ABSTRACT
Background: The absence of systematic screening for psychosis within general psychiatric services contribute to substantial treatment delays and poor long-term outcomes. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate rates of psychotic experiences, clinical high-risk for psychosis syndrome (CHR-P), and psychotic disorders identified by screening treatment-seeking individuals to inform implementation recommendations for routine psychosis screening in general psychiatric settings. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched to identify empirical studies that contained information on the point prevalence of psychotic experiences, CHR-P, or psychotic disorders identified by screening inpatient and outpatient samples aged 12-64 receiving general psychiatric care. Psychotic experiences were identified by meeting threshold scores on validated self-reported questionnaires, and psychotic disorders and CHR-P by gold-standard structured interview assessments. A meta-analysis of each outcome was conducted using the Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimator method of estimating effect sizes in a random effects model. Results: 41 independent samples (k=36 outpatient) involving n=25,751 patients (58% female, mean age: 24.1 years) were included. Among a general psychiatric population, prevalence of psychotic experiences was 44.3% (95% CI: 35.8-52.8%; 28 samples, n=21,957); CHR-P was 26.4% (95% CI: 20.0-32.7%; 28 samples, n=14,395); and psychotic disorders was 6.6% (95% CI: 3.3-9.8%; 32 samples, n=20,371). Conclusions: High rates of psychotic spectrum illness in general psychiatric settings underscore need for secondary prevention with psychosis screening. These base rates can be used to plan training and resources required to conduct assessments for early detection, as well as build capacity in interventions for CHR-P and early psychosis in non-specialty mental health settings.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Adults with serious mental illness have high tobacco use disorder rates and underutilization of first-line tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy. In a randomized trial, participants offered community health worker (CHW) support and primary care provider (PCP) education had higher tobacco abstinence rates at two years, partly through increased tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy initiation. This study determined the association between participant-CHW engagement and tobacco abstinence outcomes. Methods: This was a secondary, mixed-methods analysis of 196 participants in the trial's intervention arm. Effects of CHW visit number and duration, CHW co-led smoking cessation group sessions attended, and CHW-attended PCP visit number on tobacco use disorder pharmacotherapy initiation and tobacco abstinence were modeled using logistic regression. Interviews with 12 CHWs, 16 participants, and 17 PCPs were analyzed thematically. Results: Year-two tobacco abstinence was associated with CHW visit number (OR=1.85, 95% CI=[1.29, 2.66]) and duration (OR=1.85, 95% CI=[1.33, 2.58]) and number of groups attended (OR=1.51, 95% CI=[1.00, 2.28]); effects on pharmacotherapy initiation were similar. 1-3 CHW visits per month over two years was optimal for achieving abstinence. Interviews identified engagement facilitators, including CHWs establishing trust, providing goal accountability, skills reinforcement, and assistance overcoming barriers to treatment access and adherence related to social determinants of health and illness factors. Robust training and supervision facilitated CHW effectiveness. Barriers included PCPs' and care teams' limited understanding of the CHW role. Conclusions: Feasible CHW engagement was associated with tobacco abstinence in adults with serious mental illness. CHW implementation may benefit from promoting CHW training and integration within clinical teams.
