Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 298(1): 16-22, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16565820

ABSTRACT

Because of its easy accessibility, the skin is a very attractive target for gene therapy purposes. To study potential clinical applications in a preclinical setting, appropriate animal models are needed. Pig skin is very similar to human skin, and a variety of human diseases that are potentially amenable to gene therapy applications also occur in pigs. Only a few studies have analyzed the engraftment of transduced keratinocytes (KC) in pigs, however, with limited success. We describe a porcine model in which pig KC were transduced ex vivo with a retroviral vector encoding a marker gene and subsequently grafted onto the autologous host, utilizing a relatively simple grafting technique. Enhanced transduction efficiency was achieved by an optimized transduction protocol including centrifugation of the retroviral vector at a temperature of 32 degrees C. Transduced KC were then seeded onto acellular dermis, forming a stratified epidermis. Grafting was performed by creating full thickness wounds and placing the skin graft onto the muscle fascia, covered by a protective skin flap for several days. Successful engraftment of transduced KC was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry of biopsies taken at different time points, showing transgene expression in 40-50% of grafted KC. After 4 weeks, KC expressing a foreign marker gene was lost, suggesting a transgene-specific immune response in the immunocompetent pigs and highlighting the potential problems for clinical gene therapy studies when transferring new genetic material into a patient. The model presented here may be used to examine applications of skin gene therapy, where retroviral vectors encoding endogenous pig genes will be expressed in the skin.


Subject(s)
Genetic Therapy/methods , Models, Animal , Skin Transplantation/methods , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Genetic Vectors , Keratinocytes/transplantation , Retroviridae/genetics , Swine , Swine, Miniature , Transduction, Genetic
2.
J Virol ; 76(3): 1496-504, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11773422

ABSTRACT

For skin gene therapy, introduction of a desired gene into keratinocyte progenitor or stem cells could overcome the problem of achieving persistent gene expression in a significant percentage of keratinocytes. Although keratinocyte stem cells have not yet been completely characterized and purified for gene targeting purposes, lentiviral vectors may be superior to retroviral vectors at gene introduction into these stem cells, which are believed to divide and cycle slowly. Our initial in vitro studies demonstrate that lentiviral vectors are able to efficiently transduce nondividing keratinocytes, unlike retroviral vectors, and do not require the lentiviral accessory genes for keratinocyte transduction. When lentiviral vectors expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) were directly injected into the dermis of human skin grafted onto immunocompromised mice, transduction of dividing basal and nondividing suprabasal keratinocytes could be demonstrated, which was not the case when control retroviral vectors were used. However, flow cytometry analysis demonstrated low transduction efficiency, and histological analysis at later time points provided no evidence for progenitor cell targeting. In an alternative in vivo method, human keratinocytes were transduced in tissue culture (ex vivo) with either lentiviral or retroviral vectors and grafted as skin equivalents onto immunocompromised mice. GFP expression was analyzed in these human skin grafts after several cycles of epidermal turnover, and both the lentiviral and retroviral vector-transduced grafts had similar percentages of GFP-expressing keratinocytes. This ex vivo grafting study provides a good in vivo assessment of gene introduction into progenitor cells and suggests that lentiviral vectors are not necessarily superior to retroviral vectors at introducing genes into keratinocyte progenitor cells during in vitro culture.


Subject(s)
Genetic Vectors/physiology , Keratinocytes/cytology , Lentivirus/physiology , Membrane Glycoproteins , Animals , Cell Division , Cell Line, Transformed , Cells, Cultured , Gene Transfer Techniques , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Humans , Lentivirus/genetics , Mice , Mice, Nude , Retroviridae/genetics , Retroviridae/physiology , Skin/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Transduction, Genetic , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL