Insulin Metabolism and Assessment of Hepatic Insulin Extraction During Liver Regeneration. A Study in a Rat Model.

Background: Liver regeneration is a complex procedure in which insulin metabolism has been implicated. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the role of insulin in rat hepatic regeneration following major hepatectomy (70%), employing an isolated perfused rat liver (IPRL) model to assess the extraction of insulin from the regenerating liver. Methods: Eighty-six male rats were randomized in 9 groups. A group of rats was studied at postoperative day (POD) 1 having a sham operation while control rats had no operation. All other animals were subjected to 70% hepatectomy. In phase B, at POD 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14, the IPRL was applied. The regenerating liver was perfused with insulin (450 mu/ml) at a flow of 1.4 ml/gr liver/min for 20 min. Animal weight, liver weight, glucose, lactate, aspartate transferase (AST), alanine transferase (ALT), total bilirubin, albumin, prothrombin time (PT), insulin clearance, and tissue proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression were recorded. Results: We observed reduction of the liver's biochemical activities resulting in increase of AST (684%), ALT (532%), PT (27.7%), international normalized ratio (72%), and total bilirubin (82.8%) at first POD, while a normalization of the essential liver's functions occurs at fifth POD. Endogenous insulin concentration increased, while insulin extraction by the liver was reduced at the first POD in animals who underwent hepatectomy (13.94 ± 0.8 vs 7.97 ± 1.80 u/ml, p = 0.0005 and 71 ± 9.9 vs 165.88 µU/gr liver/min, respectively, p = 0.0005). Conclusions: Insulin seems to take part in hepatic regeneration, as the pancreas increases insulin production and the liver absorbs less despite the reduced hepatic mass and function.

Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method.

Introduction. To present our experience regarding the use of pancreatic stump occlusion technique as an alternative management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods. Between 2002 and 2009, hospital records of 93 patients who had undergone a Whipple's procedure for either pancreatic-periampullary cancer or chronic pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. In 37 patients the pancreatic duct was occluded by stapling and running suture without anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant, whereas in 56 patients a pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. Operative data, postoperative complications, oncological parameters, and survival rates were recorded. Results. 2/37 patients of the occlusion group and 9/56 patients of the anastomosis group were treated for chronic pancreatitis, whereas 35/37 and 47/56 patients for periampullary malignancies. The duration of surgery for the anastomosis group was significantly longer (mean time 220 versus 180 minutes). Mean hospitalization time was 6 days for both groups. The occlusion group had a lower morbidity rate (24% versus 32%). With regard to postoperative complications, a slightly higher incidence of pancreatic fistulas was observed in the anastomosis group. Conclusions. Pancreatic remnant occlusion is a safe, technically feasible, and reducing postoperative complications alternative approach of the pancreatic stump during Whipple's procedure.

Right Kocher's incision: a feasible and effective incision for right hemicolectomy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical incision is determined by access to the surgical field, particularly when an oncological resection is required. Special consideration is also given to other factors, such as postoperative pain and its sequelae, fewer complications in the early postoperative period and a lower occurrence of incisional hernias. The purpose of this study is to compare the right Kocher's and the midline incision, for patients undergoing right hemicolectomy, by focusing on short- and longterm results. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2009, hospital records for 213 patients that had undergone a right hemicolectomy for a right- sided adenocarcinoma were retrospectively studied. 113 patients had been operated via a Kocher's and 100 via a midline incision. Demographic details, operative data (explorative access to the peritoneal cavity, time of operation), recovery parameters (time with IV analgesic medication, time to first oral fluid intake, time to first solid meal, time to discharge), and oncological parameters (lymph node harvest, TNM stage and resection margins) were analyzed. Postoperative complications were also recorded. The two groups were retrospectively well matched with respect to demographic parameters and oncological status of the tumor. RESULTS: The median length of the midline incision was slightly longer (12 vs. 10 cm, p < 0.05). The duration of the surgery for the Kocher's incision group was significantly shorter (median time 70 vs 85 min, p < 0.001). In three patients we performed wedge resection of liver metastasis and in one patient we performed a typical right hepatectomy that lasted 190 min. No major operative complications were noted. There was no immediate or 30- day postoperative mortality. The Kocher's incision group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (median time 5 vs 8 days). All patients underwent wide tumor excision and clear resection margins were obtained in all cases. No significant difference was noted regarding analgesia requirements and early postoperative complications. Late postoperative complications included 2 incisional hernias and three patients presented with one episode of obstructive ileus, that resolved conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The Kocher's incision approach for right- sided colon cancer is technically feasible, safe and overall very well tolerated. It can achieve the same standards of tumor resection and surgical field accessibility as the midline approach, while reducing postoperative recovery.