Applying holistic review practices to a Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree Program: Reflections on lessons learned.

PROBLEM: Despite the implementation of holistic review in the medical school application process, there is little information about how this can be utilized in Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree pipeline programs, especially since many programs offer reserved spots to their students in the medical school. Implementing holistic review in a Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree program and intentionally structuring it to align with the medical school mission and admissions practices and processes, can improve the diversification of the physician workforce, contribute to more primary care doctors, and promote in-state practice. INTERVENTION: Utilizing the medical school admissions by-laws, committee structure, shared training, and educational processes, we successfully engrained in our committee members the values and mission alignment to select the best applicants to fulfill the medical school mission using holistic review. To our knowledge, no other program has written about how holistic review is used in Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree programs and how it contributes to program outcomes. CONTEXT: The Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree Program is a partnership between the undergraduate College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Medicine. The Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree admissions committee is a subcommittee of the School of Medicine admissions committee but has a separate membership. Hence, the holistic admissions process for the program mirrors the School of Medicine admissions process. To determine the outcome of this process, we analyzed practice specialty, practice location, gender, race and ethnicity of program alumni. IMPACT: To date, the Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree holistic admissions processes have supported the medical school mission, "…To meet the physician workforce needs of the state by selection of students who are likely to train in specialty areas of need and to remain in or return to the areas of our state needing physicians." This implementation has resulted in 75% (37/49) of our practicing alumni selecting a primary care specialty, and 69% (34/49) practicing in the state. In addition, 55% (27/49) identify as Underrepresented in Medicine. LESSONS LEARNED: We observed that having an intentional structured alignment in place allowed for implementation of holistic practices in the Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree admissions process. The high retention rates and specialty of graduates from the Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree Program support our intentional efforts to diversify our admissions committees and align the Combined Baccalaureate/Medical Degree program's holistic review admissions process with our School of Medicine mission and admissions practices and processes, as key strategies to reach our diversity-related goals.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on American College of Surgeons-Accredited Education Institutes & American Society of Anesthesiologists-Simulation Education Network: Opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges for simulation programs including American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes and American Society of Anesthesiologists Simulation Education Network. American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes and American Society of Anesthesiologists Simulation Education Network leadership were surveyed to identify opportunities to enhance patient safety through simulation. METHODS: Between January and June 2021, surveys consisting of 3 targeted domains: (I) Changing practice; (II) Contributions and recognition; and (III) Moving ahead were distributed to 100 American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes and 54 American Society of Anesthesiologists Simulation Education Network centers. Responses were combined and percent frequencies reported. RESULTS: Ninety-six respondents, representing 51 (51%) American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes, 17 (31.5%) American Society of Anesthesiologists Simulation Education Network, and 28 dually accredited centers, completed the survey. Change of practice. Although 20.3% of centers stayed fully operational at the COVID-19 onset, 82% of all centers closed: 32% were closed less than 3 months, 28% were closed 3 to 6 months, 8% were closed 7 to 9 months, and 32% remained closed as of June 6, 2021. Most impacted activities were large-group instruction and team training. Sixty-nine percent of programs converted in-person to virtual programs. Contributions. The top reported innovative contributions included policies (80%), curricula (80%), and scholarly work (74%), Moving ahead. The respondents' top concerns were returning to high-quality training to best address learners' deficiencies and re-engagement of re-directed training programs. When asked "How the American College of Surgeons/American Society of Anesthesiologists Programs could best assist your simulation center goals?" the top responses were "facilitate collaboration" and "publish best practices from this work." CONCLUSION: The Pandemic presented multiple challenges and opportunities for simulation centers. Opportunities included collaboration between American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes and the American Society of Anesthesiologists Simulation Education Network to identify best practices and resources needed to enhance patient safety through simulation.

Teaching Effective Informed Consent Communication Skills in the Virtual Surgical Clerkship.

BACKGROUND: The disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate medical education allowed for assessment of virtual curricular innovations. One of the difficulties encountered in the virtual curriculum is the teaching of clinical competencies that would traditionally require students to undergo in-person simulations and patient encounters. We implemented a novel informed consent activity module, with standardized patients, to improve self-efficacy in communication within our core surgery clerkship. STUDY DESIGN: All medical students who participated in the virtual surgery clerkship were recruited to participate in a retrospective survey study regarding the novel informed consent module. These questions evaluated their perceived competence in 4 domains relating to informed consent: identifying the key elements, describing common challenges, applying the New Mexico Clinical Communication Scale (NMCCS), and documenting. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 90 students participated in the study (38% of the cohort). Respondents to the survey reported that their self-efficacy in communication skills related to informed consent improved as a result of their participation in the activity in each of the 4 domains surveyed (p < 0.01), with the majority of students identifying as satisfactory or above in each domain post-module. Students generally viewed the virtual informed consent activity positively, but noted that it was not the same as an in-person clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: A virtual module of communication skills training, using standardized patients and faculty, improved students' belief in their self-efficacy in obtaining informed consent. This communication module can be useful in a virtual or mixed curricular structure for both current and future medical students.

Adapting Simulation Curricula to the Future Needs of Anesthesiology.

We have discussed some examples of the types of program development strategies that are in common use and have presented examples of the type of performance gaps that can occur when a coordinated curriculum development process is not applied (or is applied in an uncoordinated fashion). We have outlined one method to develop a simulation-based curriculum focusing more on ways to identify how to "simulate what is needed" rather than using the "simulate what we know" style. We believe that curricula must be designed to continually evolve rather being conceived as a single finished program. We have attempted to illustrate what a designed simulation curriculum for training anesthesiology residents and faculty in the PSH might look like, and we have provided a sample scenario to illustrate how this process could be presented (Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/AIA/A23, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/AIA/A24). Our hope is that this model may be applied to create simulation education curricula in a wide variety of areas. We suggest that it be a part of any attempt to create a standardized, longitudinal simulation-based assessment for residents or practitioners. A cohesive, strategic approach to simulation curriculum design and implementation will be required as we seek to create the same type of effective safety training in medicine that has been present in other high-risk professions.

Physician communication in the operating room.

In this study, communication research was conducted with multidisciplinary groups of operating-room physicians. Theoretical frameworks from intercultural communication and rhetoric were used to (a) measure latent cultural communication variables and (b) conduct communication training with the physicians. A six-step protocol guided the research with teams of physicians from different surgical specialties: anesthesiologists, general surgeons, and obstetrician-gynecologists (n = 85). Latent cultural communication variables were measured by surveys administered to physicians before and after completion of the protocol. The centerpiece of the 2-hour research protocol was an instructional session that informed the surgical physicians about rhetorical choices that support participatory communication. Post-training results demonstrated scores increased on communication variables that contribute to collaborative communication and teamwork among the physicians. This study expands health communication research through application of combined intercultural and rhetorical frameworks, and establishes new ways communication theory can contribute to medical education.

Cause or effect? The relationship between student perception of the medical school learning environment and academic performance on USMLE Step 1.

BACKGROUND: A school's learning environment is believed to influence academic performance yet few studies have evaluated this association controlling for prior academic ability, an important factor since students who do well in school tend to rate their school's environment more highly than students who are less academically strong. AIM: To evaluate the effect of student perception of the learning environment on their performance on a standardized licensing test while controlling for prior academic ability. METHODS: We measured perception of the learning environment after the first year of medical school in 267 students from five consecutive classes and related that measure to performance on United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, taken approximately six months later. We controlled for prior academic performance by including Medical College Admission Test score and undergraduate grade point average in linear regression models. RESULTS: Three of the five learning environment subscales were statistically associated with Step 1 performance (p < 0.05): meaningful learning environment, emotional climate, and student-student interaction. A one-point increase in the rating of the subscales (scale of 1-4) was associated with increases of 6.8, 6.6, and 4.8 points on the Step 1 exam. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide some evidence for the widely held assumption that a positively perceived learning environment contributes to better academic performance.

Improved climate, culture, and communication through multidisciplinary training and instruction.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team training on organizational culture and team communication. STUDY DESIGN: The training included a 6-step protocol: (1) a pretest survey assessing cultural attitudes and perceptions, (2) a baseline high-fidelity simulation session, (3) invitational medical rhetoric instruction, (4) a second high-fidelity simulation session, (5) a posttest survey assessing changed cultural attitudes and perceptions, and (6) a debriefing with participants. Teams of 4 physicians trained together: 2 obstetricians and 2 anesthesiologists. Forty-four physicians completed the training protocol during 2010 and 2011. RESULTS: Paired-sample t tests demonstrated significant decreases in autonomous cultural attitudes and perceptions (t = 8.23, P < .001) and significant increases in teamwork cultural attitudes and perceptions (t = -4.05, P < .001). Paired-sample t tests also demonstrated significant increases in communication climate that invited participation and integrated information from both medical services (t = -5.80, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The multidisciplinary team training program specified in this report resulted in increased teamwork among obstetricians and anesthesiologists.