Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Res Vet Sci ; 135: 486-494, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33268004

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica serovar Abortusovis (S. Abortusovis) infection is one of the most important causes of infectious late-term abortion as well as birth of weak lambs in sheep in many countries throughout the world. Implementation of protocols based on the application of effective vaccines is one of the most effective approaches for controlling this disease, but variable efficacy has been reported, possibly related to factors associated with the host, the vaccine, the parameters used for determining efficacy and the challenge protocols. In this context, a new commercial inactivated vaccine (INMEVA; Laboratorios Hipra S.A., Spain) was evaluated in 20 control and 17 vaccinated gestating ewes, subcutaneously challenged at 90 days of gestation with 5 × 106 colony-forming units (cfu) of a wild strain of S. Abortusovis. Incidence of reproductive failures, bacterial vaginal excretion (by real time PCR), and lamb survival were evaluated as indicators of the vaccine's level of protection. Moreover, humoral response (by ELISA test in serum samples) was studied. Vaccination was showed to be safe under the study conditions. Vaccine efficacy was demonstrated in two different ways: i) it significantly decreased the percentage of abortions [29.4% (5/17) in the vaccinated group compared to the control group (65%; 13/20)] and ii) there was a significant reduction of the overall vaginal excretion in the sampling period (3.05 log cfu/mL ±â€¯0.84 in the vaccinated group vs. 5.68 ±â€¯0.67 in the control group). Given these results, the vaccine evaluated can be considered as an effective alternative for controlling S. Abortusovis infection in ovine flocks.


Subject(s)
Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Salmonella Vaccines/administration & dosage , Salmonella enterica , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Pregnancy , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella Vaccines/immunology , Salmonella enterica/immunology , Serogroup , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Spain , Vaccination/veterinary , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
2.
Front Vet Sci ; 7: 593, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33102549

ABSTRACT

Ovine enzootic abortion (OEA), caused by Chlamydia abortus, is an economically important disease in many countries. Inactivated vaccines have been used for many years as they induce immunity in sheep, although outbreaks of abortions have been described in vaccinated flocks. In addition, there is a commercially available live attenuated vaccine that provides good protective results. Recently however, reports question the attenuation of this vaccine and associate it with the appearance of outbreaks of OEA in vaccinated flocks. In the present study, a recently commercialized inactivated vaccine (INMEVA®; Laboratorios Hipra S.A., Amer, Spain) has been evaluated using mouse and sheep experimental models. In the mouse models (non-pregnant and pregnant models), the efficacy of INMEVA vaccine has been compared to an unvaccinated control group and to an experimental inactivated vaccine considered as a positive protection control (UMU vaccine). In the non- pregnant model, the UMU vaccine was more effective than the INMEVA vaccine regarding the impact on body weight or the presence of C. abortus in the liver, but both vaccinated groups (UMU and INMEVA) had significantly lower C. abortus in the liver compared to the control group. In the pregnant model in terms of reproductive failures, pups per mouse or the presence of C. abortus in the liver or uterus, no significant differences were found between both vaccines, inducing protection compared to the control group. In the ovine pregnant model, where INMEVA vaccine was compared only to an unvaccinated group, the results indicate that this new commercial vaccine is safe and provides a suitable level of protection against an experimental challenge with C. abortus. A 75% reduction in reproductive disorders, 55% reduction in animals with C. abortus shedding on day of parturition/abortion, and a significant reduction of the average amount of chlamydial shedding from parturition/abortion over the next 21 days was observed, in relation to the infected control group. The results suggest that this vaccine is adequate for the control and prevention of OEA; however, future studies are necessary to elucidate the type of protective immune response that it induces.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...