Antimicrobial resistance in generic E. coli isolated from western Canadian cow-calf herds.

Objective: To examine antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in commensal fecal Escherichia coli (E. coli) from extensively managed beef calves and cows in western Canada and describe the differences among cows and calves in the spring and fall. Animal: Beef cattle, cow-calf. Procedure: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted on generic E. coli isolates collected from 388 calves and 387 cows from 39 herds following calving in 2021, 419 calves from 39 herds near weaning, and 357 cows from 36 herds at pregnancy testing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were measured with the NARMS CMV5AGNF plate for Gram-negative bacteria and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standard breakpoints for humans. Results: Only 16% (242/1551) of all isolates from 97% (38/39) of herds were resistant to ≥ 1 antimicrobial. Generic E. coli isolates were most commonly resistant to sulfisoxazole (11%, 175/1551), followed by tetracycline (9.3%, 145/1551) and chloramphenicol (3.5%, 55/1551). Isolates from calves in the spring were more likely to be resistant to sulfisoxazole, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol than those from cows in the spring or calves in the fall. Multiclass-resistant isolates were identified in 5% (39/807) of calves. Only 2 isolates recovered from cows were resistant to antimicrobials of very high importance for human health. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Most generic E. coli isolates were pansusceptible. The observed resistance patterns were consistent with earlier studies of AMR from commensal E. coli in this region. Baseline AMR data for cow-calf herds are not currently collected as part of routine surveillance, but are essential to inform antimicrobial use policy and stewardship.

Résistance aux antimicrobiens chez E. coli générique isolé dans des troupeaux vache-veau de l'Ouest canadien. Objectif: Examiner la résistance aux antimicrobiens (RAM) chez Escherichia coli de la flore fécale commensale (E. coli) provenant de veaux et de vaches de boucherie en élevage extensif dans l'ouest du Canada et décrire les différences entre les vaches et les veaux au printemps et à l'automne. Animal: Bovins de boucherie, vache-veau. Procédure: Des tests de sensibilité aux antimicrobiens ont été effectués sur des isolats génériques d'E. coli collectés auprès de 388 veaux et 387 vaches de 39 troupeaux après le vêlage en 2021, de 419 veaux de 39 troupeaux à l'approche du sevrage et de 357 vaches de 36 troupeaux lors des tests de gestation. Les concentrations minimales inhibitrices ont été mesurées avec la plaque NARMS CMV5AGNF pour les bactéries à Gram négatif et interprétées à l'aide des seuils standard pour les humains du Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Résultats: Seulement 16 % (242/1 551) de tous les isolats provenant de 97 % (38/39) des troupeaux étaient résistants à ≥ 1 antimicrobien. Les isolats génériques d'E. coli étaient le plus souvent résistants au sulfisoxazole (11 %, 175/1 551), suivi de la tétracycline (9,3 %, 145/1 551) et du chloramphénicol (3,5 %, 55/1 551). Les isolats provenant des veaux au printemps étaient plus susceptibles d'être résistants au sulfisoxazole, à la tétracycline et au chloramphénicol que ceux provenant des vaches au printemps ou des veaux à l'automne. Des isolats résistants à plusieurs classes ont été identifiés chez 5 % (39/807) des veaux. Seuls deux isolats récupérés chez des vaches étaient résistants à des antimicrobiens de très haute importance pour la santé humaine. Conclusion et pertinence clinique: La plupart des isolats génériques d'E. coli étaient sensibles à l'ensemble des antimicrobiens. Les profils de résistance observés concordaient avec les études antérieures sur la RAM provenant d'E. coli commensal dans cette région. Les données de base sur la RAM pour les troupeaux vache-veau ne sont pas actuellement recueillies dans le cadre de la surveillance de routine, mais elles sont essentielles pour éclairer la politique et la gestion de l'utilisation des antimicrobiens.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus isolated from western Canadian cow-calf herds.

BACKGROUND: Data on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in cow-calf herds is limited and there have been no Canadian studies examining AMR in Enterococcus in cow-calf herds. Enterococcus is a ubiquitous Gram-positive indicator of AMR for enteric organisms that is also important in human health. The objective of this study was to describe AMR in specific Enterococcus species of interest from cow-calf herds; highlighting differences in AMR among isolates from cows and calves and samples collected in the spring and fall. Isolates (n = 1505) were examined from 349 calves and 385 cows from 39 herds in the spring of 2021 and 413 calves from 39 herds and 358 cows from 36 herds in the fall of 2021. Enterococcus species were identified using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-Of-Flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was completed based on a prioritization scheme for importance to human health and using the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Gram positive Sensititre broth microdilution panel. RESULTS: Resistance was observed to at least one antimicrobial in 86% (630/734) of isolates from the spring and 84% (644/771) of isolates from the fall. The most common types of resistance across all species were: lincomycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, daptomycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline. However, the proportion of isolates with AMR varied substantially based on species. Multiclass resistance, defined as resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial classes after excluding intrinsic resistance, was highest in isolates from calves in the spring (6.9%) (24/349) and cows in the fall (6.7%) (24/357). Differences in resistance were seen between cows and calves in the spring and fall as well as across seasons, with no differences seen between cows and calves in the fall. CONCLUSIONS: While most Enterococcus isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial, questions remain regarding species differences in intrinsic resistance and the accuracy of certain antimicrobial breakpoints for specific Enterococcus spp. As a result, some species-specific AMR profiles should be interpreted with caution. Despite these constraints, Enterococcus species are important indicator organisms for AMR and resulting data can be used to inform stewardship initiatives.

Producer attitudes regarding antimicrobial use and resistance in Canadian cow-calf herds.

Objective: To describe producer attitudes toward antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), identify factors associated with attitudes, and inform stewardship initiatives. Animal: Beef cattle, cow-calf. Procedure: Cow-calf producers from the Canadian Cow-Calf Surveillance Network (C3SN) completed a survey (n = 146) on producers' attitudes toward AMU, AMR, and impacts of recent regulatory changes requiring a prescription for the purchase of medically important antimicrobials (MIA). Results: Most producers (78%, 114/146) reported being aware of initiatives to improve antimicrobial stewardship within the beef industry and 67% (97/146) indicated that AMR was a highly important issue to the industry and producers personally. Almost half of producers reported concerns that AMR development has impacted AMU decisions on their operations. Overall, veterinarians were producers' primary source of information regarding AMU, including treatment protocols, stewardship programs, and regulatory changes. Following introduction of the 2018 prescription-only regulations, 95% (138/146) of producers reported no change in AMU on their operations. Similarly, 77% (112/146) of producers reported no change in antimicrobial product access, whereas 63% (91/146) reported no change in cost. Conclusion: Most producers reported little change in access to antimicrobials and in AMU following the introduction of regulations requiring a prescription for MIA. Clinical relevance: Producers rely on veterinarians as their primary source of information regarding antimicrobial regulations and AMU. It is therefore important for veterinarians to understand their role as educators for beef cow-calf producers. Ultimately, veterinarians and producers need to work together to ensure that the health and welfare of animals are protected while using antimicrobials in a responsible manner.

Attitudes des producteurs à l'égard de l'utilisation des antimicrobiens et de la résistance dans les troupeaux vache-veau canadiens. Objectif: Décrire les attitudes des producteurs à l'égard de l'utilisation des antimicrobiens (AMU) et de la résistance aux antimicrobiens (RAM), identifier les facteurs associés à ces attitudes et les informations sur les initiatives de gouvernance. Animal: Bovins de boucherie, vache-veau. Procédure: Les producteurs naisseurs du Réseau canadien de surveillance vache-veau (C3SN) ont répondu à une enquête (n = 146) sur les attitudes des producteurs à l'égard de l'AMU, de la RAM et des impacts des récents changements réglementaires exigeant une ordonnance pour l'achat d'antimicrobiens médicalement importants (MIA). Résultats: La plupart des producteurs (78 %, 114/146) ont déclaré être au courant des initiatives visant à améliorer la gouvernance des antimicrobiens au sein de l'industrie du bœuf et 67 % (97/146) ont indiqué que la RAM était un problème très important pour l'industrie et les producteurs personnellement. Près de la moitié des producteurs ont fait part de leurs inquiétudes quant au fait que le développement de la RAM ait un impact sur les décisions d'AMU sur leurs opérations. Dans l'ensemble, les médecins vétérinaires étaient la principale source d'information des producteurs concernant l'AMU, y compris les protocoles de traitement, les programmes de gouvernance et les changements réglementaires. À la suite de l'introduction de la réglementation sur prescription uniquement en 2018, 95 % (138/146) des producteurs n'ont signalé aucun changement dans l'AMU de leurs opérations. De même, 77 % (112/146) des producteurs n'ont signalé aucun changement dans l'accès aux produits antimicrobiens, tandis que 63 % (91/146) n'ont signalé aucun changement dans le coût. Conclusion: La plupart des producteurs ont signalé peu de changements dans l'accès aux antimicrobiens et dans l'AMU par suite de l'introduction de réglementations exigeant une prescription pour le MIA. Pertinence clinique: Les producteurs comptent sur les médecins vétérinaires comme principale source d'information concernant la réglementation antimicrobienne et l'AMU. Il est donc important que les médecins vétérinaires comprennent leur rôle d'éducateurs auprès des producteurs de vaches-veaux de boucherie. En fin de compte, les médecins vétérinaires et les producteurs doivent travailler ensemble pour garantir la protection de la santé et du bien-être des animaux tout en utilisant les antimicrobiens de manière responsable.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Antimicrobial Use in Canadian Cow-Calf Herds.

Despite growing concern surrounding antimicrobial use (AMU) and the importance of cow-calf herds to the Canadian livestock industry, surveillance of AMU in cow-calf herds to inform antimicrobial stewardship programs has been sporadic. Producers from the Canadian Cow-Calf Surveillance Network (87%, 146/168) provided data and almost all reported AMU in at least one animal (99%, 145/146 herds) in 2019-2020. The most common reasons for AMU were treatment of respiratory disease in nursing calves in 78% of herds and neonatal diarrhea in 67% of herds, as well as for lameness in cows in 83% of herds. However, most herds treated <5% of animals for these reasons. Less than 2.5% of herds treated more than 30% of calves for either bovine respiratory disease or neonatal diarrhea and no herds treated more than 30% of cows for lameness. The most frequently reported antimicrobial was oxytetracycline in 81% of herds, followed by florfenicol in 73% of herds. Antimicrobials with very high importance to human health, such as ceftiofur, were used at least once by 20% of herds but were only used in >30% of nursing calves from one herd. Similarly, while 56% of herds used macrolides at least once, within-herd use was the highest in nursing calves where <4% of herds reported use in >30% of animals. Herds using artificial insemination and calving in the winter were more likely (p = 0.05) to treat >5% of nursing calves for respiratory disease, suggesting the importance of vaccination programs for herds at risk. Overall, AMU was similar to previous Canadian studies; however, the percentage of herds using macrolides had increased from a comparable study in 2014.