Reasons of not having breast reconstruction: a historical cohort of 1937 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to investigate the factors associated with not having breast reconstruction following mastectomy and to assess patient satisfaction with information on reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed a historical cohort of 1937 consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy at Institut Curie between January 2004 and February 2007. Their sociodemographic and clinicobiological characteristics were recorded in a prospective database. A questionnaire was sent to 10% of nonreconstructed patients. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with invasive cancer was 82.7%. The rate of nonreconstruction in patients with in situ and invasive cancer was 34.6% and 74.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, only employment outside the home was associated with reconstruction in patients with in situ cancer (p < 0.001). In patients with invasive cancer, employment status (p < 0.001) and smoking (p = 0.045) were associated with reconstruction, while age > 50, ASA score >1, radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) and metastatic status (p = 0.018) were associated with nonreconstruction. For 80% of questionnaire responders, nonreconstruction was a personal choice, mainly for the following reasons: refusal of further surgery, acceptance of body asymmetry, risk of complications and advanced age. Information on reconstruction was entirely unsatisfactory or inadequate for 62% of patients. CONCLUSION: Better understanding the factors that influence decision of nonreconstruction can help us adapt the information to serve the patient's personal needs.

Breast and ovarian cancer risk management in a French cohort of 158 women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation: patient choices and outcome.

Description of the various modalities of breast and ovarian cancer risk management, patient choices and their outcome in a single-center cohort of 158 unaffected women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation. Between 1998 and 2009, 158 unaffected women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation were prospectively followed. The following variables were studied: general and gynecological characteristics, data concerning any prophylactic procedures, and data concerning the outcome of these patients. Median age at inclusion was 37 years and median follow-up was 54 months. Among the 156 women who received systematic information about prophylactic mastectomy, 5.3 % decided to undergo surgery within 36 months after disclosure of genetic results. Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 68 women. Among women in whom follow-up started between the ages of 40 and 50 years, prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was performed, within 24 months after start of follow-up, in 83.7 and 52 % of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Twenty four women developed breast cancer. Ovarian cancer was detected during prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in two women (2.9 %). In this cohort of French women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations, prophylactic mastectomy was a rarely used option. However, good compliance with prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was observed. This study confirms the high breast cancer risk in these women.

A need for laparoscopic evaluation of patients with endometrial carcinoma selected for conservative treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to report two cases of extrauterine disease in patients with early stage endometrial cancer (EC) who desired fertility-sparing management. CASES: Two patients presenting an apparent early stage EC and desiring conservative management. The two patients, aged 35 and 36 years old, had a grade 1 and grade 2 EC diagnosed after curettage or hysteroscopic resection of a polyp. Ultrasound (US) imaging was normal (ovary). Once informed about the risk of recurrence, both patients opted for conventional therapy (hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). A small ovarian carcinoma was found in one patient and isolated positive peritoneal cytology in the other. CONCLUSIONS: These cases seem to suggest that laparoscopic evaluation including adnexal exploration and peritoneal cytology (and possibly pelvic lymphadenectomy) should be performed in patients with early stage EC selected for conservative management to confirm the absence of extrauterine disease.

Impact of surgical staging in patients with macroscopic "stage I" ovarian borderline tumours: analysis of a continuous series of 101 cases.

The aim of this study was to assess the patient's clinical outcome following complete or incomplete surgical staging in cases treated for an early stage low-malignant-potential ovarian tumour (LMPOT). One-hundred and one patients treated between 1965 and 1998 for a early stage I LMPOT were reviewed according to whether the initial surgical staging was complete (Group 1/defined by peritoneal cytology + peritoneal biopsies + infracolic omentectomy) or incomplete (Group 2/omission of at least one of the peritoneal staging procedures described above). Complete and incomplete surgical stagings were carried out in 48 (48%) and 53 (52%) patients, respectively. Four (8%) LMPOT recurrences were observed in Group 2, all following conservative management, but there were no recurrences in Group 1. No relapses with invasive carcinoma or peritoneal disease and no tumour-related deaths were observed. The absence of complete peritoneal staging in patients with an apparent "stage I" LMPOT increased the recurrence rate. However, this surgical restaging (in cases of incomplete initial surgery) does not modify the survival of patients with apparent "stage I" LMPOT misdiagnosed during the initial surgery. This procedure could probably be omitted: (1) if the peritoneum is clearly reported as "normal" during the initial surgery; (2) in the absence of a micropapillary pattern; and (3) if the patient agrees to be carefully followed-up.