Patient referral is influenced by dialysis centre structure in the Diamant Alpin Dialysis cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Late referral (LR) to the nephrologist of patients with progressing chronic kidney disease (CKD) has numerous deleterious effects and is observed in many countries. The contributing factors associated with LR are controversial and poorly defined. We hypothesized that these factors might be better identified by analysing patients starting dialysis in three distinct European countries within the same area. METHOD: The referral and progression of kidney failure patterns were analysed with demographic, clinical and biological data in 279 non-selected consecutive patients starting dialysis in eight centres of three adjacent regions in France, Italy and Switzerland. RESULTS: Early referral (>6 months before the start of dialysis) was seen in 200 patients (71.6%), intermediate referral (1-6 months) in 42 (15.1%) and LR (<1 month) in 37 (13.3%). However inter-centre variations were between 2 and 19% for LR and 6-50% for combined late and intermediate referral. There were no differences at the national levels, but LR was more frequent in the large city centres than in the private or regional structures, with 31 out of 169 (18.3%), two out of 55 (5.4%) and four out of 55 (7.3%), respectively, of their patients (P<0.01). By multivariate analysis, it appears that, besides the presence of an active cancer and the CKD progression rate, the centre structure and the referring physician (primary care physicians and nephrologists are less responsible for LR than other medical specialists) play a significant role in the practice of LR. CONCLUSIONS: Within a dialysis cohort spread over adjacent regions of three countries, LR has the same global distribution pattern, indicating that different health and social security systems do not play a major role in inducing or preventing this practice. The contributing factors for LR that were identified are the type of the referring physician and the structure of the dialysis unit. Both factors are potential targets for an educational and collaborative approach.

The Diamant Alpin Dialysis cohort study: clinico-biological characteristics and cardiovascular genetic risk profile of incident patients.

BACKGROUND: Clinical and therapeutic characteristics of chronic dialysis patients vary widely at national and/or regional levels. Their increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality is not explained by traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors only. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the characteristics of patients starting dialysis in a homogeneous Alpin region and possibly to identify new biological parameters (phenotypes or genotypes), which eould be responsible for the increased CVD seen in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. METHODS: A cohort of 279 non-selected consecutive patients entering a dialysis program was prospectively investigated in eight centers of three adjacent regions in France, Italy and Switzerland. In addition to the usual demographic, clinical and biological data, we analyzed at study entry the blood levels of homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and antioxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL) antibodies, vitamin B12 status, Lp(a) and haptoglobin phenotypes, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), allele epsilon E4 of apolipoprotein (ApoE4) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) genetic polymorphism. RESULTS: At entry, 90.3% of patients were hypertensive, 30% had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 17.6% were current smokers; 42% of patients had already experienced at least one CV event: peripheral artery disease (26% of the cohort), coronary artery disease (22%) or ischemic cerebro-vascular disease (16%). Forty-two patients had had > or =2 CV events or documented atherosclerotic localizations. Anemia was not optimally treated: mean hemoglobin (Hb) was at 97.7 g/L and, while overall 62% of patients received erythropoietin (EPO) prior to dialysis, large national differences were observed. Compared to the reference population, ESRD patients exhibited increased homocysteinemia, Lp(a) levels and ApoE4 allele prevalence. Conversely, the distribution of Lp(a) phenotype, MTHFR TT, ACE DD and PAI-1 4G/4G was equivalent to that of the reference population. In addition, none of the analyzed phenotypical or genotypical parameters, except for the haptoglobin 2.2 phenotype, could be associated with the existence of a previous adverse CV event. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The clinical characteristics of the ESRD patients entering dialysis in our region were comparable to the currently observed dialysis populations in most European countries with the deleterious role of advancing age, diabetes, previous CVD, smoking and hypertension evident (2). Except for anemia therapy, there were no regional or national differences observed at dialysis start. (3) An analysis of the phenotypic and genotypic CV risk factors demonstrated differences with the reference population only for hyperhomocysteinemia, Lp(a) and ApoE4 allele prevalence, with no notable differences among the participating centers.

Darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly maintains haemoglobin levels in stable dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Darbepoetin alfa, a glycoprotein that stimulates erythropoiesis by the same mechanism as endogenous erythropoietin, has a 3-fold longer terminal half-life than recombinant human erythropoietin, allowing for an extended dosing interval. Darbepoetin alfa is currently recommended for once-weekly and once every 2 weeks administration in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). The objective of this study was to explore once-monthly administration in this patient population. METHODS: Clinically stable dialysis patients (mean haemoglobin concentration, 10.0-13.0 g/dl) receiving stable darbepoetin alfa therapy administered once every 2 weeks in a long-term treatment study were converted to darbepoetin alfa once every 3 weeks for 20 weeks and then, if haemoglobin concentrations were successfully maintained between 10.0 and 13.0 g/dl, were converted to darbepoetin alfa once every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. The darbepoetin alfa dose was titrated to maintain haemoglobin within a target range (-1.0 to +1.5 g/dl of baseline haemoglobin, and between 10.0 and 13.0 g/dl). Success with the extended dosing interval was defined as maintenance of mean haemoglobin >/=10.0 g/dl during a 4-week evaluation at the end of the dosing period. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients who entered the study, 38 patients were converted to darbepoetin alfa administered once every 4 weeks. Of these, 36 patients were considered evaluable and 30 (83%) of those evaluable patients successfully maintained the target haemoglobin. For successful patients the mean (SD) haemoglobin during evaluation was 11.16 (0.60) g/dl, and the mean change in haemoglobin from baseline to evaluation was -0.26 g/dl (95% CI: -0.51, -0.01). The median change from baseline in average weekly darbepoetin alfa dose was 1.61 microg (95% CI: 0.00, 4.75). Adverse events were consistent with those expected for this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Darbepoetin alfa, administered once monthly, maintained haemoglobin effectively and safely in most dialysis patients stabilized previously on once every 2 weeks dosing. Once-monthly dosing may optimize anaemia management for patients with CRF and for health care providers.