Belgian Fertility Clinic Staff Value Healthy Lifestyle Promotion but Lack Access to a Structured Lifestyle Modification Programme: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines advise promoting a healthy lifestyle among patients with fertility problems as the lifestyle of women and men proved to be associated with their fertility. Australian fertility nurses were shown to lack access to structured lifestyle modification programmes, although they value healthy lifestyle promotion. This study aimed to examine whether gynaecologists also value promoting a healthy lifestyle and whether structured lifestyle modification programmes are available in Belgian fertility clinics. DESIGN: An observational study was conducted among health care professionals (HCPs) working in Belgian fertility clinics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: An Australian questionnaire on attitudes and practices related to promoting a healthy lifestyle among patients with fertility problems was reciprocally back-to-back translated and three open-ended questions were added. All HCPs of Belgian fertility clinics, including gynaecologists, fertility nurses/midwives, psychologists, and embryologists, were invited by e-mail to complete the questionnaire online. Responses to closed and open-ended questions were analysed with, respectively, descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Finally, differences in perspectives between different groups of HCPs were explored. RESULTS: A total of 50 fertility nurses/midwives, 42 gynaecologists, and 19 other HCPs completed the survey (n = 111). Regarding attitudes, all respondents valued informing patients about the impact of lifestyle on fertility. The vast majority of HCPs (n = 96; 86%) stated that fertility clinics have the responsibility to address unhealthy lifestyles prior to offering fertility treatment. Fertility nurses/midwives were significantly more likely than gynaecologists to state that fertility clinics have this responsibility (p = 0.040). Regarding practices, the patient's lifestyle was most commonly discussed by the gynaecologist (n = 107; 96%) during the first appointment (n = 105; 95%). The lifestyle factors that were being addressed, according to the vast majority of respondents, were smoking, weight, age, alcohol, and recreational drugs. Only three HCPs (from three different clinics) stated that their clinic offered a structured lifestyle modification programme. HCPs explained that they lacked the resources and expertise for offering a structured lifestyle modification programme. LIMITATIONS: Response rates were limited, but the responding Belgian gynaecologists and fertility nurses/midwives confirmed the findings of the previous study in Australian fertility nurses. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs working in Belgian fertility clinics value healthy lifestyle promotion but lack access to structured lifestyle modification programmes to implement in their daily clinical practice. Future studies should focus on developing and evaluating structured lifestyle modification programmes for patients with fertility problems.

Impact of Indication for Oocyte and Embryo Reception on Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess if the indication for oocyte reception (OR) or embryo reception (ER) impacts the reproductive and obstetric outcomes by evaluating our experience at a tertiary fertility centre and by performing a literature review on this subject. Several previous studies have reported that, in contrast to other types of fertility treatment, the indication for OR/ER seems to have little impact on the outcomes. However, the compared indication groups vary considerably between these studies, and some data indicates worse outcomes in patients who developed premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) due to Turner syndrome or treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of all cases of OR/ER at a tertiary fertility centre from 2001 until 2020 was conducted. We analysed 584 cycles from 194 individual patients. A literature review on the impact of indication on reproductive or obstetric outcomes of OR/ER was performed using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 27 studies were included and analysed. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: For the retrospective analysis, patients were divided into three major indication groups: failure of autologous assisted reproductive technology, POI, and genetic disease carrier. To assess reproductive outcomes, we determined pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate. For comparing obstetric outcomes, we reviewed the term of birth, mode of delivery, and birthweight. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test, χ2 test, and one-way ANOVA utilizing the GraphPad tool. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in reproductive and obstetric outcomes between the three major indication groups in our population, in line with the findings reported by existing literature. Data on impaired reproductive outcomes in patients with POI after chemotherapy/radiotherapy are conflicting. Obstetrically, these patients are at higher risk of preterm birth and possibly also low birthweight, especially after abdomino-pelvic or total body irradiation. For patients with POI due to Turner syndrome, most data suggest similar pregnancy rates but a higher rate of pregnancy loss, and obstetrically an increased risk of hypertensive disorders and caesarean section. LIMITATIONS: The small number of patients in the retrospective analysis resulted in low statistical power when evaluating differences between smaller subgroups. There were some missing data on the occurrence of complications during pregnancy. Our analysis covers a period of 20 years, during which several technological innovations have also been made. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the important heterogeneity in couples treated with OR/ER does not significantly impact their reproductive or obstetric outcomes, except for POI due to Turner syndrome or treatment with chemotherapy/radiotherapy, where there seems to be an important uterine/endometrial component that cannot be entirely overcome by providing a healthy oocyte.

The Impact of Chronic Endometritis on Infertility: Prevalence, Reproductive Outcomes, and the Role of Hysteroscopy as a Screening Tool.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of chronic endometritis (CE) in infertile women, its impact on reproductive outcomes, and the accuracy of hysteroscopy as a screening tool for CE. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants involved in this study were 514 asymptomatic patients with infertility. SETTING: The review was conducted in a tertiary care center. METHODS: The participants underwent a hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). Antibiotics were given for cases of CE. We investigated the prevalence of CE in patients starting assisted reproductive technologies (ART) as a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in the ART cycle after hysteroscopy, EMB, and antibiotic treatment in cases of CE; the cumulative CPR in the subsequent 2 years after hysteroscopy and EMB; the sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy as a screening tool compared to EMB as the "gold standard" for diagnosing CE. RESULTS: CE was identified in 2.8% of patients starting ART (11/393). CPRs did not differ significantly between patients with CE and the entire cohort of patients without CE in the subsequent ART cycle (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.09-2.02) or in the 2 years after EMB (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.16-1.97). In a matched control comparison (with matching for age, basal FSH, and cause of infertility), CPR in patients with CE did not differ in the subsequent ART cycle (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.09-1.61); however, their CPR in the 2 years after EMB was significantly lower (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.13-0.38). The sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy as a screening tool for diagnosing CE were 8.3% and 90.1%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Due to our cohort's low CE prevalence, we could not detect significant differences in CPRs. CONCLUSION: CE is rare in our studied population of asymptomatic patients starting ART. Hysteroscopy cannot replace EMB for diagnosing CE.

Multicentre study on rates and reasons for treatment discontinuation in patients with remaining cryopreserved embryos.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the discontinuation rate among patients with remaining cryopreserved embryos in Belgium and what are the reasons for discontinuation? DESIGN: Multicentre, cross-sectional study across 11 Belgian fertility clinics. Patients were eligible (n = 1917) if they had previously undergone an unsuccessful fresh embryo transfer (fresh group) or frozen embryo transfer (FET) (in-between group) and did not start a subsequent FET cycle within 1 year despite having remaining cryopreserved embryos. The denominator was all patients with embryos cryopreserved during the same period (2012-2017) (n = 21,329). Data were collected through an online anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: The discontinuation rate for patients with remaining cryopreserved embryos was 9% (1917/21329). For the final analysis, 304 completed questionnaires were included. The most important reasons for discontinuing FET cycles were psychological (50%) and physical (43%) burden, effect on work (29%), woman's age (25%) and effect on the relationship (25%). In 69% of cases, the patient themselves made the decision to delay FET treatment. In 16% of respondents, the decision to delay FET was determined by external factors: treating physician (9%), social environment (4%), close family (3%) and society (3%). Suggested improvements were psychological support before (41%), during (51%) and after (51%) treatment, as well as lifestyle counselling (44%) and receiving digital information (43%). CONCLUSIONS: The discontinuation rate is remarkably high in patients with remaining cryopreserved embryos who have a good prognosis. Respondents stressed the need to improve the integration of psychological and patient-tailored care into daily assisted reproductive technology practice.

A blended preconception lifestyle programme for couples undergoing IVF: lessons learned from a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the effect of a blended preconception lifestyle programme on reproductive and lifestyle outcomes of couples going through their first 12 months of IVF as compared to an attention control condition? SUMMARY ANSWER: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was stopped prematurely because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic but the available data did not suggest that a blended preconception lifestyle programme could meaningfully affect time to ongoing pregnancy or other reproductive and lifestyle outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Increasing evidence shows associations between a healthy lifestyle and IVF success rates. Lifestyle programmes provided through a mobile phone application have yet to be evaluated by RCTs in couples undergoing IVF. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A multicentre RCT (1:1) was carried out. The RCT started in January 2019 and was prematurely stopped because of the Covid-19 pandemic, leading to a reduced sample size (211 couples initiating IVF) and change in primary outcome (cumulative ongoing pregnancy to time to ongoing pregnancy). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Heterosexual couples initiating IVF in five fertility clinics were randomized between an attention control arm and an intervention arm for 12 months. The attention control arm received treatment information by mobile phone in addition to standard care. The intervention arm received the blended preconception lifestyle (PreLiFe)-programme in addition to standard care. The PreLiFe-programme included a mobile application, offering tailored advice and skills training on diet, physical activity and mindfulness, in combination with motivational interviewing over the telephone. The primary outcome was 'time to ongoing pregnancy'. Secondary reproductive outcomes included the Core Outcome Measures for Infertility Trials and IVF discontinuation. Changes in the following secondary lifestyle outcomes over 3 and 6 months were studied in both partners: diet quality, fruit intake, vegetable intake, total moderate to vigorous physical activity, sedentary behaviour, emotional distress, quality of life, BMI, and waist circumference. Finally, in the intervention arm, acceptability of the programme was evaluated and actual use of the mobile application part of the programme was tracked. Analysis was according to intention to treat. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 211 couples were randomized (105 control arm, 106 intervention arm). The hazard ratio of the intervention for time to ongoing pregnancy was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.4). Little to no effect on other reproductive or lifestyle outcomes was identified. Although acceptability of the programme was good (6/10), considerable proportions of men (38%) and 9% of women did not actively use all the modules of the mobile application (diet, physical activity, or mindfulness). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings of this RCT should be considered exploratory, as the Covid-19 pandemic limited its power and the actual use of the mobile application was low. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first multicentre RCT evaluating the effect of a blended preconception lifestyle programme for women and their partners undergoing IVF on both reproductive and lifestyle outcomes. This exploratory RCT highlights the need for further studies into optimal intervention characteristics and actual use of preconception lifestyle programmes, as well as RCTs evaluating effectiveness. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Supported by the Research foundation Flanders (Belgium) (FWO-TBM; reference: T005417N). No competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03790449. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31 December 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 2 January 2019.

Anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels and pulmonary comorbid conditions are linked to post-COVID-19 syndrome.

BACKGROUNDProlonged symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection are well documented. However, which factors influence development of long-term symptoms, how symptoms vary across ethnic groups, and whether long-term symptoms correlate with biomarkers are points that remain elusive.METHODSAdult SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription PCR-positive (RT-PCR-positive) patients were recruited at Stanford from March 2020 to February 2021. Study participants were seen for in-person visits at diagnosis and every 1-3 months for up to 1 year after diagnosis; they completed symptom surveys and underwent blood draws and nasal swab collections at each visit.RESULTSOur cohort (n = 617) ranged from asymptomatic to critical COVID-19 infections. In total, 40% of participants reported at least 1 symptom associated with COVID-19 six months after diagnosis. Median time from diagnosis to first resolution of all symptoms was 44 days; median time from diagnosis to sustained symptom resolution with no recurring symptoms for 1 month or longer was 214 days. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG level in the first week after positive RT-PCR test and history of lung disease were associated with time to sustained symptom resolution. COVID-19 disease severity, ethnicity, age, sex, and remdesivir use did not affect time to sustained symptom resolution.CONCLUSIONWe found that all disease severities had a similar risk of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome in an ethnically diverse population. Comorbid lung disease and lower levels of initial IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen were associated with longer symptom duration.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04373148.FUNDINGNIH UL1TR003142 CTSA grant, NIH U54CA260517 grant, NIEHS R21 ES03304901, Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Sunshine Foundation, Crown Foundation, and Parker Foundation.

Evaluation of a stand-alone mobile mindfulness app in people experiencing infertility: the protocol for an exploratory randomised controlled trial (MoMiFer-RCT).

INTRODUCTION: Infertility and its treatment bring a considerable emotional burden. Increasing evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of smartphone-delivered mindfulness apps for reducing symptoms of emotional distress in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Evidence on this topic in women, men and couples experiencing infertility is currently under-represented. The aim of the MoMiFer study is, therefore, to investigate the efficacy of a stand-alone mobile mindfulness app on symptoms of emotional distress and fertility-related quality of life in people experiencing infertility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an exploratory randomised controlled trial (RCT) with open enrollment. The primary outcomes are symptoms of emotional distress and fertility-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes are mindfulness skills, repetitive negative thinking, self-compassion, user-rated quality of the stand-alone mobile mindfulness app and use of the app. Experience sampling method and standardised self-report questionnaires are combined within a repeated measures design to measure the effects of the stand-alone mobile mindfulness app on the primary and secondary outcomes, apart from the use of the app. The latter will be evaluated through app tracking. People, including women, men and couples, experiencing infertility (n=60) will be randomised to an intervention group receiving the stand-alone mobile mindfulness app for 3 months or a wait-list control group. The app follows the format and content of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction. Data will be collected at baseline, at 1.5 months and 3 months after randomisation. Analysis will be according to intention to treat and based on general linear modelling and multilevel mixed-effects modelling. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Leuven University Hospital (Belgium). The findings of this exploratory RCT will be disseminated through presentations at public lectures, scientific institutions and meetings, and through peer-reviewed scientific articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04143828.

Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility.

BACKGROUND: Infertility is a prevalent problem that has significant consequences for individuals, families, and the community. Modifiable lifestyle factors may affect the chance of people with infertility having a baby. However, no guideline is available about what preconception advice should be offered. It is important to determine what preconception advice should be given to people with infertility and to evaluate whether this advice helps them make positive behavioural changes to improve their lifestyle and their chances of conceiving. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and effectiveness of preconception lifestyle advice on fertility outcomes and lifestyle behavioural changes for people with infertility. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, trial registers, Google Scholar, and Epistemonikos in January 2021; we checked references and contacted field experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), randomised cross-over studies, and cluster-randomised studies that compared at least one form of preconception lifestyle advice with routine care or attention control for people with infertility. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Primary effectiveness outcomes were live birth and ongoing pregnancy. Primary safety outcomes were adverse events and miscarriage. Secondary outcomes included reported behavioural changes in lifestyle, birth weight, gestational age, clinical pregnancy, time to pregnancy, quality of life, and male factor infertility outcomes. We assessed the overall quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS: We included in the review seven RCTs involving 2130 participants. Only one RCT included male partners. Three studies compared preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics with routine care or attention control. Four studies compared preconception lifestyle advice on one topic (weight, alcohol intake, or smoking) with routine care for women with infertility and specific lifestyle characteristics. The evidence was of low to very low-quality. The main limitations of the included studies were serious risk of bias due to lack of blinding, serious imprecision, and poor reporting of outcome measures. Preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics versus routine care or attention control Preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics may result in little to no difference in the number of live births (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.10; 1 RCT, 626 participants), but the quality of evidence was low. No studies reported on adverse events or miscarriage. Due to very low-quality evidence, we are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics affects lifestyle behavioural changes: body mass index (BMI) (mean difference (MD) -1.06 kg/m², 95% CI -2.33 to 0.21; 1 RCT, 180 participants), vegetable intake (MD 12.50 grams/d, 95% CI -8.43 to 33.43; 1 RCT, 264 participants), alcohol abstinence in men (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.58; 1 RCT, 210 participants), or smoking cessation in men (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.12; 1 RCT, 212 participants). Preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics may result in little to no difference in the number of women with adequate folic acid supplement use (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.01; 2 RCTs, 850 participants; I² = 4%), alcohol abstinence (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.17; 1 RCT, 607 participants), and smoking cessation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; 1 RCT, 606 participants), on low quality evidence. No studies reported on other behavioural changes. Preconception lifestyle advice on weight versus routine care Studies on preconception lifestyle advice on weight were identified only in women with infertility and obesity. Compared to routine care, we are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice on weight affects the number of live births (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.43; 2 RCTs, 707 participants; I² = 68%; very low-quality evidence), adverse events including gestational diabetes (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.26; 1 RCT, 317 participants; very low-quality evidence), hypertension (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.75; 1 RCT, 317 participants; very low-quality evidence), or miscarriage (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.37; 1 RCT, 577 participants; very low-quality evidence). Regarding lifestyle behavioural changes for women with infertility and obesity, preconception lifestyle advice on weight may slightly reduce BMI (MD -1.30 kg/m², 95% CI -1.58 to -1.02; 1 RCT, 574 participants; low-quality evidence). Due to very low-quality evidence, we are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice affects the percentage of weight loss, vegetable and fruit intake, alcohol abstinence, or physical activity. No studies reported on other behavioural changes. Preconception lifestyle advice on alcohol intake versus routine care Studies on preconception lifestyle advice on alcohol intake were identified only in at-risk drinking women with infertility. We are uncertain whether preconception lifestyle advice on alcohol intake affects the number of live births (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.50; 1 RCT, 37 participants; very low-quality evidence) or miscarriages (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 8.34; 1 RCT, 37 participants; very low-quality evidence). One study reported on behavioural changes for alcohol consumption but not as defined in the review methods. No studies reported on adverse events or other behavioural changes. Preconception lifestyle advice on smoking versus routine care Studies on preconception lifestyle advice on smoking were identified only in smoking women with infertility. No studies reported on live birth, ongoing pregnancy, adverse events, or miscarriage. One study reported on behavioural changes for smoking but not as defined in the review methods. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low-quality evidence suggests that preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics may result in little to no difference in the number of live births. Evidence was insufficient to allow conclusions on the effects of preconception lifestyle advice on adverse events and miscarriage and on safety, as no studies were found that looked at these outcomes, or the studies were of very low quality. This review does not provide clear guidance for clinical practice in this area. However, it does highlight the need for high-quality RCTs to investigate preconception lifestyle advice on a combination of topics and to assess relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes in men and women with infertility.

Implementing the international evidence-based guideline of assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): how to achieve weight loss in overweight and obese women with PCOS?

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women. Many of these women are overweight or obese. A minor weight loss of 5%-10% can significantly reduce reproductive, metabolic and psychological symptoms of PCOS and is recommended as a first step in the treatment of overweight or obese women with PCOS. Many weight loss programs have been proposed, but optimal methods on how to achieve the recommend weight loss are lacking. The aim of this systematic review was to generate practical tools for health professionals to guide women with PCOS towards a sustainable healthier lifestyle. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct the systematic review. Eleven randomized controlled trials were found eligible for inclusion. Lifestyle modification strategies consisted of a diet, physical exercise, behavioural coaching or combined interventions. Mean weight loss ranged from +0.5 to -10.6 % of the initial body weight. However, the majority of the studies reported considerable drop-out rates varying between 12% and 47%. The heterogeneity of the described interventions and the high drop-out rates impede extrapolation of these results to daily clinical care. Hence, none of the described interventions seems superior to another in achieving substantial weight loss. In conclusion, the need for obtaining a healthier weight in overweight and obese women with PCOS is now well accepted. However, achieving this goal remains a challenge for both patients and healthcare providers. More research focusing on the multidisciplinary approach of lifestyle modification advice in daily practice is needed.

Pre-existing immunity to influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk might drive selection for antibody-escape mutant viruses in a human challenge model.

The conserved region of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) stalk (or stem) has gained attention as a potent target for universal influenza vaccines1-5. Although the HA stalk region is relatively well conserved, the evolutionarily dynamic nature of influenza viruses6 raises concerns about the possible emergence of viruses carrying stalk escape mutation(s) under sufficient immune pressure. Here we show that immune pressure on the HA stalk can lead to expansion of escape mutant viruses in study participants challenged with a 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus inoculum containing an A388V polymorphism in the HA stalk (45% wild type and 55% mutant). High level of stalk antibody titers was associated with the selection of the mutant virus both in humans and in vitro. Although the mutant virus showed slightly decreased replication in mice, it was not observed in cell culture, ferrets or human challenge participants. The A388V mutation conferred resistance to some of the potent HA stalk broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bNAbs). Co-culture of wild-type and mutant viruses in the presence of either a bNAb or human serum resulted in rapid expansion of the mutant. These data shed light on a potential obstacle for the success of HA-stalk-targeting universal influenza vaccines-viral escape from vaccine-induced stalk immunity.

Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT).

INTRODUCTION: Infertility and in vitro fertilisation (IVF; with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection) result in considerable emotional and financial burden. Increasing evidence suggests that lifestyle factors, including diet, physical activity and personal well-being, are associated with IVF-success rates. Currently, IVF is not routinely combined with a lifestyle programme. The preconception lifestyle (PreLiFe) randomised controlled trial (RCT) assesses the effects of a new mobile PreLiFe programme in couples undergoing IVF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre RCT including 460 heterosexual couples starting IVF in Belgian fertility clinics. IVF couples are randomised between an attention control group or the PreLiFe programme for a period of 12 months or until an ongoing pregnancy is confirmed by ultrasound. The attention control programme includes a mobile application with treatment information (ie, appointments and medication instructions) in addition to standard care. The PreLiFe programme includes a mobile application with the same treatment information in combination with a lifestyle programme. This new lifestyle programme includes tailored advice and skills training on diet, physical activity and mindfulness in combination with text messages and telephone interaction with a healthcare professional trained in motivational interviewing. The primary outcome of this RCT is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate within 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include changes in diet, physical activity, emotional distress, body mass index, waist circumference, quality of life and other reproductive outcomes including IVF discontinuation, clinical pregnancy rate and time to pregnancy. Additionally, partner support and the feasibility (use and acceptability) of the PreLiFe programme will be evaluated in the intervention group. Analysis will be according to intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Leuven University Hospital (Belgium) and the other recruiting clinics. The findings of this RCT will be disseminated through presentations at international scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03790449; Pre-results.

Comparison of the Efficacy of N9 Neuraminidase-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies against Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Infection.

The fifth wave of A(H7N9) virus infection in China from 2016 to 2017 caused great concern due to the large number of individuals infected, the isolation of drug-resistant viruses, and the emergence of highly pathogenic strains. Antibodies against neuraminidase (NA) provide added benefit to hemagglutinin-specific immunity and may be important contributors to the effectiveness of A(H7N9) vaccines. We generated a panel of mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to identify antigenic domains on NA of the novel A(H7N9) virus and compared their functional properties. The loop formed in the region of residue 250 (250 loop) and the domain formed by the loops containing residues 370, 400, and 430 were identified as major antigenic regions. MAbs 1E8, 2F6, 10F4, and 11B2, which recognize these two antigenic domains, were characterized in depth. These four MAbs differ in their abilities to inhibit cleavage of small and large substrates (methyl-umbelliferyl-acetyl neuraminic acid [MU-NANA] and fetuin, respectively) in NA inhibition assays. 1E8 and 11B2 did not inhibit NA cleavage of either MU-NANA or fetuin, and 2F6 inhibited cleavage of fetuin alone, whereas 10F4 inhibited cleavage of both substrates. All four MAbs reduced the in vitro spread of viruses carrying either the wild-type N9 or N9 with antiviral-resistant mutations but to different degrees. These MAbs have different in vivo levels of effectiveness: 10F4 was the most effective in protecting mice against challenge with A(H7N9) virus, 2F6 was less effective, and 11B2 failed to protect BALB/c mice at the doses tested. Our study confirms that NA-specific antibodies can protect against A(H7N9) infection and suggests that in vitro properties can be used to rank antibodies with therapeutic potential.IMPORTANCE The novel A(H7N9) viruses that emerged in China in 2013 continue to infect humans, with a high fatality rate. The most recent outbreak resulted in a larger number of human cases than previous epidemic waves. Due to the absence of a licensed vaccine and the emergence of drug-resistant viruses, there is a need to develop alternative approaches to prevent or treat A(H7N9) infection. We have made a panel of mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for neuraminidase (NA) of A(H7N9) viruses; some of these MAbs are effective in inhibiting viruses that are resistant to antivirals used to treat A(H7N9) patients. Binding avidity, inhibition of NA activity, and plaque formation correlated with the effectiveness of these MAbs to protect mice against lethal A(H7N9) virus challenge. This study identifies in vitro measures that can be used to predict the in vivo efficacy of NA-specific antibodies, providing a way to select MAbs for further therapeutic development.

The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in the classification of anovulatory infertility.

OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined three classes of anovulatory infertility, based on serum gonadotrophin and oestradiol levels: low gonadotrophin and oestradiol levels in women with WHO 1 anovulation, normal hormone levels in WHO 2 anovulation and high gonadotrophin but low oestradiol levels in WHO 3 anovulation. The number of follicles on the ovary also seems to be different in the three classes of anovulatory infertility. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels correlate well with the number of pre-antral and small antral follicles. The objective of our study was to investigate whether a single AMH measurement might simplify the classification of the WHO classes of anovulatory dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: In a tertiary hospital, 1863 patients with either oligomenorrhea or secondary amenorrhea were recruited. Standardized screening was performed, including transvaginal ultrasound and serum AMH measurement. Serum AMH levels were compared with those in 348 age-matched controls. RESULTS: Serum AMH levels were slightly elevated in women with hypogonadotropic anovulation (n=128) (P<0.001) as compared with controls. Normogonadotropic anovulatory women (n=1.465) had distinctly higher serum AMH levels than controls (P<0.001) and serum AMH levels were low in women with hypergonadotropic anovulation (n=270) (P<0.001). Although median AMH levels were distinctly different in each class of anovulatory dysfunction, serum AMH levels were comparable in hypogonadotropic women and normogonadotropic women without polycystic ovary syndrome. CONCLUSION: The clinical applicability of serum AMH as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between the different classes of anovulatory dysfunction seems to be limited to the prediction of hypergonadotropic anovulation.

The phenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome ameliorates with aging.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of aging on the features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal follow-up study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENT(S): Patients with PCOS, diagnosed according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria, who visited the outpatient clinic on consecutive occasions with a minimum interval of 6 months. INTERVENTION(S): Comparisons were made between the first visit and the consecutive visit grouped by intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Changes in clinical and endocrine characteristics. RESULT(S): A total of 254 women visited the outpatient clinic on 2 occasions each. Consecutive visits were grouped into 0.5 to 3.9 years (n = 172; mean follow-up, 2.6 years) and 4.0 to 7.0 years (n = 82; mean follow-up, 5.5 years). At their second visit, significantly more women had regained a regular cycle. The total antral follicle count was similar. Serum levels of testosterone, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate had decreased significantly. Plasma glucose levels had increased, whereas serum insulin levels and homeostasis model assessment score had significantly decreased. CONCLUSION(S): The PCOS phenotype changed with aging, suggesting an amelioration of the phenotype and ovarian dysfunction as indicated by the increase in number of regular menstrual cycles, decrease in serum androgen levels, and decrease in insulin resistance.

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B concentrations are not useful predictors of ovarian response during ovulation induction treatment with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B during low-dose gonadotropin ovulation induction (OI) treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and thus disturbed selection of the dominant follicle. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: A referral fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Women with PCOS (n = 48) and normo-ovulatory women (n = 23). INTERVENTION(S) AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum AMH, inhibin B, FSH, and E(2) concentrations were measured at start of stimulation, on the day of follicle selection, and at administration of hCG during OI cycles and were compared with concentration measured during the normal menstrual cycle. RESULT(S): Development of a single dominant follicle was observed in 92% of all OI cycles, reflected by similar E(2) concentrations compared with those in spontaneous cycles. AMH concentrations were constant during low-dose ovarian stimulation. Inhibin B concentrations remained elevated in patients with PCOS, suggesting prolonged survival of small antral follicles, whereas in controls inhibin B concentrations declined during the late follicular phase. CONCLUSION(S): The lack of change in AMH and inhibin B concentrations suggest that follicle dynamics during low-dose stimulation seem different from those during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. In addition, constant AMH and inhibin B levels suggest that neither AMH nor inhibin B is an accurate marker of ovarian response after low-dose gonadotropin OI in patients with PCOS.

Oligoovulatory and anovulatory cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): what's the difference?

CONTEXT: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous disorder. The phenotype may differ between patients who exhibit signs of recent ovulation and anovulatory PCOS patients. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study differences in clinical and endocrine characteristics and response to ovulation induction (OI) treatment comparing oligoovulatory and anovulatory PCOS patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: PCOS patients (n=1750) presenting with oligo- or amenorrhea were diagnosed according to the Rotterdam 2003 consensus criteria. Arbitrarily, oligoovulatory PCOS was defined by a single random serum progesterone level of 10 nmol/liter or higher. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the incidence of oligo- or amenorrhea, menstrual cycle length, serum androgen levels, follicle count, and OI outcome parameters. RESULTS: Anovulatory women (n=1541 of 1750, 88.1%) were more often amenorrheic (P<0.001) and presented with a longer cycle duration (P<0.001) compared with oligoovulatory women (n=209 of 1750, 11.9%). Serum levels of testosterone (P<0.001), the free androgen index (P<0.001), and total follicle count (P<0.005) were higher in anovulatory compared with oligoovulatory patients. During clomiphene citrate OI, more oligoovulatory women gained regular menstrual cycles (P<0.05), whereas after second-line treatment with recombinant FSH, more anovulatory women became pregnant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oligoovulatory women with PCOS exhibit a milder phenotype of ovarian dysfunction and have a more favorable response to OI treatment using clomiphene citrate compared with anovulatory PCOS patients. However, during second-line treatment with recombinant FSH, anovulatory PCOS patients presented with a higher chance of pregnancy compared with oligoovulatory patients.

Cooperation of the agonistic DR5 antibody apomab with chemotherapy to inhibit orthotopic lung tumor growth and improve survival.

PURPOSE: Apomab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that induces programmed cell death through the proapoptotic receptor DR5 in various cancer cells but not in normal cells. Several lung cancer cell lines express DR5 and exhibit apoptosis in response to apomab in vitro. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We investigated the efficacy of apomab and its interaction with chemotherapy in xenograft models based on human NCI-H460 non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. In an established model of s.c. tumor xenografts, apomab or Taxol plus carboplatin chemotherapy delayed tumor progression, whereas combined treatment caused tumor regression and a substantially longer growth delay. To test apomab activity in a setting that may more closely mimic lung cancer pathology in patients, we developed a lung orthotopic model. RESULTS: In this model, microcomputed tomography imaging showed that apomab, chemotherapy, or combination treatment significantly inhibited tumor growth compared with vehicle, whereas the combination caused greater inhibition in tumor growth relative to chemotherapy or apomab. Similarly, histologic analysis revealed that apomab, chemotherapy, or the combination significantly reduced tumor size compared with vehicle, whereas the combination induced significantly greater reduction in tumor size than did chemotherapy or apomab. Furthermore, combined treatment improved 105-day survival relative to vehicle (P = 0.0023) as well as to apomab (P = 0.0445) or chemotherapy (P = 0.0415). CONCLUSION: These results show a positive interaction of apomab with chemotherapy, evidenced by significant inhibition of tumor growth as well as improved survival, thus supporting further investigation of this therapeutic approach in lung cancer patients.

A functional anti-mullerian hormone gene polymorphism is associated with follicle number and androgen levels in polycystic ovary syndrome patients.

CONTEXT: The common characteristic of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a disturbance in the selection of the dominant follicle, resulting in anovulation. In PCOS women, serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are elevated. Because AMH decreases FSH sensitivity in mice, the elevated AMH levels may contribute to the disturbed follicle selection in PCOS women. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the role of the AMH signaling pathway in the pathophysiology of PCOS using a genetic approach. DESIGN: The association of the AMH Ile(49)Ser (rs10407022) and the AMH type II receptor -482 A>G (rs2002555) polymorphism with PCOS susceptibility and phenotype was studied in a large cohort of PCOS women. SETTING/SUBJECTS: A total of 331 women with PCOS, 32 normoovulatory controls, and 3635 population-based controls were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ovarian parameters, serum AMH, FSH, androgen, and estradiol levels were measured. RESULTS: Genotype and allele frequencies for the AMH Ile(49)Ser and AMH type II receptor -482 A>G polymorphism were similar in PCOS women and controls. However, within the group of PCOS women, carriers of the AMH (49)Ser allele less often had polycystic ovaries (92.7 vs. 99.5%, P = 0.0004), lower follicle numbers (P = 0.03), and lower androgen levels, compared with noncarriers (P = 0.04). In addition, in vitro studies demonstrated that the bioactivity of the AMH (49)Ser protein is diminished, compared with the AMH (49)Ile protein (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variants in the AMH and AMH type II receptor gene do not influence PCOS susceptibility. However, our results suggest that the AMH Ile(49)Ser polymorphism contributes to the severity of the PCOS phenotype.

Anti-Müllerian hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor polymorphisms are associated with follicular phase estradiol levels in normo-ovulatory women.

BACKGROUND: In mice, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) inhibits primordial follicle recruitment and decreases FSH sensitivity. Little is known about the role of AMH in human ovarian physiology. We hypothesize that in women AMH has a similar role in ovarian function as in mice and investigated this using a genetic approach. METHODS: The association of the AMH Ile(49)Ser and the AMH type II receptor (AMHR2) -482 A > G polymorphisms with menstrual cycle characteristics was studied in a Dutch (n = 32) and a German (n = 21) cohort of normo-ovulatory women. RESULTS: Carriers of the AMH Ser(49) allele had higher serum estradiol (E(2)) levels on menstrual cycle day 3 when compared with non-carriers in the Dutch cohort (P = 0.012) and in the combined Dutch and German cohort (P = 0.03). Carriers of the AMHR2 -482G allele also had higher follicular phase E(2) levels when compared with non-carriers in the Dutch cohort (P = 0.028), the German cohort (P = 0.048) and hence also the combined cohort (P = 0.012). Women carrying both AMH Ser(49) and AMHR2 -482G alleles had highest E(2) levels (P = 0.001). For both polymorphisms no association with serum AMH or FSH levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphisms in the AMH and AMHR2 genes are associated with follicular phase E(2) levels, suggesting a role for AMH in the regulation of FSH sensitivity in the human ovary.

Identification and immunotherapeutic targeting of antigens induced by chemotherapy.

Cancer cells differ from normal cells in their response to chemotherapy. We exploited this dissimilarity by identifying and targeting tumor-specific, cell-surface proteins whose expression is induced by the chemotherapeutic irinotecan (CPT-11; Camptosar). A cytotoxin-armed antibody reactive with one of these drug-induced surface proteins, the LY6D/E48 antigen, originally identified as the target of a monoclonal antibody reactive with squamous cell carcinomas, caused complete regression of colorectal tumor xenografts in mice treated with CPT-11, whereas either agent alone was less effective. These results suggest that a positive therapeutic index may be generated for other drug combinations by immunotherapeutic targeting of chemotherapy-induced antigens.