The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance: Working Toward a New Care Model for the Metabolic Syndrome.

The Cardiometabolic Think Tank was convened on June 20, 2014, in Washington, DC, as a "call to action" activity focused on defining new patient care models and approaches to address contemporary issues of cardiometabolic risk and disease. Individual experts representing >20 professional organizations participated in this roundtable discussion. The Think Tank consensus was that the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a complex pathophysiological state comprised of a cluster of clinically measured and typically unmeasured risk factors, is progressive in its course, and is associated with serious and extensive comorbidity, but tends to be clinically under-recognized. The ideal patient care model for MetS must accurately identify those at risk before MetS develops and must recognize subtypes and stages of MetS to more effectively direct prevention and therapies. This new MetS care model introduces both affirmed and emerging concepts that will require consensus development, validation, and optimization in the future.

Appropriate revascularization in stable angina: lessons from the BARI 2D trial.

BACKGROUND: The 2012 Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease recommend intensive antianginal and risk factor treatment (optimal medical management [OMT]) before considering revascularization to relieve symptoms. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial randomized patients with ischemic heart disease and anatomy suitable to revascularization to (1) initial OMT with revascularization if needed or (2) initial revascularization plus OMT and found no difference in major cardiovascular events. Ultimately, however, 37.9% of the OMT group was revascularized during the 5-year follow-up period. METHODS: Data from the 1192 patients randomized to OMT were analyzed to identify subgroups in which the incidence of revascularization was so high that direct revascularization without a trial period could be justified. Multivariate logistic analysis, Cox regression models of baseline data, and a landmark analysis of participants who did not undergo revascularization at 6 months were constructed. RESULTS: The models that used only data available at the time of study entry had limited predictive value for revascularization by 6 months or by 5 years; however, the model incorporating severity of angina during the first 6 months could better predict revascularization (C statistic = 0.789). CONCLUSIONS: With the possible exception of patients with severe angina and proximal left anterior descending artery disease, this analysis supports the recommendation of the 2012 guidelines for a trial of OMT before revascularization. Patients could not be identified at the time of catheterization, but a short period of close follow-up during OMT identified the nearly 40% of patients who underwent revascularization.

Risk factors for incident peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes: results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in type 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to define risk factors for incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), overall and within the context of differing glycemic control strategies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) randomized controlled trial assigned participants to insulin-sensitizing (IS) therapy versus insulin-providing (IP) therapy. A total of 1,479 participants with normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) at study entry were eligible for analysis. PAD outcomes included new ABI ≤0.9 with decrease at least 0.1 from baseline, lower extremity revascularization, or lower extremity amputation. Baseline risk factors within the overall cohort and time-varying risk factors within each assigned glycemic control arm were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During an average 4.6 years of follow-up, 303 participants (20.5%) experienced an incident case of PAD. Age, sex, race, and baseline smoking status were all significantly associated with incident PAD in the BARI 2D cohort. Additional baseline risk factors included pulse pressure, HbA1c, and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (P < 0.05 for each). In stratified analyses of time-varying covariates, changes in BMI, LDL, HDL, systolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure were most predictive among IS patients, while change in HbA1c was most predictive among IP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with T2DM, traditional cardiovascular risk factors were the main predictors of incident PAD cases. Stratified analyses showed different risk factors were predictive for patients treated with IS medications versus those treated with IP medications.

Favorable effects of insulin sensitizers pertinent to peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes: results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this manuscript was to report the risk of incident peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in a large randomized clinical trial that enrolled participants with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes and compare the risk between assigned treatment arms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial randomly assigned participants to insulin sensitization (IS) therapy versus insulin-providing (IP) therapy for glycemic control. Results showed similar 5-year mortality in the two glycemic treatment arms. In secondary analyses reported here, we examine the effects of treatment assignment on the incidence of PAD. A total of 1,479 BARI 2D participants with normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) (0.91-1.30) were eligible for analysis. The following PAD-related outcomes are evaluated in this article: new low ABI≤0.9, a lower-extremity revascularization, lower-extremity amputation, and a composite of the three outcomes. RESULTS: During an average 4.6 years of follow-up, 303 participants experienced one or more of the outcomes listed above. Incidence of the composite outcome was significantly lower among participants assigned to IS therapy than those assigned to IP therapy (16.9 vs. 24.1%; P<0.001). The difference was significant in time-to-event analysis (hazard ratio 0.66 [95% CI 0.51-0.83], P<0.001) and remained significant after adjustment for in-trial HbA1c (0.76 [0.59-0.96], P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In participants with type 2 diabetes who are free from PAD, a glycemic control strategy of insulin sensitization may be the preferred therapeutic strategy to reduce the incidence of PAD and subsequent outcomes.

Comparison of aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with stage 2 hypertension and diabetes are at high cardiovascular risk and require large blood pressure (BP) reductions to reach treatment goals. This randomized double-blind study compared aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy with amlodipine monotherapy in 860 patients with mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) ≥160 mm Hg to <200 mm Hg and type 2 diabetes. Patients received either once-daily aliskiren/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 1 week then force-titrated to double the doses for 7 weeks. Baseline BP was 167.7/91.4 mm Hg. At week 8 end point, aliskiren/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions in msSBP than amlodipine (28.8 mm Hg vs 26.2 mm Hg; P<.05). Mean sitting diastolic BP reductions were similar with aliskiren/HCTZ (9.9 mm Hg) and amlodipine (9.0 mm Hg). Achievement of BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) was significantly greater with aliskiren/HCTZ (23.2%) than amlodipine (13.8%; P<.0001). Aliskiren/HCTZ provides substantial msSBP reductions and greater BP control rates than amlodipine, and offers an attractive treatment option for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.

Prescription omega-3 fatty acid as an adjunct to fenofibrate therapy in hypertriglyceridemic subjects.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia is indicated to reduce the risk of pancreatitis in patients with triglyceride (TG) levels > or =500 mg/dL. Hypertriglyceridemia is also a risk factor for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease. Prescription omega-3 fatty acids (P-OM3) and fenofibrate (FENO) are among the most effective lipid-altering agents that reduce TG levels. Given that some patients may not achieve optimal TG levels with a single agent, we hypothesized that concomitant use of P-OM3 or addition of P-OM3 to FENO would result in a TG reduction greater than that with FENO alone. METHODS: This randomized, 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of P-OM3 4 g QD plus concomitant FENO 130 mg with FENO 130 mg QD plus placebo in subjects with very high TG levels (> or =500 mg/dL). Subjects who completed the double-blind study were given the option to continue into an open-label, 8-week extension study, wherein they all received P-OM3 4 g plus FENO 130 mg QD. On completion of the first extension study, subjects were eligible to continue into an open-label 24-month extension of the treatment with P-OM3 4 g plus FENO 130 mg QD. RESULTS: Concomitant P-OM3 + FENO (n = 81) and FENO monotherapy (n = 82) reduced median TG values from 649.5 to 267.5 mg/dL (60.8%) and from 669.3 to 310 mg/dL (53.8%), respectively (P = 0.059). When subjects who had received 8 weeks of stable FENO monotherapy were given P-OM3 during the 8-week, open-label extension study (n = 58), TG levels were reduced 17.5% (P = 0.003) over the course of the extension. The second extension phase was terminated early (n = 93)-not because of a safety signal but because of the lack of a substantial incremental change in the primary endpoint lipid values above that reached in either the original study or the first extension in subjects receiving the combination of fenofibrate and P-OM3. CONCLUSIONS: Both FENO monotherapy and P-OM3 + FENO significantly reduced TGs in subjects with very high TGs, with a trend to greater reduction in the P-OM3 + FENO group. The addition of P-OM3 to stable FENO therapy in the same subjects in an open-label extension study resulted in a statistically significant reduction in TG levels. Subjects who received P-OM3 + FENO for 16 weeks and subjects in which P-OM3 was added to FENO monotherapy during the open-label phase of the study did not differ in their final lipid responses. In the second open-label extension, within the combined group taking P-OM3 and FENO, analysis of change from the second extension baseline to end of treatment revealed no clinically important change.

Relation of severe coronary artery narrowing to insulin or thiazolidinedione use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Study).

Patients with diabetes continue to die of coronary artery disease (CAD) at rates 2 to 4 times higher than patients without diabetes, despite advances in treatment of cardiovascular disease. The role of glycemic control therapies, independent of their glucose-lowering effects, on cardiovascular disease is a recurring question. We examined the association of glycemic control therapies with extent of CAD as measured by coronary angiogram obtained at baseline in 1,803 subjects in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial who had type 2 diabetes mellitus, documented moderate to severe CAD, and no previous cardiac revascularization procedures. The association between glycemic control therapy use recorded at baseline and percent coronary artery stenosis and myocardial jeopardy index was analyzed by multiple regression models. Insulin use at study entry was associated with 23% fewer highly stenotic lesions (> or =70%) (p <0.001) and a significantly lower myocardial jeopardy index compared with subjects not on insulin, despite a worse cardiac risk factor profile, more unstable angina, and increased inflammatory markers in insulin users. Subjects taking thiazolidinediones (TZDs) for > or =6 months had 17% fewer highly stenotic lesions (p = 0.02) and significantly lower C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels compared with those not taking TZDs. In conclusion, this cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CAD showed that treatment with insulin or TZDs was associated with fewer highly stenotic lesions, independent of disease duration, glycemic control, and other risk factors.

Control of lipids at baseline in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial.

In order to examine lipids, a major treatment parameter in those with diabetes and heart disease, the authors analyzed baseline data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. The study consisted of 2368 participants with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease from 49 sites in 6 countries (2295 provided lipid measurements). Fifty-nine percent of participants had a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level < 100 mg/dL. Levels of total, LDL, and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides differed by age group (younger than 55, 55-64, and 65 years and older); they were lowest in those aged 65 years. Women had higher total, LDL, and non-HDL cholesterol values. Education was associated with lower total, LDL, and non-HDL cholesterol levels. LDL cholesterol and triglyceride values were lower in the United States and Canada. Adjustment for age, sex, education level, randomization year, and medication did not eliminate these differences. Geographic variation was seen and was not fully accounted for by demographic or treatment characteristics (all P values < .05).

Hyperthyroidism: a "curable" cause of congestive heart failure--three case reports and a review of the literature.

With the increasing incidence of coronary artery disease and the aging population, the prevalence of congestive heart failure (CHF) is increasing. In the majority of these cases the etiology is underlying coronary artery disease. Other less common causes of CHF include valvular heart disease, hypertension, alcoholic cardiomyopathy, and dilated cardiomyopathy. In addition, there are rare causes, one of which is hyperthyroidism. Hyperthyroidism can affect the cardiovascular system in a variety of ways. The cardiovascular manifestations range from sinus tachycardia to atrial fibrillation and from a high cardiac output state to CHF due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction. If the underlying hyperthyroidism is recognized and treated early the CHF in such cases can be cured. The authors present three cases of CHF due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to hyperthyroidism, which showed considerable improvement in the left ventricular function once the hyperthyroidism was treated.