Evidence-based pharmacological prophylaxis recommendations for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

Venous thromboembolism is a complex multifactorial disease considered the most common cause of preventable deaths in hospitalized patients. Recommendations about pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adult hospitalized patients are available in clinical practice guidelines for optimization of healthcare delivery and improvement of patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines using ADAPTE to synthesize recommendations for pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients at a medium complexity university hospital. Recommendations for pharmacological prophylaxis were extracted from seven clinical practice guidelines considered of high quality after assessment with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. These recommendations will support discussion with specialists and implementation of practices in the setting of the hospital studied.

O tromboembolismo venoso é uma doença multifatorial complexa, considerada uma causa comum de óbitos evitáveis em pacientes hospitalizados. Recomendações sobre profilaxia farmacológica de tromboembolismo venoso em pacientes adultos hospitalizados estão disponíveis em diretrizes clínicas para otimizar os cuidados à saúde e contribuir com a melhora do desfecho do paciente. Dessa forma, foi conduzida uma revisão sistemática de diretrizes clínicas utilizando a metodologia ADAPTE para sintetizar as recomendações para profilaxia farmacológica de tromboembolismo venoso em pacientes clínicos adultos hospitalizados em um hospital universitário de média complexidade. As recomendações para profilaxia farmacológica foram extraídas de sete diretrizes clínicas consideradas de alta qualidade após avaliação pelo Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Essas recomendações servirão de apoio para discussão com especialistas e implementação de práticas dentro do contexto do hospital estudado.

Factors associated with higher quality of clinical practice guidelines and their recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of depression: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the pharmacological treatment of depression along with their recommendations and factors associated with higher quality. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review that included CPGs for the pharmacological treatment of depression in adults. DATA SOURCES: We searched for publications from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021, in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, BVS and 12 other databases and guideline repositories. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included CPGs containing recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of depression in adults at outpatient care setting, regardless of whether it met the U.S. National Academy of Medicine criteria, or not. If a CPG included recommendations for both children and adults, they were considered. No language restriction was applied. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction was also conducted independently and in duplicate, a process that was validated in a previous project. The quality of the CPGs and their recommendations were assessed by three independent reviewers using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX). A CPG was considered to be of high quality if AGREE II Domain 3 was ≥60%; while their recommendations were considered high if AGREE-REX Domain 1 was ≥60%. RESULTS: Seventeen out of 63 (27%) CPGs were classified as high quality, while 7 (11.1%) had high-quality recommendations. The factors associated with higher-scoring CPGs and recommendations in the multiple linear regression analyses were 'Handling of conflicts of interest', 'Multiprofessional team' and 'Type of institution'. 'Inclusion of patient representative in the team' was also associated with higher-quality recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of professionals from diverse backgrounds, the handling of conflicts of interest, and the inclusion of patients' perspectives should be prioritised by developers aiming for high-quality CPGs for the treatment of depression.

Guidelines' recommendations for the treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review of their quality.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is a serious and widespread mental health disorder. A significant proportion of patients with depression fail to remit after two antidepressant treatment trials, a condition named treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are instruments aimed to improve diagnosis and treatment. This study objective is to systematically appraise the quality and elaborate a comparison of high-quality CPGs with high-quality recommendations aimed at TRD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched several specialized databases and organizations that develop CPGs. Independent researchers assessed the quality of the CPGs and their recommendations using AGREE II and AGREE-REX instruments, respectively. We selected only high-quality CPGs that included definition and recommendations for TRD. We investigated their divergencies and convergencies as well as weak and strong points. RESULTS: Among seven high-quality CPGs with high-quality recommendations only two (Germany's Nationale Versorgungs Leitlinie-NVL and US Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense-VA/DoD) included specific TRD definition and were selected. We found no convergent therapeutic strategy among these two CPGs. Electroconvulsive therapy is recommended by the NVL but not by the VA/DoD, while repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is recommended by the VA/DoD but not by the NVL. While the NVL recommends the use of lithium, and a non-routine use of thyroid or other hormones, psychostimulants, and dopaminergic agents the VA/DoD does not even include these drugs among augmentation strategies. Instead, the VA/DoD recommends ketamine or esketamine as augmentation strategies, while the NVL does not mention these drugs. Other differences between these CPGs include antidepressant combination, psychotherapy as a therapeutic augmentation, and evaluation of the need for hospitalization all of which are only recommended by the NVL. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality CPGs for the treatment of depression diverge regarding the definition and use of the term TRD. There is also no convergent approach to TRD from currently high-quality CPGs.

Evidence-based pharmacological prophylaxis recommendations for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines / Recomendações baseadas em evidências científicas de profilaxia farmacológica para tromboembolismo venoso em pacientes hospitalizados com doenças agudas: uma revisão sistemática de diretrizes clínicas

Abstract Venous thromboembolism is a complex multifactorial disease considered the most common cause of preventable deaths in hospitalized patients. Recommendations about pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adult hospitalized patients are available in clinical practice guidelines for optimization of healthcare delivery and improvement of patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines using ADAPTE to synthesize recommendations for pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients at a medium complexity university hospital. Recommendations for pharmacological prophylaxis were extracted from seven clinical practice guidelines considered of high quality after assessment with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. These recommendations will support discussion with specialists and implementation of practices in the setting of the hospital studied.

Resumo O tromboembolismo venoso é uma doença multifatorial complexa, considerada uma causa comum de óbitos evitáveis em pacientes hospitalizados. Recomendações sobre profilaxia farmacológica de tromboembolismo venoso em pacientes adultos hospitalizados estão disponíveis em diretrizes clínicas para otimizar os cuidados à saúde e contribuir com a melhora do desfecho do paciente. Dessa forma, foi conduzida uma revisão sistemática de diretrizes clínicas utilizando a metodologia ADAPTE para sintetizar as recomendações para profilaxia farmacológica de tromboembolismo venoso em pacientes clínicos adultos hospitalizados em um hospital universitário de média complexidade. As recomendações para profilaxia farmacológica foram extraídas de sete diretrizes clínicas consideradas de alta qualidade após avaliação pelo Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Essas recomendações servirão de apoio para discussão com especialistas e implementação de práticas dentro do contexto do hospital estudado.

Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is a serious and widespread mental health disorder. Although effective treatment does exist, a significant proportion of patients with depression fail to respond to antidepressant treatment trials, a condition named treatment-resistant depression. Efficient approach should be given this condition in order to revert the burden caused by depression. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are evidence-based health promotion instruments to improve diagnosis and treatment. CPGs recommendations for treatment-resistant depression must be trustworthy. The objective of the proposed study is to systematically identify, appraise the quality of CPGs for the treatment of depression and elaborate a synthesis of recommendations for treatment-resistant depression of CPGs considered to be of high quality and with high quality recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the databases of organizations, such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, and the Virtual Health Library, and organizations that develop CPGs. Three independent researchers will assess the quality of the CPGs and their recommendations using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instruments, respectively. Given the identification of divergences and convergences as well as weak and strong points among high quality CPGs, our work may help developers, clinicians and eventually patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for a systematic review, as no patient data will be used. The research results will be disseminated in conferences and submitted to a peer reviewed journal.

Patient safety culture from the perspective of employees in a university hospital

Abstract Safety culture is a product of values, attitudes, skills, and behavioral patterns, and it determines the commitment of the management to a secure organization. The evaluation of safety culture in hospitals helps to identify and manage the relevant patient safety issues in hospital routines and working conditions proactively. Thus, this study is aimed to evaluate patient safety culture in all the departments of a university hospital of medium complexity. This study employed a cross-sectional and analytical design employed in the Portuguese version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. A sample of all hospital staff participated in this study, which was conducted from December 2016 to May 2017. The percentage of positive responses was calculated to identify the strong and weak areas in patient safety. Of the 413 questionnaires distributed, 368 valid responses were returned. The response rate was, therefore, 89%. The overall percentage of positive responses was 50.3%. The "Supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety" dimension obtained the highest percentage of positive responses (67.1%). The "Nonpunitive response to error" dimension was considered the weakest for safety culture, with only 22.9% positive responses. Furthermore, most professionals (70.6%) did not report any events in the previous 12 months. Nevertheless, 69.5% of participants considered patient safety within their unit/work area as "very good" or "great." The results showed that the employees' perception of patient safety diverged from the reality within the institution. Therefore, efforts should be made to promote an acceptable safety culture in all hospital areas.