ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical and technical advances have changed the state of postoperative surgical patient care, allowing for better and faster recovery. Since its publication, predictable 24-hour recovery in breast augmentation surgery has been controversial and has generated discussion. In this study, we present a novel, easy, and reproducible protocol for Enhanced Recovery After Breast Augmentation Surgery (ERABAS), along with a summary of the ten points to follow. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all primary breast augmentation surgeries performed between 2010 and 2020 by a private activity. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon according to the same protocol, and all implants were obtained from the same company. Data were evaluated using two binary logistic regression models, taking as variables responses to recovery time and postoperative pain and as predictor or explanatory variables to the factors age, smoking, size, and location of the implant. RESULTS: In total, 2906 patients were included in this study. Of these, 2770 patients (95%) immediately returned to normal life within the first 24 h, 129 achieved normal life in four days, and only seven needed a week to recover. In these seven patients, the main acute complications were hemorrhage and acute hematoma. The implants were always round; textured implants were used in 88.8% of patients, while smooth implants were used in 11.2%. A subfascial pocket was used in 934 patients, and a dual-plane pocket was performed for 1972 patients. The only factor that showed a significant effect on recovery time was the location of the implant (p < 0.05), with the dual-plane pocket being the intervention associated with a later recovery, specifically a probability of recovery after 24 hour, 2.86 times greater than subfascial. CONCLUSIONS: The ERABAS protocol allowed rapid return to daily activities with low complication rates. Further prospective comparative multicenter studies are required to confirm these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Blood Transfusion , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surgery, PlasticSubject(s)
Surgeons , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , United States , Patient Safety , Obesity , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , EstheticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An informed consent is mandatory to obtain any clinical audiovisual material from patients. Although there are some documents created for this purpose, there are some barriers for their application, such as the context in which they were created, the language and download availability. AIM: To create a proposal for an informed consent form (ICF) for the capture and different uses for audiovisual material from patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A bibliographic search was carried out to obtain different ICFs in Spanish and English, which were subjected to a process of translation, counter-translation and fragmentation. Subsequently, a panel of experts was formed by members of the Chilean Society of Plastic Surgery with extensive experience in social networks. Delphi methodology was applied to reach a consensus about the definitive content of the ICF based on the previously selected fragments. RESULTS: ICFs available for download were identified. The panel was made up of seven Plastic Surgeons and two Delphi rounds were carried out through electronic surveys. At the end of the process, an ICF proposal was obtained for therapeutic, academic or scientific purposes and another for dissemination or education in the mass media. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ICFs were liberated for their use among health care professionals in Chile, who could use them, provided that they are approved by the local healthcare ethics committees.
Subject(s)
Humans , Consent Forms , Informed Consent , Translations , Surveys and Questionnaires , LanguageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An informed consent is mandatory to obtain any clinical audiovisual material from patients. Although there are some documents created for this purpose, there are some barriers for their application, such as the context in which they were created, the language and download availability. AIM: To create a proposal for an informed consent form (ICF) for the capture and different uses for audiovisual material from patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A bibliographic search was carried out to obtain different ICFs in Spanish and English, which were subjected to a process of translation, counter-translation and fragmentation. Subsequently, a panel of experts was formed by members of the Chilean Society of Plastic Surgery with extensive experience in social networks. Delphi methodology was applied to reach a consensus about the definitive content of the ICF based on the previously selected fragments. RESULTS: ICFs available for download were identified. The panel was made up of seven Plastic Surgeons and two Delphi rounds were carried out through electronic surveys. At the end of the process, an ICF proposal was obtained for therapeutic, academic or scientific purposes and another for dissemination or education in the mass media. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ICFs were liberated for their use among health care professionals in Chile, who could use them, provided that they are approved by the local healthcare ethics committees.
Subject(s)
Consent Forms , Informed Consent , Humans , Language , Surveys and Questionnaires , TranslationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Suction-assisted lipectomy is one of the most common procedures performed in plastic surgery. To minimize blood loss and to obtain adequate analgesia, a liquid solution is infiltrated into the subcutaneous plane before suction. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of lidocaine in the infiltration solution reduces postoperative pain. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial was designed. Each side of patients' body zones to be treated with suction-assisted lipectomy was randomized to receive infiltration solution with or without lidocaine. Treatment allocation was performed using computer-generated random numbers in permuted blocks of eight. Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale and registered 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the procedure. RESULTS: The trial was stopped after a first interim analysis. The use of lidocaine in the dilute solution reduced pain by 0.5 point on the visual analogue scale (95 percent CI, 0.3 to 0.8; p<0.001). The effect was independent of the suctioned body zone (p=0.756), and lasted until 18 hours after surgery. Its analgesic effect was lost at the 24-hour postoperative control. Pain increased an average of 0.018 point on the visual analogue scale per hour (95 percent CI, 0.001 to 0.036; p=0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The use of lidocaine in the infiltration solution is effective in postoperative pain control until 18 hours after surgery. Nevertheless, its clinical effect is limited and clinically irrelevant, and therefore it is no longer used by the authors. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.
