Investigation of relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement effect at -1.6 ppm in an ischemic stroke model.

Background: When an ischemic stroke happens, it triggers a complex signalling cascade that may eventually lead to neuronal cell death if no reperfusion. Recently, the relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement effect at -1.6 ppm [NOE(-1.6 ppm)] has been postulated may allow for a more in-depth analysis of the ischemic injury. This study assessed the potential utility of NOE(-1.6 ppm) in an ischemic stroke model. Methods: Diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging, and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired from five rats that underwent scans at 9.4 T after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Results: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and apparent exchange-dependent relaxations (AREX) at 3.5 ppm and NOE(-1.6 ppm) were quantified. AREX(3.5 ppm) and NOE(-1.6 ppm) were found to be hypointense and exhibited different signal patterns within the ischemic tissue. The NOE(-1.6 ppm) deficit areas were equal to or larger than the ADC deficit areas, but smaller than the AREX(3.5 ppm) deficit areas. This suggested that NOE(-1.6 ppm) might further delineate the acidotic tissue estimated using AREX(3.5 ppm). Since NOE(-1.6 ppm) is closely related to membrane phospholipids, NOE(-1.6 ppm) potentially highlighted at-risk tissue affected by lipid peroxidation and membrane damage. Altogether, the ADC/NOE(-1.6 ppm)/AREX(3.5 ppm)/CBF mismatches revealed four zones of increasing sizes within the ischemic tissue, potentially reflecting different pathophysiological information. Conclusions: Using CEST coupled with ADC and CBF, the ischemic tissue may thus potentially be separated into four zones to better understand the pathophysiology after stroke and improve ischemic tissue fate definition. Further verification of the potential utility of NOE(-1.6 ppm) may therefore lead to a more precise diagnosis.

Clinical translation of amide proton transfer (APT) MRI for ischemic stroke: a systematic review (2003-2020).

Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a pH-sensitive imaging technique that can potentially complement existing clinical imaging protocol for the assessment of ischemic stroke. This review aims to summarize the developments in the clinical research of APT imaging of ischemic stroke after 17 years of progress since its first preclinical study in 2003. Three electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for articles reporting clinical studies on APT imaging of ischemic stroke. Only articles in English published between 2003 to 2020 that involved patients presenting ischemic stroke-like symptoms that underwent APT MRI were included. Of 1,093 articles screened, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria with a total of 282 patients that had been scanned using APT imaging. Generally, the clinical studies agreed APT effect to be hypointense in ischemic tissue compared to healthy tissue, allowing for the detection of ischemic stroke. Other uses of APT imaging have also been investigated in the studies, including penumbra identification, predicting long term clinical outcome, and serving as a biomarker for supportive treatment monitoring. The published results demonstrated the potential of APT imaging in these applications, but further investigations and larger trials are needed for conclusive evidence. Future studies are recommended to report the result of asymmetry analysis at 3.5 ppm along with the findings of the study to reduce this contribution to the heterogeneity of experimental methods observed and to facilitate effective comparison of results between studies and centers. In addition, it is important to focus on the development of fast 3D imaging for full volumetric ischemic tissue assessment for clinical translation.

Study of common quantification methods of amide proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging for ischemic stroke detection.

PURPOSE: To assess the correlation and differences between common amide proton transfer (APT) quantification methods in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke. METHODS: Five APT quantification methods, including asymmetry analysis and its variants as well as two Lorentzian model-based methods, were applied to data acquired from six rats that underwent middle cerebral artery occlusion scanned at 9.4T. Diffusion and perfusion-weighted images, and water relaxation time maps were also acquired to study the relationship of these conventional imaging modalities with the different APT quantification methods. RESULTS: The APT ischemic area estimates had varying sizes (Jaccard index: 0.544 ≤ J ≤ 0.971) and had varying correlations in their distributions (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.104 ≤ r ≤ 0.995), revealing discrepancies in the quantified ischemic areas. The Lorentzian methods produced the highest contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs; 1.427 ≤ CNR ≤ 2.002), but generated APT ischemic areas that were comparable in size to the cerebral blood flow (CBF) deficit areas; asymmetry analysis and its variants produced APT ischemic areas that were smaller than the CBF deficit areas but larger than the apparent diffusion coefficient deficit areas, though having lower CNRs (0.561 ≤ CNR ≤ 1.083). CONCLUSION: There is a need to further investigate the accuracy and correlation of each quantification method with the pathophysiology using a larger scale multi-imaging modality and multi-time-point clinical study. Future studies should include the magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry results alongside the findings of the study to facilitate the comparison of results between different centers and also the published literature.

Magnetic Resonance pH Imaging in Stroke - Combining the Old With the New.

The study of stroke has historically made use of traditional spectroscopy techniques to provide the ground truth for parameters like pH. However, techniques like 31P spectroscopy have limitations, in particular poor temporal and spatial resolution, coupled with a need for a high field strength and specialized coils. More modern magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-based imaging techniques like chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) have been developed to counter some of these limitations but lack the definitive gold standard for pH that 31P spectroscopy provides. In this perspective, both the traditional (31P spectroscopy) and emerging (CEST) techniques in the measurement of pH for ischemic imaging will be discussed. Although each has its own advantages and limitations, it is likely that CEST may be preferable simply due to the hardware, acquisition time and image resolution advantages. However, more experiments on CEST are needed to determine the specificity of endogenous CEST to absolute pH, and 31P MRS can be used to calibrate CEST for pH measurement in the preclinical model to enhance our understanding of the relationship between CEST and pH. Combining the two imaging techniques, one old and one new, we may be able to obtain new insights into stroke physiology that would not be possible otherwise with either alone.

Analysis of model-based and model-free CEST effect quantification methods for different medical applications.

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds great potential to provide new metabolic information for clinical applications such as tumor, stroke and Parkinson's Disease diagnosis. Many active research and developments have been conducted to translate this emerging MRI technique for routine clinical applications. In general, there are two CEST quantification techniques: (i) model-free and (ii) model-based techniques. The reliability of these quantification techniques depends heavily on the experimental conditions and quality of the collected data. Errors such as noise may lead to misleading quantification results and thus inaccurate diagnosis when CEST imaging becomes a standard or routine imaging scan in the future. This paper investigates the accuracy and robustness of these quantification techniques under different signal-to-noise (SNR) levels and magnetic field strengths. The quantified CEST effect before and after adding random Gaussian White Noise using model-free and model-based quantification techniques were compared. It was found that the model-free technique consistently yielded larger average percentage error across all tested parameters compared to its model-based counterpart, and that the model-based technique could withstand SNR of about 3 times lower than the model-free technique. When applied on noisy brain tumor, ischemic stroke, and Parkinson's Disease clinical data, the model-free technique failed to produce significant differences between normal and abnormal tissue whereas the model-based technique consistently generated significant differences. Although the model-free technique was less accurate and robust, its simplicity and thus speed would still make it a good approximate when the SNR was high (>50) or when the CEST effect was large and well-defined. For more accurate CEST quantification, model-based techniques should be considered. When SNR was low (<50) and the CEST effect was small such as those acquired from clinical field strength scanners, which are generally 3T and below, model-based techniques should be considered over model-free counterpart to maintain an average percentage error of less than 44% even under very noisy condition as tested in this work.