Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutrients ; 16(9)2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732538

ABSTRACT

In preterm infants, early nutrient intake during the first week of life often depends on parenteral nutrition. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of standardized parenteral nutrition using three-in-one double-chamber solutions (3-in-1 STD-PN) on early neonatal growth in a cohort of moderately preterm (MP) infants. This population-based, observational cohort study included preterm infants admitted to neonatal centers in the southeast regional perinatal network in France. During the study period, 315 MP infants with gestational ages between 320/7 and 346/7 weeks who required parenteral nutrition from birth until day-of-life 3 (DoL3) were included; 178 received 3-in-1 STD-PN solution (56.5%). Multivariate regression was used to assess the factors associated with the relative body-weight difference between days 1 and 7 (RBWD DoL1-7). Infants receiving 3-in-1 STD-PN lost 36% less body weight during the first week of life, with median RBWD DoL1-7 of -2.5% vs. -3.9% in infants receiving other PN solutions (p < 0.05). They also received higher parenteral energy and protein intakes during the overall first week, with 85% (p < 0.0001) and 27% (p < 0.0001) more energy and protein on DoL 3. After adjusting for confounding factors, RBWD DoL1-7 was significantly lower in the 3-in-1 STD-NP group than in their counterparts, with beta (standard deviation) = 2.08 (0.91), p = 0.02. The use of 3-in-1 STD-PN provided better energy and protein intake and limited early weight loss in MP infants.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature , Parenteral Nutrition , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature/growth & development , Female , Male , Cohort Studies , Gestational Age , Energy Intake , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , France , Parenteral Nutrition Solutions
2.
Sci Data ; 11(1): 307, 2024 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514693

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces the MinCan database that presents mine-level estimates for the Canadian mining industry with a persistent annual coverage between 1950 and 2022. These estimates are based on archival maps and a selection of historical sources, which follows a hierarchy of criteria-based credibility and standardization. The information contained in MinCan covers 947 mines and provides information about their location (longitude and latitude in decimal), the company ownership, the principal commodities produced, and the years of operation (opening and closing dates). It is the first open access database to propose an exhaustive, free, and reliable compilation of the principal past and present mines producing in Canada. The geographic coordinates enable matching with other local, regional, and national databases, and allow for a wide range of research objectives to be met.

3.
BMJ Open ; 11(9): e046324, 2021 09 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34531206

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections occur in around 1%-4% of boys and 3%-8% of girls under 2 years old. Diagnosis is difficult because of non-specific symptoms and the risk of urine analysis contamination depending on the sampling method used for precontinent infants. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommend transurethral catheterisation and suprapubic aspiration because of a low contamination rate but these techniques are invasive. On the other hand, while the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advocate clean catch urine for its minimal invasiveness and acceptable contamination rate, it is difficult to accomplish in precontinent infants. Two recent methods have been described: the Quick-Wee method by Kaufman et al (suprapubic stimulation with cold saline-soaked gauze); and bladder stimulation by Herreros et al then by Tran et al (pubic tapping alternating with lumbar massage). This study aims to compare the effectiveness in collecting midstream urine by bladder stimulation vs the Quick-Wee method in infants under 1 year, before walking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial of 230 infants under 1 year and before walking who need urine analysis, conducted in four paediatric emergency departments in France. Patients will be randomised into two groups: bladder stimulation and Quick-Wee method.The primary endpoint will be the success rate of voiding at least 2 mL of urine in less than 5 min.Secondary outcomes are the time to collect at least 2 mL of urine, comfort, quality of urine and the risk factors associated with failure of the two techniques. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the French national ethic committee (consultative committee of the protection of persons). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials Registry - NCT04587999. DATE AND PROTOCOL VERSION IDENTIFIER: October 2020, V.1.


Subject(s)
Urinary Bladder , Urinary Tract Infections , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Urinalysis , Urination , Urine Specimen Collection
4.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0152598, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27031953

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Midstream clean-catch urine is an accepted method to diagnose urinary tract infection but is impracticable in infants before potty training. We tested the bladder stimulation technique to obtain a clean-catch urine sample in infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 142 infants under walking age who required a urine sample in a cross-sectional study carried out during a 3-months period, from September to November 2014, in the emergency department of the University Children's Hospital of Nice (France). A technique based on bladder stimulation and lumbar stimulation maneuvers, with at least two attempts, was tested by four trained physicians. The success rate and time to obtain urine sample within 3 minutes were evaluated. Discomfort (EVENDOL score ≥4/15) was measured. We estimated the risk factors in the failure of the technique. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare frequencies. T-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare quantitative data according to the normality of the distribution. Risk factors for failure of the technique were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: We obtained midstream clean-catch urine in 55.6% of infants with a median time of 52.0 s (10.0; 110.0). The success rate decreased with age from 88.9% (newborn) to 28.6% (>1 y) (p = 0.0001) and with weight, from 85.7% (<4 kg) to 28.6% (>10 kg) (p = 0.0004). The success rate was 60.8% for infants without discomfort (p<0.0001). Heavy weight and discomfort were associated with failure, with adjusted ORs of 1.47 [1.04-2.31] and 6.65 [2.85-15.54], respectively. CONCLUSION: Bladder stimulation seems to be efficient in obtaining midstream urine with a moderate success rate in our study sample. This could be an alternative technique for infants before potty training but further randomized multicenter studies are needed to validate this procedure.


Subject(s)
Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urine Specimen Collection/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , France , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Urinary Bladder/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...