Prenatal exposure to valproic acid during pregnancy and limb deficiencies: a case-control study.

We conducted a case-control study using data from the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC) on the relationship between prenatal exposure to valproic acid (VPA) and the presence of limb deficiencies in newborn infants. Among a total of 22,294 consecutive malformed infants (once we excluded genetic syndromes) and 21,937 control infants with specified data on antiepileptic drugs during gestation, 57 malformed infants and 10 control infants were exposed to VPA during the first trimester of pregnancy. Of the total of malformed infants exposed to VPA, 36.8% (21/57) presented with congenital limb defects of different types (including overlapping digits, talipes, clubfoot, clinodactyly, arachnodactyly, hip dislocation, pre- and postaxial polydactyly, etc.), three of them having limb deficiencies. The result of the case-control analysis shows a risk for limb deficiencies of odds ratio = 6.17 [confidence interval (CI) 1.28-29.66, P = 0.023], after controlling for potential confounder factors. If we consider that in our population the prevalence at birth of this type of defect is 6.88 per 10,000 livebirths (95% CI 6.43-7.36) we can estimate that the risk for women treated with VPA of having a baby with limb deficiencies would be around 0.42%. The limb deficiencies in the three patients exposed to VPA were the following: the first case was a newborn infant with hypoplasia of the left hand, the second patient was a newborn infant with unilateral forearm defect and hypoplastic first metacarpal bone in the left hand, and the third patient presented with short hands with hypoplastic first metacarpal bone, absent and hypoplastic phalanges, retrognathia, facial asymmetry, hypospadias, teleangiectatic angioma in skull, and hypotonia.

Amelia: analysis of its epidemiological and clinical characteristics.

Eighteen cases of amelia in the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC) were analyzed epidemiologically. Prevalence at birth was 0.15 per 10,000 newborn infants, which is not different from that reported by other authors. Affected females outnumbered males. When compared with the control group, a lower birth weight, shorter gestation, lower placental weight, greater frequency of single umbilical artery, noncephalic presentation at birth, and more frequent maternal vaginal bleeding were observed in amelia cases. There were no significant variations of parental age. None of these patients was exposed to known teratogens, apart from 1 born to a diabetic mother; 3 patients had a genetic condition. Comparison of these variables with other studies is difficult because there is only one study that specifically analyzed amelia. Our data together with previous observations suggest that the genetic basis of amelia might be more important than has been considered previously.