Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(12): 4126-30, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21998435

ABSTRACT

We compared recovery of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from nasal and groin swab specimens of 600 HIV-infected outpatients by selective and nonselective direct plating and broth enrichment. Swabs were collected at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month visits and cultured by direct plating to mannitol salt agar (MSA) and CHROMagar MRSA (CM) and overnight broth enrichment with subculture to MSA (broth). MRSA isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, and PCR for the Panton-Valentine leukocidin. At each visit, 13 to 15% of patients were colonized with MRSA and 30 to 33% were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Broth, CM, and MSA detected 95%, 82%, and 76% of MRSA-positive specimens, respectively. MRSA recovery was significantly higher from broth than CM (P ≤ 0.001) or MSA (P ≤ 0.001); there was no significant difference in recovery between MSA and CM. MSSA recovery also increased significantly when using broth than when using MSA (P ≤ 0.001). Among specimens collected from the groin, broth, CM, and MSA detected 88%, 54%, and 49% of the MRSA-positive isolates, respectively. Broth enrichment had a greater impact on recovery of MRSA from the groin than from the nose compared to both CM (P ≤ 0.001) and MSA (P ≤ 0.001). Overall, 19% of MRSA-colonized patients would have been missed with nasal swab specimen culture only. USA500/Iberian and USA300 were the most common MRSA strains recovered, and USA300 was more likely than other strain types to be recovered from the groin than from the nose (P = 0.05).


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , HIV Infections/complications , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Exotoxins/genetics , Genotype , Groin/microbiology , Humans , Leukocidins/genetics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Molecular Typing , Nose/microbiology , Outpatients , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 45(5): 1611-3, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17344366

ABSTRACT

AdvanDx VRE EVIGENE, a commercial vanA/vanB DNA hybridization assay to identify vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), was evaluated for the detection of vanA in Staphylococcus aureus. Performance was assessed using S. aureus, VRE, and vancomycin-intermediate and -susceptible isolates. The assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity when analyzed visually and by optical density.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/analysis , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Carbon-Oxygen Ligases/analysis , Carbon-Oxygen Ligases/genetics , Nucleic Acid Hybridization/methods , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Vancomycin Resistance , DNA, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...