Fluorescent IGF-II analogues for FRET-based investigations into the binding of IGF-II to the IGF-1R.

The interaction of IGF-II with the insulin receptor (IR) and type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) has recently been identified as potential therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer. Understanding the interactions of IGF-II with these receptors is required for the development of potential anticancer therapeutics. This work describes an efficient convergent synthesis of native IGF-II and two non-native IGF-II analogues with coumarin fluorescent probes incorporated at residues 19 and 28. These fluorescent analogues bind with nanomolar affinities to the IGF-1R and are suitable for use in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) studies. From these studies the F19Cou IGF-II and F28Cou IGF-II proteins were identified as good probes for investigating the binding interactions of IGF-II with the IGF-1R and its other high affinity binding partners.

Delineation of the IGF-II C domain elements involved in binding and activation of the IR-A, IR-B and IGF-IR.

OBJECTIVE: Human insulin-like growth factor-I and -II (IGF-I and -II) ligands share a high degree of sequence and structural homology. Despite their similarities, IGF-I and IGF-II exhibit differential receptor binding and activation characteristics. The C domains of IGF-I and IGF-II are the primary determinants of binding specificity to the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR), insulin receptor exon 11- (IR-A) and exon 11+ (IR-B) isoforms. DESIGN: Three IGF-II analogues were generated in order to delineate the C domain residues that confer the differential receptor binding affinity and activation properties of the IGFs. Chimeric IGF-II analogues IGF-IICI(N) and IGF-IICI(C) contained partial IGF-I C domain substitutions (IGF-I residues underlined) GYGSSSRRSR and SRVSRRAPQT, respectively. RESULTS: The IGF-IICI(N) analogue bound the IR-A and IGF-IR with high affinity but bound the IR-B with a relatively lower affinity than IGF-II, suggesting a negative interaction between the exon-11 encoded peptide in the IR-B and the C-domain. The ability of IGF-IICI(N) to activate receptors and elicit cell viability responses was generally proportional to its relative receptor binding affinity but appeared to act as a partial agonist equivalent to IGF-I when binding and activating the IGF-IR. In contrast, IGF-IICI(C) bound IGF-IR with high affinity but elicited lower receptor activation and cell viability responses. Analogue IGF-IICI(S) contained a truncated IGF-I C domain (GSSSRRAT) and generally displayed a relatively poor ability to bind, activate and elicit viability responses via each receptor. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the IGF analogues demonstrate that both flanks of the IGF-II C domain play important roles in the greater ability of IGF-II to bind and activate IR receptors than IGF-I.

Exogenous administration of protease-resistant, non-matrix-binding IGFBP-2 inhibits tumour growth in a murine model of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) signal via the type 1 IGF receptor (IGF-1R) and IGF-II also activates the insulin receptor isoform A (IR-A). Signalling via both receptors promotes tumour growth, survival and metastasis. In some instances IGF-II action via the IR-A also promotes resistance to anti-IGF-1R inhibitors. This study assessed the efficacy of two novel modified IGF-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) proteins that were designed to sequester both IGFs. The two modified IGFBP-2 proteins were either protease resistant alone or also lacked the ability to bind extracellular matrix (ECM). METHODS: The modified IGFBP-2 proteins were tested in vitro for their abilities to inhibit cancer cell proliferation and in vivo to inhibit MCF-7 breast tumour xenograft growth. RESULTS: Both mutants retained low nanomolar affinity for IGF-I and IGF-II (0.8-2.1-fold lower than IGFBP-2) and inhibited cancer cell proliferation in vitro. However, the combined protease resistant, non-matrix-binding mutant was more effective in inhibiting MCF-7 tumour xenograft growth and led to inhibition of angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: By removing protease cleavage and matrix-binding sites, modified IGFBP-2 was effective in inhibiting tumour growth and reducing tumour angiogenesis.

Silencing of the insulin receptor isoform A favors formation of type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR) homodimers and enhances ligand-induced IGF-IR activation and viability of human colon carcinoma cells.

Insulin receptor (IR) overexpression is common in cancers, with expression of the A isoform (IR-A, exon 11-) predominating over the B isoform. The IR-A signals a proliferative, antiapoptotic response to IGF-II, which itself can be secreted by tumors to establish an autocrine proliferative loop. Therefore, IGF-II signaling via the IR-A could mediate resistance to type 1 IGF receptor (IGF-IR) inhibitory drugs that are currently in development. This study addressed the role of the IR-A, using a small interfering RNA-based approach in SW480 human colon adenocarcinoma cells that coexpress the IGF-IR. Clonogenic survival was inhibited by depletion of the IGF-IR but not the IR-A, and dual receptor depletion had no greater effect than IGF-IR knockdown alone, suggesting that the IR-A could not compensate for IGF-IR loss. IGF-IR knockdown also resulted in a decrease in viability, whereas IR-A depletion resulted in increased viability. Consistent with this, upon IR-A depletion, we found a concomitant enhancement of IGF-IR activation by IGF-I and IGF-II, reduced formation of IGF-IR:IR-A hybrid receptors and increased IGF-IR homodimer formation. Together, these results suggest that IGF bioactivity is mediated more effectively by the IGF-IR than by the IR-A or receptor hybrids and that signaling via the IGF-IR is dominant to the IR-A in colon cancer cells that express both receptors.

Interactions of IGF-II with the IGF2R/cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor mechanism and biological outcomes.

The cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-II receptor (IGF2R) is a membrane-bound glycoprotein consisting of 15 homologous extracellular repeat domains. The major function of this receptor is trafficking of lysosomal enzymes from the trans-Golgi network to the endosomes and their subsequent transfer to lysosomes. The IGF2R also plays a major role in binding and regulating the circulating and tissue levels of IGF-II. As this ligand is important for cell growth, survival, and migration, the maintenance of correct IGF-II levels influences its actions in normal growth and development. Deregulation of IGF2R expression has therefore been associated with growth related disease and cancer. This review highlights recent advances in understanding the IGF2R structure and mechanism of interaction with its ligands, in particular IGF-II. Recent mutagenesis studies combined with the crystal structure of domains 11-14 in complex with IGF-II have mapped the sites of interaction and explain how the IGF2R specificity for IGF-II is achieved. The role of domain 13 in high-affinity IGF-II binding is also revealed. Characterization of ligand:IGF2R interactions is vital for the understanding of the mechanism of IGF2R actions and will allow the development of specific cancer therapies in the future.

Interaction of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and -II with IGF binding protein-2: mapping the binding surfaces by nuclear magnetic resonance.

The interaction of IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) with IGF-I and -II has been investigated in solution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Chemical shift perturbations in 15N- and 2H/15N-labelled IGF-I or -II upon binding to unlabelled thioredoxin-tagged bovine IGFBP-2 (Trx(1-279)IGFBP-2) have been monitored to identify residues involved directly in the binding interaction as well as any affected by conformational changes associated with the interaction. A key step in obtaining high-quality spectra of the complexes was the use of transverse relaxation optimised spectroscopy (TROSY) methods with partially deuterated ligands. Indeed, because the effects of conformational averaging and aggregation are eliminated in IGF-I and -II bound to IGFBP-2, the spectra of the complexes are actually superior to those of the free ligands. Comparison of our results with the crystal structure of the complex between IGF-I and an N-terminal fragment of IGFBP-5 allowed identification of those residues perturbed by the C-domain of IGFBP-2. Other perturbations, such as those of Gly 19 and Asp 20 of IGF-I (and the corresponding residues in IGF-II) - which are located in a reverse turn linking N-domain and C-domain interactive surfaces - are due to local conformational changes in the IGF-I and -II. Our results confirm that the C-domain of IGFBP-2 plays a key role in binding regions of IGF-I and -II that are also involved in binding to the type-1 IGF receptor and thereby blocking ligand binding to this receptor.

The insulin receptor isoform exon 11- (IR-A) in cancer and other diseases: a review.

The insulin receptor plays a vital role in mediating the actions of insulin. These include metabolic and mitogenic effects. This review will focus on the role of the insulin receptor isoforms in normal development and the pathogenesis of certain cancers and type 2 diabetes. There are two insulin receptor isoforms arising from the alternative splicing of exon 11 resulting in either the exon 11+ (IR-B) isoform (including 12 amino acids encoded by exon 11) or the exon 11- (IR-A) isoform. The isoforms have different affinities for insulin, IGF-II and IGF-I with the exon 11- isoform binding both insulin and IGF-II with high affinities. Interestingly, differential expression of the insulin receptor isoforms has been demonstrated in disease. Several cancer cell types that also overexpress IGF-II preferentially express the exon 11- isoform. Activation of the exon 11- insulin receptor by IGF-II and insulin results in mitogenic effects and a potentiation of the cancer phenotype. Also hyperinsulinemia has been associated with increased risk of cancer. Differential expression of the insulin receptor isoforms has also been demonstrated in type 2 diabetes although there is some discrepancy in the literature as to which isoform is expressed.

BIAcore analysis of bovine insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 identifies major IGF binding site determinants in both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains.

In the absence of a complete tertiary structure to define the molecular basis of the high affinity binding interaction between insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), we have investigated binding of IGFs by discrete amino-terminal domains (amino acid residues 1-93, 1-104, 1-132, and 1-185) and carboxyl-terminal domains (amino acid residues 96-279, 136-279, and 182-284) of bovine IGFBP-2 (bIGFBP-2). Both halves of bIGFBP-2 bound IGF-I and IGF-II in BIAcore studies, albeit with different affinities ((1-132)IGFBP-2, K(D) = 36.3 and 51.8 nm; (136-279)IGFBP-2HIS, K(D) = 23.8 and 16.3 nm, respectively). The amino-terminal half appears to contain components responsible for fast association. In contrast, IGF binding by the carboxyl-terminal fragment results in a more stable complex as reflected by its K(D). Furthermore, des(1-3)IGF-I and des(1-6)IGF-II exhibited reduced binding affinity to (1-279)IGFBP-2HIS, (1-132)IGFBP-2, and (136-279)IGFBP-2HIS biosensor surfaces compared with wild-type IGF. A charge reversal at positions 3 and 6 of IGF-I and IGF-II, respectively, affects binding interactions with the amino-terminal fragment and full-length bIGFBP-2 but not the carboxyl-terminal fragment.

Secretion in Escherichia coli and phage-display of recombinant insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2.

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) promote cell growth and differentiation. Their actions are regulated by six different, but related, binding proteins (IGFBPs). To investigate the molecular interactions between IGFs and IGFBPs, an Escherichia coli based production method and a phage display system has been developed. The cDNA for bovine IGFBP-2 was inserted between regions coding for the pelB signal sequence and geneIII product, g3p, of bacteriophage fd in a phagemid vector to generate pGF14. The coding sequences of IGFBP-2 and g3p were separated by an amber stop codon and a flexible linker containing the cleavage recognition site for H64A subtilisin. Using this system in BL21, a non-supE strain lacking ompT, most product, approximately 4 mg 1(-1) of IGFBP-2, was obtained in the growth medium. The bacterially derived IGFBP-2 had a correct N-terminal sequence, molecular mass on SDS-PAGE and the same affinity for IGF-1 and IGF-II as IGFBP-2 from mammalian cells. In a supE strain of E. coli, IGFBP-2 was produced as an IGF-binding fusion to g3p. Procedures for display and approximately 10000 fold enrichment of IGFBP-2 bearing phage using adsorption to IGF-II coated microtitre plates were developed. Thus IGFBP-2 can be secreted in E. coli and displayed on filamentous phage. These can be selectively enriched by binding to immobilised IGF-II.

Alanine screening mutagenesis establishes tyrosine 60 of bovine insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 as a determinant of insulin-like growth factor binding.

The determinants of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding to its binding proteins (IGFBPs) are poorly characterized in terms of important residues in the IGFBP molecule. We have previously used tyrosine iodination to implicate Tyr-60 in the IGF-binding site of bovine IGFBP-2 (Hobba, G. D., Forbes, B. E., Parkinson, E. J., Francis, G. L., and Wallace, J. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30529-30536). In this report, we show that the mutagenic replacement of Tyr-60 with either Ala or Phe reduced the affinity of bIGFBP-2 for IGF-I (4.0- and 8.4-fold, respectively) and for IGF-II (3.5- and 4.0-fold, respectively). Although adjacent residues Val-59, Thr-61, Pro-62, and Arg-63 are well conserved in IGFBP family members, Ala substitution for these residues did not reduce the IGF affinity of bIGFBP-2. Kinetic analysis of the bIGFBP-2 mutants on IGF biosensor chips in the BIAcore instrument revealed that Tyr-60 --> Phe bIGFBP-2 bound to the IGF-I surface 3.0-fold more slowly than bIGFBP-2 and was released 2.6-fold more rapidly than bIGFBP-2. We therefore propose that the hydroxyl group of Tyr-60 participates in a hydrogen bond that is important for the initial complex formation with IGF-I and the stabilization of this complex. In contrast, Tyr-60 --> Ala bIGFBP-2 associated with the IGF-I surface 5.0-fold more rapidly than bIGFBP-2 but exhibited an 18.4-fold more rapid release from this surface compared with bIGFBP-2. Thus both the aromatic nature and the hydrogen bonding potential of the tyrosyl side chain of Tyr-60 are important structural determinants of the IGF-binding site of bIGFBP-2.

Localization of an insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding site of bovine IGF binding protein-2 using disulfide mapping and deletion mutation analysis of the C-terminal domain.

We have investigated which region(s) of bovine insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (bIGFBP-2) interact with insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) using C-terminally truncated forms of bIGFBP-2. Initially to aid in mutant design, we defined the disulfide bonding pattern of bIGFBP-2 C-terminal region using enzymatic digestion. The pattern is Cys186-Cys220, Cys231-Cys242, and Cys244-Cys265. In addition, cyanogen bromide cleavage of bIGFBP-2 revealed that the N- and C-terminal cysteine-rich domains were not linked by disulfide bonds. Taking the disulfide bonding pattern into consideration, C-terminal truncation mutants were designed and expressed in COS-1 mammalian cells. Following IGF binding assays, a region between residues 222 and 236 was identified as important in IGF binding. Specifically, mutants truncated by 14, 36, and 48 residues from the C terminus bound IGFs to the same extent as wild type (WT) bIGFBP-2. Removal of 63 residues resulted in a greatly reduced (up to 80-fold) ability to bind IGF compared with WT bIGFBP-2. Interestingly this mutant lacked the IGF-II binding preference of WT bIGFBP-2. Residues 236-270 also appeared to play a role in determining IGF binding specificity as their removal resulted in mutants with higher IGF-II binding affinity.

Covalent modification of an exposed surface turn alters the global conformation of the biotin carrier domain of Escherichia coli acetyl-CoA carboxylase.

We have studied the apo (unbiotinylated) and holo (biotinylated) forms of BCCP87, an 87-residue COOH-terminal peptide comprising the biotin carrier domain of the biotin carboxyl carrier protein subunit of Escherichia coli acetyl-CoA carboxylase. The apo protein spontaneously formed disulfide-linked dimers and was modified readily by sulfhydryl reagents, whereas the holo protein remained monomeric and was unreactive toward sulfhydryl reagents unless a protein denaturant was present. These data indicated that the single cysteine residue of the domain (Cys-116) was much more reactive in the apo form of the protein. Incubation of apoBCCP87 with biotin ligase for different times, followed by reaction with fluorescein-5-maleimide, clearly showed that the loss of Cys-116 reactivity was the result of modification with biotin. In addition, reaction of Cys-116 with 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) showed that apoBCCP87 denatured at lower urea concentrations than holoBCCP87. We also found that apoBCCP87 was at least 10-fold more sensitive than the holo form to proteolysis by a range of proteases. Identification of the cleavage sites indicated that the differences in protease sensitivity could not be attributed to shielding of susceptible bonds by the biotin moiety of the holo protein. These data indicate that a conformational change accompanies biotinylation of the biotin domain. Thus, modification of a beta-turn protruding from the protein surface results in alteration of the overall structure of this protein domain.

Introduction of spacer peptides N-terminal to a cleavage recognition motif in recombinant fusion proteins can improve site-specific cleavage.

To improve site-specific cleavage of a methionyl porcine growth hormone [[Met1]-pGH(1-46)-IGF-II] fusion protein by the enzyme H64A subtilisin, a series of flexible, unstructured spacer peptides were introduced N-terminal to the cleavage site. When enzymatic digestion preceded refolding of the fusion proteins, IGF-II could only be liberated from substrates which contained spacer peptides. Compared with the parent construct, the yield of IGF-II from refolded fusion proteins containing spacers was improved up to two-fold. Furthermore, this cleavage rate was improved by removing a competing protease recognition motif from the fusion partner. These data show that fusion partners can influence site-specific proteolysis of fusion proteins. Introduction of flexible spacers between the moieties can alleviate these interactions.

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding site of bovine insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (bIGFBP-2) probed by iodination.

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding site of bovine insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (bIGFBP-2) has been probed by chemical iodination. Tyrosyl residues of bIGFBP-2 were reacted by chloramine T-mediated iodination. The modification patterns of free bIGFBP-2 and bIGFBP-2 associated with insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) were compared by tryptic mapping using electrospray mass spectrometry and N-terminal sequencing. The presence of bound IGF-II resulted in protection of tyrosine at position 60 from iodination measured by the relative loss of tyrosine specific fluorescence and the incorporation of the radioisotope 125I. In addition, the pattern of iodine incorporation of bIGFBP-2 was not different whether IGF-I or IGF-II was the protective ligand. bIGFBP-2, when iodinated alone sustained a 8-fold loss of binding affinity for IGF-I and a 4-fold loss in binding affinity for IGF-II. In contrast, bIGFBP-2 iodinated while complexed with either IGF-I or IGF-II retained the same binding affinity for IGF-I or IGF-II as non-iodinated bIGFBP-2. We conclude that tyrosine 60 lies either in a region of bIGFBP-2 which directly interacts with both IGF-I and IGF-II or lies in a region of bIGFBP-2 which undergoes a conformational change that is important for IGF binding. Furthermore, iodination of tyrosine residues at positions 71, 98, 213, 226, and 269 has no detectable impact on binding of bIGFBP-2 to the IGFs.

Influence of nutrition on hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels and plasma concentrations of IGF-I and IGF-II in meat-type chickens.

We have examined the influence of nutrition on plasma IGF-I, IGF-II and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) levels and on hepatic IGF-I gene expression in young meat-type chickens. Plasma IGF concentrations were measured by using RIA with recombinant chicken IGFs as standards. In chickens fed the control diet containing 200 g/kg dietary protein ad libitum for 7 days, plasma IGF-I concentrations increased significantly from those found in the initial control group. Food restriction for either 4 or 7 days decreased plasma IGF-I by 30% from the initial control. When chickens were refed ad libitum for 3 days after 4 days of restricted feeding, plasma IGF-I levels recovered to those of the control birds fed ad libitum. In chickens eating a low protein diet (100 g/kg protein), the plasma IGF-I tended to be lowered but the decrease was not significant. Although the intensity of IGF-I and beta-actin mRNA bands protected in the RNase protection assay was changed by nutrition, no statistical effect of nutrition on the ratio of IGF-I to beta-actin was observed. The nutritional treatments had no effect on plasma IGF-II concentrations. Western ligand blot and chromatographic analyses were used to investigate the influence of nutrition on IGFBP profiles. Both IGF-I and IGF-II ligands in the Western ligand blot revealed the most intense binding at 30 kDa for plasma obtained from chickens with restricted food intake. The 30 kDa band also appeared at a lower intensity in the group fed a low protein diet but not in any other groups. These observations were confirmed by neutral gel chromatography. The chicken IGF-II ligand revealed an intensely labelled band corresponding to 75 kDa and this was not affected by nutrition. IGF-I and IGFBP concentrations in the plasma of young broiler chickens were influenced by nutritional state but IGF-II concentrations were not. The lack of a response in circulating IGF-II levels may have been due to the presence of high concentrations of a 75 kDa specific binding protein which did not respond to nutrition in this experiment.

Solution structure of human insulin-like growth factor II. Relationship to receptor and binding protein interactions.

The three-dimensional structure of human insulin-like growth factor (IGF) II in aqueous solution at pH 3.1 and 300 K has been determined from nuclear magnetic resonance data and restrained molecular dynamics calculations. Structural constraints consisting of 502 NOE-derived distance constraints, 11 dihedral angle restraints, and three disulfide bridges were used as input for distance geometry calculations in DIANA and X-PLOR, followed by simulated annealing refinement and energy minimization in X-PLOR. The resulting family of 20 structures was well defined in the regions of residues 5 to 28 and 41 to 62, with an average pairwise root-mean-square deviation of 1.24 A for the backbone heavy-atoms (N, C2, C) and 1.90 A for all heavy atoms. The poorly defined regions consist of the N and C termini, part of the B-domain, and the C-domain loop. Resonances from these regions of the protein gave stronger cross peaks in two dimensional NMR spectra, consistent with significant motional averaging. The main secondary structure elements in IGF-II are alpha-helices encompassing residues 11 to 21, 42 to 49 and 53 to 59. A small anti-parallel beta-sheet is formed by residues 59 to 61 and 25 to 27, while residues 26 to 28 appear to participate in intermolecular beta-sheet formation. The structure of IGF-II in the well-defined regions is very similar to those of the corresponding regions of insulin and IGF-I. Significant differences between IGF-II and IGF-I occur near the start of the third helix, in a region known to modulate affinity for the type 2 IGF receptor, and at the C terminus. The IGF II structure is discussed in relation to its binding sites for the insulin and IGF receptors and the IGF binding proteins.