Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Sci Med Sport ; 20(6): 528-533, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare three different ultrasound-guided injections for chronic tennis elbow. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded, randomized controlled comparative trial. METHODS: 44 patients with clinically diagnosed tennis elbow, confirmed by Doppler ultrasound, received under ultrasound guidance, a single corticosteroid injection (n=14), or two injections (separated by 4 weeks) of either autologous blood (n=14) or polidocanol (n=16). Clinical and ultrasound examination was performed at baseline, 4, 12 and 26 weeks. RESULTS: Complete recovery or much improvement was greater for corticosteroid injection than autologous blood and polidocanol at 4 weeks (p<0.001, number needed to treat 1 (95% CI 1-2)). In contrast, at 26 weeks corticosteroid was significantly worse than polidocanol (p=0.004, number needed to harm 2 (1-6)). Recurrence after corticosteroid injection was significantly higher than autologous blood or polidocanol (p=0.007, number needed to harm 2 (1-4)). Corticosteroid injection produced greater reduction in tendon thickness and vascularity than autologous blood at 4 weeks only. Compared to autologous blood, polidocanol reduced tendon thickness at 4 and 12 weeks and reduced echogenicity and hyperaemia after 12 or 26 weeks respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Injections of corticosteroid cannot be recommended over polidocanol or autologous blood, because despite beneficial short-term effect there were inferior long-term effects. Whether polidocanol or autologous blood injections are effective is unknown, especially as their global effect profiles are not unlike previously reported for wait-and-see.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Transfusion, Autologous , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Sclerosing Solutions/therapeutic use , Tennis Elbow/therapy , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Polidocanol , Single-Blind Method , Tennis Elbow/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Ultrasonography, Interventional
2.
Br J Nutr ; 88 Suppl 1: S39-49, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12215180

ABSTRACT

Probiotic ingestion can be recommended as a preventative approach to maintaining the balance of the intestinal microflora and thereby enhance 'well-being'. Research into the use of probiotic intervention in specific illnesses and disorders has identified certain patient populations that may benefit from the approach. Undoubtedly, probiotics will vary in their efficacy and it may not be the case that the same results occur with all species. Those that prove most efficient will likely be strains that are robust enough to survive the harsh physico-chemical conditions present in the gastrointestinal tract. This includes gastric acid, bile secretions and competition with the resident microflora. A survey of the literature indicates positive results in over fifty human trials, with prevention/treatment of infections the most frequently reported output. In theory, increased levels of probiotics may induce a 'barrier' influence against common pathogens. Mechanisms of effect are likely to include the excretion of acids (lactate, acetate), competition for nutrients and gut receptor sites, immunomodulation and the formation of specific antimicrobial agents. As such, persons susceptible to diarrhoeal infections may benefit greatly from probiotic intake. On a more chronic basis, it has been suggested that some probiotics can help maintain remission in the inflammatory conditions, ulcerative colitis and pouchitis. They have also been suggested to repress enzymes responsible for genotoxin formation. Moreover, studies have suggested that probiotics are as effective as anti-spasmodic drugs in the alleviation of irritable bowel syndrome. The approach of modulating the gut flora for improved health has much relevance for the management of those with acute and chronic gut disorders. Other target groups could include those susceptible to nosocomial infections, as well as the elderly, who have an altered microflora, with a decreased number of beneficial microbial species. For the future, it is imperative that mechanistic interactions involved in probiotic supplementation be identified. Moreover, the survival issues associated with their establishment in the competitive gut ecosystem should be addressed. Here, the use of prebiotics in association with useful probiotics may be a worthwhile approach. A prebiotic is a dietary carbohydrate selectively metabolised by probiotics. Combinations of probiotics and prebiotics are known as synbiotics.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/diet therapy , Intestinal Diseases/diet therapy , Intestines/microbiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Animals , Dietary Carbohydrates/metabolism , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/microbiology
3.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care ; 2(6): 481-4, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10678677

ABSTRACT

Prebiotics and probiotics are microflora management tools designed to improve human health. Both are dietary materials that fortify components of the gut flora seen as 'beneficial'. Gut flora modulation is an important area of the nutritional sciences, however, it is imperative that reliable methodologies be used to determine efficacy. This review will discuss the current techniques used in prebiotic and probiotic research.


Subject(s)
Nutritive Value , Probiotics , Animals , Bacteria/growth & development , Humans , Intestines/microbiology , Oligosaccharides
4.
Health Visit ; 65(7): 250, 1992 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1506232
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL