Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 216: 614-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26262124

ABSTRACT

In order to measure the level of utilization of colonoscopy procedures, identifying the primary indication for the procedure is required. Colonoscopies may be utilized not only for screening, but also for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. To determine whether a colonoscopy was performed for screening, we created a natural language processing system to identify colonoscopy reports in the electronic medical record system and extract indications for the procedure. A rule-based model and three machine-learning models were created using 2,000 manually annotated clinical notes of patients cared for in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Performance of the models was measured and compared. Analysis of the models on a test set of 1,000 documents indicates that the rule-based system performance stays fairly constant as evaluated on training and testing sets. However, the machine learning model without feature selection showed significant decrease in performance. Therefore, rule-based classification system appears to be more robust than a machine-learning system in cases when no feature selection is performed.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/organization & administration , Electronic Health Records/classification , Medical Overuse/prevention & control , Natural Language Processing , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Data Mining/methods , Hospitals, Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Machine Learning , Mass Screening/methods , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , United States
2.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 21(e1): e163-8, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24201026

ABSTRACT

Binge eating disorder (BED) does not have an International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th edition code, but is included under 'eating disorder not otherwise specified' (EDNOS). This historical cohort study identified patients with clinician-diagnosed BED from electronic health records (EHR) in the Department of Veterans Affairs between 2000 and 2011 using natural language processing (NLP) and compared their characteristics to patients identified by EDNOS diagnosis codes. NLP identified 1487 BED patients with classification accuracy of 91.8% and sensitivity of 96.2% compared to human review. After applying study inclusion criteria, 525 patients had NLP-identified BED only, 1354 had EDNOS only, and 68 had both BED and EDNOS. Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. This is the first study to use NLP as a method to identify BED patients from EHR data and will allow further epidemiological study of patients with BED in systems with adequate clinical notes.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Binge-Eating Disorder/diagnosis , Electronic Health Records , Natural Language Processing , Humans , Narration
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24303238

ABSTRACT

Patients report their symptoms and subjective experiences in their own words. These expressions may be clinically meaningful yet are difficult to capture using automated methods. We annotated subjective symptom expressions in 750 clinical notes from the Veterans Affairs EHR. Within each document, subjective symptom expressions were compared to mentions of symptoms in clinical terms and to the assigned ICD-9-CM codes for the encounter. A total of 543 subjective symptom expressions were identified, of which 66.5% were categorized as mental/behavioral experiences and 33.5% somatic experiences. Only two subjective expressions were coded using ICD-9-CM. Subjective expressions were restated in semantically related clinical terms in 246 (45.3%) instances. Nearly one third (31%) of subjective expressions were not coded or restated in standard terminology. The results highlight the diversity of symptom descriptions and the opportunities to further develop natural language processing to extract symptom expressions that are unobtainable by other automated methods.

4.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 192: 1213, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23920987

ABSTRACT

Human annotation and chart review is an important process in biomedical informatics research, but which humans are best suited for the job? Domain expertise, such as medical or linguistic knowledge is desirable, but other factors may be equally important. The University of Utah has a group of 20+ reviewers with backgrounds in medicine and linguistics, and 10 key traits have surfaced in those best able to annotate quickly and with high quality. To identify reviewers with these key traits, we created a hiring process that includes interviewing candidates, testing their medical and linguistic knowledge, and having them complete an annotation exercise on realistic medical text. Each step is designed to assess the key traits and allow the investigator to choose the skill set required for each project.


Subject(s)
Data Curation/methods , Electronic Health Records , Job Description , Meaningful Use/organization & administration , Medical Informatics , Personnel Selection/methods , Utah , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...