Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 76
Filter
1.
Lung Cancer ; 177: 29-36, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36701841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapies exhibit a series of adverse side effects including smell and taste alterations, which can have a significant impact on their food behavior and quality of life. Particularly, olfactory alterations are often underestimated, although declared as frequent by cancer patients. In the present study, we set out to examine loss of smell in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and its relationship to food habits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-four bronchial cancer patients receiving cisplatin and 44 controls age and gender matched participants were tested for olfactory and gustatory functions using the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities and the Taste Strips test. Participants reported their food and dietary habits by filling a self-administered questionnaire. Patients were tested under two different sessions: i) before the beginning of the treatment, and ii) 6 weeks later, after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Controls were tested under the same protocol with two sessions separated by 6 weeks. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results highlighted decreased smell and taste abilities in almost half of the lung patients' group even before the exposition to Cisplatin. On a perceptual level, patients rated typical food odors as less edible compared to controls. Moreover, within the patients' group, hyposmics reported using more condiments, possibly as a compensatory mechanism to their decreased sensory abilities. Taken together, these findings showed that loss of smell is prevalent in lung cancer patients and is related to changes in dietary practices including seasoning. Future studies will provide a better understanding of these sensory compensation mechanisms associated with olfactory loss and their effects on food pleasure in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Lung Neoplasms , Olfaction Disorders , Humans , Smell , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Taste , Anosmia/drug therapy , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Feeding Behavior , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy
2.
Rev Mal Respir ; 39(9): 731-739, 2022 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36272856

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are commonly observed in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Over the past decade, the management of NSCLC-carrying EGFR mutation has evolved considerably with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The main objective of this retrospective study was to analyze the evolution of therapeutic strategies in a cohort of patients with metastatic or locally advanced EGFR- mutated NSCLC. METHODS: Data on patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, eligible for TKIs, and treated between 2010 to 2019 were collected. The main therapeutic strategies adopted following progression under TKIs and the prognostic factors for survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of the 177 patients was included in the cohort was 70years. The majority of patients (77.4%) received TKIs as first-line treatment, while 16.4% received chemotherapy. Osimertinib initiation as second-line treatment was a factor for better prognosis (OR=0.5). Finally, change of chemotherapy line was the main therapeutic strategy adopted for 41.3% of the patients having relapsed under TKIs. DISCUSSION: Therapeutic management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients was in accordance with regional, national and international recommendations. The characterization of progression under TKI therapy has become systematic, allowing better adaption of therapeutic strategies.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Mutation
3.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 69(4): 266-271, 2019 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31051041

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Between 10 and 20% of lung cancers are of occupational origin. Screening for occupational risk factors is part of the diagnostic workup. A self-administered questionnaire to detect lung carcinogens of occupational origin, the RECAP questionnaire, was drawn up and validated with a view to limiting under-declaration of lung cancer as an occupational disease (OD). AIMS: Optimal administration conditions were investigated, to facilitate systematic use in the management of patients admitted to hospital with lung cancer. METHODS: The various care pathways of lung cancer patients were first studied in two centres, to identify the health-care professionals involved in medical management, the various care sites and the stages of treatment. A focus group of health-care professionals was set up, and semi-directive interviews were conducted with 24 patients. RESULTS: Caregivers tended to suggest that a physician or nurse should present the RECAP questionnaire, whereas patients rather chose non-caregiver staff, seeing the undertaking as being 'administrative' in nature. Some caregivers and patients thought the questionnaire should not be administered at the outset of treatment, due to the psychological trauma entailed by diagnosis. Administration during chemotherapy was recommended by patients, as they are more freely available at that time, and by caregivers, who thought patients better able to pay attention then. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted patients' lack of information on how lung cancer can be recognized as an OD. Implementing the RECAP questionnaire should facilitate patients' claims for insurance cover for lung cancer as an OD.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Female , Focus Groups , France/epidemiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data
4.
Acta Oncol ; 58(6): 880-887, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907190

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Obesity is a major risk factor for chronic disease and cancer development. Therapeutic management of obese patients with cancer is a real challenge for physician because of the alteration of antineoplastic pharmacokinetics parameters in this population. In routine clinical practices, chemotherapy doses in obese patients are arbitrarily capped or adjusted to an ideal weight to minimize excessive toxicities. Material and methods: The main goal of this review is to describe the current state of knowledge concerning the correlation between the adjustment of BSA (capping or ideal weight) and the rates of global toxicities and survival outcomes in obese patients under chemotherapy in different types of cancer. We searched in the Medline database (via PubMed) in order to identify all publications of literature reviews whose subject chemotherapy dosing in obese population. Results: Only a single study was pointing toward increased of global toxicities of full weight dosing. Furthermore, some studies suggests that the practice of limiting doses in overweight and obese patients may negatively influence the quality of care and outcomes in a constantly increasing population. Conclusion: This review highlights the lack of prospective studies focusing on chemotherapy methods of administration in obese patients. At this time, there is no prospective study comparing capping and full weight dose chemotherapy administration in obese patient population.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Dosage Calculations , Mathematics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Obesity/physiopathology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Neoplasms/pathology , Tissue Distribution , Treatment Outcome
5.
Public Health ; 143: 44-51, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28159026

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ten to thirty percent of lung cancer is thought to be of occupational origin. Lung cancer is under-declared as an occupational disease in Europe, and most declarations of occupational disease concern asbestos. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a short, sensitive self-administered questionnaire, as an aid for physicians in detecting occupational exposure to asbestos and other lung carcinogens in order to remedy occupational lung cancer under-declaration. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A short (30-question) self-administered questionnaire was drawn up by oncologist-pneumologists and occupational physicians, covering situations of exposure to proven and probable lung carcinogens. Understanding and acceptability were assessed on 15 lung cancer patients. Validity and reliability were assessed on 70 lung cancer patients by comparison against a semi-directive questionnaire considered as gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed by comparing responses to items on the two questionnaires. Reliability was assessed by analysing the kappa concordance coefficient for items on the two questionnaires. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 0.85 and specificity 0.875. Concordance between responses on the two questionnaires was 85.7%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.695 [0.52-0.87]. Mean self-administration time was 3.1 min (versus 8.12 min to administer the gold-standard questionnaire). In 16 patients, the self-administered questionnaire detected lung carcinogen exposure meeting the criteria for occupational disease. CONCLUSION: The present short, easy-to-use self-administered questionnaire should facilitate detection of occupational exposure to lung carcinogens. It could be used in occupational lung cancer screening and increase the presently low rate of application for recognition of lung cancer as an occupational disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Asbestos/toxicity , Carcinogens/toxicity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Reproducibility of Results
6.
Prog Urol ; 26(9): 524-31, 2016 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27567304

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to appreciate the place and role of geriatric assessment in elderly patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients who underwent geriatric assessment during the therapeutic management from 2008 to 2014. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and their associated toxicity as well as the parameters of geriatric assessment were studied. The occurrence of geriatric assessment within the 3 months preceding a therapeutic decision was reviewed. RESULTS: Data of seventy-four patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 15.6 years. The average age at diagnosis was 74.3 and 80.6 at the geriatric assessment. At the time of the geriatric assessment 64 patients had metastatic disease, 39 were in poor condition more than 50% of patients had walking ability disorders. Thirteen patients underwent radical surgery, 28 received radiotherapy, 30 patients had chemotherapy and hormonotherapy was prescribed for 72 patients. The geriatric assessment, requested on average 15 years after diagnosis, was not carried out within the 3 months preceding treatment decision for 55 patients. CONCLUSION: The recourse to geriatric assessment is predominantly used to endorse a decision of supportive care for elderly patients with prostate cancer. An early intervention by a geriatrician consultant for the initial management and then at each therapeutic event is a sine qua non condition for efficient personalized therapeutic management suitable to every patient according to physiological age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Decision-Making , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
7.
Cancer Radiother ; 20(1): 54-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26867467

ABSTRACT

Carcinomatous meningitis complicates 5 to 10% of cancers, essentially with breast cancers, lung cancers and melanomas. The incidence probably increased because of therapeutic advances in oncology. Treatment is based on external beam radiotherapy, systemic treatment, intrathecal chemotherapy and supportive care. The aim of this work was to review data on external radiation therapy and carcinomatous meningitis. There are few evidences on the subject, but it is a major topic of interest. A whole brain radiation therapy is indicated in case of brain metastases or clinical encephalitis. Focal radiation therapy is recommended on symptomatic, bulky or obstructive sites. The dose depends on performance status (20 to 40 Gy in five to 20 fractions), volume to treat and available techniques (classic fractionation or hypofractionation via stereotactic radiosurgery). The objective of radiation therapy is to improve quality of life. Association with systemic therapy improves overall survival. Administration of sequential intrathecal chemotherapy may also improve overall survival, but induces more toxicity. The use of new radiotherapy techniques and development of radiosensitizing molecules in patients with good performance status could improve survival in this frequent complication of cancer.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Carcinomatosis/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Decision Trees , Humans , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Dosage
8.
Ann Oncol ; 27(2): 281-6, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26598547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HER2 mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers in lung cancers and are found in 1-2% of lung adenocarcinomas. There is, to date, no standard of care for these patients. We thus aim to study the therapeutic outcomes of patients harboring HER2 mutations and establish the efficacy of various drug regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study in European centers assessed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a known HER2 exon-20 insertion, treated with chemotherapy and/or HER2-targeted drugs. RESULTS: We identified 101 eligible patients from 38 centers: median age 61 years (range: 30-87), 62.4% women, 60.4% never-smokers. All tumors were adenocarcinomas. Concomitant EGFR mutations, ALK translocations, and ROS translocations were observed in 5, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. The median number of treatment lines was 3 (range: 1-11). The median overall survival was 24 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) with conventional chemotherapy (excluding targeted therapies) were 43.5% and 6 months in first-line (n = 93), and 10% and 4.3 months in second-line (n = 52) therapies. Sixty-five patients received HER2-targeted therapies: trastuzumab = 57, neratinib = 14, afatinib = 9, lapatinib = 5, T-DM1 = 1. ORR was 50.9% and PFS was 4.8 months with trastuzumab or T-DM1. CONCLUSION: This series shows the chemosensitivity of HER2-driven NSCLC, and the potential interest of HER2-targeted agents. Our results should help to define the best therapeutic strategy for these patients and to orient future clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Adult , Afatinib , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Europe , Female , Humans , Lapatinib , Male , Middle Aged , Quinazolines/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
9.
Target Oncol ; 11(2): 167-74, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26315967

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Retrospective studies suggested a benefit of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment continuation after response evaluation in solid tumors (RECIST) progression in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this multicenter observational retrospective study was to assess the frequency of this practice and its impact on overall survival (OS). The analysis included advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with first-line TKI who experienced RECIST progression between June 2010 and July 2012. Among the 123 patients included (67 ± 12.7 years, women: 69 %, non smokers: 68 %, PS 0-1: 87 %), 40.6 % continued TKI therapy after RECIST progression. There was no difference between the patients who did and did not continue TKI therapy with respect to progression-free survival (PFS1: 10.5 versus 9.5 months, p = 0.4). Overall survival (OS) showed a non-significant trend in favor of continuing TKI therapy (33.0 vs. 21.2 months, p = 0.054). Progressions were significantly less symptomatic in the TKI continuation group than in the discontinuation group (18 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed a higher risk of death among patients with PS >1 (HR 4.33, 95 %CI: 2.21-8.47, p = 0.001), >1 one metastatic site (HR 1.96, 95 %CI: 1.06-3.61, p = 0.02), brain metastasis (HR 1.75, 95 %CI: 1.08-2.84, p = 0.02) at diagnosis, and a trend towards a higher risk of death in cases of TKI discontinuation after progression (HR 1.62, 95 %CI: 0.98-2.67, p = 0.056 ). In multivariate analysis only PS >1 (HR 6.27, 95 %CI: 2.97-13.25, p = 0.00001) and >1 metastatic site (HR 2.54, 95 %CI: 1.24-5.21, p = 0.02) at diagnosis remained significant. This study suggests that under certain circumstances, first-line TKI treatment continuation after RECIST progression is an acceptable option in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT02293733.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Mutation , Retrospective Studies
11.
Rev Mal Respir ; 32(2): 166-72, 2015 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25765121

ABSTRACT

The modest impact of specific treatments is a major problem in oncology and particularly for metastatic lung cancer patients. Therapeutic progress achieved by some targeted therapies is, in fact, only relevant for a small proportion of patients. The vast majority of people with this condition are rapidly confronted by the limits of specific therapies and management is or becomes entirely palliative. This article addresses therapeutic limitations in the management of metastatic lung cancer, as well as legislative aspects and guidelines for practitioners when discussing these issues with patients, together with a discussion of the psychological consequences for patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/standards , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/psychology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Palliative Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/psychology , Patient Rights , Terminal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Terminal Care/psychology
12.
Ann Oncol ; 26(5): 908-914, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25688059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II-III trial sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab (Bev) following induction chemotherapy (CT) in extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled SCLC patients received two induction cycles of CT. Responders were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive four additional cycles of CT alone or CT plus Bev (7.5 mg/kg), followed by single-agent Bev until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the percentage of patients for whom disease remained controlled (still in response) at the fourth cycle. RESULTS: In total, 147 patients were enrolled. Partial response was observed in 103 patients, 74 of whom were eligible for Bev and randomly assigned to the CT alone group (n = 37) or the CT plus Bev group (n = 37). Response assessment at the end of the fourth cycle showed that disease control did not differ between the two groups (89.2% versus 91.9% of patients remaining responders in CT alone versus CT plus Bev, respectively; Fisher's exact test: P = 1.00). Progression-free survival (PFS) since randomization did not significantly differ, with a median PFS of 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9% to 6.0%] versus 5.3 months (95% CI 4.8% to 5.8%) in the CT alone and CT plus Bev groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) for CT alone: 1.1; 95% CI 0.7% to 1.7%; unadjusted P = 0.82]. Grade ≥2 hypertension and grade ≥3 thrombotic events were observed in 40% and 11% of patients, respectively, in the CT plus Bev group. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble VEGF receptor titrations failed to identify predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Administering 7.5 mg/kg Bev after induction did not improve outcome in extensive SCLC patients.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Epirubicin/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Female , France , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/mortality , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
13.
Rev Mal Respir ; 32(1): 66-72, 2015 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25618207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In response to questions regarding the appropriate intensity of care for some patients, "a decision support aid regarding the intensity of care in case of worsening condition of a patient with a chronic disease" has been established at the Grenoble university hospital. According to patient's wishes and the experience of the medical and paramedical team who are responsible for him, a level of intensity of care will be suggested. METHODS: We propose a prospective and multicenter study conducted in the Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne area. All lung cancer patients admitted to a pulmonology unit in 2014 would be included. This document would be used if a decision to withhold life-sustaining treatment exists. We would assess the relationship between the planned intensity of care and those established when the patient develops organ failure. Patient characteristics and factors associated with proposed levels and types of care would be analyzed. Patient and family opinions will be obtained at 3 months. The number of subjects to be included is 468. EXPECTED RESULTS: Therefore, we hope to be able to define the wishes of patients' and to propose an appropriate and adapted aid for decisions if they develop organ failure.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Lung Neoplasms , Withholding Treatment , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Male , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Patients/psychology , Professional-Family Relations , Professional-Patient Relations , Prospective Studies , Research Design , Withholding Treatment/ethics
14.
Lung Cancer ; 85(3): 415-9, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25082565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Concomitant administration of erlotinib with standard chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but preliminary studies suggest that sequential administration might be effective. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line sequential administration of erlotinib and docetaxel in advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In an open-label phase II trial, patients with advanced NSCLC, EGFR wild-type or unknown, PS 0-2, in whom initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy had failed were randomized to sequential erlotinib 150 mg/d (day 2-16)+docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) d1) (arm ED) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) d1) alone (arm D) (21-day cycle). The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate at 15 weeks (PFS 15). Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), the overall response rate (ORR) and tolerability. Based on a Simon optimal two-stage design, the ED strategy was rejected if the primary endpoint was below 33/66 patients at the end of the two Simon stages. RESULTS: 147 patients were randomized (median age: 60±8 years, PS 0/1/2: 44/83/20 patients; males: 78%). The ED strategy was rejected, with only 18 of 73 patients achieving PFS15 in arm ED at the end of stage 2 and 17 of 74 patients in arm D. In arms ED and D, respectively, median PFS was 2.2 and 2.5 months and median OS was 6.5 and 8.3 months. CONCLUSION: Sequential erlotinib and docetaxel was not more effective than docetaxel alone as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR status.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Docetaxel , Erlotinib Hydrochloride , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Retreatment , Risk Factors , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
15.
Rev Mal Respir ; 30(3): 231-7, 2013 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23497934

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the best treatment for stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer. Despite an improvement in the perioperative management of cancer patients and specialization of surgical teams, morbidity and mortality remains significant. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is an effective therapeutic option in hypercapnic respiratory failure. It also improves functional and gasometric parameters when undertaken before surgery. The objective of the preOVNI study is to demonstrate that preoperative non-invasive ventilation for 7 days, at home, reduces the postoperative respiratory and cardiovascular complications of lung resection surgery, in a high-risk population. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled open-labelled multicentric French study, under the supervision of the Groupe Français de Pneumocancérologie (GFPC), comparing 7 days of preoperative non-invasive ventilation with standard treatment. Inclusion criteria are: patients suitable for lobectomy or segmentectomy for primary bronchial carcinoma and presenting with obstructive or restrictive lung disease, obesity or chronic cardiac insufficiency. The primary criterion is a composite one, including all respiratory and cardiac complications. The number of patients is 150 in each treatment arm, 300 in total. EXPECTED RESULTS: We think that preoperative NIV will be able to reduce the rate of postoperative complications. If this objective is achieved, the management of these patients could be changed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Noninvasive Ventilation , Pneumonectomy , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Preoperative Care , Adult , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Heart Diseases/complications , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Obesity/complications , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Sample Size
16.
Rev Pneumol Clin ; 68(1): 1-9, 2012 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22197158

ABSTRACT

This survey, conducted in Rhône-Alpes region (France), aims to better understand the actual conditions of practice in thoracic oncology. A questionnaire was distributed to all oncologists, pulmonologists, radiotherapy physicians and thoracic surgeons in the region. Of 401 questionnaires, the response rate was 56%. Among the responders 46% reported exercising the Thoracic Oncology (TO). Most physicians practicing TO are pulmonologists (62%). The majority (45%) are engaged in secondary hospital or university hospital (27%). However, practitioners with the most important activity exerts in university hospitals and cancer centre (71% of physicians practicing in secondary hospitals and 75% of those in private practice reported to manage fewer than 80 new NSCLC cases per year in structure). Furthermore, 91% are regularly involved in a multidisciplinary team. Radiation oncologist, pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons are assiduous to these meeting; however radiologists and, to a lesser extent, pathologists are less attentive. Moreover, 92% of practitioners belong to cancer networks. Similarly, over one third of working together in a cooperative clinical research institution and nearly half are involved in clinical trials (with nearly half in secondary hospital). These results highlight the reality of practice in Rhône-Alpes and will serve as the basis for coordinating authorities to correct dysfunctions or monitor certain activities of interest (clinical trials).


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Thoracic Neoplasms/therapy , Disease Management , France , Health Surveys , Humans , Organizations , Radiation Oncology , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Rev Mal Respir ; 26(10): 1091-6, 2009 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20032844

ABSTRACT

Until recently, first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was based on ASCO guidelines. Since several years, first-line chemotherapy is a platin-based doublet for patients with a good performans status. For elderly or unfit patients, a single-drug chemotherapy or a combination without cisplatin was recommended. The association of an anti-angiogenic therapy, bevacizumab, with carboplatin-paclitaxel or cisplatin-gemcitabine regimens improves progression-free survival for patients with non-epidermoid tumors. The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed is better in terms of survival than cisplatine-gemcitabine in these tumors. The choice of treatment according to histology is becoming a new concept. Another is maintenance therapy. The main objective is to reduce duration of platin-based chemotherapy while improving quality of life and progression-free survival. This concept is ongoing validation. The combination of cetuximab with platin-chemotherapy improves survival for all histologic types. We should integrate this new approach among other available treatments. First-line therapy for advanced NSCLC is changing. In the future, first-line therapy will be chosen according to clinical features and biomarkers such as gene mutations of EGFR.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Humans
18.
Cancer Radiother ; 13(1): 55-60, 2009 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19041270

ABSTRACT

The objective was the drafting of a practical document intended for radiotherapists and radiophysicists, describing the technique of irradiation of a non small cell bronchial cancer. The good practices concern the care of patients affected by bronchial cancer localized in the thorax and inoperable or patients who must undergo postoperative irradiation. The document has been developed according to a methodology aiming to join the current scientific data from an analysis of the literature on the subject and the assessment of radiotherapists, radiophysicists, lung specialists and methodologists from Rhône-Alpes area. From the stages necessary for the good progress of a radiotherapy, the writers of this document proposed common definitions concerning the centering and the location of the zone to be treated, the calculation of the dose distribution, the preparation of the patient for the treatment, the treatment and the surveillance during the treatment. The recommendations of this guide took into account the peculiarities bound to the nature of the treated region and more particularly the lung heterogeneity, respiratory movements and the radiosensibility of healthy lung tissue. Even if the technical aspect of the radiotherapy was particularly developed, the interest accorded to patient information takes on all its importance for a therapeutic coverage of quality. The authors of the document wished that this Guide of Good Practices, which will be regularly updated, helps the radiotherapists and allows them to harmonize their practices.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking/organization & administration , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiation Oncology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/standards , Radiotherapy Dosage/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Respiratory Mechanics , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden
19.
Rev Mal Respir ; 25(1): 91-6, 2008 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18288059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As chemotherapy gains wider acceptance for the treatment of earlier stages of NSCLC, particularly in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, physicians face a growing population of high performance status patients who have relapsed after their first-line chemotherapy. The type of second-line chemotherapy after initial adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment with a platinum-based regimen remains largely undefined. The current study has been designed to compare the classical mono chemotherapy docetaxel with a docetaxel cisplatin doublet. METHODS: Patients will be randomized in 2 arms. Arm: docetaxel cisplatin (cycles repeated every 21 days), 4 cycles followed by 2 cycles of docetaxel alone in case of objective response or stabilisation. Arm B: docetaxel alone (cycles repeated every 21 days), 4 cycles followed by 2 cycles of docetaxel alone in case of objective response or stabilisation. EXPECTED RESULTS: 300 patients will be randomized with a statistical hypothesis of a progression free survival of 3 months in the control arm and of 4.5 months in the experimental arm.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Docetaxel , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
20.
Ann Oncol ; 18(11): 1882-6, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17878178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In routine practice, the evaluation of the nutritional status of patients with cancer is not always performed although there is frequent modification as disease progresses. The validated screening and evaluation tools currently available are time-consuming and costly. In this study we analysed factors that could be used to identify patients likely to need nutritional surveillance or intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out for 2 weeks in June 2006 on 477 patients with cancer. RESULTS: 30.2% of the patients had lost more than 10% of their body weight since the start of the illness. After adjustment, the factors significantly associated with weight loss were: depressive state (OR = 3.49; P = 0.002), digestive or ENT tumours (OR = 3.20; P = <0.001), chemotherapy (OR = 2.66; P = 0.011), male gender (OR = 2.30; P = 0.001) and professional status (OR = 2.08; P = 0.02). Using a logistic model, we calculated the risk of weight loss as a function of the presence of the identified predictive factors. CONCLUSION: We report a simple screening tool, which will not replace the available evaluation methods but will enable targeting of the patients most likely, after a specific evaluation, to benefit from nutritional intervention. This remains to be validated in further prospective studies.


Subject(s)
Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Nutritional Support/methods , Wasting Syndrome/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Causality , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Malnutrition/therapy , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Prevalence , ROC Curve , Risk Assessment , Sex Distribution , Wasting Syndrome/physiopathology , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...