Acute Toxicity of Hypofractionated and Conventionally Fractionated (Chemo)Radiotherapy Regimens for Bladder Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the RAIDER Trial.

AIMS: Adding concurrent (chemo)therapy to radiotherapy improves outcomes for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. A recent meta-analysis showed superior invasive locoregional disease control for a hypofractionated 55 Gy in 20 fractions schedule compared with 64 Gy in 32 fractions. In the RAIDER clinical trial, patients undergoing 20 or 32 fractions of radical radiotherapy were randomised (1:1:2) to standard radiotherapy or to standard-dose or escalated-dose adaptive radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant therapy were permitted. We report exploratory analyses of acute toxicity by concomitant therapy-fractionation schedule combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants had unifocal bladder urothelial carcinoma staged T2-T4a N0 M0. Acute toxicity was assessed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) weekly during radiotherapy and at 10 weeks after the start of treatment. Within each fractionation cohort, non-randomised comparisons of the proportion of patients reporting treatment emergent grade 2 or worse genitourinary, gastrointestinal or other adverse events at any point in the acute period were carried out using Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and April 2020, 345 (163 receiving 20 fractions; 182 receiving 32 fractions) patients were recruited from 46 centres. The median age was 73 years; 49% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 71% received concomitant therapy, with 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C most commonly used: 44/114 (39%) receiving 20 fractions; 94/130 (72%) receiving 32 fractions. The acute grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity rate was higher in those receiving concomitant therapy compared with radiotherapy alone in the 20-fraction cohort [54/111 (49%) versus 7/49 (14%), P < 0.001] but not in the 32-fraction cohort (P = 0.355). Grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity was highest for gemcitabine, with evidence of significant differences across therapies in the 32-fraction cohort (P = 0.006), with a similar pattern but no significant differences in the 20-fraction cohort (P = 0.099). There was no evidence of differences in grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity between concomitant therapies in either the 20- or 32-fraction cohorts. CONCLUSION: Grade 2+ acute adverse events are common. The toxicity profile varied by type of concomitant therapy; the gastrointestinal toxicity rate seemed to be higher in patients receiving gemcitabine.

Evolving Practice Pattern of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases from Lung Cancer in Australia.

AIMS: Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for bone metastases. Single-fraction conformal radiation therapy (SF-CRT) is equally effective as multifraction radiation therapy for the management of uncomplicated bone metastases. There has been a rapid development of advanced radiation therapy techniques (ART) in radiation oncology. We evaluated the changing pattern of SF-CRT and ART use for the management of bone metastases in lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a state-wide population-based cohort of lung cancer patients from Victoria, Australia, who received radiation therapy for bone metastases between 2012 and 2017. The primary outcomes were proportion of radiation therapy courses using: SF-CRT and ART. We identified a subcohort in which radiation therapy was delivered at the end of life (EOL), i.e. within 30 days of death. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate the change in pattern of SF-CRT and ART use over time. Multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 4335 courses of radiation therapy for bone metastases in lung cancer, 20% were SF-CRT - increasing from 19% in 2012 to 26% in 2017 (P-trend = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, treatment to the rib, shoulder, hip or extremities, and treatment in public institutions were independently associated with SF-CRT use, but the effect of year of radiation therapy was no longer significant. Five per cent of radiation therapy was delivered using ART, increasing markedly from 2016 onwards (P-trend < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, treatment in private institutions and more recent years of treatment were independently associated with the use of ART. There were 587 courses of radiation therapy delivered at the EOL, with SF-CRT more commonly used closer to death - 53%, 29% and 25% of radiation therapy within 7 days, 8-14 days and 15-30 days of death, respectively. CONCLUSION: SF-CRT continued to be underutilised for bone metastases in lung cancer in Australia, including at the EOL. We observed an increase in ART use for bone metastases from 2016, which occurred contemporaneously with changes in government funding.

Vertebral Fractures Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multi-institutional Analysis of Patient Outcomes.

AIMS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a locally ablative therapy used for the treatment of patients with spine metastases. However, it is associated with higher rates of vertebral compression fractures (VCF) than conventionally fractionated palliative radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of VCF following spine SBRT and to identify the risk factors associated with this outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at two Australian institutions from January 2015 to March 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient, tumour and treatment factors. The Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were applied in univariate and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with VCF, local control and overall survival. RESULTS: We evaluated 113 spinal segments from 84 patients, with a median follow-up time of 11.9 months. The median dose and fractionation utilised was 30 Gy in three fractions (67.3%), with a single-fraction rate of 0.9%. The median Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of the lesions was 4/18, with most (84.1%) being SINS stable, scoring between 0 and 6. Five VCFs were observed (three progression of pre-existing fractures and two de novo), a cumulative VCF risk of 4.4%. Four of five fractures occurred within the first year after treatment, with a median time to VCF of 9.2 months. A pre-existing VCF (P = 0.011) was associated with subsequent fracture on multivariable analysis, whereas all VCF segments displayed lytic disease appearance. All fractures were managed conservatively with analgesia, without requirement for subsequent surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: SBRT to spine metastases is safe with respect to VCF, with rates around the lower limit observed in similar studies. Knowledge of factors that predispose to post-treatment fracture, such as pre-existing compression, lytic vertebral disease and SINS >6 will aid in the counselling and selection of patients for this therapy.

Assessment of Intrafraction Motion of the Urinary Bladder Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (cineMRI).

AIM: To assess the intrafraction motion of the urinary bladder and delineate the appropriate margin size for radiotherapy planning, for both the full and empty bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-site, single-arm study of 20 patients planned to undergo radical cystectomy for histologically confirmed muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (cineMRI) of the entire pelvis using a 3-Tesla system, prior to cystectomy. Patients first underwent a cineMRI with a full bladder, then voided and underwent a second MRI with an empty bladder. All MRI sequences were acquired over 18 min. We assessed the differences in bladder filling and subsequent bladder wall displacement, between the empty and full bladder, during a time period consistent with radiotherapy treatment delivery. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent cineMRI of the entire pelvis. The maximum mean directional displacements of the bladder walls over the 18 min duration of the scan for the empty bladders were 9.8 mm superiorly, 1.1 mm inferiorly, 2.39 mm anteriorly, 3.73 mm posteriorly, 2.74 mm to the left and 2.48 mm to the right. The maximal mean displacements for the full bladders were 9.2 mm superiorly, 1.1 mm inferiorly, 2.28 mm anteriorly, 1.08 mm posteriorly, 1.85 mm to the left and 1.73 mm to the right. Statistically significant differences were seen in the posterior, left and right displacements but were quantitatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Intrafractional motion secondary to bladder filling showed minimal variation between the full and empty bladder. Similar clinical target volume to planning target volume margins can be applied for the delivery of radiotherapy for a full and empty bladder.

Real-time Image-guided Adaptive-predictive Prostate Radiotherapy using Rectal Diameter as a Predictor of Motion.

AIMS: To investigate a relationship between maximum rectal diameter (MRD) on pre-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intra-fraction prostate motion, in the context of an adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MRD was measured on 2125 CBCTs from 55 retrospective patient datasets and related to prostate displacement from intra-fraction imaging. A linear regression model was developed to determine a threshold MRD associated with a high probability of small prostate displacement. Standard and reduced adaptive margin plans were created to compare rectum and bladder normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) with each method. RESULTS: A per-protocol analysis carried out on 1910 fractions from 51 patients showed with 90% confidence that for a MRD≤3 cm, prostate displacement will be ≤5 mm and that for a MRD≤3.5 cm, prostate displacement will be ≤5.5 mm. In the first scenario, if adaptive therapy was used instead of standard therapy, median reductions in NTCP for rectum and bladder were 0.5% (from 9.5% to 9%) and 1.3% (from 6.6% to 5.3%), respectively. In the second scenario, the NTCP for rectum and bladder would have median reductions of 1.1% and 2.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a potential method for adaptive prostate IGRT based upon predicting small prostate intra-fraction motion by measuring MRD on pre-treatment CBCT.

A Multidisciplinary Evaluation of a Web-based eLearning Training Programme for SAFRON II (TROG 13.01): a Multicentre Randomised Study of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Lung Metastases.

AIMS: In technically advanced multicentre clinical trials, participating centres can benefit from a credentialing programme before participating in the trial. Education of staff in participating centres is an important aspect of a successful clinical trial. In the multicentre study of fractionated versus single fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in lung oligometastases (TROG 13.01), knowledge transfer of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy techniques to the local multidisciplinary team is intended as part of the credentialing process. In this study, a web-based learning platform was developed to provide education and training for the multidisciplinary trial teams at geographically distinct sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based platform using eLearning software consisting of seven training modules was developed. These modules were based on extracranial stereotactic theory covering the following discrete modules: Clinical background; Planning technique and evaluation; Planning optimisation; Four-dimensional computed tomography simulation; Patient-specific quality assurance; Cone beam computed tomography and image guidance; Contouring organs at risk. Radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation therapists from hospitals in Australia and New Zealand were invited to participate in this study. Each discipline was enrolled into a subset of modules (core modules) and was evaluated before and after completing each module. The effectiveness of the eLearning training will be evaluated based on (i) knowledge retention after participation in the web-based training and (ii) confidence evaluation after participation in the training. Evaluation consisted of a knowledge test and confidence evaluation using a Likert scale. RESULTS: In total, 130 participants were enrolled into the eLearning programme: 81 radiation therapists (62.3%), 27 medical physicists (20.8%) and 22 radiation oncologists (16.9%). There was an average absolute improvement of 14% in test score (P < 0.001) after learning. This score improvement compared with initial testing was also observed in the long-term testing (>4 weeks) after completing the modules (P < 0.001). For most there was significant increase in confidence (P < 0.001) after completing all the modules.

Calculating radiotherapy margins based on Bayesian modelling of patient specific random errors.

Collected real-life clinical target volume (CTV) displacement data show that some patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) demonstrate significantly more fraction-to-fraction variability in their displacement ('random error') than others. This contrasts with the common assumption made by historical recipes for margin estimation for EBRT, that the random error is constant across patients. In this work we present statistical models of CTV displacements in which random errors are characterised by an inverse gamma (IG) distribution in order to assess the impact of random error variability on CTV-to-PTV margin widths, for eight real world patient cohorts from four institutions, and for different sites of malignancy. We considered a variety of clinical treatment requirements and penumbral widths. The eight cohorts consisted of a total of 874 patients and 27 391 treatment sessions. Compared to a traditional margin recipe that assumes constant random errors across patients, for a typical 4 mm penumbral width, the IG based margin model mandates that in order to satisfy the common clinical requirement that 90% of patients receive at least 95% of prescribed RT dose to the entire CTV, margins be increased by a median of 10% (range over the eight cohorts -19% to +35%). This substantially reduces the proportion of patients for whom margins are too small to satisfy clinical requirements.

Comparison of Single-fraction and Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-staged Pulmonary Oligometastases.

AIM: To compare outcomes of single-fraction and multi-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for pulmonary metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review from two academic institutions of patients with one to three pulmonary metastases staged with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scans. For single-fraction SABR, 26 Gy was prescribed for peripheral targets and 18 Gy for central targets. In the multi-fraction cohort, 48 Gy/4 or 50 Gy/5 was prescribed for peripheral targets and 50 Gy/5 was prescribed for central targets. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were delivered using heterogeneity corrections. Conformity indices at an intermediate dose (R50%) and at a high dose (R100%) were used to assess a relationship with the planning target volume (PTV). Overall survival, local and distant progression and toxicity rates were analysed from the date of treatment completion. RESULTS: Between February 2010 and June 2013, 65 patients with 85 pulmonary metastases were reviewed. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. Metastases most commonly originated from colorectal cancer (31%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (25%). 3D-CRT was used in 52 targets, IMRT in 21 and VMAT in 12. 3D-CRT showed a lower median R50% (P=0.01), but a higher median R100% than IMRT/VMAT (P=0.04). The R50% index was inversely correlated to the PTV with all techniques (P=0.01). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years in all patients was 93% (95% confidence interval 87-100%) and 71% (95% confidence interval 58-86%), respectively. The 2 year freedom from local and distant progression was 93% (95% confidence interval 86-100%) and 38% (95% confidence interval 27-55%), respectively. There were no significant differences between overall survival (P=0 .14), time to distant progression (P=0.06) or toxicity rates (P=0.75) between single- and multi-fraction cohorts. CONCLUSION: We report comparable local control, overall survival and toxicity rates between single-fraction and multi-fraction SABR treatments in patients with FDG-PET-staged pulmonary oligometastases. We propose a guideline for R50% conformity incorporating 3D-CRT/IMRT/VMAT techniques with heterogeneity corrected planning algorithms.

Predictors of respiratory-induced lung tumour motion measured on four-dimensional computed tomography.

AIMS: The delivery of radical radiotherapy in lung cancer is complicated by respiratory-induced tumour motion. The aim of the study was to correlate tumour motion characteristics with tumour and patient factors, particularly the anatomical lobe and pulmonary zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lung tumour volumes on four-dimensional computed tomography were delineated by a single observer at maximal expiration and propagated through all 10 phases of the breathing cycle. Movements were tracked in the superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) directions by changes in the tumour centroid coordinates. Tumour motion characteristics were correlated with anatomical lobe, pulmonary zone, tumour volume, T-stage, smoking status and spirometry. RESULTS: In 101 consecutive patients, the median magnitude of tumour motion in the SI direction was significantly larger in tumours located in lower lobes compared with upper lobes and middle/lingular lobes (0.70 cm versus 0.09 cm versus 0.26 cm, P < 0.01). No significant difference was found in median tumour motion between lower, upper and middle/lingular lobes in the AP (0.16 cm versus 0.13 cm versus 0.16 cm, P = 0.45) and ML (0.08 cm versus 0.08 cm versus 0.13 cm, P = 0.32) directions, respectively. When assessed by zone, the median tumour displacement in the SI direction was significantly larger in the lower zones (0.81 cm) as compared with the middle zones (0.30 cm) and upper zones (0.11 cm), P < 0.01. No difference was observed in the AP (P = 0.45) and ML (P = 0.73) directions. Tumour volume, T-stage and forced expiratory ratio were not statistically significant predictors of respiratory-induced tumour motion. CONCLUSION: Respiratory-induced tumour motion in the SI direction was significantly greater in lower lobe and lower pulmonary zone tumours compared with apical tumours. Tumour volume, T-stage and spirometry did not correlate with the magnitude or direction of respiratory-induced tumour motion. During curative radiotherapy in lung cancer, attention should be paid to motion management, especially for lower lobe tumours.

Efficacy of high-dose palliative radiotherapy for localised, castration-resistant prostate cancer.

AIMS: There are limited outcome data after radiotherapy treatment for clinically localised, castration-resistant prostate cancer. We report our single institution experience on patient outcomes in this group using high-dose palliative radiotherapy (HDPRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patient hospital records was conducted in prostate cancer patients treated with palliative intent radiotherapy and restricted to those who had castration-resistant disease, no evidence of regional or distant disease and who received a local radiotherapy dose equivalent to 40 Gy or greater. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met the study criteria, 88% of these had high-risk disease at initial diagnosis. The median time to delivery of HDPRT was 66 months and the median follow-up from HDPRT was 54 months. Grade 3 or worse toxicity was experienced in 8%. The estimated freedom from local failure, cause-specific survival and overall survival at 5 years were 81, 65 and 35%, respectively. Local procedures were a significant contributor to local morbidity, with the most common procedure a transurethral resection of the prostate (27% patients). Only two patients died from complications of local failure. CONCLUSION: HDPRT was well tolerated and provided a high rate of local control in a clinically localised castration-resistant prostate cancer population. Although prostate cancer remained the most frequent cause of death, some patients had extended survival without evidence of disease progression.

Prostate bed radiation therapy: the utility of ultrasound volumetric imaging of the bladder.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of incorporating daily ultrasound scanning to reduce variation in bladder filling before prostate bed radiotherapy. The primary aim was to confirm that coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) with the 95% isodose was within tolerance when the ultrasound-determined bladder volume was within individualised patient limits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were acquired on 10 occasions during the course of treatment to assess systematic changes in rectal or bladder volume as part of a standard offline image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) protocol. In addition, through a two-part study an ultrasound scan of the bladder was added to the IGRT protocol. In the Part 1 study, the ultrasound-determined bladder volume at the time of treatment simulation in 26 patients was compared with the simulation computed tomography cranio-caudal bladder length. The relationship between the two was used to establish bladder volume tolerance limits for the interventional component of the Part 2 study. In the Part 2 study, 24 patients underwent ultrasound scanning before treatment. When bladder volumes were outside the specified limits, they were asked to drink more water or void as appropriate until the volume was within tolerance. RESULTS: Based on the results of the Part 1 study, a 100 ml tolerance was applied in the Part 2 study. Seventy-six per cent of patients found to have bladder volumes outside tolerance were able to satisfactorily adjust their bladder volumes on demand. Comparing the bladder volumes with the CBCT data revealed that the bladder scanner correctly predicted that the target volume would be accurately targeted (using surrogate end points) in 83% of treatment fractions. CONCLUSION: A simple hand-held ultrasound bladder scanner provides a practical, inexpensive, online solution to confirming that the bladder volume is within acceptable, patient-specific limits before treatment delivery, with the potential to improve overall treatment accuracy.

Comparison of margins, integral dose and interfraction target coverage with image-guided radiotherapy compared with non-image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer.

AIMS: To measure the difference in cumulative doses received by the bladder (target) and integral doses with different clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins, comparing set-up to skin tattoos versus image-guided radiotherapy to bone or soft tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four plans were generated on each planning computed tomography dataset using the CTV with 5, 10, 15, 20 mm PTV margins using a three-dimensional conformal four-field technique. Set-up data based on skin, bone and soft tissue to the bladder on pre-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were recorded. In total, 316 CBCTs were evaluable from 10 bladder cancer patients. Each CBCT was fused to the planning computed tomography dataset using the isocentre corresponding to each of the three pre-treatment matching conditions. The target was contoured on each CBCT and called the CTV of the day and the plan was re-calculated to determine the dose to this. RESULTS: The mean D95 with CTV to PTV margins of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mm for skin set-up was 89.4, 93.0, 97.2, 98.6; for bone 88.8, 92.6, 96.7, 98.6; and for soft tissue 96.3, 98.6, 98.7, 99.5. With soft-tissue matching, the mean (standard deviation) volume of normal tissue receiving 5 Gy with 5, 10, 15 and 20 mm margins was 3899 (1022), 4561 (1142), 5663 (1304) and 6315 (1426) in cm(3). CONCLUSION: Soft-tissue matching results in superior target coverage and a reduced integral dose to the surrounding tissues. With soft-tissue matching, increasing CTV to PTV margins progressively beyond 5 mm results in modest improvement in CTV coverage, but a large increase in integral dose.

A review of kidney motion under free, deep and forced-shallow breathing conditions: implications for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment.

Motion management strategies are important during stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for abdominal targets. The kidney is a mobile retroperitoneal organ that moves with respiration. A review of the literature was performed to investigate the reported degree of kidney motion associated with various breathing conditions. A structured search was performed using Medline from January 1970 to May 2013 for all publications describing cranial-caudal kidney motion. Relevance to radiotherapy practice was reviewed based on any breathing instructions and/or immobilization equipment that could affect breathing pattern. Studies were categorized under three types of breathing conditions: Forced-shallow, breath-hold/deep and free. A total of 25 publications were identified describing cranial-caudal kidney motion with a combined total of 415 participants. Three publications described forced-shallow breathing using prone positioning or abdominal compression plates. Prone positioning, compared to supine positioning, did little to minimise kidney motion, however use of compression plates can result in kidney motion of less than 5 mm. Eight publications described deep breathing/breath hold techniques that showed average kidney motion ranging between 10 mm-40 mm. Fifteen publications investigated kidney motion under free breathing with the majority reporting mean motion of less than 10 mm. Kidney movement of up to 8.1 mm in the anterior posterior direction and 6.2 mm laterally were reported with no indications that breathing technique can influence the extent of this motion. In summary, kidney movement is complex and consideration should be made to ensure that motion management strategies provide the desired radiotherapy benefit. There are limited publications on the effectiveness of abdominal compression on reducing kidney motion which warrant further investigation in this area.

Calculating geometrical margins for hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Formulae to calculate margins for external beam radiotherapy traditionally treat the radiotherapy regimen for analysis purposes as consisting of a very large number of treatment sessions, each delivering a very small dose. It is assumed that the difference in the calculated margin for an infinitely fractionated regimen, and the margin for real world treatment scenarios with finite fractions per patient, is negligible given the usual large number of fractions used to treat most malignancies. However hypofractionated radiotherapy using five fractions or even fewer is becoming increasingly common, causing the accuracy of traditional margin formulae to break down. This work introduces an algorithm that accurately calculates margins for hypofractionated treatment regimens. A method for estimating an upper limit for the required margin is introduced, and an adjustment to the van Herk formula (van Herk et al (2000 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 47 1121-35)) is used to provide a lower limit. A single-term mathematical model is then used to interpolate between these limits. Results are compared to those calculated by Monte Carlo simulation, demonstrating that the proposed method yields accurate estimates of the actual margin required (consistently within ~1%) for wide ranges of values of the systematic error, random error and penumbral width, even when the number of fractions per patient is as low as 2.

Bladder cancer radiotherapy margins: a comparison of daily alignment using skin, bone or soft tissue.

AIMS: To determine the clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins required for bladder coverage when using skin or bony or soft tissue matching on a daily basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with T2-T4 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were treated with daily online adaptive image-guided radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography. All daily CTVs were contoured by a single observer. A retrospective comparison of coverage of the bladder CTV using skin, bone and soft tissue matching was conducted. RESULTS: With the skin set-up, bladder CTV coverage with a margin of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 cm was 0, 19, 56, 93 and 96%, respectively. For the daily set-up based on bone, the respective coverage was 0, 41, 63, 89 and 96%. For soft tissue set-up based on the geometric centre of the bladder, coverage was 52, 89, 96, 100 and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on coverage of the CTV, the required CTV to PTV margins are smaller for the daily online soft tissue set-up compared with skin or bone.

Cost minimisation analysis: kilovoltage imaging with automated repositioning versus electronic portal imaging in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

AIMS: To compare the treatment time and cost of prostate cancer fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using orthogonal kilovoltage imaging (KVI) and automated couch shifts and orthogonal electronic portal imaging (EPI) and manual couch shifts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IGRT treatment delivery times were recorded automatically on either unit. Costing was calculated from real costs derived from the implementation of a new radiotherapy centre. To derive cost per minute for EPI and KVI units the total annual setting up and running costs were divided by the total annual working time. The cost per IGRT fraction was calculated by multiplying the cost per minute by the duration of treatment. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of our analysis. Treatment times without couch shift were compared. RESULTS: Time data were analysed for 8648 fractions, 6057 from KVI treatment and 2591 from EPI treatment from a total of 294 patients. The median time for KVI treatment was 6.0 min (interquartile range 5.1-7.4 min) and for EPI treatment it was 10.0 min (interquartile range 8.3-11.8 min) (P value < 0.0001). The cost per fraction for KVI was A$258.79 and for EPI was A$345.50. The cost saving per fraction for KVI varied between A$66.09 and A$101.64 by sensitivity analysis. In patients where no couch shift was made, the median treatment delivery time for EPI was 8.8 min and for KVI was 5.1 min. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment time is less on KVI units compared with EPI units. This is probably due to automation of couch shift and faster evaluation of imaging on KVI units. Annual running costs greatly outweigh initial setting up costs and therefore the cost per fraction was less with KVI, despite higher initial costs. The selection of appropriate IGRT equipment can make IGRT practical within radiotherapy departments.

Finding the optimal statistical model to describe target motion during radiotherapy delivery--a Bayesian approach.

Early approaches to characterizing errors in target displacement during a fractionated course of radiotherapy assumed that the underlying fraction-to-fraction variability in target displacement, known as the 'treatment error' or 'random error', could be regarded as constant across patients. More recent approaches have modelled target displacement allowing for differences in random error between patients. However, until recently it has not been feasible to compare the goodness of fit of alternate models of random error rigorously. This is because the large volumes of real patient data necessary to distinguish between alternative models have only very recently become available. This work uses real-world displacement data collected from 365 patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer to compare five candidate models for target displacement. The simplest model assumes constant random errors across patients, while other models allow for random errors that vary according to one of several candidate distributions. Bayesian statistics and Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation of the model parameters are used to compare model goodness of fit. We conclude that modelling the random error as inverse gamma distributed provides a clearly superior fit over all alternatives considered. This finding can facilitate more accurate margin recipes and correction strategies.

Patient-reported complications from fiducial marker implantation for prostate image-guided radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To report on complications from transrectal ultrasound-guided insertion of fiducial markers for prostate image-guided radiotherapy. METHODS: 234 patients who underwent transrectal fiducial marker insertion for prostate cancer image-guided radiotherapy were assessed retrospectively by questionnaire with regard to the duration and severity of eight symptoms experienced following the procedure. Pain during the implantation procedure was assessed according to the Wong-Baker faces pain scale. RESULTS: Of 234 patients, 32% had at least one new symptom after the procedure. The commonest new symptom following the procedure was urinary frequency affecting 16% of patients who had not been troubled by frequency beforehand. Haematuria, rectal bleeding, dysuria and haematospermia affected 9-13% of patients, mostly at Grade 1 or 2. Pain, obstruction, and fever and shivers affected 3-4% of patients. Grade 3 rectal bleeding, haematuria, fever and shivers, and urinary frequency affected 0.5-1.5% of patients. Only one patient had a Grade 4 complication (i.e. fever and shivers). Overall, 9% of patients had symptoms lasting more than 2 weeks. The commonest symptoms that lasted more than 2 weeks were frequency, dysuria, obstructive symptoms and rectal bleeding. Mean pain score during the procedure was 1.1 (range 0-5). CONCLUSION: Transrectal ultrasound-guided fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy is well tolerated in the majority of prostate cancer patients. Most symptoms were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. Symptoms in the majority of patients last under 2 weeks. The most serious complication was sepsis in our study.

Electronic portal imaging vs kilovoltage imaging in fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of set-up uncertainties.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare interfraction prostate displacement data between electronic portal imaging (EPI) and kilovoltage imaging (KVI) treatment units and discuss the impact of any difference on margin calculations for prostate cancer image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS: Prostate interfraction displacement data was collected prospectively for the first 4 fractions in 333 patients treated with IGRT with daily pre-treatment EPI or KVI orthogonal imaging. Displacement was recorded in the anteroposterior (AP), left-right (LR) and superoinferior (SI) directions. The proportion of displacement <3 mm and the difference in median absolute displacements were calculated in all directions. RESULTS: 1088 image pairs were analysed in total, 448 by EPI and 640 by KVI. There were 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18-28%) more displacements under 3 mm for EPI than for KVI in the AP direction, 14% (95% CI 10-19%) more in the LR direction and 10% (95% CI 5-15%) more in the SI direction. The differences in absolute median displacement (KVI>EPI) were AP 1 mm, LR 1 mm and SI 0.5 mm. Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed that distributions were significantly different for all three dimensions (p<0.0001 for AP and LR and p=0.02 for SI). CONCLUSION: EPI has a statistically significant smaller set-up error distribution than KVI. We would expect that, because fiducial marker imaging is less clear for EPI, the clinical target volume to planning target volume margin would be greater when using IGRT; however, relying wholly on displacement data gives the opposite result. We postulate that this is owing to observer bias, which is not accounted for in margin calculation formulas.

Interfraction patient motion and implant displacement in prostate high dose rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To quantify movement of prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment, using an in-house developed motion sensor in order to determine a relationship between patient movement and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy implant displacement. METHODS: An electronic motion sensor was developed based on a three axis accelerometer. HDR brachytherapy treatment for prostate is delivered at this institution in two fractions 24 h apart and 22 patients were monitored for movement over the interval between fractions. The motion sensors functioned as inclinometers, monitoring inclination of both thighs, and the inclination and roll of the abdomen. The implanted HDR brachytherapy catheter set was assessed for displacement relative to fiducial markers in the prostate. Angle measurements and angle differences over a 2 s time base were binned, and the standard deviations of the resulting frequency distributions used as a metric for patient motion in each monitored axis. These parameters were correlated to measured catheter displacement using regression modeling. RESULTS: The mean implant displacement was 12.6 mm in the caudal direction. A mean of 19.95 h data was recorded for the patient cohort. Patients generally moved through a limited range of angles with a mean of the exception of two patients who spent in excess of 2 h lying on their side. When tested for a relationship between movement in any of the four monitored axes and the implant displacement, none was significant. CONCLUSIONS: It is not likely that patient movement influences HDR prostate implant displacement. There may be benefits to patient comfort if nursing protocols were relaxed to allow patients greater freedom to move while the implant is in situ.