the analyses of neonatal test performance (Norton et al., 2000). In this selected group there were 30 infants with bilateral impairment of at least mild degree, which is an incidence of 1%. There were approximately equal numbers of ears in the mild, moderate, severe and profound range of hearing loss. Risk factors associated with hearing loss were reviewed for the total sample of infants tested with VRA and for those infants with hearing loss. A history of treatment with aminoglycosides was the risk factor most often reported in the entire sample; however, there was no difference in prevalence of this risk factor for the normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups. The risk factor associated with the highest incidence of hearing loss was stigmata of syndromes associated with sensorineural hearing loss and other neurosensory disorders. Sixty-seven infants who returned for follow-up could not be tested with VRA due to severe developmental delay or visual disability. Many of these infants had medical histories indicating the sequelae of extreme prematurity and/or very low birthweight. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the hearing losses found in this study were mild and, based on clinical history and tympanometry tests, many of the mild and some of the moderate impairments may have been acquired in early infancy due to middle ear effusion. In the group of infants used for determination of neonatal test performance there were approximately equal numbers of mild, moderate, severe and profound losses. Only a small percentage of infants with a conventional risk indicator for hearing loss actually had a hearing loss, and there were a significant number of infants with hearing loss who did not have a risk indicator. These findings support the need for an early identification program based on universal neonatal hearing screening rather than by targeted testing of those with risk indicators.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Ear, Middle/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
12.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 529-35, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059708

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This article summarizes the results of a multi-center study, "Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment," sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance characteristics of three measures of peripheral auditory system status, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brain stem responses (ABR), applied in the neonatal period in predicting hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. DESIGN: The design and implementation of this study are described in the first two articles in this series. Seven institutions participated in this study; 7179 infants were evaluated. Graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit and well babies with one or more risk factors for hearing loss were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Neonatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the "gold standard." RESULTS: The major results of the study are described in the nine articles preceding this summary article. TEOAEs in response to an 80 dB pSPL click, DPOAEs in response to L1 = 65 and L2 = 50 dB SPL and ABR in response to a 30 dB nHL click performed well as predictors of permanent hearing loss of 30 dB or greater at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. All measures were robust with respect to infant state, test environment and infant medical status. No test performed perfectly. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data from this study, the 1993 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference-recommended protocol-an OAE test followed by an ABR test for those infants failing the OAE test-would result in low referral rate (96 to 98%). TEOAEs for 80 dB pSPL, ABR for 30 dB nHL and DPOAEs for L1 = 65 dB SPL and L2 = 50 dB SPL perform well in predicting hearing status based on the area under the relative operating characteristic curve. Accuracy for the OAE measurements are best when the speech awareness threshold or the pure-tone average for 2.0 kHz and 4 kHz are used as the gold standard. ABR accuracy varies little as a function of the frequencies included in the gold standard. In addition, 96% of those infants returning for VRA at 8 to 12 mo corrected age were able to provide reliable ear-specific behavioral thresholds using insert earphones and a rigorous psychophysical VRA protocol.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Photic Stimulation , Reinforcement, Psychology , Risk Factors
13.
Ear Hear ; 21(5): 508-28, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11059707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) as tools for identification of neonatal hearing impairment. DESIGN: A total of 4911 infants including 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units, 353 well babies with one or more risk factors for hearing loss (Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, 1994) and 80 well babies without risk factor who did not pass one or more neonatal test were targeted as the potential subject pool on which test performance would be assessed. During the neonatal period, they were evaluated using TEOAEs in response to an 80 dB pSPL click, DPOAE responses to two stimulus conditions (L1 = L2 = 75 dB SPL and L1 = 65 dB SPL L2 = 50 dB SPL), and ABR elicited by a 30 dB nHL click. In an effort to describe test performance, these "at-risk" infants were asked to return for behavioral audiologic assessments, using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age, regardless of neonatal test results. Sixty-four percent of these subjects returned and reliable VRA data were obtained on 95.6% of these returnees. This approach is in contrast to previous studies in which, by necessity, efforts were made to follow only those infants who "failed" the neonatal screening tests. The accuracy of the neonatal measures in predicting hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age was determined. Only those infants who provided reliable, monaural VRA test results were included in the analysis. Separate analyses were performed without regard to intercurrent events (i.e., events between the neonatal and VRA tests that could cause their results to disagree), and then after accounting for the possible influence of intercurrent events such as otitis media and late-onset or progressive hearing loss. RESULTS: Low refer rates were achieved for the stopping criteria used in the present study, especially when a protocol similar to the one recommended in the National Institutes of Health (1993) Consensus Conference Report was followed. These analyses, however, do not completely describe test performance because they did not compare neonatal screening test results with a gold standard test of hearing. Test performance, as measured by the area under a relative operating characteristic curve, were similar for all three neonatal tests when neonatal test results were compared with VRA data obtained at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. However, ABRs were more successful at determining auditory status at 1 kHz, compared with the otoacoustic emission (OAE) tests. Performance was more similar across all three tests when they were used to identify hearing loss at 2 and 4 kHz. No test performed perfectly. Using either the two- or three-frequency pure-tone average (PTA), with a fixed false alarm rate of 20%, hit rates for the neonatal tests, in general, exceeded 80% when hearing impairment was defined as behavioral thresholds > or =30 dB HL. All three tests performed similarly when a two-frequency (2 and 4 kHz) PTA was used as the gold standard; OAE test performance decreased when a three-frequency PTA (adding 1 kHz) was used as the gold standard definition. For both PTA and all three neonatal screening measures, however, hit rate increased as the magnitude of hearing loss increased. CONCLUSIONS: Singly, all three neonatal hearing screening tests resulted in low refer rates, especially if referrals for follow-up were made only for the cases in which stopping criteria were not met in both ears. Following a protocol similar to that recommended in the National Institutes of Health (1993) Consensus Conference report resulted in refer rates that were less than 4%. TEOAEs at 80 dB pSPL, DPOAE at L1 = 65, L2 = 50 dB SPL and ABR at 30 dB nHL measured during the neonatal period, and as implemented in the current study, performed similarly at predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Hearing Disorders/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Cochlea/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Photic Stimulation , Reinforcement, Psychology , Risk Factors
14.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 46(1): 107-20, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10079794

ABSTRACT

A behavioral approach is the first choice for hearing assessment in infants and children. It is the only true test of hearing. Physiologic measures are not tests of hearing, only indicators of auditory function. The use of physiologic measures in estimating hearing levels makes some presumptions regarding the concept of hearing. As such, these measures are used when a definitive statement about hearing cannot be made on the basis of behavioral audiometric results, or when other factors (e.g., age or developmental delay) preclude obtaining reliable behavioral information.


Subject(s)
Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Hearing Disorders/psychology , Hearing Tests/methods , Child , Child Behavior , Child, Preschool , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Humans
15.
Ear Hear ; 17(6): 455-68, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8979034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss commonly is associated with Down syndrome, but little is known about the development of auditory sensitivity in individuals with Down syndrome. This study had two objectives: 1) to determine whether an observer-based procedure can be used to assess the behavioral sensitivity of infants with Down syndrome, and 2) to provide preliminary information about the early course of hearing development among infants with Down syndrome. DESIGN: Behavioral measures of sensitivity were made in 16 infants with Down syndrome using an observer-based procedure. Ten of the infants were followed longitudinally between 2 and 12 mo of age. All infants passed a screening auditory brain stem response at 20 dB nHL during the study and completed screening tympanometry at each test session. The infants detected a 4000 Hz tone at levels ranging from 25 to 50 dB SPL; psychometric functions and thresholds for the tone were obtained. RESULTS: Infants with Down syndrome completed 80% of the test sessions they began, a rate similar to that seen in normally developing infants in the same type of study. Performance improved with increasing stimulus level, as one would expect, and thresholds were obtained from 15 of 16 infants for at least one age. The performance of infants with Down syndrome generally improved with age. The sensitivity of 2- to 3-mo-olds was poorer than that of older infants, but little if any improvement in sensitivity occurred between 4 and 12 mo. This pattern is similar to that seen in normally developing infants. Thresholds of infants with Down syndrome were 10 to 25 dB higher than those reported for normally developing infants. The psychometric functions of infants with Down syndrome were shallower than the psychometric functions of normally developing infants, and the slope of the psychometric functions did not change with age. Infants with Down syndrome achieved only 75 to 80% correct at any of the levels tested, 5 to 10% poorer than reported for other infants. These characteristics of the psychometric functions of the infants with Down syndrome suggest that they are inattentive during testing more often than are normally developing infants. CONCLUSIONS: An observer-based procedure can be used to obtain reasonable thresholds from infants with Down syndrome who are as young as 2 mo of age. Both sensory and nonsensory factors could contribute to the threshold elevation seen in infants with Down syndrome. At least on preliminary examination, the course of auditory sensitivity development of infants with Down syndrome is qualitatively similar to that seen in normally developing infants.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Down Syndrome , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing/physiology , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Female , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Psychometrics
16.
Hear Res ; 89(1-2): 21-7, 1995 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8600128

ABSTRACT

The frequency-following response (FFR) and the envelope-following response (EFR) were recorded in 1-month-old infants and in adults to examine the development of temporal coding. The stimuli were amplitude-modulated (AM) tones. A modulation frequency of 80 Hz was used in infants; modulation frequencies of 40 and 80 Hz were used in adults. The effects of intensity, carrier frequency, and modulation frequency on these responses were studied. Responses were analyzed using magnitude-squared coherence. The effect of intensity on the growth of FFR- and EFR-coherence were similar in infants and adults. In addition, the growth functions were not affected by the carrier frequency or the modulation frequency of the stimulus. FFR thresholds did not differ across age groups. 'Best frequency' (i.e., infant 80 Hz and adult 40 Hz) EFR thresholds were the same for infants and adults at 500 and 1000 Hz, but infant EFR thresholds were poorer than adult thresholds at 2000 Hz. Thus, although FFRs and EFRs are primarily adult-like at 1 month of age, there are some age differences in the EFR that deserve further study.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Aging/physiology , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn
17.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 98(2 Pt 1): 921-30, 1995 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7642831

ABSTRACT

Studies of tuning in infants have reported that auditory brain-stem response (ABR) tuning curves generated using low-frequency probes are adultlike by 3 months of age while high-frequency tuning curves remain immature [Folsom and Wynne, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 412-417 (1987)]. Behavioral studies have similarly reported adultlike low-frequency psychoacoustic tuning curves by 3 months with high-frequency tuning curves immature until approximately 6 months of age [L. Olsho, Infant Behav. Dev. 8, 371-384 (1985); Spetner and Olsho, Child Dev. 61, 632-652 (1990); Schneider et al., J. Exp. Psych.: Human Percept. Perform. 16, 642-652 (1990)]. Prior to this experiment, there have been no ABR studies of the development of frequency resolution for infants older than 3 months. In this study, notched-noise tuning functions were constructed from wave-V amplitude data for 3-month-old, 6-month-old, and adult subjects. Tone-pip stimuli at 1000, 4000, and 8000 Hz (50 dB nHL) were presented simultaneously with notched-noise masking centered at frequencies related to the tone-pip frequency (1/3-oct intervals above and below the probe frequency). By plotting wave-V amplitude across notched-noise center frequency, isointensity tuning functions were generated for the three subject groups at the three probe frequencies. Auditory filter width (Q) and slope (dB/oct) were measured from each notched-noise tuning function in order to qualify degree of tuning. Consistent with previous studies, results showed that 3-month-old infants do not have adultlike tuning for high-frequency stimulation (8000 Hz). In contrast, by 6 months of age, tuning-function width (Q) is adultlike for both high- and low-frequency probes. These results, combined with previously reported evidence that the human cochlea is fully tuned at birth [Abdala et al., submitted to Hear. Res. (1995); Bargones and Burns, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1809-1816 (1988)], suggest that immaturities in the auditory-neural system contribute to the broad high-frequency tuning consistently observed in 3-month-old human infants.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Perceptual Masking , Speech Perception , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Infant , Noise
18.
Ear Hear ; 16(3): 311-20, 1995 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7672480

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to investigate morphologic differences in the ABR as a result of reversing the stimulus polarity of frequency-limited single-cycle stimuli in normal-hearing subjects. The results clearly demonstrate that large latency differences occur between condensation and rarefaction stimuli for low-frequency stimuli. It is believed that polarity-specific latencies are a result of the highly phase-sensitive neural elements tuned to low-frequency stimuli. In the majority of test subjects the rarefaction stimulus produced shorter absolute wave latencies; however, in a small number of subjects, significantly shorter latencies were elicited with the condensation stimulus. It is believed that differences may occur from varying summation patterns of inner hair cell depolarization between subjects which would be consistent over time within the same subject.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing/physiology , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors
19.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 97(4): 2394-404, 1995 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7714257

ABSTRACT

The results of previous research reports have led some investigators to hypothesize that frequency contribution to the infant click-evoked auditory brain-stem response (ABR) is low-frequency dominated and derived primarily from the apical cochlea. This is in contrast to latency and morphology of the adult click-evoked ABR which reflects contributions from the basal cochlea. Recent research, however, has suggested that a simple low-frequency first model of development does not adequately describe the infant auditory brain-stem response. This experiment was conducted as a carefully controlled comparison of infant and adult click-evoked ABRs restricted to narrow frequency ranges with notched-noise masking. The primary objective of this experiment was to define frequency contribution to wave I and V click-evoked ABR latency and morphology in adults and 3-month-old infants. Results indicate that 3-month-old infants have adultlike latency shifts (re: unmasked latency) when the ABR is recorded in the presence of notched-noise masking with center frequencies ranging from 500-8000 Hz. With high-frequency centered notches, latency, and morphology change are similar to the unmasked response, while low-frequency centered notches induce an average latency shift of approximately 3.5 ms for wave I and V of both infant and adult subjects. These data suggest that by 3 months of age, in normal hearing infants, ABR latency and appearance are determined by high-frequency spectral components in the broadband click which activate the basal cochlea. The adultlike pattern of latency shift observed in the ABR of these infants suggests that relatively mature tonotopic organization is established by 3 months of age.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing/physiology , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Noise , Perceptual Masking
20.
Hear Res ; 77(1-2): 88-98, 1994 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7928741

ABSTRACT

The relationship between behavioral thresholds and auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies for 4 and 8 kHz tone pips were examined in normal-hearing 3-month-olds, 6-month-olds and adults. The latencies of waves I and V and the I-V interval of the ABR were analyzed. A linear latency-intensity function was also fit to each subject's latencies for each wave at several levels. The y-intercept of the latency-intensity function was used as a summary measure of latency to examine behavior-ABR correlations. The pattern of age-related change in behavioral threshold was not closely matched by age-related latency reduction for Wave I, Wave V or the I-V interval. However, 3-month-olds with higher behavioral thresholds had longer Wave V latencies and longer I-V intervals than 3-month-olds with lower behavioral thresholds. There was no significant difference in latency between 6-month-olds or adults with higher thresholds and 6-month-olds or adults with lower thresholds. There was also a significant correlation between the Wave V-Wave I latency-intensity intercept difference and behavioral threshold at both 4 and 8 kHz among 3-month-olds. The correlation was not significant among 6-month-olds or adults. These findings suggest that one of the factors responsible for immature behavioral thresholds at 3 months is related to transmission through the auditory brainstem. Because variability in hearing threshold among normal-hearing adults is low, it is not surprising that behavioral threshold is unrelated to ABR latency in this group. However, the lack of such a relationship among 6-month-olds implies that structures central to the auditory brainstem, either sensory or nonsensory, or both, must be responsible for immature behavioral thresholds after 6 months of age.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold/physiology , Behavior/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Age Factors , Child Development , Humans , Infant , Psychoacoustics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...