Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Ectasia After Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Corneal ectasia leads to progressive irregular corneal curvature and reduced visual acuity. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for managing corneal ectasia resulting from refractive laser surgery (RSL). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were realized according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies on CXL in patients with ectasia after RLS. The outcomes of interest included visual acuity, refractive outcomes, topographic parameters (Kmax, index surface variance (ISV), index of Vertical Asymmetry (IVA), keratoconus index (KI), central keratoconus index (CKI), index of height asymmetry (IHA), index of height decentration (IHD) and Rmin (minimum sagittal curvature)), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and possible adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software (version 4.2.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results: 15 studies encompassing 421 patients (512 eyes) were included. The mean age was 32.03 ± 4.4 years. The pooled results showed a stable uncorrected visual acuity post-CXL, with a significant improvement in corrected distance visual acuity (SMD = 0.09; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.26). The spherical equivalent decreased significantly (SMD = -0.09; 95% CI: -0.35, -0.02). The topographic parameter Kmax decreased significantly (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI:0.01 to 0.28); however, the other parameters, ISV, IVA, KI, CKI, IHA, IHD, and Rmin, did not change significantly. Central corneal thickness decreased significantly (SMD = 0.24; 95% CI:0.07 to 0.41), and the endothelial cell count remained stable The complications were rare. Conclusion: CXL is a safe and effective technique for managing corneal ectasia after RLS.

Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular biomechanical metrics given by the CorVis ST (Oculus, Inc., Berlin, Germany) in a population of healthy Brazilian patients. METHODS: An observational and cross-sectional study involving 1 eye randomly selected from 90 healthy patients. Studied parameters (including deformation amplitude, first applanation time, highest concavity time, second applanation time, first applanation length, second applanation length, curvature radius highest concavity, curvature radius normal, velocity in, and velocity out) derived from the CorVis ST were correlated to central corneal thickness from the Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.). Differences between data on the basis of gender were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 35.80 ± 12.83 years (range: 21.07 to 78.84 years). Mean central corneal thickness was 547.50 ± 32.00 µm (range: 490 to 647 µm) and mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.29 ± 3.69 diopters (range: -9.50 to +10.37 diopters). Mean deformation amplitude was 1.05 ± 0.08 mm (range: 0.91 to 1.26 mm). Highest concavity time was 18.38 ± 0.93 ms (range: 16.95 to 21.07 ms). Intraocular pressure was 16.43 ± 2.15 mm Hg (range: 11.50 to 21.0 mm Hg). First applanation time was 8.32 ± 0.33 ms (range: 7.53 to 9.12 ms) and second applanation time was 23.80 ± 0.44 ms (range: 22.76 to 24.95 ms). First applanation length (max) was 2.07 ± 0.38 mm (range: 1.20 to 3.10 mm) and second applanation length (max) was 2.37 ± 0.47 mm (range: 1.33 to 4.12 mm). Curvature radius highest concavity was 11.09 ± 2.06 mm (range: 7.58 to 15.98 mm) and curvature radius normal was 7.59 ± 0.67 mm (range: 6.82 to 11.02 mm). Velocity in was 0.21 ± 0.05 m/s (range: 0.16 to 0.72 m/s) and velocity out was -0.33 ± 0.07 m/s (range: -0.72 to -0.20 m/s). Studied parameters were not associated with gender. CONCLUSIONS: Eight of 11 ocular biomechanical metrics given by the CorVis ST were associated with central corneal thickness, but the influence of central corneal thickness on these measurements was low.

Técnica para diagnosticar o ceratocone / Best waveform score for diagnosing keratoconus

PURPOSE: To test whether corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) can discriminate between keratoconus and normal eyes and to evaluate whether the averages of two consecutive measurements perform differently from the one with the best waveform score (WS) for diagnosing keratoconus. METHODS: ORA measurements for one eye per individual were selected randomly from 53 normal patients and from 27 patients with keratoconus. Two groups were considered the average (CH-Avg, CRF-Avg) and best waveform score (CH-WS, CRF-WS) groups. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate whether the variables had similar distributions in the Normal and Keratoconus groups. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were calculated for each parameter to assess the efficacy for diagnosing keratoconus and the same obtained for each variable were compared pairwise using the Hanley–McNeil test. RESULTS: The CH-Avg, CRF-Avg, CH-WS and CRF-WS differed significantly between the normal and keratoconus groups (p<0.001). The areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) for CH-Avg, CRF-Avg, CH-WS, and CRF-WS were 0.824, 0.873, 0.891, and 0.931, respectively. CH-WS and CRF-WS had significantly better AUROCs than CH-Avg and CRF-Avg, respectively (p=0.001 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: The analysis of the biomechanical properties of the cornea through the ORA method has proved to be an important aid in the diagnosis of keratoconus, regardless of the method used. The best waveform score (WS) measurements were superior to the average of consecutive ORA measurements for diagnosing keratoconus.

OBJETIVO: Testar se a histerese corneana (CH) e o fator de resistência corneano (CRF) podem discriminar olhos com ceratocone e avaliar se a média de duas medidas consecutivas apresenta desempenho diferente da medida única com a melhor waveform score para diagnósticar o ceratocone. MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas medidas do ORA de um olho por indivíduo, selecionados aleatoriamente a partir de 53 pacientes normais e de 27 pacientes com ceratocone. Dois grupos foram considerados: a média (CH-médio, o CRF-médio) e melhor waveform score (CH-WS, CRF-WS). O teste de Mann-Whitney U-teste foi utilizado para avaliar se as variáveis apresentaram distribuições semelhantes entre os grupos. As curvas (ROC) foram calculadas para cada parâmetro para avaliar eficácia no diagnóstico e as obtidas para cada variável foram comparadas usando o teste de Hanley-McNeil. RESULTADOS: CH-médio, CRF-médio, CH-WS e CRF-WS diferiram significativamente entre os grupos (p<0,001). Já as áreas sob a curva ROC para CH-médio, CRF-médio, CH-WS, e CRF-WS foram 0,824, 0,873, 0,891, 0,931, respectivamente. CH-WS e CRF-WS obtiveram AUROCs significativamente melhores do que CH-médio e CRF-médio (p=0,001 e 0,002). CONCLUSÃO: A análise das propriedades biomecânicas da córnea através do ORA demonstrou ser um método auxiliar importante no diagnóstico de ceratocone, independente do método utilizado. As melhores medidas waveform score foram superiores à média das medições consecutivas para o diagnóstico de ceratocone.

Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera.

PURPOSE: To correlate parameters derived from corneal deformation resulting from non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Corvis ST, Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) with age in normal eyes from young patients. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study involving one eye randomly selected from study participants, totaling 89 healthy eyes. The Scheimpflug images were taken with an ultra-high-speed camera during each measurement by the corvis ST. The deformation amplitude (DA) and other parameters (e.g., pachy apex, intraocular pressure, 1(st) A time, highest concavity-time, 2(nd) A time, 1(st) A Length, 2(nd) A Length, Wing-Dist, curvature radius highest concavity, curvature radius normal, Vin, Vout) measured by the corvis ST were correlated with age. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied, and Spearman's correlation test was utilized to evaluate the parameters measured by the Corvis ST and age. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 27.50 ± 6.30 years. The highest concavity-time was the only studied parameter statistically significantly correlated to age (i.e., p=0.04, rs=0.18). All other corvis parameters were not correlated to age. This included DA (p=0.319), intraocular pressure (p=0.854), pachy apex (p=0.066), 1(st) A time (p=0.959), 2(nd) A time (p=0.561), 1(st) Length (0.552), 2nd Length (p=0.697), Wing-Dist (p=0.769), curvature radius HC (p=0.145), curvature radius normal (p=0.513), Vin (p=0.980) and Vout (p=0.592). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy eyes, age and pressure or biomechanics as derived from the Corvis ST parameters were not associated with exception to highest concavity-time, i.e., the time from starting until the highest concavity is reached.

Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera / Efeitos da idade sobre a deformação da córnea utilizando o sistema de tonometria de não contato com a câmera de Scheimpflug

PURPOSE: To correlate parameters derived from corneal deformation resulting from non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Corvis ST, Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) with age in normal eyes from young patients. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study involving one eye randomly selected from study participants, totaling 89 healthy eyes. The Scheimpflug images were taken with an ultra-high-speed camera during each measurement by the corvis ST. The deformation amplitude (DA) and other parameters (e.g., pachy apex, intraocular pressure, 1st A time, highest concavity-time, 2nd A time, 1st A Length, 2nd A Length, Wing-Dist, curvature radius highest concavity, curvature radius normal, Vin, Vout) measured by the corvis ST were correlated with age. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied, and Spearman's correlation test was utilized to evaluate the parameters measured by the Corvis ST and age. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 27.50 ± 6.30 years. The highest concavity-time was the only studied parameter statistically significantly correlated to age (i.e., p=0.04, rs=0.18). All other corvis parameters were not correlated to age. This included DA (p=0.319), intraocular pressure (p=0.854), pachy apex (p=0.066), 1st A time (p=0.959), 2nd A time (p=0.561), 1st Length (0.552), 2nd Length (p=0.697), Wing-Dist (p=0.769), curvature radius HC (p=0.145), curvature radius normal (p=0.513), Vin (p=0.980) and Vout (p=0.592). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy eyes, age and pressure or biomechanics as derived from the Corvis ST parameters were not associated with exception to highest concavity-time, i.e., the time from starting until the highest concavity is reached.

OBJETIVO: Correlacionar os parâmetros derivados da deformação da córnea pelo sistema de tonometria de não-contato integrado com a câmera ultra-rápida de Scheimpflug (Oculus Corvis ST, Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) com a idade de pacientes jovens saudáveis. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo envolvendo 89 olhos de 89 pacientes. As imagens de Scheimpflug foram feitas pela câmera acoplada ao sistema de tonometria de não-contato (Corvis ST) em cada paciente e os parâmetros utilizados foram: Deformidade de amplitude (DA), paquimetria, pressão intraocular, 1st A time, tempo de concavidade máxima, 2nd A time, 1st A Length, 2nd A Length, Wing-Dist, raio de curvatura de maior alcance, raio de curvatura normal, Velocidade de entrada (Vin) e de saída (Vout). Estes parâmetros foram correlacionados com a idade. RESULTADOS: A média de idade dos pacientes foi de 27,50 ± 6,30 anos. O tempo de concavidade máxima alcançada da córnea (HC-time) foi o único parâmetro estudado estatisticamente significante correlacionado com a idade (p=0,04, rs=0,18). O valor p das correlações dos parâmetros derivados do Corvis ST e idade foram: DA (p=0,319), pressão intraocular (p=0,854), paquimetria (p=0,066), 1st A time (p=0,959), 2nd A time (p=0,561), 1st Length (0,552), 2nd Length (p=0,697), Wing-Dist (p=0,769), raio de curvatura de maior alcance (p=0,145), curvature radius normal (p=0,513), Vin (p=0,980) e Vout (p=0,592). CONCLUSÃO: Em olhos saudáveis de pacientes jovens, a idade e os parâmetros pressóricos e biomecânicos da deformação da córnea não foram associados, exceto o tempo de concavidade máxima, que é o tempo do início de aplanação até a concavidade máxima alcançada da córnea.

ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) to distinguish between normal and keratoconic eyes, by comparing pressure and waveform signal-derived parameters. METHODS: This retrospective comparative case series study included 112 patients with normal corneas and 41 patients with bilateral keratoconic eyes. One eye from each subject was randomly selected for analysis. Keratoconus diagnosis was based on clinical examinations, including Placido disk-based corneal topography and rotating Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Data from the ORA best waveform score (WS) measurements were extracted using ORA software. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldman-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), and 37 parameters derived from the waveform signal were analyzed. Differences in the distributions among the groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between keratoconic and normal eyes were found in all parameters (p<0.05) except IOPcc and W1. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was greater than 0.85 for 11 parameters, including CH (0.852) and CRF (0.895). The parameters related to the area under the waveform peak during the second and first applanations (p2area and p1area) had the best performances, with AUROCs of 0.939 and 0.929, respectively. The AUROCs for CRF, p2area, and p1area were significantly greater than that for CH. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in biomechanical metrics between normal and keratoconic eyes. Compared with the pressure-derived parameters, corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, novel waveform-derived ORA parameters provide better identification of keratoconus.

ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes / Parâmetros biomecânicos derivados da forma da curva do ORA para discriminar olhos normais de ceratocones

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) to distinguish between normal and keratoconic eyes, by comparing pressure and waveform signal-derived parameters. METHODS: This retrospective comparative case series study included 112 patients with normal corneas and 41 patients with bilateral keratoconic eyes. One eye from each subject was randomly selected for analysis. Keratoconus diagnosis was based on clinical examinations, including Placido disk-based corneal topography and rotating Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Data from the ORA best waveform score (WS) measurements were extracted using ORA software. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldman-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), and 37 parameters derived from the waveform signal were analyzed. Differences in the distributions among the groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between keratoconic and normal eyes were found in all parameters (p<0.05) except IOPcc and W1. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was greater than 0.85 for 11 parameters, including CH (0.852) and CRF (0.895). The parameters related to the area under the waveform peak during the second and first applanations (p2area and p1area) had the best performances, with AUROCs of 0.939 and 0.929, respectively. The AUROCs for CRF, p2area, and p1area were significantly greater than that for CH. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in biomechanical metrics between normal and keratoconic eyes. Compared with the pressure-derived parameters, corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, novel waveform-derived ORA parameters provide better identification of keratoconus.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a capacidade do Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) em discriminar olhos com ceratocone de olhos normais e comparar parâmetros derivados da pressão dos parâmetros derivados da forma da curva. MÉTODOS:Estudo comparativo retrospectivo série de casos que incluiu 112 pacientes com olhos normais e 41 pacientes com ceratocone bilateral. Um olho de cada indivíduo foi randomicamente selecionado para análise. O diagnóstico de ceratocone foi baseado em exame clínico, incluindo topografia de Plácido e tomografia Scheimpflug. Informação do melhor waveform score foi extraída do software do ORA. Histerese corneana (CH), fator de resistência corneana (CRF), pressão intraocular correlacionada com Goldman (IOPg), pressão intraocular compensada pela córnea (IOPcc) e 37 novos parâmetros derivados da forma da curva do sinal do ORA foram analisados. Diferenças nas distribuições dos grupos foram avaliadas pelo teste Mann-Whitney. Curvas ROC foram calculadas. RESULTADOS: Diferenças estatisticamente significantes foram encontradas entre os olhos normais e ceratocones em todos os parâmetros (p<0,05) salvo IOPcc e W1. A área sob a curva ROC (AUROC) foi maior que 0.85 em 11 parâmetros, incluindo CH (0,852) a CRF (0,895). Os parâmetros relacionados com a área sob o pico da forma de onda durante a segunda e primeira aplanação (p2area e p1area) obtiveram as melhores performances, com AUROCs de 0,939 e 0,929, respectivamente. Os valores de AUROCs do fator de resistência corneana, p2area e p1area foram significativamente maiores que os valores de histerese corneana. CONCLUSÃO: Existem diferenças significantes nas medidas biomecânicas entre olhos normais e com ceratocone. Comparados com os parâmetros derivados da pressão, histerese corneana e fator de resistência corneana, os parâmetros derivados da forma da curva proporcionaram melhor identificação dos ceratocones.

Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam HR system / Reprodutibilidade da medida da espessura central da córnea com o sistema Pentacam HR

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement at the geometrical center (Central Corneal Thickness - CCT) given by the Pentacam High Resolution (HR) Comprehensive Eye Scanner (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) over time. METHODS: Prospective, single center, observational study. Two separate CCT measurements were taken by the Pentacam corneal tomography exam (CTm) 3 to 12 months apart, and compared. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen eyes (n=116) of 62 health patients were included in this study. Average CCT in first and last visits was 541.6±37 µm and 543.6±36.9 µm respectively. Mean difference between both measurements was 9.2±6.4 µm, and there was no statistically significant difference in CCT measurement between visits, with good correlation between them (P = 0.057, r² = 0,9209). CONCLUSION: Pentacam (HR) CTm gives repeatable CCT measurements over time.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a reprodutibilidade da medida da espessura corneana central, no seu centro geométrico, com medidas obtidas pelo sistema Pentacam de Alta Resolução (HR) com o decorrer do tempo. MÉTODOS: Realizado estudo observacional prospectivo em Centro Oftalmológico. Duas medidas isoladas da espessura central da córnea (ECC) foram realizadas com exame de tomografia do segmento anterior Pentacam HR em períodos com intervalos maiores que 3 e em até 12 meses, sendo então comparadas os resultados. RESULTADOS: Cento e dezesseis olhos (n = 116) de 62 pacientes saudáveis foram incluídos neste estudo. A média das medidas da ECC na primeira e na última avaliação foi de 541,6 ± 37 µm e 543,6 ± 36,9 µm, respectivamente. A diferença média entre as duas medições foi de 9,2 ± 6,4 µm, e não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa das medida da ECC entre as visitas, com boa correlação entre si (P = 0,057, r2 = 0,9209). CONCLUSÃO: O Tomógrafo de Segmento Anterior Pentacam HR apresentou medidas de ECC reprodutíveis ao longo do tempo.

Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry.

PURPOSE: To compare the achieved refractive outcomes of patients undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation performed by conventional immersion ultrasound (US) or partial coherence interferometry (PCI). METHODS: Prospective, comparative case series. Patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly divided in two groups with regard to the IOL power calculation method. Group 1 had calculations performed by PCI (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec), while US was used in Group 2 (Ultrascan; Alcon), using the Holladay 1 formula. Differences between target and achieved refractions were then compared. RESULTS: The study comprised 120 eyes from 79 patients. Biometry with PCI was used in 50 eyes of 33 patients, and US was used in 70 eyes of 46 patients. Mean age of patients in the PCI Group was 69.8 ± 13.1 years (range 11 - 85) and 70.0 ± 9.3 (45 - 86) in the US Group (P=0.7165). Mean axial length measured by PCI was 23.22 ± 1.00 mm (range 21.01 - 25.45) and that by US was 23.22 ± 1.06 mm (20.05 - 25.78) (P=0.9110). Mean absolute error in the PCI group was 0.15 ± 0.33 D (range -0.65 - 0.9) and that in the US group was 0.26 ± 0.48 D (-1.05 - 1.76). All eyes in the PCI group and 94.3% of those in the US group were within 1.00 D of the planned refraction. CONCLUSION: Although both PCI and US yielded good prediction in IOL power calculation, the PCI group tended to show better accuracy and improved refractive outcome.

Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in healthy eyes with a central corneal thickness (CCT) < 505 µm with CH and CRF in gender-, age-, and CCT-matched keratoconus cases, and to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of these parameters for discriminating between the two groups. METHODS: Prospective, comparative case series. In total 46 eyes from 30 healthy patients with CCT < 505 µm, and 42 eyes from 30 CCT-, gender- and age-matched keratoconus cases were enrolled. Biomechanical metrics (CH and CRF) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and then compared. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify cut-off points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between the groups. RESULTS: The CCT was 485.96 ± 17.61 µm (range, 438 - 505) in healthy thin corneas and 483.64 ± 16.19 µm (range, 452 - 505) in keratoconus; p=0.5225. CH was 8.63 ± 1.23 mmHg (range, 5.95 - 12.2) and 8.07 ± 1.17 mmHg (range, 4.9 - 9.85), respectively; p=0.0312. CRF was 8.43 ± 1.29 mmHg (range, 5.45 - 11.10) and 7.22 ± 1.34 mmHg (range, 4.7 - 9.45), respectively; p<0.001. ROC curve analysis showed a poor overall predictive accuracy of CH (cut-off, 8.95 mmHg; sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 23.8%; test accuracy, 44.30%) and CRF (cut-off, 7.4 mmHg; sensitivity, 28.3%; specificity, 40.5%; test accuracy, 34.12%) for detecting keratoconus in the eyes studied. CONCLUSION: CH and CRF were statistically lower in keratoconus than in healthy thin corneas. However, CH and CRF offered very low sensitivity and specificity for discriminating the groups.

Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry / Cálculo da dioptria da lente intraocular medindo o comprimento axial através de interferometria de coerência parcial ou biometria ultrassônica

PURPOSE: To compare the achieved refractive outcomes of patients undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation performed by conventional immersion ultrasound (US) or partial coherence interferometry (PCI). METHODS: Prospective, comparative case series. Patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly divided in two groups with regard to the IOL power calculation method. Group 1 had calculations performed by PCI (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec), while US was used in Group 2 (Ultrascan; Alcon), using the Holladay 1 formula. Differences between target and achieved refractions were then compared. RESULTS: The study comprised 120 eyes from 79 patients. Biometry with PCI was used in 50 eyes of 33 patients, and US was used in 70 eyes of 46 patients. Mean age of patients in the PCI Group was 69.8 ± 13.1 years (range 11 - 85) and 70.0 ± 9.3 (45 - 86) in the US Group (P=0.7165). Mean axial length measured by PCI was 23.22 ± 1.00 mm (range 21.01 - 25.45) and that by US was 23.22 ± 1.06 mm (20.05 - 25.78) (P=0.9110). Mean absolute error in the PCI group was 0.15 ± 0.33 D (range -0.65 - 0.9) and that in the US group was 0.26 ± 0.48 D (-1.05 - 1.76). All eyes in the PCI group and 94.3 percent of those in the US group were within 1.00 D of the planned refraction. CONCLUSION: Although both PCI and US yielded good prediction in IOL power calculation, the PCI group tended to show better accuracy and improved refractive outcome.

OBJETIVO: Comparar os resultados refracionais obtidos em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de catarata com cálculo da lente intraocular realizado por meio de biometria ultrassônica de imersão (US) ou por interferometria de coerência parcial (ICP). MÉTODOS: Série de casos comparativa, prospectiva. Os pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de catarata foram aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos em relação ao método de cálculo do poder da lente intraocular (LIO) a ser implantada. O grupo 1 teve seu cálculo efetuado por ICP (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec), enquanto o grupo 2 usou-se US (Ultrascan; Alcon). A fórmula Holladay 1 foi utilizada nos dois grupos. As diferenças entre os resultados refracionais planejados e obtidos foram então comparadas. RESULTADOS: O estudo contou com 120 olhos de 79 pacientes. Biometria por meio de ICP foi utilizada em 50 olhos de 33 pacientes e com US em 70 olhos de 46 pacientes. A idade média dos pacientes no grupo 1 foi de 69,8 ± 13,1 anos e de 70,0 ± 9,3 anos no grupo 2 (P=0,7165). O comprimento axial médio aferido pela ICP foi de 23,22 ± 1,00 mm (variando de 21,01 a 25,45 mm) e no grupo US foi de 23,22 ± 1,06 mm (variando de 20,05 a 25,78 mm) (P=0,9110). O erro absoluto médio (diferença entre o planejado e o obtido) no grupo 1 foi de 0,15 ± 0,33 D (variando de -0,65 a 0,9 D) e no grupo 2 de 0,26 ± 0,48 D (variando de -1,05 a 1,76 D). Todos os olhos do grupo 1 e 94,3 por cento dos olhos do grupo 2 obtiveram resultados refracionais de até 1,00 D de diferença do resultado refracional inicialmente planejado. CONCLUSÃO: Os dois métodos estudados mostraram boa previsibilidade refracional quando utilizados para o cálculo do poder da LIO. No entanto, o grupo que utilizou ICP mostrou uma tendência a melhor acurácia, com menos dispersão de resultados.

Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases / Análise da biomecânica corneana em córneas finas saudáveis comparadas com pacientes com ceratocone pareados por espessura corneana, sexo e idade

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in healthy eyes with a central corneal thickness (CCT) < 505 µm with CH and CRF in gender-, age-, and CCT-matched keratoconus cases, and to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of these parameters for discriminating between the two groups. METHODS: Prospective, comparative case series. In total 46 eyes from 30 healthy patients with CCT < 505 µm, and 42 eyes from 30 CCT-, gender- and age-matched keratoconus cases were enrolled. Biomechanical metrics (CH and CRF) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and then compared. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify cut-off points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between the groups. RESULTS: The CCT was 485.96 ± 17.61 µm (range, 438 - 505) in healthy thin corneas and 483.64 ± 16.19 µm (range, 452 - 505) in keratoconus; p=0.5225. CH was 8.63 ± 1.23 mmHg (range, 5.95 - 12.2) and 8.07 ± 1.17 mmHg (range, 4.9 - 9.85), respectively; p=0.0312. CRF was 8.43 ± 1.29 mmHg (range, 5.45 - 11.10) and 7.22 ± 1.34 mmHg (range, 4.7 - 9.45), respectively; p<0.001. ROC curve analysis showed a poor overall predictive accuracy of CH (cut-off, 8.95 mmHg; sensitivity, 63 percent; specificity, 23.8 percent; test accuracy, 44.30 percent) and CRF (cut-off, 7.4 mmHg; sensitivity, 28.3 percent; specificity, 40.5 percent; test accuracy, 34.12 percent) for detecting keratoconus in the eyes studied. CONCLUSION: CH and CRF were statistically lower in keratoconus than in healthy thin corneas. However, CH and CRF offered very low sensitivity and specificity for discriminating the groups.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar e comparar a histerese corneana (CH) e o fator de resistência corneano (CRF) em olhos saudáveis com espessura corneana central (CCT) < 505 µm com os resultados de CH e CRF em pacientes com ceratocone pareados por sexo, idade e CCT, além de estimar a sensibilidade e especificidade destes parâmetros na diferenciação dos grupos. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo, do tipo série de casos comparativa. No total, 46 olhos de 30 pacientes saudáveis com CCT < 505 µm, e 42 olhos de 30 pacientes com ceratocone pareados por sexo, idade e CCT foram incluídos. Os parâmetros biomecânicos (CH e CRF) foram obtidos através do equipamento Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) e depois comparados. Curvas ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) foram utilizadas para identificar o melhor valor de corte que apresentasse a maior sensibilidade e especificidade na discriminação entre ceratocone e córneas finas saudáveis para cada dado estudado. RESULTADOS: A CCT encontrada foi 485,96 ± 17,61 µm (de 438 a 505) no grupo de córneas finas saudáveis e 483.64 ± 16,19 µm (de 452 a 505) no grupo ceratocone; p=0,5225. CH 8,63 ± 1,23 mmHg (de 5,95 a 12,2) e 8,07 ± 1,17 mmHg (de 4,9 a 9,85), respectivamente; p=0,0312. CRF 8,43 ± 1,29 mmHg (de 5,45 a 11,10) e 7,22 ± 1,34 mmHg (de 4,7 a 9,45), respectivamente; p<0,001. Análise das curvas ROC mostrou baixa acurácia na diferenciação das córneas finas saudáveis daquelas com ceratocone tanto para CH (ponto de corte, 8,95 mmHg; sensibilidade, 63 por cento; especificidade, 23,8 por cento; acurácia, 44,30 por cento) quanto para CRF (ponto de corte, 7,4 mmHg; sensibilidade, 28,3 por cento; especificidade, 40,5 por cento; acurácia, 34,12 por cento). CONCLUSÃO: Dados fornecidos pelo ORA (CH e CRF) mostraram-se estatisticamente mais baixos em pacientes com ceratocone quando comparados com córneas finas de indivíduos saudáveis. No entanto, os dois parâmetros biomecânicos estudados apresentaram sensibilidade e especificidade muito baixas na diferenciação dos grupos.

Ability of corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment data in the differentiation of keratoconus and healthy corneas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and test accuracy of corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment data in differentiating keratoconus from healthy corneas. METHODS: Comparative case series. Patients with and without keratoconus (gender and age-matched) were submitted for complete eye examinations including corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) as measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and anterior segment data as gathered through Pentacam assessments. The anterior segment data measurement included average central keratometric readings (K-Ave), corneal astigmatism (CA), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (AC depth) and corneal volume (CV). All parameters were assessed, compared and analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the best cutoff point by which to maximize the sensitivity and specificity of discriminating keratoconus from normal corneas for each data category. RESULTS: Seventy seven eyes from forty three patients (24 male, 19 female) with keratoconus and eighty six eyes from forty three (24 male, 19 female) healthy controls were enrolled. ROC curve analysis showed poor overall predictive accuracy for all studied parameters in differentiating keratoconus from normal corneas. The highest sensitivity (79.2%) was obtained for both AC depth and CH (cutoff points 3.22 mm and 9.39 mmHg respectively). The best specificity (89.5%) and test accuracy (80.34%) were obtained for CA (cutoff point of 2.2 D). CONCLUSION: When considered together, studied parameters showed statistical differences between groups. However, when considered independently they presented low sensitivity, specificity and test accuracy in differentiating keratoconus from healthy corneas.

Ability of corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment data in the differentiation of keratoconus and healthy corneas / Estudo da performance diagnóstica de parâmetros biomecânicos e dados anatômicos da câmara anterior na diferenciação de córneas saudáveis e com ceratocone

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and test accuracy of corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment data in differentiating keratoconus from healthy corneas. METHODS: Comparative case series. Patients with and without keratoconus (gender and age-matched) were submitted for complete eye examinations including corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) as measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and anterior segment data as gathered through Pentacam assessments. The anterior segment data measurement included average central keratometric readings (K-Ave), corneal astigmatism (CA), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (AC depth) and corneal volume (CV). All parameters were assessed, compared and analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the best cutoff point by which to maximize the sensitivity and specificity of discriminating keratoconus from normal corneas for each data category. RESULTS: Seventy seven eyes from forty three patients (24 male, 19 female) with keratoconus and eighty six eyes from forty three (24 male, 19 female) healthy controls were enrolled. ROC curve analysis showed poor overall predictive accuracy for all studied parameters in differentiating keratoconus from normal corneas. The highest sensitivity (79.2 percent) was obtained for both AC depth and CH (cutoff points 3.22 mm and 9.39 mmHg respectively). The best specificity (89.5 percent) and test accuracy (80.34 percent) were obtained for CA (cutoff point of 2.2 D). CONCLUSION: When considered together, studied parameters showed statistical differences between groups. However, when considered independently they presented low sensitivity, specificity and test accuracy in differentiating keratoconus from healthy corneas.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a sensibilidade, especificidade e acurácia de parâmetros biomecânicos e anatômicos do segmento anterior isolados na diferenciação de córneas saudáveis e com ceratocone. MÉTODOS: Estudo tipo série de casos comparativa. Pacientes com ceratocone e controles saudáveis foram pareados (idade e sexo) e submetidos a exame oftalmológico completo, incluindo avaliação biomecânica (ORA) e tomográfica (Pentacam). Ceratometria central média, astigmatismo corneano, espessura corneana central, profundidade da câmara anterior, volume corneano, CH e CRF foram estabelecidos, avaliados e comparados. Curvas ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) foram utilizadas para identificar o melhor valor de corte que apresentasse a maior sensibilidade e especificidade na discriminação entre ceratocone e córneas saudáveis para cada dado estudado. RESULTADOS: Setenta e sete olhos de 43 pacientes com ceratocone (24 homens e 19 mulheres) e 86 olhos de pacientes saudáveis (24 homens e 19 mulheres) foram incluídos no estudo. Curvas ROC mostraram baixa acurácia na predição do diagnóstico de ceratocone em todos os parâmetros isolados estudados. Maior sensibilidade encontrada foi 79,2 por cento para profundidade da câmara anterior e CH (ponto de corte 3,22mm e 9,39mmHg respectivamente); maior especificidade e acurácia foram encontradas na análise do astigmatismo corneano (ponto de corte 2,2 D; 89,5 por cento e 80,34 por cento respectivamente). CONCLUSÃO: Todos os parâmetros estudados mostraram diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos. No entanto, quando considerados isoladamente apresentaram baixas sensibilidade, especificidade e acurácia na diferenciação entre ceratocone e córneas saudáveis.

Refractive enhancement following presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses are widely available. Residual ametropia is one of the most common issues that can result in patient dissatisfaction. Options for correcting refractive surprises include piggyback intraocular lens implantation, corneal incisional surgery and laser correction. Excimer laser surgery is a safe and predictable method to correct residual amounts of ametropia in pseudophakic patients with monofocal intraocular lenses; however, there is scant published literature regarding this technique. RECENT FINDINGS: Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses require emmetropia for the best visual outcome, as small amounts of astigmatism or residual refractive errors can limit their visual performance. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy are safe and effective results in pseudophakic patients. Surgeons can refine the refractive outcome after intraocular lens implantation with the excimer laser to achieve better results and higher patient satisfaction. SUMMARY: Excimer laser corneal surgery for fine-tuning residual ametropia after presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses is a safe adjunct treatment to increase patient satisfaction. Which technique (photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis) to use depends on surgeon preference and patient characteristics, as both demonstrate similar results in published literature. Knowledge of all available refractive methods and technologies are crucial for improving outcomes in these patients.

Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy after uneventful phacoemulsification: case report.

To report a case of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) after uneventful cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Prospective, observational case report and literature review. We report the case history of a 74-year-old woman who underwent phacoemulsification and developed sudden loss of vision on the 13th postoperative day. After complete ocular and systemic evaluation the diagnosis of NAION was made. NAION can be associated with cataract extraction, and surgeons should be aware of this potentially blinding complication.

Epidemiological findings of ocular trauma in childhood.

PURPOSE: To describe epidemiological findings of ocular trauma in childhood in an emergency unit. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out including patients under 16 years old who were treated for ocular trauma at the emergency unit of the Federal University of São Paulo from September 2001 to September 2004. Age, sex, involved eye, place, circumstance and mechanism of injury, initial visual acuity and immediate management were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were included in the study. The age group comprising most cases was 7 to 10 years (39.9%). The most frequent cause of ocular injury was traumatism by external agents like stone, iron and wood objects (27.9%). The commonest place was the home (53.1%). Initial visual acuity was over 20/40 in 63.4% of cases. Closed globe injury occurred in 201 (73.6%) accidents. Seventy-six children (27. 8%) were treated with medicines and in forty-eight (17.6%) cases surgery was necessary. CONCLUSION: Ocular trauma in childhood was more frequent in the male schoolchild and was due mostly to traumatism with agents like stone, wood and iron pieces, domestic utensils and leisure objects. The injuries occurred most frequently at home. Closed globe injuries predominated. Programs of education and prevention for ocular trauma in childhood are necessary.

Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy after uneventful phacoemulsification: case report

To report a case of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) after uneventful cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Prospective, observational case report and literature review. We report the case history of a 74-year-old woman who underwent phacoemulsification and developed sudden loss of vision on the 13th postoperative day. After complete ocular and systemic evaluation the diagnosis of NAION was made. NAION can be associated with cataract extraction, and surgeons should be aware of this potentially blinding complication.

Os autores relatam um caso de neuropatia óptica isquêmica anterior (NOIA) não-arterítica após facoemulsificação de rotina e implante de lente intra-ocular. Uma paciente de 74 anos do sexo feminino foi submetida à cirurgia de catarata pela técnica de facoemulsificação e desenvolveu perda súbita e grave de visão no décimo terceiro dia pós-operatório. Após extensa investigação clínica e laboratorial, ocular e sistêmica, foi feito o diagnóstico de NOIA não-arterítica. Feita revisão da literatura, encontrando-se descrição desta complicação em raros casos associada a facectomia e implante de lente intra-ocular.