Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 53(1): 185-188, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869170

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate in an experimental model, the mobility of a novel peritoneal dialysis catheter with a metallic tip (Mag-Cath) using an extra-corporeal magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Mag-Cath was installed in a porcine model under general anesthesia using laparoscopic access. A senior urologist, a urology resident, and a 3rd-year medical student were assigned to complete 2 tasks guided by fluoroscopy: (1) Move the catheter tip from the right flank to the pelvis and (2) move the catheter tip from the pelvis to the left flank. Accomplishment and time to complete the tasks were recorded. Participants were asked independently to grade the difficulty of the tasks using an analog scale from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult). RESULTS: All participants completed the tasks. The difficulty of the tasks was graded equal to 1 by the senior urologist and urology resident and equal to 3 by the medical student. The time to move the Mag-Cath from the right flank to the target was 14, 10, and 55 s for the senior urologist, urology resident, and medical student, respectively. The time to move the Mag-Cath from the target to the left flank was 17, 18, and 43 s for the senior urologist, urology resident, and medical student, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary analysis, the use of an extra-corporeal magnet to move the Mag-Cath was feasible, with a low grade of difficulty, and individuals with different levels of expertise could perform it. Further studies in human subjects are needed to evaluate the clinical applicability of the Mag-Cath properly.


Subject(s)
Catheterization , Magnets , Peritoneal Dialysis/instrumentation , Animals , Male , Models, Animal , Peritoneal Dialysis/methods , Swine
2.
World J Urol ; 38(11): 2743-2753, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32095882

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostate biopsy is a standard tool for diagnosing prostate cancer, with more than 4 million procedures performed worldwide each year. Infectious complications and economic burden are reportedly rising with continued use of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, despite the transperineal approach being associated with less infectious complications. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: In this review, the contemporary literature on pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, causative organisms and emerging approaches for prevention of infectious complications are outlined. RESULTS: Management of infectious complications after TRUSB has caused significant financial burden on health systems. The most frequent causative agents of infectious complications after prostate biopsy are Gram-negative bacilli are particularly concerning in the era of antibiotic resistance. Increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones and beta-lactam antibiotics has complicated traditional preventive measures. Patient- and procedure-related risk factors, reported by individual studies, can contribute to infectious complications after prostate biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Recent literature shows that the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy results in higher infectious complication rate than the transperineal prostate biopsy. NAATs, recently introduced technique to detect FQr may detect all antibiotic-resistant rectal microbiota members-included MDRs-although the technique still has limitations and economical burdens. Transient solutions are escalating antibiotic prophylaxis and widening the indications for TPB.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Algorithms , Biopsy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/microbiology
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(6): 1089-1105, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975672

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the length hospital stay and predictors of prolonged hospitalization after RRP performed in a high-surgical volume teaching institution, and analyze the rate of unplanned visits to the office, emergency care, hospital readmissions and perioperative complications rates. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a standardized database for patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RRP in our institution between January/2010 - January/2012. A logistic regression model including preoperative variables was initially built in order to determine the factors that predict prolonged hospital stay before the surgical procedure; subsequently, a second model including both pre and intraoperative variables was analyzed. Results: 1011 patients underwent RRP at our institution were evaluated. The median hospital stay was 2 days, and 217 (21.5%) patients had prolonged hospitalization. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay among the preoperative variables were ICC (OR. 1.40 p=0.003), age (OR 1.050 p<0.001), ASA score of 3 (OR. 3.260 p<0.001), prostate volume on USG-TR (OR, 1.005 p=0.038) and African-American race (OR 2.235 p=0.004); among intra and postoperative factors, operative time (OR 1.007 p=0.022) and the presence of any complications (OR 2.013 p=0.009) or major complications (OR 2.357 p=0.01) were also correlated independently with prolonged hospital stay. The complication rate was 14.5%. Conclusions: The independent predictors of prolonged hospitalization among preoperative variables were CCI, age, ASA score of 3, prostate volume on USG-TR and African-American race; amongst intra and postoperative factors, operative time, presence of any complications and major complications were correlated independently with prolonged hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging
4.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(6): 1089-1105, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325597

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the length hospital stay and predictors of prolonged hospitalization after RRP performed in a high-surgical volume teaching institution, and analyze the rate of unplanned visits to the office, emergency care, hospital readmissions and perioperative complications rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a standardized database for patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RRP in our institution between January/2010 - January/2012. A logistic regression model including preoperative variables was initially built in order to determine the factors that predict prolonged hospital stay before the surgical procedure; subsequently, a second model including both pre and intraoperative variables was analyzed. RESULTS: 1011 patients underwent RRP at our institution were evaluated. The median hospital stay was 2 days, and 217 (21.5%) patients had prolonged hospitalization. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay among the preoperative variables were ICC (OR. 1.40 p=0.003), age (OR 1.050 p<0.001), ASA score of 3 (OR. 3.260 p<0.001), prostate volume on USG-TR (OR, 1.005 p=0.038) and African-American race (OR 2.235 p=0.004); among intra and postoperative factors, operative time (OR 1.007 p=0.022) and the presence of any complications (OR 2.013 p=0.009) or major complications (OR 2.357 p=0.01) were also correlated independently with prolonged hospital stay. The complication rate was 14.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The independent predictors of prolonged hospitalization among preoperative variables were CCI, age, ASA score of 3, prostate volume on USG-TR and African-American race; amongst intra and postoperative factors, operative time, presence of any complications and major complications were correlated independently with prolonged hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...