Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Lymphology ; 55(4): 144-154, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553003

ABSTRACT

Diagnosing malignant lymphedema is a challenge in daily clinical practice. Clinically, patients may show clear signs of malignancy, but this is not always the case, and at times the diagnosis is not straightforward. In some patients, pain, hardness of the tissues, joint stiffness, proximal involvement, collateral circulation, or an acute onset will provide the clue to determining malignancy. Our aim is to describe several diverse scenarios of Secondary Malignant Lymphedema (SML) with the etiopathogenesis. One possible cause is lymphatic obstruction due to extrinsic compression of lymphatic vessels and/or nodes by either the primary tumor or metastatic masses. Lymphatic obstruction can also be caused by tumoral infiltration. This infiltration can affect both deep and regional nodes as well as cutaneous and subcutaneous vessels and is commonly known as lymphangitis carcinomatosa. Malignant lymphedema can also be secondary to obstruction of the venous flow due to tumoral venous thromboembolism or to extrinsic compression of the veins by tumors or adenopathic masses. Nevertheless, the most frequent cause of this illness is a mixed mechanism of compression of the lymphatic and venous systems. Frequently, SML is the first manifestation of relapse. When lymphedema appears abruptly, is progressive, with intense pain, associated with collateral circulation, or with hard and infiltrated skin or joint stiffness, SML must be ruled out with an urgent referral to the oncologist and an imaging evaluation.

2.
Lymphology ; 54(4): 170-181, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35073621

ABSTRACT

Lipedema is a chronic disease seen frequently in women that causes abnormal fat deposition in the lower limbs and associated bruising and pain. Despite increasing knowledge concerning lipedema, there are still aspects of diagnosis that need further investigation. We performed a prospective, observational cohort study to describe prevalence of clinical characteristics present in patients with lipedema in an attempt to establish diagnostic criteria. Participants were consecutive patients with lipedema presenting at a public hospital in Spain from September 2012 to December 2019. Patients were examined for the following signs and symptoms of lipedema: symmetrical involvement; disproportion between the upper and lower part of the body; sparing of the feet; pain; bruising; Stemmer' sign; pitting test; fibrosis; venous insufficiency; upper limbs involvement; vascular spiders; skin coldness; and lymphangitis attacks. In addition, orthopedic alterations were examined in all patients. We recruited 138 patients (median age=47.6 years; mean BMI=29.9 Kg/m2). Using waist-to-height-ratio, 41.3% of the patients were slim or healthy. The most frequent type of lipedema was Type III (71%), and most were in stage 1 and 2. The features of lipedema with a prevalence >80% were symmetrical involvement, unaffected feet, pain, bruising, vascular spiders, and disproportion. Pain was nociceptive in 60.2% and neuropathic in 33.1%, and there was a reduced social or working activities in 37.9%. Orthopedic alterations including cavusfeet or valgus-knees were observed in 1/3 of the patients. X-ray of the knees was performed in 63 patients and knee osteoarthritis diagnosed in 37. We found that the most frequent manifestations of lipedema were bilateral involvement, unaffected feet, pain, easy bruising, vascular spiders, and disproportion between the upper and lower parts of the body. These should be considered as major criteria for diagnosis. In addition, our findings on the prevalence of orthopedic alterations in patients with lipedema highlights the need for a multidisciplinary and integrated approach.


Subject(s)
Lipedema , Female , Humans , Lipedema/diagnosis , Lipedema/epidemiology , Lower Extremity , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies
3.
Rehabilitación (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 54(4): 276-283, oct.-dic. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-192491

ABSTRACT

La pandemia de COVID-19 es un desafío para el manejo de las patologías no COVID como la enfermedad linfática y el lipedema. La telemedicina puede evitar la propagación del coronavirus. Se necesita un sistema que nos ayude a determinar la prioridad clínica y la selección de la asistencia presencial o telemática para cada paciente y la forma de realizarlas durante la pandemia. El Grupo Español de Linfología ha realizado un documento de consenso con recomendaciones basadas en la bibliografía y experiencia clínica, como guía de práctica clínica en el manejo de anomalías linfáticas y lipedema durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Estas recomendaciones deben adaptarse a las características del paciente, las condiciones locales de los centros y las decisiones de los profesionales de la salud. Es un documento de criterios mínimos, sujeto a modificaciones según evolucione la pandemia, los conocimientos científicos y las instrucciones de las autoridades sanitarias


The COVID-19 pandemic poses a challenge to the management of non-COVID pathologies such as lymphatic diseases and lipoedema. The use of telemedicine can prevent the spread of the disease. A system is needed to help determine the clinical priority and selection of face-to-face or telemedicine options for each patient and how to carry them out during the pandemic. The Spanish Lymphology Group has drafted a consensus document with recommendations based on the literature and clinical experience, as clinical practice guidelines for the management of lymphatic abnormalities and lipoedema during the COVID-19 pandemic. These recommendations must be adapted to the characteristics of each patient, the local conditions of the centres, and the decisions of health care professionals. The document contains minimum criteria, subject to modifications according to the evolution of the pandemic, scientific knowledge and instructions from health authorities


Subject(s)
Humans , Coronavirus Infections/rehabilitation , Lipedema/rehabilitation , Lymphatic Abnormalities/rehabilitation , Lymphedema/rehabilitation , Vascular Malformations/rehabilitation , Telerehabilitation/organization & administration , Pandemics , Rehabilitation Centers/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Health Priorities/trends
4.
Rehabilitacion (Madr) ; 54(4): 276-283, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863012

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic poses a challenge to the management of non-COVID pathologies such as lymphatic diseases and lipoedema. The use of telemedicine can prevent the spread of the disease. A system is needed to help determine the clinical priority and selection of face-to-face or telemedicine options for each patient and how to carry them out during the pandemic. The Spanish Lymphology Group has drafted a consensus document with recommendations based on the literature and clinical experience, as clinical practice guidelines for the management of lymphatic abnormalities and lipoedema during the COVID-19 pandemic. These recommendations must be adapted to the characteristics of each patient, the local conditions of the centres, and the decisions of health care professionals. The document contains minimum criteria, subject to modifications according to the evolution of the pandemic, scientific knowledge and instructions from health authorities.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Lipedema/therapy , Lymphatic Diseases/therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Telemedicine , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Compression Bandages , Continuity of Patient Care , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Management , Emergencies , Equipment Design , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Lipedema/complications , Lipedema/rehabilitation , Lymphatic Diseases/complications , Lymphatic Diseases/rehabilitation , Manual Lymphatic Drainage , Office Visits , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Participation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Precision Medicine , SARS-CoV-2 , Telephone , Triage , Videoconferencing
7.
Rev. esp. med. nucl. imagen mol. (Ed. impr.) ; 37(6): 341-348, nov.-dic. 2018. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-178249

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El lipedema es un síndrome caracterizado por edema, acúmulo de grasa, dolor y hematomas en miembros inferiores que afecta principalmente a mujeres. Su diagnóstico actual se basa en criterios clínicos, dado que no tiene un diagnóstico de imagen de certeza. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue describir los hallazgos linfogammagráficos observados en pacientes con lipedema. Material y método: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo de mujeres con criterios clínicos de lipedema a las que se realizó una linfogammagrafía. Dos médicos nucleares independientes describieron y clasificaron los hallazgos linfogammagráficos en diferentes grados de gravedad, en función de la migración y de la distribución del radiofármaco. Fueron incluidas 83 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 49,7años (rango: 18-80) y un índice medio de masa corporal (IMC) de 29,9kg/m2 (IC95%: 28,4-31,3). Resultados: En el 47% de las pacientes se observó alguna alteración en la linfogammagrafía, siendo en la mayoría de bajo grado (35,9%) o de grado bajo-moderado (48,7%). Ninguna presentó afectación severa (no migración del radiofármaco). El grado de afectación linfogammagráfica no presentó relación con la edad (p=0,674), ni con el signo de Stemmer (p=0,506), ni con el IMC (p=0,832). Encontramos hallazgos linfogammagráficos en todos los estadios clínicos de lipedema, sin diferencias significativas entre el grado de afectación linfogammagráfico y el estadio clínico del lipedema (p=0,142). Conclusión: Aunque la linfogammagrafía se ha empleado para diferenciar lipedema de linfedema, encontramos alteraciones frecuentes en las pacientes con lipedema, por lo que la presencia de hallazgos no descarta el diagnóstico de lipedema


Introduction: Lipedema is a syndrome that is characterised by edema, an accumulation of fat, pain and haematomas in the lower limbs that principally affects women. Diagnosis is currently based on clinical criteria, since there is no accurate diagnostic imaging for the condition. The aim of our study was to describe the lymphoscintigraphic findings in patients with lipedema. Material and method: A prospective cohort study of women with clinical criteria of lipedema who underwent lymphoscintigraphy. Two independent nuclear physicians described and classified the lymphoscintigraphy findings in different grades of severity, according to the migration and distribution of the radiopharmaceutical. Eighty three patients were included with a median age of 49.7years (range: 18-80) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.9kg/m2 (95%CI: 28.4-31.3) Results: Lymphoscintigraphy showed alterations in 47% of the patients, most were low (35.9%) or low-moderate grade (48.7%). None of the patients were severely affected (no migration of the radiopharmaceutical). The degree of lymphoscintigraphic involvement bore no relation to age (P=.674), Stemmer's sign (P=.506), or BMI (P=.832). We found lymphoscintigraphy findings in all the clinical stages of lipedema, with no significant differences between the grade of lymphoscintigraphic involvement and the clinical stage of lipedema (P=.142). Conclusion: Although lymphoscintigraphy has been used to differentiate lipedema from lymphedema, we found frequent alterations in the patients with lipedema, therefore the presence of findings dues not discount a diagnosis of lip1aedema


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Lymphoscintigraphy/methods , Lipedema/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Lymphedema/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential
8.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30166264

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema is a syndrome that is characterised by edema, an accumulation of fat, pain and haematomas in the lower limbs that principally affects women. Diagnosis is currently based on clinical criteria, since there is no accurate diagnostic imaging for the condition. The aim of our study was to describe the lymphoscintigraphic findings in patients with lipedema. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective cohort study of women with clinical criteria of lipedema who underwent lymphoscintigraphy. Two independent nuclear physicians described and classified the lymphoscintigraphy findings in different grades of severity, according to the migration and distribution of the radiopharmaceutical. Eighty three patients were included with a median age of 49.7years (range: 18-80) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.9kg/m2 (95%CI: 28.4-31.3) RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy showed alterations in 47% of the patients, most were low (35.9%) or low-moderate grade (48.7%). None of the patients were severely affected (no migration of the radiopharmaceutical). The degree of lymphoscintigraphic involvement bore no relation to age (P=.674), Stemmer's sign (P=.506), or BMI (P=.832). We found lymphoscintigraphy findings in all the clinical stages of lipedema, with no significant differences between the grade of lymphoscintigraphic involvement and the clinical stage of lipedema (P=.142). CONCLUSION: Although lymphoscintigraphy has been used to differentiate lipedema from lymphedema, we found frequent alterations in the patients with lipedema, therefore the presence of findings dues not discount a diagnosis of lip1aedema.


Subject(s)
Lipedema/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoscintigraphy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult
9.
Cir Pediatr ; 29(1): 35-40, 2016 Jan 25.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27911069

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Lymphatic disease is a rarely cause of some very unspecific genitourinary manifestations, assuming a diagnostic challenge in most cases. The aim of this paper is to warn about the possible etiology of these urological lymphatic presentations and discuss its management. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical data in pediatric patients with urological pathology of lymphatic origin between 2008-2014. Three patients, two boys and a girl, were included. The complaints were: redundant prepuce, inguinal scrotal tumor and urinary incontinence. Clinical, diagnosis and treatment protocol is described. RESULTS: The first case is a male with genital lymphedema presented at birth as a redundant prepuce and the subsequent emergence of lower limb lymphedema, treated with compression bandages. The second case, a groin lymphangioma which debuted as a sudden painless inguinal tumor simulating a cord cyst, it was sclerosed and treated with OK- 432. Finally, a preteen who consulted for involuntary leakage of urine, genital lymphedema likely primary cause (lymphodisplasia) or malformation was diagnosed, which improved with two Lipiodol® embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Genitourinary manifestations can be the debut of more complex lymphatic pathology, so it is necessary to consider this cause, uncommon and nonspecific. Its management must be conservative initially by compression bandages, OK-432 or embolization with Lipiodol®.


OBJETIVOS: La patología linfática es infrecuente como causa de manifestaciones genitourinarias inespecíficas, suponiendo un reto diagnóstico en la mayoría de los casos. El objetivo de este trabajo es advertir sobre la posible etiología linfática de estas presentaciones urológicas y discutir su manejo. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Revisión retrospectiva de los datos clínicos de los pacientes pediátricos con patología urológica de origen linfático entre el año 2008-2014. Se incluyeron 3 pacientes, dos niños y una niña. Todos ellos se evaluaron para obtener un diagnóstico fiable. Los motivos de consulta fueron: prepucio redundante, tumoración inguino-escrotal e incontinencia urinaria. Se describe la clínica, el protocolo diagnóstico y el tratamiento de los mismos. CASOS CLINICOS: El primer caso se trata de un lactante varón con un linfedema genital que presentaba un prepucio redundante congénito y la aparición posterior de linfedema en el miembro inferior que es tratado con vendajes compresivos. El siguiente, un linfangioma inguinal que debutó con una tumoración inguinal indolora de aparición súbita simulando un quiste de cordón y tratado mediante esclerosis con OK-432. Por último, una preadolescente que consultó por escapes involuntarios de orina diagnosticada de linfedema genital de probable causa primaria (linfodisplasia) o malformativa que mejoró con dos embolizaciones de Lipiodol®. CONCLUSIONES: Las manifestaciones genitourinarias pueden ser el debut de una patología linfática más compleja, por ello es necesario tener presente esta etiología infrecuente e inespecífica. Su manejo inicialmente debe ser conservador, mediante vendajes compresivos, OK-432 o embolización con Lipiodol®.


Subject(s)
Lymphangioma/therapy , Lymphedema/complications , Penis/abnormalities , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods , Child , Compression Bandages , Ethiodized Oil/therapeutic use , Female , Groin , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lower Extremity , Lymphedema/therapy , Male , Picibanil/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Incontinence/etiology
10.
Cir. pediátr ; 29(1): 35-40, ene. 2016. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-158258

ABSTRACT

Objetivos. La patología linfática es infrecuente como causa de manifestaciones genitourinarias inespecíficas, suponiendo un reto diagnóstico en la mayoría de los casos. El objetivo de este trabajo es advertir sobre la posible etiología linfática de estas presentaciones urológicas y discutir su manejo. Material y métodos. Revisión retrospectiva de los datos clínicos de los pacientes pediátricos con patología urológica de origen linfático entre el año 2008-2014. Se incluyeron 3 pacientes, dos niños y una niña. Todos ellos se evaluaron para obtener un diagnóstico fiable. Los motivos de consulta fueron: prepucio redundante, tumoración inguino-escrotal e incontinencia urinaria. Se describe la clínica, el protocolo diagnóstico y el tratamiento de los mismos. Casos clínicos. El primer caso se trata de un lactante varón con un linfedema genital que presentaba un prepucio redundante congénito y la aparición posterior de linfedema en el miembro inferior que es tratado con vendajes compresivos. El siguiente, un linfangioma inguinal que debutó con una tumoración inguinal indolora de aparición súbita simulando un quiste de cordón y tratado mediante esclerosis con OK-432. Por último, una preadolescente que consultó por escapes involuntarios de orina diagnosticada de linfedema genital de probable causa primaria (linfodisplasia) o malformativa que mejoró con dos embolizaciones de Lipiodol®. Conclusiones. Las manifestaciones genitourinarias pueden ser el debut de una patología linfática más compleja, por ello es necesario tener presente esta etiología infrecuente e inespecífica. Su manejo inicialmente debe ser conservador, mediante vendajes compresivos, OK-432 o embolización con Lipiodol®


Objectives. Lymphatic disease is a rarely cause of some very unspecific genitourinary manifestations, assuming a diagnostic challenge in most cases. The aim of this paper is to warn about the possible etiology of these urological lymphatic presentations and discuss its management. Methods. Retrospective review of clinical data in pediatric patients with urological pathology of lymphatic origin between 2008-2014. Three patients, two boys and a girl, were included. The complaints were: redundant prepuce, inguinal scrotal tumor and urinary incontinence. Clinical, diagnosis and treatment protocol is described. Results. The first case is a male with genital lymphedema presented at birth as a redundant prepuce and the subsequent emergence of lower limb lymphedema, treated with compression bandages. The second case, a groin lymphangioma which debuted as a sudden painless inguinal tumor simulating a cord cyst, it was sclerosed and treated with OK- 432. Finally, a preteen who consulted for involuntary leakage of urine, genital lymphedema likely primary cause (lymphodisplasia) or malformation was diagnosed, which improved with two Lipiodol® embolization. Conclusions. Genitourinary manifestations can be the debut of more complex lymphatic pathology, so it is necessary to consider this cause, uncommon and nonspecific. Its management must be conservative initially by compression bandages, OK-432 or embolization with Lipiodol®


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child , Lymphedema/surgery , Lymphangioma/surgery , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Occlusive Dressings , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods
11.
Int Angiol ; 32(6): 541-74, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24212289

ABSTRACT

Primary lymphedema can be managed effectively as a form of chronic lymphedema by a sequenced and targeted treatment and management program based around a combination of Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy (DLT) with compression therapy, when the latter is desired as an adjunct to DLT. Treatment in the maintenance phase should include compression garments, self-management, including self-massage, meticulous personal hygiene and skin care, in addition to lymphtransport-promoting excercises and activities, and, if desired, pneumatic compression therapy applied in the home. When conservative treatment fails, or gives sub-optimal outcomes, the management of primary lymphedema can be improved, where appropriate, with the proper addition of surgical interventions, either reconstructive or ablative. These two surgical therapies can be more effective when fully integrated with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD)-based DLT postoperatively. Compliance with a long-term commitment to MLD/DLT and particularly compression postoperatively is a critical factor in determining the success of any new treatment strategy involving either reconstructive or palliative surgery. The future of management of primary lymphedema has never been brighter with the new prospect of gene-and perhaps stem-cell oriented management.


Subject(s)
Drainage/standards , Lymphedema/diagnosis , Lymphedema/therapy , Chronic Disease , Combined Modality Therapy , Consensus , Drainage/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Lymphedema/physiopathology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Int Angiol ; 31(4): 316-29, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22801397

ABSTRACT

Chronic edema is a multifactorial condition affecting patients with various diseases. Although the pathophysiology of edema varies, compression therapy is a basic tenant of treatment, vital to reducing swelling. Clinical trials are disparate or lacking regarding specific protocols and application recommendations for compression materials and methodology to enable optimal efficacy. Compression therapy is a basic treatment modality for chronic leg edema; however, the evidence base for the optimal application, duration and intensity of compression therapy is lacking. The aim of this document was to present the proceedings of a day-long international expert consensus group meeting that examined the current state of the science for the use of compression therapy in chronic edema. An expert consensus group met in Brighton, UK, in March 2010 to examine the current state of the science for compression therapy in chronic edema of the lower extremities. Panel discussions and open space discussions examined the current literature, clinical practice patterns, common materials and emerging technologies for the management of chronic edema. This document outlines a proposed clinical research agenda focusing on compression therapy in chronic edema. Future trials comparing different compression devices, materials, pressures and parameters for application are needed to enhance the evidence base for optimal chronic oedema management. Important outcomes measures and methods of pressure and oedema quantification are outlined. Future trials are encouraged to optimize compression therapy in chronic edema of the lower extremities.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Edema/therapy , Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices/standards , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Research Design/standards , Stockings, Compression/standards , Chronic Disease , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Consensus , Cooperative Behavior , Edema/diagnosis , Edema/etiology , Edema/physiopathology , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , International Cooperation , Treatment Outcome
13.
Lymphology ; 45(3): 91-102, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23342929

ABSTRACT

This retrospective study was carried out at eight Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) Centers worldwide on 33 newborns presenting at birth with pleural, pericardial, or abdominal chylous effusions. Diagnosis of chylous effusion is based on findings of fluid with a milk-like appearance, a concentration of triglycerides in pleural effusion >1.1 mmol/l, and a total cell count >1,000 cells/ml with a predominance of >80% lymphocytes. Thirty-three newborns met the inclusion criteria and were studied. Six subjects who presented at birth with fetal effusion were treated by in-utero pleuro-amniotic shunt. Five of these patients are alive at follow-up. At birth, pleural drainage was performed in 29/33 patients and abdominal drainage was carried out in 3/33. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was given to 32/33 patients; 19/23 patients were fed a medium-chain triglycerides (MCT). No adverse effects were observed. Eight patients were treated with Octreotide at dosages ranging from 1 to 7 mcg/kg/hour for 8 to 35 days. All patients showed decreased chylous production. Two patients were treated by pleurodesis. Twenty-two babies are alive after at least 6 months follow-up, 9/33 are deceased, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Clinical conditions of survivors are basically good except for lung involvement [chronic lung disease (CLD) or lung lymphangiectasia] and lymphedema. All patients were using a MCT diet at follow-up with good control of chylous effusion. Visceral chylous effusions of the fetus and neonate are rare disorders, and there currently is only partial agreement on decision-making strategies. We suggest the need for an international prospective trial in an effort to establish the efficacy and effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options described in this article.


Subject(s)
Chylothorax/congenital , Chylous Ascites/congenital , Chylothorax/diagnosis , Chylothorax/therapy , Chylous Ascites/diagnosis , Chylous Ascites/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Triglycerides/administration & dosage
14.
Clin Obes ; 2(3-4): 86-95, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25586162

ABSTRACT

Lipedema is a disproportionate, symmetrical fatty swelling characterized by pain and bruising existing almost exclusively among women. We undertook a systematic review of the available literature about lipedema, given the lack of knowledge and little evidence about this disorder especially among obesity experts. Diagnosis of lipedema is usually based on clinical features. Symmetrical edema in the lower limbs with fatty deposits located to hips and thighs usually appears at puberty and often affects several members of the same family. Main disorders considered for differential diagnosis are lymphedema, obesity, lipohypertrophy and phlebedema. Treatment protocols comprise conservative (decongestive lymphatic therapy) and surgical (liposuction) approaches. Early diagnosis and treatment are mandatory for this disorder otherwise gradual enlargement of fatty deposition causes impaired mobility and further comorbidities like arthrosis and lymphatic insufficiency.

15.
Int Angiol ; 29(5): 442-53, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20924349

ABSTRACT

AIM: A mainstay of lymphedema management involves the use of compression therapy. Compression therapy application is variable at different levels of disease severity. Evidence is scant to direct clinicians in best practice regarding compression therapy use. Further, compression clinical trials are fragmented and poorly extrapolable to the greater population. An ideal construct for conducting clinical trials in regards to compression therapy will promote parallel global initiatives based on a standard research agenda. The purpose of this article is to review current evidence in practice regarding compression therapy for BCRL management and based on this evidence, offer an expert consensus recommendation for a research agenda and prescriptive trials. Recommendations herein focus solely on compression interventions. METHODS: This document represents the proceedings of a session organized by the International Compression Club (ICC) in June 2009 in Ponzano (Veneto, Italy). The purpose of the meeting was to enable a group of experts to discuss the existing evidence for compression treatment in breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) concentrating on areas where randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking. RESULTS: The current body of research suggests efficacy of compression interventions in the treatment and management of lymphedema. However, studies to date have failed to adequately address various forms of compression therapy and their optimal application in BCRL. We offer recommendations for standardized compression research trials for prophylaxis of arm lymphedema and for the management of chronic BCRL. Suggestions are also made regarding; inclusion and exclusion criteria, measurement methodology and additional variables of interest for researchers to capture. CONCLUSION: This document should inform future research trials in compression therapy and serve as a guide to clinical researchers, industry researchers and lymphologists regarding the strengths, weaknesses and shortcomings of the current literature. By providing this construct for research trials, the authors aim to support evidence-based therapy interventions, promote a cohesive, standardized and informative body of literature to enhance clinical outcomes, improve the quality of future research trials, inform industry innovation and guide policy related to BCRL.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Compression Bandages , Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices , Lymphedema/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Research Design , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Lymphedema/etiology , Lymphedema/physiopathology , Pressure , Treatment Outcome
16.
Rehabilitación (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 44(supl.1): 14-20, oct. 2010. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-143550

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Realizar una revisión y actualización del diagnóstico diferencial del linfedema y de las pruebas complementarias necesarias y presentar un algoritmo simplificado del diagnóstico. Estrategia de búsqueda: Se buscaron los artículos originales en las principales bases de datos: National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines Finder de la National Electronic Library for Health del NHS británico, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Knowledge y Medline (1996–2009), y las monografías más relevantes sobre linfedema. Selección de estudios: Se valoró la relevancia de los artículos mediante la lectura del título y resumen, y se analizó el texto completo de aquellos considerados relevantes. Datos: El edema de miembro inferior puede aparecer por múltiples causas y puede ser difícil de diagnosticar adecuadamente. Se deben descartar las causas sistémicas, como la insuficiencia cardiaca congestiva, la hipoalbuminemia, la insuficiencia renal, el síndrome nefrótico y la hepatopatía avanzada. Las causas locales, como el linfedema, el flebedema y el lipedema son más difíciles de diagnosticar (AU)


Objective: To review and update the existing knowledge regarding the differential diagnosis of lymphedema and the necessary complementary tests and to present a simplified algorithm for the diagnosis. Search strategy: A search was made of the original articles in the major databases: Clearinghouse National Guidelines, Guidelines Finder of the National electronic Library for Health of Britannic NHS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Knowledge and MEDLINE (1996–2009), and for the most relevant monographs on lymphedema. Articles selection: The relevance of the articles was evaluated by initial reading of the title and abstract and the full text of those considered relevant was analyzed. Data: Lower limb edema may appear due to multiple causes and may be difficult to diagnose adequately. Systemic causes such as hypoalbuminemia, congestive heart failure, kidney failure, nephrotic syndrome and advanced liver disease need to be ruled out. Local causes such as lymphedema, phleboedema and lipedema are more difficult to diagnose (AU)


Subject(s)
Lymphedema/diagnosis , Lymphatic System/physiopathology , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Diagnosis, Differential , Lipedema/diagnosis , Phlebitis/diagnosis , Lymphoscintigraphy , Lymphography , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
17.
Rehabilitación (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 44(supl.1): 21-28, oct. 2010. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-143551

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Realizar una revisión y una actualización de los conocimientos existentes respecto a los diferentes métodos de medición del linfedema y los criterios diagnósticos relacionados, cuestiones muy debatidas en las sociedades internacionales de linfología. Estrategia de búsqueda: Se buscaron los artículos originales en las principales bases de datos: Clearinghouse National Guidelines, Guidelines Finder de la National electronic Library for Health del NHS británico, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Knowledge y MEDLINE (1996–2009) y las monografías más relevantes sobre linfedema. Selección de estudios: Se valoró la relevancia de los artículos mediante la lectura del título y el resumen, y aquellos considerados relevantes fueron recuperados a texto completo para su análisis posterior. Datos: La medición del tamaño del miembro constituye el aspecto central del diagnóstico y la valoración del linfedema, pudiendo realizarse mediante medidas perimetrales (criometría) o volumetría directa o indirecta. Otras técnicas cuantifican aspectos como las propiedades mecánicas o físicas de los tejidos (AU)


Objective: To review and update the existing knowledge regarding the different methods of measurement of lymphedema and diagnostic criteria, these being very debated issues in international societies of lymphology. Search strategy: Original articles were searched for in major databases: Clearinghouse National Guidelines, Guidelines Finder of the National electronic Library for Health of Britannic NHS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Knowledge and MEDLINE (1996–2009), and the most relevant monographs on Lymphedema. Study selection: The relevance of the articles was evaluated by initial reading of the title and abstract and the full text of those considered relevant was analyzed. Data: The main aspect of the diagnosis and assessment of lymphedema is the measurement of the size of the limb that can be done by circumference measurement or by direct or indirect volumetry. Other methods assess physical or mechanical properties of tissues (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Lymphedema/pathology , Cell Enlargement , Cell Size , Lymphedema/physiopathology , Lymphatic System/physiopathology , Breast Neoplasms/complications
18.
Physiol Meas ; 29(4): N21-31, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18401071

ABSTRACT

A common problem shared by accelerometers, inertial sensors and any motion measurement method based on skin-mounted sensors is the movement of the soft tissues covering the bones. The aim of this work is to propose a method for the validation of the attachment of skin-mounted sensors. A second-order (mass-spring-damper) model was proposed to characterize the behaviour of the soft tissue between the bone and the sensor. Three sets of experiments were performed. In the first one, different procedures to excite the system were evaluated to select an adequate excitation stimulus. In the second one, the selected stimulus was applied under varying attachment conditions while the third experiment was used to test the model. The heel drop was chosen as the excitation method because it showed lower variability and could discriminate between different attachment conditions. There was, in agreement with the model, a trend to increase the natural frequency of the system with decreasing accelerometer mass. An important result is the development of a standard procedure to test the bandwidth of skin-mounted inertial sensors, such as accelerometers mounted on the skin or markers heavier than a few grams.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Biosensing Techniques , Movement/physiology , Skin Physiological Phenomena , Biomechanical Phenomena , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Elasticity , Gait/physiology , Humans , Models, Statistical , Reproducibility of Results
19.
J Wound Care ; 16(5): 235-9, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17552410

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A prospective evaluation to explore the effect of treating patients with chronic lower limb lymphoedema and lymphatic ulcers using a nanocrystalline dressing and multilayer bandaging. METHOD: Ulcers were cleansed and dressed with a nanocrystalline silver dressing, an alginate dressing and a hydrocellular dressing, followed by multilayer short-stretch compression bandages. A digital planimetry system was used to calculate the ulcer surface area. In cases of multiple ulcers, the areas were added together. RESULTS: Eight patients with chronic lower limb lymphoedema plus ulcers were included. Median age was 53.7 years (range 39.2-72.3). Mean ulcer size was 10.5cm2 (range: 0.8-33.8). All ulcers completely healed after one to nine weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: This protocol has been effective in healing lymphatic ulcers and was well accepted by patients. There were no adverse effects or withdrawals. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are required to support these results.


Subject(s)
Bandages , Leg Ulcer/therapy , Lymphedema/complications , Nanoparticles/therapeutic use , Silver Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Leg Ulcer/etiology , Leg Ulcer/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Wound Healing/drug effects
20.
Rehabilitación (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 38(2): 51-58, mar. 2004. tab, graf
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-30795

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La valoración del lesionado medular se realiza con la escala de la American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) para medir el déficit, la Medida de la Independencia Funcional (MIF) (Functional Independence Measure, FIM) para medir discapacidad, el Baremo de la Ley 30/95 para indemnizar las secuelas y las tablas de minusvalía. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las diferencias existentes en la valoración entre un grupo de pacientes con lesión medular cervical y otro dorsal, mediante estas cuatro escalas de valoración. Pacientes y método. Se incluyeron 19 pacientes varones con lesión medular completa traumática, 7 tetrapléjicos C6 y 12 parapléjicos entre D2-D11, con una media de edad de 23,2 años. Se evaluaron con las 4 escalas y se definió un modelo matemático, el "grado de diferencia relativa", para cuantificar objetivamente el grado de diferencia que presentan las escalas entre tetrapléjicos y parapléjicos. Resultado. Todas las escalas presentan diferencias en la puntuación entre tetrapléjicos y parapléjicos (p < 0,0001) y todas mantienen una asociación lineal entre sí y con la puntuación motora de la escala ASIA, siendo la MIF (R de Pearson: 0,924) y el baremo de tráfico (R: -0,887) las que presentan un mayor índice de correlación. Al calcular el grado de diferencia relativa, la MIF detecta una diferencia del 42 por ciento entre tetrapléjicos y parapléjicos; la escala ASIA un 29,8 por ciento, el baremo el 13,1 por ciento y las tablas de minusvalía sólo el 2,4 por ciento. Conclusiones. Las diferencias encontradas en el baremo y en las tablas de minusvalía entre tetrapléjicos y parapléjicos no se ajustan a las diferencias clínicas y funcionales existentes entre ellos (AU)


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Male , Humans , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Paraplegia/etiology , Quadriplegia/etiology , Trauma Severity Indices , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disabled Persons
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...