ABSTRACT
There are approximately 256,000 heroin and other opiate users in England of whom 155,000 are in treatment for heroin (or opiate) addiction. The majority of people in treatment receive opiate substitution treatment (OST) (methadone and buprenorphine). However, OST suffers from high attrition and persistent heroin use even whilst in treatment. Contingency management (CM) is a psychological intervention based on the principles of operant conditioning. It is delivered as an adjunct to existing evidence based treatments to amplify patient benefit and involves the systematic application of positive reinforcement (financial or material incentives) to promote behaviours consistent with treatment goals. With an international evidence base for CM, NICE recommended that CM be implemented in UK drug treatment settings alongside OST to target attendance and the reduction of illicit drug use. While there was a growing evidence base for CM, there had been no examination of its delivery in UK NHS addiction services. The PRAISe trial evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, clinical and cost effectiveness of CM in UK addiction services. It is a cluster randomised controlled effectiveness trial of CM (praise and financial incentives) targeted at either abstinence from opiates or attendance at treatment sessions versus no CM among individuals receiving OST. The trial includes an economic evaluation which explores the relative costs and cost effectiveness of the two CM intervention strategies compared to TAU and an embedded process evaluation to identify contextual factors and causal mechanisms associated with variations in outcome. This study will inform UK drug treatment policy and practice. Trial registration ISRCTN 01591254.
Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Heroin Dependence , Mental Health Services , Methadone/administration & dosage , Opioid-Related Disorders , Reinforcement, Psychology , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Drug Misuse/prevention & control , Drug Misuse/psychology , Female , Heroin Dependence/psychology , Heroin Dependence/therapy , Humans , Male , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Medication Therapy Management/standards , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/standards , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Opioid-Related Disorders/psychology , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Quality Improvement , United KingdomABSTRACT
Pagoclone is a cyclopyrrolone that is believed to act as a partial agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A/benzodiazepine (BDZ) receptor. In theory, such partial agonists should be anxiolytic but lack the adverse side-effects of sedation, tolerance and withdrawal associated with full GABA-A/BDZ agonists. The objective of the randomized double-blind crossover study was to assess whether pagoclone was an effective anti-panic agent and also to assess its side-effect profile. Patients recruited had a diagnosis of Panic Disorder (DSM-IV) with at least one panic attack per week. Following a 2-week screening period, patients entered a 6-week trial consisting of two 2-week treatment periods, each followed by a 1-week washout. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either pagoclone 0.1 mg t.d.s. or placebo on their first treatment period and the converse on their second. The primary measure was daily panic attack dairy. Fourteen patients completed the study, the mean number of panic attacks during screening was 5.8+/-0.8 (SEM), this fell to 3.6+/-0.5 during treatment with pagoclone (p = 0.05) and 4.3+/-0.8 with placebo (p = 0.14). There was no significant difference on direct comparison of pagoclone with placebo or in any of the secondary measures (including Rickels withdrawal scale) or the adverse event profiles. The study provides preliminary evidence that pagoclone has anxiolytic properties in the absence of typical BDZ side-effects. This is consistent with its theoretical mode of action as a partial agonist at the GABA(A)/BDZ receptor.
Subject(s)
Agoraphobia/drug therapy , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , GABA Agonists/therapeutic use , Panic Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Agoraphobia/psychology , Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , GABA Agonists/adverse effects , Humans , Isoindoles , Male , Middle Aged , Naphthyridines/adverse effects , Naphthyridines/therapeutic use , Panic Disorder/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have demonstrated efficacy in depression and anxiety disorders. This raises the question of how the single action of serotonin reuptake inhibition can improve several psychiatric conditions. In order to understand this apparent paradox it is necessary to consider where SSRIs act in the pathogenic process underlying depression or anxiety disorders. Tryptophan depletion has been used extensively in research into depression and has shown that, in patients receiving an SSRI whose depression is in remission, depleting serotonin leads to recurrence of the disorder. Similar results have been found for panic disorder. This suggests that increased levels of serotonin are necessary in the synapse for the SSRI to be effective in the treatment of depression and panic disorder. In obsessive compulsive disorder, depletion of serotonin in patients recovered on an SSRI does not cause relapse; receptor adaptation may be more important. Variations within the SSRI drug class, such as the selectivity ratios for serotonin versus noradrenaline uptake, elimination half-life, and affinity for the 5-HT2 receptor have been identified and may be important determinants of efficacy, side effects and clinical use.
