Proposal for a screening protocol for Candida auris colonization.

BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast which can cause severe infection in hospitalized patients. Since its first detection in 2009, C. auris has spread globally. The control and elimination of this pathogen in a hospital setting is particularly challenging because of its ability to form biofilms, allowing for long-term patient colonization and persistence in the environment. Identification of C. auris from cultures is difficult due to the morphologic similarities to other yeasts, its slow growth, and the low culture sensitivity when using standard agars and temperatures. AIM: We have developed a screening protocol for C. auris colonization using an in-house-developed polymerase chain reaction (PCR), combined with confirmatory culture in optimized conditions. METHODS: C. auris-specific primers and probe were developed, targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, and specificity was confirmed in silico using the BLAST tool. The PCR was validated using a panel of 12 C. auris isolates and 103 isolates from 22 other Candida species and was shown to be 100% accurate. The limit of detection of the assay was determined at approximately four cells per PCR. FINDINGS: C. auris screening was introduced on February 15th, 2023, and was used for patients who had been admitted to a healthcare facility abroad in the two months prior to admission to our hospital. The screening protocol included swabs from nose, throat, rectum, axilla, and groin. In the first eight months, 199 patients were screened and seven were found positive (4%). CONCLUSION: Our proposed screening protocol may contribute to control C. auris in hospitals.

Use of stewardship smartphone applications by physicians and prescribing of antimicrobials in hospitals: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs promote appropriate use of antimicrobials and reduce antimicrobial resistance. Technological developments have resulted in smartphone applications (apps) facilitating AMS. Yet, their impact is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Systematically review AMS apps and their impact on prescribing by physicians treating in-hospital patients. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Google Scholar. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies focusing on smartphone or tablet apps and antimicrobial therapy published from January 2008 until February 28th 2019 were included. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians treating in-hospital patients. INTERVENTIONS: AMS apps. METHODS: Systematic review. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. None was a randomized controlled trial. Methodological study quality was considered low to moderate in all but three qualitative studies. The primary outcomes were process indicators, adherence to guidelines and user experience. Guidelines were more frequently accessed by app (53.0% - 89.6%) than by desktop in three studies. Adherence to guidelines increased (6.5% - 74.0%) significantly for several indications after app implementation in four studies. Most users considered app use easy (77.4%->90.0%) and useful (71.0%->90%) in three studies and preferred it over guideline access by web viewer or booklet in two studies. However, some physicians regarded app use adjacent to colleagues or patients unprofessional in three qualitative studies. Susceptibility to several antimicrobials changed significantly post-intervention (from 5% decrease to 10% - 14% increase) in one study. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AMS apps seems to promote access to and knowledge of antimicrobial prescribing policy, and increase adherence to guidelines in hospitals. However, this has been assessed in a limited number of studies and for specific indications. Good quality studies are necessary to properly assess the impact of AMS apps on antimicrobial prescribing. To improve adherence to antimicrobial guidelines, use of AMS apps could be considered.