Development of a clinical pathway for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia care: A tool to improve resident outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical pathways are used to improve the quality of care, reduce variation and maximise health or treatment outcomes in selected populations. The aim of this study was to develop a draft clinical pathway based on the best practice evidence for use in the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). METHODS: The pathway was developed using the best practice evidence from clinical practice guidelines, operational guides and a systematic literature review. A multidisciplinary team of health professionals and researchers worked in an iterative process to contextualise the proposed pathway to local needs and context, and improve its clarity and user-friendliness. The pathway was then re-assessed for accuracy and adherence to the evidence. RESULTS: The draft pathway outlines processes for BPSD prevention, watchful waiting for mild-to-moderate BPSD, and specific interventions for severe BPSD. Ongoing risk assessment is required throughout, and non-pharmacological options are first-line interventions. Person-centred care was found to be an important care component across all three phases. An instruction guide with colour-coded flow charts was developed to assist staff with determining the best care and treatment for each person living with dementia. Feasibility testing is underway. CONCLUSIONS: A draft clinical pathway based on clinical practice guidelines was developed to enhance the translation of evidence into practice for the management of BPSD, by nursing and clinical leaders in RACFs.

Occupational therapists and physiotherapists weighing up the dignity of risk for people living with a brain injury: grounded theory.

PURPOSE: Following a brain injury survivors may have physical, or cognitive changes or behaviours which bring safety risks into play when engaging in activities. Therapists experience tensions in enabling the dignity of participation in the context of managing risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten occupational therapists and seven physiotherapists participated in a grounded theory study utilising semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore the tensions between dignity and management of safety risks. Data were analysed using constant comparative method and a process of moving from open coding to categories to theory development. RESULTS: The process of weighing up was central to the therapists' approach to supporting dignity while managing risk. Respecting dignity itself is placed at risk when preventing harm is weighted higher than living a full life. Therapists who use weighing up as a process that respects dignity place greater value on the principles of respecting autonomy and promotion of justice for people with a brain injury. CONCLUSION: Rather than taking control and attempting to minimise risk therapists who privilege the perspective of the client, and provide opportunities for learning through failure or success, enable clients to live a full life.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONEnsuring that clients with brain injury are safe often requires therapists to exercise control and remove agency thus removing the rights of the client to the dignity of risk and living a full life.Providing opportunities within rehabilitation for clients to experience failure and success enables learning and thereby support dignity.Privileging the client perspective provides clients the dignity of living a normal life.

Clinical pathways for the evidence-based management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in a residential aged care facility: A rapid review.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify a clinical pathway, or practice guidelines to inform a clinical pathway, for the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). METHODS: Fifteen evidence sources were searched, and publications were appraised for methodological quality. RESULTS: Seven publications met the inclusion criteria, but no clinical pathways were found. These publications emphasised prevention via respectful, person-centred care; non-pharmacological interventions prioritised; and potential dangers of antipsychotic use. Pharmacological management was only recommended: when there is a high risk of harm; as a short-term option, to be regularly monitored and discontinued as soon as possible; and used in conjunction with investigation into the causes of BPSD and the introduction of non-pharmacological therapies. CONCLUSION: This rapid review provided high-quality, current guidelines and recommendations on the prevention and management of BPSD that can inform the development of an evidence-based clinical pathway for use in Australian RACFs.

Recency of Practice and the Maintenance of Professional Competence for Nurses and Midwives: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Australian and international nursing regulators have specific requirements for continuing competence and the professional, safe practice of nurses and midwives. Requirements can dictate duration of practice, time away from/recency of practice, revalidation policies, and time between study program completion and practice commencement. Requirements vary between contexts and are periodically updated. To identify and examine Australian and international evidence for best regulatory practices relating to recency and the maintenance of professional competence among nurses and midwives, a scoping review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews will be undertaken. This protocol details the scope, inclusion criteria, and methodology that will guide the scoping review, which will inform an update to the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia's Registration Standard: Recency of Practice.

Valuing the impact of health and social care programs using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To identify how social return on investment (SROI) analysis-traditionally used by business consultants-has been interpreted, used and innovated by academics in the health and social care sector and to assess the quality of peer-reviewed SROI studies in this sector. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTINGS: Community and residential settings. PARTICIPANTS: A wide range of demographic groups and age groups. RESULTS: The following databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Econlit, Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, Emerald, Social Care Online and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Limited uptake of SROI methodology by academics was found in the health and social care sector. From 868 papers screened, 8 studies met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Study quality was found to be highly variable, ranging from 38% to 90% based on scores from a purpose-designed quality assessment tool. In general, relatively high consistency and clarity was observed in the reporting of the research question, reasons for using this methodology and justifying the need for the study. However, weaknesses were observed in other areas including justifying stakeholders, reporting sample sizes, undertaking sensitivity analysis and reporting unexpected or negative outcomes. Most papers cited links to additional materials to aid in reporting. There was little evidence that academics had innovated or advanced the methodology beyond that outlined in a much-cited SROI guide. CONCLUSION: Academics have thus far been slow to adopt SROI methodology in the evaluation of health and social care interventions, and there is little evidence of innovation and development of the methodology. The word count requirements of peer-reviewed journals may make it difficult for authors to be fully transparent about the details of their studies, potentially impacting the quality of reporting in those studies published in these journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018080195.