Facilitation of early percutaneous coronary intervention after reteplase with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results from the SPEED (GUSTO-4 Pilot) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the utility of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a trial that encouraged its use after thrombolysis and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Early PCI has shown no benefit when performed early after thrombolysis alone. METHODS: We studied 323 patients (61%) who underwent PCI with planned initial angiography, at a median 63 min after reperfusion therapy began. A blinded core laboratory reviewed cineangiograms. Ischemic events, bleeding, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were compared between early PCI and no-PCI patients (n = 162), between patients with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 or 1 before PCI versus flow grade 2 or 3, and among three treatment regimens. RESULTS: Early PCI patients showed a procedural success (<50% residual stenosis and TIMI flow grade 3) rate of 88% and a 30-day composite incidence of death, reinfarction, or urgent revascularization of 5.6%. These patients had fewer ischemic events and bleeding complications (15%) than did patients not undergoing early PCI (30%, p = 0.001). Early PCI was used more often in patients with initial TIMI flow grade 0 or 1 versus flow grade 2 or 3 (83% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001). Patients receiving abciximab with reduced-dose reteplase (5 U double bolus) showed an 86% incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow at approximately 90 min and a trend toward improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, early PCI facilitated by a combination of abciximab and reduced-dose reteplase was safe and effective. This approach has several advantages for acute MI patients, which should be confirmed in a dedicated, randomized trial.

Hemodynamic effects of double bolus reteplase versus alteplase infusion in massive pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic agents are given in massive pulmonary embolism to dissolve or reduce the clot and normalize hemodynamics. Comparative clinical studies have shown that administration of a 2-hour infusion of alteplase is more effective than urokinase over a 12-hour period. Reteplase is a new generation thrombolytic with a longer half-life that can be administered more conveniently as a double bolus. We compared efficacy and safety of reteplase with the approved regimen of alteplase in massive pulmonary embolism. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled and randomly assigned: 23 received reteplase and 13 received alteplase along with intravenous heparin. Reteplase was administered as 2 intravenous bolus injections of 10 U 30 minutes apart, and alteplase was administered as an intravenous infusion of a total dose of 100 mg over a 2-hour period, including an initial 10-mg bolus. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was confirmed by selective pulmonary angiography. Hemodynamic monitoring was conducted during the first 24 hours after administration. The primary end point was change in total pulmonary resistance. Secondary variables were pulmonary pressure, cardiac index, clinical parameters, and adverse events. RESULTS: The primary parameter of total pulmonary resistance showed a significant decrease after just 0.5 hours in the reteplase group and after 2 hours in the alteplase group, with a further decrease persisting for up to 24 hours in both treatment groups. A similar pattern was seen in other directly measured hemodynamic parameters, especially mean pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac index; there was no significant difference between reteplase and alteplase. There was also no apparent difference between the treatment groups with respect to safety, and no stroke or intracranial hemorrhage occurred. The rate of bleedings and the incidence of nonhemorrhagic adverse events were as expected for patients with pulmonary embolism treated with a thrombolytic agent. CONCLUSIONS: Reteplase is suitable for treatment of massive pulmonary embolism with a standard double bolus 10 + 10 U. Efficacy of reteplase appeared to be at least as good at decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance as that of the approved alteplase regimen of 100 mg infusion over a 2-hour period.

More rapid, complete, and stable coronary thrombolysis with bolus administration of reteplase compared with alteplase infusion in acute myocardial infarction. RAPID Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Early restoration and maintenance of normal (TIMI 3) blood flow during acute myocardial infarction is critical for optimal preservation of left ventricular function and survival. Recombinant plasminogen activator (r-PA, reteplase) is a nonglycosylated deletion mutant of wild-type tissue-type plasminogen activator (TPA) that has been shown to achieve more rapid and complete thrombolysis compared with other plasminogen activators in animal models. METHODS AND RESULTS: The RAPID Trial was designed to test the hypothesis that bolus administration of one or more dosage regimens of r-PA was superior to standard-dose alteplase (TPA) in achieving infarct-related artery patency 90 minutes after initiation of treatment. Six hundred six patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to one of four treatment arms: (1) TPA 100 mg i.v. over 3 hours, (2) r-PA as a 15-MU single bolus, (3) r-PA as a 10-MU bolus followed by 5 MU 30 minutes later, or (4) r-PA as a 10-MU bolus followed by 10 MU 30 minutes later. Coronary arteriography was performed at 30, 60, and 90 minutes after initiation of treatment and at hospital discharge. The 10 + 10-MU r-PA group achieved better 90-minute and 5- to 14-day TIMI 3 flow (63% [CI, 55% to 71%] versus 49% [41% to 57%], P = .019, and 88% [82% to 94%] versus 71% [63% to 79%], P < .001, respectively) than the TPA group. The TIMI 3 flow in the 10 + 10-MU r-PA group at 60 minutes was equivalent to that in the TPA group at 90 minutes (51 versus 49%). Global ejection fraction and regional wall motion in the 10 + 10-MU r-PA group were superior to those of the TPA group at hospital discharge (53 +/- 1.3% versus 49 +/- 1.3%, P = .034; -2.19 +/- 0.12 versus -2.61 +/- 0.13 SD per chord, P = .02, respectively). The 15-MU and 10 + 5-MU r-PA patency and left ventricular function results were similar to those of the TPA and inferior to those of the 10 + 10-MU r-PA group. Bleeding complications were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: r-PA given as a double bolus of 10 + 10 MU achieves more rapid, complete, and sustained thrombolysis of the infarct-related artery than standard-dose TPA, without an apparent increased risk of complications. This was associated with improved global and regional left ventricular function at hospital discharge.

Prehospital thrombolysis: beneficial effects of very early treatment on infarct size and left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of very early (< or = 1.5 h after symptom onset) and later (> 1.5 up to 4 h) thrombolytic therapy on infarct size, left ventricular function and early mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To start thrombolysis at the earliest possible moment, it was performed in the prehospital setting. A cutoff time of 1.5 h was prospectively stipulated. BACKGROUND: Shortening of ischemic time is crucial within the 1st 2 h. Prehospital thrombolysis can reduce time to treatment and enables very early initiation of therapy for many patients. METHODS: One hundred seventy patients received 30 mg of anistreplase up to 4 h from symptom onset by a mobile intensive care unit physician. Infarct size was measured from cumulative release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, and left ventricular function was assessed by contrast angiograms 10 days after the infarction. RESULTS: The decision to treat on scene was correct in 98% of patients. There were no bleeding complications or deaths outside the hospital setting. In 28 patients (17%) the ischemic process was interrupted. Findings with thrombolytic therapy initiated < or = 1.5 (96 patients) versus > 1.5 h (74 patients) were the following: initial extent of epicardial injury, 1.6 +/- 0.9 versus 1.4 +/- 0.7 mV, p = NS; infarct size by cardiac enzyme release 646 +/- 634 versus 886 +/- 712 IU/liter, p < 0.05; ejection fraction 57 +/- 14% versus 51 +/- 13%, p < 0.05; regional dyssynergic area 24 +/- 22 versus 33 +/- 24 U, p < 0.05; 21-day mortality 1 of 96 versus 5 of 74 patients (1% vs. 7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that in evolving myocardial infarction up to 4 h in duration, the start of thrombolytic therapy at < or = 1.5 h compared with > 1.5 h limits infarct size, preserves left ventricular function and may save lives.

Improved thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction with front-loaded administration of alteplase: results of the rt-PA-APSAC patency study (TAPS)

Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator (APSAC) in myocardial infarction has been proved to reduce mortality. A new front-loaded infusion regimen of 100 mg of rt-PA with an initial bolus dose of 15 mg followed by an infusion of 50 mg over 30 min and 35 mg over 60 min has been reported to yield higher patency rates than those achieved with standard regimens of thrombolytic treatment. The effects of this front-loaded administration of rt-PA versus those obtained with APSAC on early patency and reocclusion of infarct-related coronary arteries were investigated in a randomized multicenter trial in 421 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography 90 min after the start of treatment revealed a patent infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3) in 84.4% of 199 patients given rt-PA versus 70.3% of 202 patients given APSAC (p = 0.0007). Early reocclusion within 24 to 48 h was documented in 10.3% of 174 patients given rt-PA versus 2.5% of 163 patients given APSAC. Late reocclusion within 21 days was observed in 2.6% of 152 patients given rt-PA versus 6.3% of 159 patients given APSAC. There were 5 in-hospital deaths (2.4%) in the rt-PA group and 17 deaths (8.1%) in the APSAC group (p = 0.0095). The reinfarction rate was 3.8% and 4.8%, respectively. Peak serum creatine kinase and left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up angiography were essentially identical in both treatment groups. There were more bleeding complications after APSAC (45% vs. 31%, p = 0.0019).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)