The Society of Gynecologic Oncology wellness curriculum pilot: A groundbreaking initiative for fellowship training.

OBJECTIVES: Trainee well-being is a core component of ACGME program requirements and the SGO has recognized the high incidence of burnout among gynecologic oncologists and its negative impact. To foster a culture of wellness throughout the SGO community we sought to engage current fellows along with fellowship directors in a structured didactic program designed to teach wellness. We evaluated the feasibility of and preliminary responses to a pilot curriculum designed to teach skills that promote wellness and prevent burnout. METHODS: The SGO Wellness Taskforce developed a curriculum with topics based on established evidence as well as specialty specific stressors such as end of life discussions. Faculty leaders from 15 pilot-sites attended a full-day training course and then taught four modules over four months. Interactive modules engaged fellows through reflective writing, guided discussion, and multimedia presentations. Fellows completed the Perceived Stress Scale pre- and post-implementation and provided feedback regarding attitudes toward wellness and the individual modules. Faculty curriculum leaders completed surveys regarding their attitudes toward the curriculum as well as their trainees' reactions. RESULTS: Among 73 participating gynecologic oncology fellows, 95% (69/73) and 52/73 (71%) completed the pre-and post-surveys, respectively. Only 34/73 (49%) respondents reported that there was wellness programming at their institution prior to the initiation of the SGO curriculum. At institutions where such programming was available, 35% (12/34) reported not utilizing them. Fifty-five (80%) fellows had PSS scores greater than 12 compared to 39 (75%) post-intervention. After the curriculum, the percentage of fellows comfortable discussing wellness topics increased from 63 to 74%. Prior to the curriculum, 75% felt they could identify symptoms of burnout or psychosocial distress. This increased to 90% post-intervention. The modules were well received by fellows, and the time spent addressing wellness was widely appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: A structured curriculum to promote wellness among gynecologic oncology fellows is feasible and was associated with observed decreased reported stress among fellows at participating programs. This curriculum addresses ACGME requirements regarding trainee well-being, and showed potential for more programmatic, nationwide implementation. Fellowship culture change was not directly measured, but may have been one of the most significant positive outcomes of the wellness program. Further longitudinal studies will be necessary to understand the natural course of fellow burnout and the impact of structured wellness programming.

Genetic consultation embedded in a gynecologic oncology clinic improves compliance with guideline-based care.

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the impact of embedding genetic counseling services in gynecologic oncology on clinician referral and patient uptake of cancer genetics services. METHODS: Data were reviewed for a total of 737 newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in gynecologic oncology at a large academic medical center including 401 from 11/2011-7/2014 (a time when cancer genetics services were provided as an off-site consultation). These data were compared to data from 8/2014-9/2016 (n=336), when the model changed to the genetics embedded model (GEM), incorporating a cancer genetic counselor on-site in the gynecologic oncology clinic. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in proportion of patients referred pre- and post-GEM was observed (21% vs. 44%, p<0.0001). Pre-GEM, only 38% of referred patients were actually scheduled for genetics consultation and post-GEM 82% were scheduled (p<0.00001). The difference in the time from referral to scheduling in genetics was also statistically significant (3.92months pre-GEM vs. 0.79months post-GEM, p<0.00001) as was the time from referral to completion of genetics consultation (2.52months pre-GEM vs. 1.67months post-GEM, p<0.01). Twenty-five percent of patients referred post GEM were seen by the genetic counselor on the same day as the referral. CONCLUSIONS: Providing cancer genetics services on-site in gynecologic oncology and modifying the process by which patients are referred and scheduled significantly increases referral to cancer genetics and timely completion of genetics consultation, improving compliance with guideline-based care. Practice changes are critical given the impact of genetic test results on treatment and familial cancer risks.

Efficacy of ablation at the anteroseptal line for the treatment of perimitral flutter.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial flutter following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly common and difficult to treat. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablation of the anteroseptal line connecting the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) to the anteroseptal mitral annulus (MA) for the treatment of perimitral flutter (PMF). METHODS: We systematically studied patients who were previously treated with AF ablation and who presented to the electrophysiology laboratory with atrial tachyarrhythmias between January 2000 and July 2010. The diagnosis of PMF was confirmed by activation mapping and/or entrainment. After re-isolation of any recovered pulmonary vein, a linear radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed on the line that connected the RSPV to the anteroseptal MA. In this analysis, we included only patients who were treated with an anteroseptal line for their PMF. RESULTS: Ablation was performed at the anteroseptal line in 27 PMF patients (63±13 years; 9 women) who had undergone prior ablation for paroxysmal (n=3) or persistent (n=24) AF, using electroanatomic activation mapping (70% CARTO, 30% NavX). The anteroseptal ablation line was effective in 22/27 (81.5%) patients in the acute-care setting. Termination of AF to sinus rhythm occurred in 15/22 (68.2%) patients, and 7/22 (31.8%) patients׳ AF converted to another right or left atrial flutter. At the 6-month follow-up, 20% of patients demonstrated recurrent left atrial tachyarrhythmia. Only one patient required repeat ablation, and the remaining patients׳ condition was controlled with antiarrhythmic medications. No major procedural complications or heart block occurred. CONCLUSION: Ablation at the left atrial anteroseptal line is safe and efficacious for the treatment of PMF. Unlike ablation at the traditional mitral isthmus line, ablation at the left atrial anteroseptal line does not require ablation in the coronary sinus.

Longitudinal changes in tumor perfusion pattern during the radiation therapy course and its clinical impact in cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To study the temporal changes of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) perfusion patterns during the radiation therapy (RT) course and their influence on local control and survival in cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DCE-MRI was performed in 98 patients with Stage IB(2)-IVA cervical cancer before RT (pre-RT) and during early RT (20-25 Gy) and mid-RT (45-50 Gy). Signal intensity (SI) from the DCE-MRI time-SI curve was derived for each tumor voxel. The poorly perfused low-DCE tumor subregions were quantified as lower 10th percentiles of SI (SI10). Local control, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were correlated with DCE parameters at pre-RT, early RT, and mid-RT. Median follow-up was 4.9 (range, 0.2-9.0) years. RESULTS: Patients (16/98) with initial pre-RT high DCE (SI10 >or=2.1) had 100% 5-year local control, 81% disease-specific survival, and 81% overall survival, compared with only 79%, 61%, and 55%, respectively, in patients with pre-RT low DCE. Conversion from pre-RT low DCE to high DCE in early RT (28/82 patients) was associated with higher local control, disease-specific survival, and overall survival (93%, 74%, and 67%, respectively). In comparison with all other groups, outcome was worst in patients with persistently low DCE from pre-RT throughout the mid-RT phase (66%, 44%, and 43%; p = 0.003, 0.003, and 0.020; respectively). CONCLUSION: Longitudinal tumor perfusion changes during RT correlate with treatment outcome. Persistently low perfusion in pre-RT, early RT, and mid-RT indicates a high risk of treatment failure, whereas outcome is favorable in patients with initially high perfusion or subsequent improvements of initially low perfusion. These findings likely reflect reoxygenation and may have potential for noninvasive monitoring of intra-treatment radio-responsiveness and for guiding adaptive therapy.

Synergistic effects of hemoglobin and tumor perfusion on tumor control and survival in cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: The tumor oxygenation status is likely influenced by two major factors: local tumor blood supply (tumor perfusion) and its systemic oxygen carrier, hemoglobin (Hgb). Each has been independently shown to affect the radiotherapy (RT) outcome in cervical cancer. This study assessed the effect of local tumor perfusion, systemic Hgb levels, and their combination on the treatment outcome in cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 88 patients with cervical cancer, Stage IB2-IVA, who were treated with RT/chemotherapy, underwent serial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) before RT, at 20-22 Gy, and at 45-50 Gy. The DCE-MRI perfusion parameters, mean and lowest 10th percentile of the signal intensity distribution in the tumor pixels, and the Hgb levels, including pre-RT, nadir, and mean Hgb (average of weekly Hgb during RT), were correlated with local control and disease-specific survival. The median follow-up was 4.6 years. RESULTS: Local recurrence predominated in the group with both a low mean Hgb (<11.2 g/dL) and low perfusion (lowest 10th percentile of signal intensity <2.0 at 20-22 Gy), with a 5-year local control rate of 60% vs. 90% for all other groups (p = .001) and a disease-specific survival rate of 41% vs. 72% (p = .008), respectively. In the group with both high mean Hgb and high perfusion, the 5-year local control rate and disease-specific survival rate was 100% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the compounded effects of Hgb level and tumor perfusion during RT influence the radioresponsiveness and survival in cervical cancer patients. The outcome was worst when both were impaired. The management of Hgb may be particularly important in patients with low tumor perfusion.

Interstitial brachytherapy for salvage treatment of vaginal recurrences in previously unirradiated endometrial cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether interstitial brachytherapy can effectively salvage vaginal recurrence from endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1989 and September 2000, 13 previously unirradiated patients (mean age 70 years) with isolated vaginal recurrences from endometrial adenocarcinoma were treated with interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without additional external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy was delivered using a modified perineal Syed template loaded with (192)Ir. The central cylinder was loaded with high-activity (192)Ir (n = 12) or (137)Cs (n = 1). RESULTS: The patients had initially presented with FIGO Stage I (n = 11) or III (n = 2) cancer. Vaginal recurrences were diagnosed at a mean interval of 27.5 months after hysterectomy (range 2-83). The patients were followed for a median of 60 months (range 15-105). Ten patients had recurrence at the vaginal apex and three had recurrence in the lower two-thirds of the vagina. The median time to recurrence was 22 months. The tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 6 cm (mean 2.2, median 2.5). Eleven of 13 patients received 45-50-Gy pelvic external beam radiotherapy, followed by a mean interstitial brachytherapy boost of 28.3 Gy (range 18-35). The 2 other patients received brachytherapy only of 40 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively. All tumors were locally controlled. Three (23%) of 13 patients had a relapse at distant sites (two in the paraaortic region and one in the liver). The overall 8-year actuarial disease-specific survival rate was 77%. Major (Grade 3 and 4) long-term morbidity occurred in 2 patients (15%) and included Grade 3 vaginal ulceration in 1 patient, and Grade 4 colovesical fistula requiring surgical intervention in 1 patient. Additional long-term morbidity included Grade 2 proctitis in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Interstitial brachytherapy with or without supplementary external beam radiotherapy can effectively salvage vaginal recurrence from endometrial cancer with very favorable local control and overall survival and acceptable morbidity.

Resilience, reflection, and residual stress in ovarian cancer survivorship: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Ovarian cancer is a life-threatening diagnosis which poses multiple challenges. The purpose of this study is to describe the quality of life (QOL) concerns and survivorship sequelae of long-term (>5 yr) early-stage ovarian cancer survivors accrued through the clinical cooperative Gynecologic Oncology Group. Forty-nine ovarian cancer survivors with a mean age at diagnosis of 55.9 yr (range 30-76) completed a telephone interview assessing QOL, psychosocial status, sexual functioning and late-effects of treatment. Results indicate that this disease-free early-stage sample enjoys a good QOL, with physical, emotional, and social well-being comparable to other survivors and same-aged noncancer cohorts. However, 20% of survivors indicated the presence of long-term treatment side effects, with a subset reporting problems related to abdominal and gynecologic symptoms, and neurotoxicity. Spiritual well-being was significantly positively associated with personal growth and mental health, and negatively associated with a declining health status. Lingering psychological survivorship sequelae included fear of follow-up diagnostic tests and fear of recurrence. Forty-three percent of respondents expressed that they would likely participate in a counseling program today to discuss psychosocial issues raised by having had ovarian cancer, and 56% stated that they would have attended a support program during the initial treatment if it had been offered. This information provides some insight into the complex survivorship relationships between quality of life, long-term physical and sexual sequelae, and factors of resilience and growth which appear to promote a sense of well-being as a result of the cancer experience.

The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for low-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.

PURPOSE: This report presents guidelines for using low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in the management of patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) with expertise in LDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer performed a literature review, supplemented by their clinical experience, to formulate guidelines for LDR brachytherapy of cervical cancer. RESULTS: The ABS strongly recommends that radiation treatment for cervical carcinoma (with or without chemotherapy) should include brachytherapy as a component. Precise applicator placement is essential for improved local control and reduced morbidity. The outcome of brachytherapy depends, in part, on the skill of the brachytherapist. Doses given by external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy depend upon the initial volume of disease, the ability to displace the bladder and rectum, the degree of tumor regression during pelvic irradiation, and institutional practice. The ABS recognizes that intracavitary brachytherapy is the standard technique for brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma. Interstitial brachytherapy should be considered for patients with disease that cannot be optimally encompassed by intracavitary brachytherapy. The ABS recommends completion of treatment within 8 weeks, when possible. Prolonging total treatment duration can adversely affect local control and survival. Recommendations are made for definitive and postoperative therapy after hysterectomy. Although recognizing that many efficacious LDR dose schedules exist, the ABS presents suggested dose and fractionation schemes for combining external beam radiotherapy with LDR brachytherapy for each stage of disease. The dose prescription point (point A) is defined for intracavitary insertions. Dose rates of 0.50 to 0.65 Gy/h are suggested for intracavitary brachytherapy. Dose rates of 0.50 to 0.70 Gy/h to the periphery of the implant are suggested for interstitial implant. Use of differential source activity or loading minimizes excessive central dose rates. These recommendations are intended only as guidelines. The responsibility for medical decisions ultimately rests with the treating radiation oncologist. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are suggested for LDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these guidelines to formulate their treatment and dose-reporting policies.