Comparison of preoxygenation using a tight facemask, humidified high-flow nasal oxygen and a standard nasal cannula - a volunteer, randomised, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Preoxygenation before anaesthesia induction is routinely performed via a tight-fitting facemask or humidified high-flow nasal oxygen. We hypothesised that effective preoxygenation, assessed by end-tidal oxygen (EtO 2 ) levels, can also be performed via a standard nasal cannula. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy of preoxygenation between a traditional facemask, humidified high-flow nasal oxygen and a standard nasal cannula. DESIGN: A volunteer, randomised, crossover study. SETTING: Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm. The study was conducted between 2 May and 31 May 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty cardiopulmonary healthy volunteers aged 25-65 years with a BMI <30. INTERVENTIONS: Preoxygenation using a traditional facemask, humidified high-flow nasal oxygen and standard nasal cannula. Volunteers were preoxygenated with all three methods, at various flow rates (10-50 l min -1 ), with open and closed mouths and during vital capacity manoeuvres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study's primary outcome compared the efficacy after 3 min of preoxygenation, assessed by EtO 2 levels, between the three methods and various flow rates of preoxygenation. RESULTS: Three methods generated higher EtO 2 levels than others: (i) facemask preoxygenation using normal breathing, (ii) humidified high-flow nasal oxygen, closed-mouth breathing, at 50 l min -1 and (iii) standard nasal cannula, closed-mouth breathing, at 50 l min -1 , and expressed as means (SD): 90% (3), 90% (6) and 88% (5), respectively. Preoxygenation efficacy was greater via the bi-nasal cannulae using closed vs. open mouth breathing as well as with 3 min of normal breathing vs. eight vital capacity breaths. Preoxygenation with a facemask and humidified high-flow nasal oxygen was more comfortable than a standard nasal cannula. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of preoxygenation using a standard nasal cannula at high flow rates is no different to clinically used methods today. The standard nasal cannula provides less comfort but is highly effective and could be an option when alternative methods are unavailable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05839665.

Pre-oxygenation using high-flow nasal oxygen versus tight facemask in trauma patients undergoing emergency anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from major traumatic injuries frequently require emergency anaesthesia. Due to often compromised physiology and the time-sensitive management, trauma patients may be more prone to desaturate during induction of anaesthesia. We hypothesised that pre-oxygenation using high-flow nasal oxygen would decrease the risk of desaturation during induction of anaesthesia in trauma patients and the study therefore aimed to compare the frequency of desaturation when pre-oxygenation was performed with high-flow nasal oxygen or a traditional facemask. METHODS: This exploratory, prospective, before-and-after study was conducted at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Adult (≥18 years of age) patients suffering major traumatic injuries needing emergency anaesthesia were included around the clock. Patients were pre-oxygenated using a tight-fitting facemask during the first nine months of enrollment. High-flow nasal oxygen was then introduced as a method for pre-oxygenation of trauma patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients desaturating <93% during induction of anaesthesia, assessed from the start of pre-oxygenation until one minute after intubation. Secondary outcomes included perceived difficulty of pre-oxygenation among anaesthetists (assessed on a scale between 1 and 10) and safety outcomes, such as incidence of regurgitations and intracranial gas (assessed radiologically). RESULTS: Data from 96 patients were analysed. Facemask pre-oxygenation was performed in 66 patients, while 30 patients were pre-oxygenated with high-flow nasal oxygen. The most frequent trauma mechanisms were stabbing injuries (n = 34 (35%)) and fall injuries (n = 21 (22%)). There were no differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Eight (12%) versus three (10%) patients desaturated <93% in the facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen group respectively, OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.20-3.28), p = .76. Anaesthetists assessed pre-oxygenation using high-flow nasal oxygen as easier compared to facemask pre-oxygenation. No patient in any group showed signs of regurgitation. Among patients with facial or skull fractures requiring anaesthesia before radiology was performed, intracranial gas was seen in four (40%) patients pre-oxygenated with a facemask and in no patient pre-oxygenated with HFNO (p = .23). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study investigating trauma patients undergoing emergency anaesthesia, we could not see any difference in the number of patients desaturating when pre-oxygenation was performed with high-flow nasal oxygen compared to a tight-fitting facemask. Pre-oxygenation using high-flow nasal oxygen was assessed as easier compared to facemask pre-oxygenation.

Cardiopulmonary haemodynamic effects and gas exchange during apnoeic oxygenation with high-flow and low-flow nasal oxygen: A large animal study.

BACKGROUND: Apnoeic oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen prolongs the safe apnoeic period during induction of general anaesthesia. However, central haemodynamic effects and the characteristics of central gaseous exchange remain unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To describe mean pulmonary arterial pressure along with arterial and mixed venous blood gases and central haemodynamic parameters during apnoeic oxygenation with low-flow and high-flow nasal oxygen in pigs. DESIGN: Experimental crossover study. SETTING: Animal study of 10 healthy Swedish landrace pigs at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, April-May 2021. INTERVENTION: The pigs were anaesthetised, their tracheas intubated and their pulmonary arteries catheterised. The animals were preoxygenated and paralysed before apnoea. Apnoeic periods between 45 and 60 min were implemented with either 70 or 10 l min -1 100% O 2 delivered via nasal catheters. In addition, seven animals underwent an apnoea without fresh gas flow. Cardiopulmonary parameters and blood gases were measured repeatedly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean pulmonary arterial pressure during apnoeic oxygenation with high-flow and low-flow oxygen. RESULTS: Nine pigs completed two apnoeic periods of at least 45 min with a Pa O 2 not lower than 13 kPa. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure increased during 45 min of apnoea, from 18 ±â€Š1 to 33 ±â€Š2 mmHg and 18 ±â€Š1 to 35 ±â€Š2 mmHg, at 70 and 10 l min -1 O 2 , respectively ( P  < 0.001); there was no difference between the groups ( P  = 0.87). The Pa CO 2 increased by 0.48 ±â€Š0.07 and 0.52 ±â€Š0.04 kPa min -1 , at 70 and 10 l min -1 O 2 , respectively; there was no difference between the groups ( P  = 0.22). During apnoea without fresh gas flow, the SpO 2 declined to less than 85% after 155 ±â€Š11 s. CONCLUSION: During apnoeic oxygenation in pigs, the mean pulmonary arterial pressure increased two-fold and Pa CO 2 five-fold after 45 min, while the arterial oxygen levels were maintained over 13 kPa, irrespective of high-flow or low-flow oxygen.

Biomarkers for oxidative stress and organ injury during Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange compared to mechanical ventilation in adults undergoing microlaryngoscopy: A randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Apnoeic oxygenation using Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) during general anaesthesia prolongs the safe apnoeic period. However, there is a gap of knowledge how THRIVE-induced hyperoxia and hypercapnia impact vital organs. The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial was to characterise oxidative stress and, secondary, vital organ function biomarkers during THRIVE compared to mechanical ventilation (MV). METHODS: Thirty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-2, undergoing short laryngeal surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to THRIVE, FI O2 1.0, 70 L min-1 during apnoea or MV. Blood biomarkers for oxidative stress, malondialdehyde and TAC and vital organ function were collected (A) preoperatively, (B) at procedure completion and (C) at PACU discharge. RESULTS: Mean apnoea time was 17.9 (4.8) min and intubation to end-of-surgery time was 28.1 (12.8) min in the THRIVE and MV group, respectively. Malondialdehyde increased from 11.2 (3.1) to 12.7 (3.1) µM (P = .02) and from 9.5 (2.2) to 11.6 (2.6) µM (P = .003) (A to C) in the THRIVE and MV group, respectively. S100B increased from 0.05 (0.02) to 0.06 (0.02) µg L-1 (P = .005) (A to C) in the THRIVE group. No increase in TAC, CRP, leukocyte count, troponin-T, NTproBNP, creatinine, eGFRcrea or NSE was demonstrated during THRIVE. CONCLUSION: While THRIVE and MV was associated with increased oxidative stress, we found no change in cardiac, inflammation or kidney biomarkers during THRIVE. Further evaluation of stress and inflammatory response and cerebral and cardiac function during THRIVE is needed.

Lung volume changes in Apnoeic Oxygenation using Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) compared to mechanical ventilation in adults undergoing laryngeal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) using high-flow 100% oxygen during apnoea has gained increased use during difficult airway management and laryngeal surgery due to a slower carbon dioxide rise compared to traditional apnoeic oxygenation. We have previously demonstrated high arterial oxygen partial pressures and an increasing arterial-alveolar carbon dioxide difference during THRIVE. Primary aim of this study was to characterise lung volume changes measured with electrical impedance tomography during THRIVE compared to mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Thirty adult patients undergoing laryngeal surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to THRIVE or mechanical ventilation. Subjects were monitored with electrical impedance tomography and repeated blood gas measurement perioperatively. The THRIVE group received 100% oxygen at 70 l min-1 during apnoea. The mechanical ventilation group was intubated and normoventilated with an FiO2 of 0.4. RESULTS: Mean age were 48.2 (19.9) and 51.3 (12.3) years, and BMI 26.0 (4.5) and 26.0 (3.9) in the THRIVE and mechanical ventilation group respectively. Mean apnoea time in the THRIVE group was 17.9 (4.8) min. Mean apnoea to end-of-surgery time was 28.1 (12.8) min in the mechanical ventilation group. No difference in delta End Expiratory Lung Impedance was seen between groups over time. In the THRIVE group all but three subjects were well oxygenated during apnoea. THRIVE was discontinued for the three patients who desaturated. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in lung volume change over time, measured by electrical impedance tomography, was detected when using THRIVE compared to mechanical ventilation during laryngeal surgery.