Showing Up Is Half the Battle: The Impact of Telehealth on Psychiatric Appointment Attendance for Hospital-Based Intensive Outpatient Services During COVID-19.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telehealth to deliver psychiatric services. Continuation of psychiatric services for individuals with high clinical acuity was critical. This study examined attendance to rapidly deployed telehealth services for psychiatrically high-risk individuals receiving intensive outpatient program (IOP), primarily group-based psychotherapy services for adults and adolescents by race/ethnicity, insurance, and clinical treatment program within a large hospital-based outpatient psychiatric setting. Methods: Chi-square tests compared whether attendance rates for telehealth versus in-person IOP services varied by population group, race, insurance, and clinical program, using observational data of adolescent and adult patients treated between October 1, 2019, and July 31, 2020. Results: Appointment attendance increased for telehealth versus in-person services for adolescents (χ2 (df = 1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001) and adults (χ2 (df = 1) = 434.37, p < 0.0001). For adults, increased appointment attendance for telehealth was observed across insurance type (Medicaid: +11.5%; Medicare: +13.79%; Commercial: +6.94%), race/ethnicity (+6.23% to +15.76% across groups), and for IOP groups across all five diagnostic treatment programs (between 7.59% and 15.9% increases across groups). Adolescent results were mixed; increased appointment attendance for telehealth was observed among commercially insured youth (+7.11%), but no differences were observed for Medicaid-insured youth. Non-Hispanic white youth had increased attendance for telehealth (+8.38%) and no differences were observed for non-Hispanic black youth. Decreases were found in telehealth attendance for Hispanic/Latinx youth (-13.49%). Discussion: Rapidly deployed telehealth increased attendance to intensive services for psychiatrically high-risk individuals, particularly among adults and for adolescents with commercial insurance and non-Hispanic white youth. Trends among racial/ethnic and Medicaid-insured youth warrant further investigation regarding the potential for special challenges or vulnerabilities and advocacy needs. Findings highlight telehealth as an important tool in supporting availability of services for individuals with high levels of psychiatric acuity, particularly for group-based services, during the pandemic.

Epidemiology, Infection Prevention, Testing Data, and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 on Five Inpatient Psychiatric Units in a large Academic Medical Center.

Inpatient psychiatric facilities can face significant challenges in containing infectious outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main objective of this study was to characterize the epidemiology, testing data, and containment protocols of COVID-19 in a large academic medical center during the height of the COVID-19 outbreak. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on hospitalized individuals on five inpatient psychiatric units from March 1st to July 8th, 2020. Demographic data collected include age, race, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis, and admission status (one or multiple admissions). In addition, a Gantt chart was used to assess outbreak data and timelines for one unit. Testing data was collected for patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric units, emergency room visits, and employees. 964 individuals were hospitalized psychiatrically. The study population included ethnically diverse patients with various mental illnesses. We also describe infection prevention strategies, screening, and triage protocols utilized to safely continue patient flow during and beyond the study period with a low patient and employee infection rate. In summary, our study suggests that early implementation of triage, screening, extensive testing, and unit-specific interventions can help prevent and contain the spread of COVID-19 in inpatient psychiatric units and help facilitate safe delivery of care during a pandemic.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Psychiatry Resident Prescribing: a Quality Improvement Education Intervention to Address Health Equity.

OBJECTIVE: Quality improvement (QI) tools can identify and address health disparities. This paper describes the use of resident prescriber profiles in a novel QI curriculum to identify racial and ethnic differences in antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing. METHODS: The authors extracted medication orders written by 111 psychiatry residents over an 18-month period from an electronic medical record and reformatted these into 6133 unique patient encounters. Binomial logistic models adjusted for covariates assessed racial and ethnic differences in antipsychotic or antidepressant prescribing in both emergency and inpatient psychiatric encounters. A multinomial model adjusted for covariates then assessed racial and ethnic differences in primary diagnosis. Models also examined interactions between gender and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Black (adjusted OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87; p < 0.01) and Latinx (adjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86; p < 0.01) patients had lower odds of receiving antidepressants relative to White patients despite diagnosis. Black and Latinx patients were no more likely to receive antipsychotics than White patients when adjusted for diagnosis. Black (adjusted OR 3.85; 95% CI, 2.9-5.2) and Latinx (adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) patients were more likely to receive a psychosis than a depression diagnosis when compared to White patients. Gender interactions with race/ethnicity did not significantly change results. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that racial/ethnic differences in antidepressant prescription likely result from alternatively higher diagnosis of psychotic disorders and prescription of antipsychotics in Black and Latinx patients. Prescriber profiles can serve as a powerful tool to promote resident QI learning around the effects of structural racism on clinical care.

Mobilizing an institutional supportive response for healthcare workers and other staff in the context of COVID-19: The Yale experience.

The burden of the COVID-19 pandemic upon healthcare workers necessitates a systematic effort to support their resilience. This article describes the Yale University and Yale New Haven Health System effort to unite several independent initiatives into a coherent integrated model for institutional support for healthcare workers. Here, we highlight both opportunities and challenges faced in attempting to support healthcare workers during this pandemic.

Legal considerations in the child psychiatric emergency department.

Clinicians who practice in the child psychiatric emergency department have the complex task of evaluating the mental health or substance abuse needs of children, adolescents, and their families during times of crisis. Adding to this challenging clinical task are multiple legal considerations with which the clinician must be familiar. The precise impact of these legal issues varies from state to state. Some of these legal considerations are present at the start of the evaluation (consent for evaluation or treatment), during the evaluation (psychiatric hospitalization), and at the end of an evaluation (mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse and duty to warn or protect third parties from harm). Other issues (confidentiality and consent for release of information) are present at all stages of the evaluation and continue long after the evaluation has been completed. Clinicians who evaluate the psychiatric needs of children and adolescents are urged to review their local state laws relating to civil commitment, confidentiality, and mandatory reporting.