Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hand Clin ; 36(3): 355-360, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586462

ABSTRACT

Clinically significant fungal infections of the upper extremity are uncommon but increasing They are classified based on anatomic location and epidemiology. The anatomic categories that affect the hand include cutaneous, subcutaneous, and deep. Cutaneous infections are caused by organisms that metabolize keratin and can cause serious morbidity but are rarely fatal. Subcutaneous infections are similar to the cutaneous infections and are produced by low virulence organisms. Cutaneous and subcutaneous infections are most common and can be treated by primary care physicians and dermatologists. Deep infections are less common but can be fatal. Epidemiologic classifications include endemic and opportunistic infections.


Subject(s)
Hand/microbiology , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/therapy , Humans , Paronychia/diagnosis , Paronychia/microbiology , Paronychia/therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Soft Tissue Infections/therapy
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(2): 108-112, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809416

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the volar Henry and dorsal Thompson approaches with respect to outcomes and complications for proximal third radial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with proximal third radial shaft fractures ± associated ulna fractures (OTA/AO 2R1 ± 2U1) treated operatively at 11 trauma centers were included. INTERVENTION: Patient demographics and injury, fracture, and surgical data were recorded. Final range of motion and complications of infection, neurologic injury, compartment syndrome, and malunion/nonunion were compared for volar versus dorsal approaches. MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome was difference in complications between patients treated with volar versus dorsal approach. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 292 days, 202 patients (range, 18-84 years) with proximal third radial shaft fractures were followed through union or nonunion. One hundred fifty-five patients were fixed via volar and 47 via dorsal approach. Patients treated via dorsal approach had fractures that were on average 16 mm more proximal than those approached volarly, which did not translate to more screw fixation proximal to the fracture. Complications occurred in 11% of volar and 21% of dorsal approaches with no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in complication rates between volar and dorsal approaches. Specifically, fixation to the level of the tuberosity is safely accomplished via the volar approach. This series demonstrates the safety of the volar Henry approach for proximal third radial shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Radius Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Radius , Radius Fractures/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Hand Surg Am ; 42(11): 930.e1-930.e4, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28899588

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Volar plating of distal radius fractures is an increasingly common procedure. Presterilized, single-use volar plate fixation sets have been purported to increase operating room efficiency and decrease cost. The purpose of this study was to compare the actual cost of using a conventional set compared with the projected cost of using its single-use counterpart. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 consecutive cases of volar plate fixation in which conventional instrument sets were used. Hardware and processing costs were calculated for the conventional sets and compared with the projected cost of using single-use sets. RESULTS: The mean total cost of hardware and processing for the conventional sets was $2,728, whereas the projected cost for the single-use sets was slightly higher at $2,868. Twenty-three of the 30 cases would have required additional screws not available in the single-use set. The cost of the additional screws needed to supplement the single-use set would have added an average of $282/case. Overall, the combined hardware and processing cost was lower for conventional sets in 25 of the 30 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although the price of the single-use set is less than the mean charge for use of a conventional set, additional screws not available in the single-use set were required in 77% of cases and consequently rendered the conventional set cheaper in 83% of cases. Stocking the single-use sets with additional screws to reflect the most commonly used screw lengths could make these sets more cost effective in the future. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and decision analysis IV.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates/economics , Cost Savings , Fracture Fixation, Internal/economics , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Wrist Injuries/surgery , Bone Screws/economics , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...