ABSTRACT
(1) Background: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity and the applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. (2) Methods: prospective cohort study with patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. For validation, the methodology proposed by the GLIM group of experts was used. Sensitivity and specificity values greater than 80% with respect to those for the subjective global assessment (SGA) were necessary for concurrent validation. The time necessary to complete each nutritional assessment test was determined. (3) Results: A total of 119 patients were evaluated. The SGA was applied to the entire cohort, but the GLIM criteria could not be applied to 3.4% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the GLIM criteria with respect to those for the SGA to detect malnutrition were 78.0 and 86.2%, respectively. The GLIM predictive validity criterion was fulfilled because patients with malnutrition more frequently had a hospital stay >10 days (odds ratio of 2.98 (1.21-7.60)). The GLIM criteria required significantly more time for completion than did the SGA (p = 0.006). (4) Conclusion: The results of this study do not support the use of the GLIM criteria over the SGA for the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions.
Subject(s)
Leadership , Malnutrition , Humans , Prospective Studies , Acute Disease , Length of Stay , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/epidemiologyABSTRACT
AIMS: The main objective was to assess if foods fortified with phytosterols (PS), including plant sterols and plant stanols, reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. The secondary objective was to determine the impact of different factors related to PS administration. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases up to March 2023. The meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021236952). From a total of 223 studies, 125 were included. On average, PS lowered LDL-C 0.55 mmol/L [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.82-12.67], and this decrease was significantly maintained for all analysed subgroups. A greater reduction in LDL-C levels was detected in relation to a higher daily PS dosage. The food format "Bread, biscuits, cereals", conditioned a lower decrease of 0.14 mmol/L (95%CI -8.71 to -2.16) in LDL-C levels, compared to the predominant food format group of "butter, margarine, spreads". No significant differences were detected with the other subgroups (treatment duration, intake pattern, number of daily intakes and concomitant statin treatment). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis supported that the use of PS-fortified foods had a beneficial effect on LDL-C lowering. In addition, it was observed that the factors that influence a decline LDL-C levels were PS dose as well as the food format in which they were consumed.
Subject(s)
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Phytosterols , Humans , Cholesterol, LDL , Food, FortifiedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since the population may not be aware of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption as a result of ignorance or non-recognition, this study aimed to ascertain the main characteristics of subjects regarding their knowledge of different easily acquired foods through a questionnaire in Google Forms format with 52 questions. Secondary objectives were to determine whether the profile of UPF consumers can be defined based on sex, age, sociodemographic factors, and lifestyle. METHODS AND RESULTS: Responses were received from 1037 participants from a convenience sample; of these, 83 (8.0%) were sporadic or non-users, and 954 (92.0%) were frequent UPF consumers. The participants of the upper tertile correctly matched >12 food items, those of the medium tertile matched 12-9 items, and those of the lower tertile matched <9 items. Factors independently associated with participants who better identified UPF (upper tertile) compared to those of the lower tertile (reference) were female sex (OR: 2.54, 95%CI: 1.70-3.79; p < 0.001), age between 21 and 50 (OR: 3.63, 95% CI: 2.56-5.15; p < 0.001), living with family (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-9.96; p = 0.033), and eating more fruit (≥3 pieces/day, OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.61-3.27; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the high consumption and low degree of awareness of UPF among consumers based mainly on food composition.
Subject(s)
Diet , Food Handling , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No studies have evaluated the effect of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cardiometabolic markers in metabolically healthy patients with morbid obesity (MHMO) at midterm. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of MBS on NAFLD and cardiometabolic markers in MHMO patients and ascertain whether metabolically unhealthy patients with morbid obesity (MUMO) remain metabolically healthy at 5 years after MBS. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: A total of 191 patients with a body mass index >40 kg/m2 and at least 5 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Lost to follow-up were 37.6% (151 of 401 patients). Patients were classified as MHMO if 1 or 0 of the cardiometabolic markers were present using the Wildman criteria. The degree of liver fibrosis was assessed using the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). RESULTS: Forty-one patients (21.5%) fulfilled the criteria for MHMO. They showed significant improvements in blood pressure (from 135.1 ± 22.1 and 84.2 ± 14.3 mm Hg to 117.7 ± 19.2 and 73.0 ± 10.9 mm Hg), plasma glucose (from 91.0 ± 5.6 mg/dL to 87.2 ± 5.2 mg/dL), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (from 2.2 ± .9 to 1.0 ± .8), triglycerides (from 88.0 [range, 79.5-103.5] mg/dL to 61.0 [range, 2.0-76.5] mg/dL), alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase NFS (from -1.0 ± 1.0 to -1.9 ± 1.2), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 56.9 ± 10.5 mg/dL to 77.9 ± 17.4 mg/dL) at 5 years after surgery. A total of 108 MUMO patients (84.4%) who became metabolically healthy after 1 year stayed healthy at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: MBS induced a midterm improvement in cardiometabolic and NAFLD markers in MHMO patients. Seventy-six percent of MUMO patients became metabolically healthy at 5 years after MBS.
Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Insulin Resistance , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Obesity, Morbid , Body Mass Index , Humans , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/complications , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/metabolism , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
To ascertain the 5-year metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in poor weight loss (WL) responders and establish associated factors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a non-randomised prospective cohort of bariatric surgery patients completing a 5-year follow-up. Mid-term poor WL was considered when 5-year excess weight loss was <50%. RESULTS: Forty-three (20.3%) of the 212 included patients were mid-term poor WL responders. They showed an improvement in all metabolic markers at 2 years, except for total cholesterol. This improvement with respect to baseline was maintained at 5 years for plasma glucose, HbA1c, HOMA, HDL and diastolic blood pressure; however, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and systolic blood pressure were similar to presurgical values. Comorbidity remission rates were comparable to those obtained in the good WL group except for hypercholesterolaemia (45.8% vs. poor WL, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, lower baseline HDL cholesterol levels, advanced age and lower preoperative weight loss were independently associated with poor mid-term WL. CONCLUSIONS: Although that 1 in 5 patients presented suboptimal WL 5 years after bariatric surgery, other important metabolic benefits were maintained.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Levothyroxine (LT4) requirements can presumably be modified differently after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The present study compared changes in LT4 dose in hypothyroid subjects undergoing LRYGB or LSG 2 years after the procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 2-year follow-up observational study was conducted in a prospective cohort of obese patients who had undergone bariatric surgery and were receiving LT4. Indication for the type of surgical procedure was based on clinical criteria. Repeated measures ANOVA models were used to examine differences within and between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included for analysis: 22 LRYGB and 13 LSG. Total daily LT4 dosage decreased in the LSG group (133.7 ± 50.3 mcg/day at baseline to 104.3 ± 43.3 mcg/day at 2 years; p = 0.047) whereas it remained stable in the LRYGB group (129.5 ± 46.1 mcg/day at baseline to 125.2 ± 55.7 mcg/day at 2 years; p = 1.000). Differences between groups became significant at 24 months. Daily weight-based LT4 dose increased in the LRYGB group (1.11 ± 0.38 mcg/kg day at baseline to 1.57 ± 0.74 mcg/kg day at 2 years; p = 0.005) with no significant changes in the LSG group (1.15 ± 0.35 mcg/kg day at baseline vs 1.11 ± 0.49 mcg/kg day at 2 years; p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: LRYGB and LSG showed different changes in LT4 requirements 2 years after surgery. There was an early decrease in daily total LT4 dose requirements after LSG, which suggests an early preventive reduction to be validated in future studies.
Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/methods , Hypothyroidism/complications , Hypothyroidism/drug therapy , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Thyroxine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Bypass/methods , Hormone Replacement Therapy/methods , Humans , Hypothyroidism/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/blood , Obesity, Morbid/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Weight Loss/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
La microbiota intestinal tiene un papel determinante en el control del peso corporal. En la presente revisión se exponen las diferentes vías por las que puede modular la homeostasis energética del huésped, en base a su capacidad modificadora del metabolismo del individuo y su contribución en la regulación del aprovechamiento energético. Con las evidencias actuales, no está claro cuál es el perfil de microbiota que se atribuye a la presencia de obesidad, aunque en modelos animales parece relacionarse con una mayor proporción de bacterias del filo Firmicutes, en detrimento de las del filo Bacteroidetes. Otros factores claramente implicados serían la diversidad en la microbiota intestinal o sus posibles cambios funcionales. Son necesarios más estudios en humanos para poder esclarecer cómo la disbiosis puede influir en el control ponderal. Por otra parte, los probióticos afectan directamente la microbiota intestinal, modulando su composición y, posiblemente, su funcionalidad. Un gran número de estudios en humanos han evaluado el impacto de los probióticos en la obesidad. A pesar de que esta intervención puede tener un potencial efecto beneficioso, es preciso esclarecer qué cepas de probióticos deben recomendarse, en qué dosis y durante cuánto tiempo
Gut microbiota plays a key role in the control of body weight. In the present review the different ways in which it can modify the energy homeostasis of the host are exposed, based on its capacity to modify the metabolism of the individual and its contribution in the energy consumption regulation. With the current evidence, it is not clear what microbiota profile is associated with the presence of obesity, although in animal models it seems to be related to a higher proportion of bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum, to the detriment of those of the Bacteroidetes phylum. Other factors clearly involved would be the diversity in the gut microbiota or its possible functional changes. More studies in humans are needed to clarify how dysbiosis can influence weight control. On the other hand, probiotics directly affect the gut microbiota, modulating its composition and, possibly, its functionality. A large number of studies in humans have evaluated the impact of probiotics on obesity. Although this intervention may have a potentially beneficial effect, more effort is needed to clarify which strains of probiotics should be recommended, at what dose and for how long
Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Obesity/metabolism , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Metabolic Syndrome/physiopathology , Models, Animal , Weight LossABSTRACT
Gut microbiota plays a key role in the control of body weight. In the present review the different ways in which it can modify the energy homeostasis of the host are exposed, based on its capacity to modify the metabolism of the individual and its contribution in the energy consumption regulation. With the current evidence, it is not clear what microbiota profile is associated with the presence of obesity, although in animal models it seems to be related to a higher proportion of bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum, to the detriment of those of the Bacteroidetes phylum. Other factors clearly involved would be the diversity in the gut microbiota or its possible functional changes. More studies in humans are needed to clarify how dysbiosis can influence weight control. On the other hand, probiotics directly affect the gut microbiota, modulating its composition and, possibly, its functionality. A large number of studies in humans have evaluated the impact of probiotics on obesity. Although this intervention may have a potentially beneficial effect, more effort is needed to clarify which strains of probiotics should be recommended, at what dose and for how long.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Obesity/therapy , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Animals , Body Weight/physiology , Humans , Obesity/microbiology , Probiotics/pharmacologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Given the lack of evidence of the effect of bariatric surgery (BS) on atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD), which is a characteristic of obese subjects, this study aimed to describe the remission rate of AD 1 year after BS in severely obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-randomised, prospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with a 1-year follow-up. AD was defined as triglycerides ≥1.71 mmol/l or treatment with fibrates and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (<1.03 mmol/l in men or <1.3 mmol/l in women). RESULTS: AD was present in 81 (22.8%) of the 356 patients; these were more frequently men and presented higher total cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol concentrations. AD remission rate was 74.1% at 3 months, 90.1% at 6 months and 96.3% at 12 months, respectively, after BS. In this group of patients, HDL cholesterol levels rose progressively (1.0 ± 0.2 to 1.5 ± 0.3 mmol/l, p < 0.001) and triglycerides decreased (2.5 ± 0.9 to 1.2 ± 0.5 mmol/l, p < 0.001) during follow-up. Regarding previous lipid-lowering therapy, fibrates and ezetimibe were withdrawn in all patients and statins in 69.4% 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION: BS has beneficial effects on lipid profile, achieving complete remission of AD at 1 year of follow-up in almost all patients.