PAF-R on activated T cells: Role in the IL-23/Th17 pathway and relevance to multiple sclerosis.

IL-23 is a potent stimulus for Th17 cells. These cells have a distinct developmental pathway from Th1 cells induced by IL-12 and are implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders including multiple sclerosis (MS). TGF-ß, IL-6, and IL-1, the transcriptional regulator RORγt (RORC) and IL-23 are implicated in Th17 development and maintenance. In human polyclonally activated T cells, IL-23 enhances IL-17 production. The aims of our study were: 1). To validate microarray results showing preferential expression of platelet activating factor receptor (PAF-R) on IL-23 stimulated T cells. 2). To determine whether PAF-R on activated T cells is functional, whether it is co-regulated with Th17-associated molecules, and whether it is implicated in Th17 function. 3). To determine PAF-R expression in MS. We show that PAF-R is expressed on activated T cells, and is inducible by IL-23 and IL-17, which in turn are induced by PAF binding to PAF-R. PAF-R is co-expressed with IL-17 and regulated similarly with Th17 markers IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22 and RORC. PAF-R is upregulated on PBMC and T cells of MS patients, and levels correlate with IL-17 and with MS disability scores. Our results show that PAF-R on T cells is associated with the Th17 phenotype and function. Clinical Implications Targeting PAF-R may interfere with Th17 function and offer therapeutic intervention in Th17-associated conditions, including MS.

Circulating Microparticles in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Disease Are Related to Embolic Plaque Activity and Recent Cerebral Ischaemia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In order to assess the association of microparticles derived from activated platelets (PMP) or endothelial cells (EMP) with risk markers for recurrent embolic events in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease, we studied the associations between PMP/EMP and three risk markers: plaque haemorrhage (PH), micro-embolic signals and cerebral diffusion abnormalities. METHODS: Patients with recently symptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis (60-99%, 42 patients, 31 men; mean age 75 ± 8 years) and 30 healthy volunteers (HV, 11 men; mean age 56 ± 12 years) were prospectively recruited. Patients were characterised by carotid magnetic resonance imaging (presence of PH [MRI PH]), brain diffusion MRI (cerebral ischaemia [DWI+]) and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (micro-embolic signals [MES+]). PMP and EMP were classified by flow cytometry and expressed as log-transformed counts per microlitre. RESULTS: MES+ patients (n = 18) had elevated PMP (MES+ 9.61 ± 0.57) compared to HV (8.80 ± 0.73; p < 0.0001) and to MES- patients (8.55 ± 0.85; p < 0.0001). Stroke patients had elevated PMP (9.49 ± 0.64) and EMP (6.13 ± 1.0) compared to non-stroke patients (PMP 8.81 ± 0.73, p = 0.026, EMP 5.52 ± 0.65, p = 0.011) and HV (PMP 8.80 ± 0.73, p = 0.007, and EMP 5.44 ± 0.47, p = 0.006). DWI+ patients (n = 16) showed elevated PMP (DWI+ 9.53 ± 0.64; vs. HV, p = 0.002) and EMP (DWI+ 5.91 ± 0.99 vs. HV 5.44 ± 0.47; p = 0.037). Only PMP but not EMP were higher in DWI+ versus DWI- patients (8.67 ± 0.90; p = 0.002). No association was found between PMP and EMP with MRI PH. CONCLUSIONS: PMP and EMP were associated with stroke and recent cerebrovascular events (DWI+) but only PMP were also associated with ongoing (MES+) thrombo-embolic activity suggesting a differential biomarker potential for EMP to index cerebral ischaemia while PMP may predict on-going thrombo-embolic activity.

How does measurement of platelet P-selectin compare with other methods of measuring platelet function as a means of determining the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy?

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y12 antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as "non-responders" to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y12 Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y12 Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y12 Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y12 test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients.

An observational study investigating the effect of platelet function on outcome after colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have assumed patients have uniform responses to aspirin, yet significant numbers are occult hypo- or hyper-responders. A new validated test of platelet function measures platelet P-selectin expression, which rises with increased platelet activity. This study investigated the measured perioperative changes in platelet function in response to aspirin, and subsequently whether quantitative variations in platelet activity affected perioperative complication severity and frequency. METHODS: 107 patients undergoing major colorectal surgery were recruited and assigned to either control (no antiplatelet therapy) or aspirin groups. P-selectin was measured following platelet stimulation at recruitment prior to cessation of medication, and at surgery before intervention. Perioperative complications, hemoglobin changes and blood transfusions were also recorded. RESULTS: Platelet function was higher in control (n = 87) than aspirin group (n = 20) at recruitment (median 1303u [IQR 1102-1499] vs 77u [IQR 63.5-113.5],P < 0.01) and surgery (median 1224u [IQR 944-1496] vs 281.5u [IQR 106.8-943], P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between length of aspirin cessation and platelet function at surgery (R(S) = 0.66, P < 0.01). Complication rates and hemorrhagic complication rates (P < 0.05) were higher with aspirin than control, although complication severity was not increased. Platelet function of the entire cohort at surgery was not associated with complication rate, severity or transfusion use. DISCUSSION: Although complication rates were higher in aspirin group, impaired platelet function within ranges seen with aspirin continuation did not affect complication severity or rate or blood transfusion use. Consequently, aspirin continuation may not affect clinical outcome in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery and requires further investigation with a large randomized trial.

A platelet P-selectin test predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with aspirin and clopidogrel.

There is wide variation in response to antiplatelet therapy and high on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The objective here was to determine whether the results of a novel strategy for assessing platelet reactivity (based on P-selectin measurement) are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This was a prospective cohort study of 100 ACS patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel. P-selectin tests designed to assess response to P2Y12 antagonists or aspirin were performed alongside light transmission aggregometry. For the P2Y12 P-selectin test, an optimal cutoff for high platelet reactivity was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on this value: patients with (n = 42) or without (n = 58) high platelet reactivity. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. After 12 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 12 patients. ROC curve analysis determined that the P2Y12 P-selectin test results were predictive of the primary endpoint (area under curve = 0.69, p = 0.046). The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity compared to those without (21.4% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio (HR) 4.14; p = 0.026). The P2Y12 P-selectin test results correlated with light transmission aggregometry (Spearman p < 0.0001). Using the Aspirin P-selectin test, only two patients demonstrated high on-treatment platelet reactivity. This study suggests that a P2Y12 P-selectin test is capable of detecting high on-treatment platelet reactivity, which is associated with subsequent cardiovascular events.

PGE1 and PGE2 modify platelet function through different prostanoid receptors.

There is evidence that the overall effects of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) on human platelet function are the consequence of a balance between promotory effects of PGE(2) acting at the EP3 receptor and inhibitory effects acting at the EP4 receptor, with no role for the IP receptor. Another prostaglandin that has been reported to affect platelet function is prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)), however the receptors that mediate its actions on platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression induced by the thromboxane A(2) mimetic U46619 to compare the effects of PGE(1) and PGE(2) on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, as a marker of cAMP, were also determined. We also investigated the ability of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists CAY10441 (IP antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist) to modify the effects of the prostaglandins on platelet function. The results obtained confirm that PGE(2) interacts with EP3 and EP4 receptors, but not IP receptors. In contrast PGE(1) interacts with EP3 and IP receptors, but not EP4 receptors. In both cases the overall effects on platelet function reflect the balance between promotory and inhibitory effects at receptors that have opposite effects on adenylate cyclase.

The role of prostanoid receptors in mediating the effects of PGE(2) on human platelet function.

The effects of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) on platelet function are believed to be the result of opposing mechanisms that lead to both enhancement and inhibition of platelet function. Enhancement of platelet function is known to be via EP3 receptors linked to G(i) and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. However, the receptors involved in inhibition of platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation, calcium signaling and P-selectin expression to assess platelet function induced by platelet activating factor (PAF), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP-6) and the thromboxane A(2) mimetic U46619 respectively, to determine the effects of PGE(2) and of selective prostanoid receptor agonists on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation were also determined. We also assessed the ability of selective prostanoid receptor antagonists to modify the effects of PGE(2). The agonists and antagonists used were iloprost (IP agonist), ONO-DI-004 (EP1 agonist), ONO-AE1-259 (EP2 agonist), sulprostone (EP3 agonist), ONO-AE1-329 (EP4 agonist), CAY10441 (IP antagonist), ONO-8713 (EP1 antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist). Using the agonists available to us we demonstrated that EP3, EP4 and IP receptors elicit functional responses in platelets. The EP3 receptor agonist promoted platelet aggregation, calcium signaling and P-selectin expression and this was associated with a reduction in VASP phosphorylation. Conversely agonists acting at IP and EP4 receptors inhibited platelet function and this was associated with an increase in VASP phosphorylation. The effects on platelet function and VASP phosphorylation of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists used in conjunction with PGE(2) were consistent with PGE(2) interacting with EP3 receptors to enhance platelet function and with EP4 receptors (but not IP receptors) to inhibit platelet function. This is the first demonstration of the involvement of EP4 receptors in platelet responses to PGE(2).

Detection of P2Y(14) protein in platelets and investigation of the role of P2Y(14) in platelet function in comparison with the EP(3) receptor.

mRNA encoding the recently discovered P2Y(14) receptor has been reported in platelets, but the presence of P2Y(14) receptor protein and its functionality have not been studied. If P2Y(14) is expressed along with P2Y(1) and P2Y(12) receptors it may have a role in haemostasis. It was the objective of this study to investigate the presence of the P2Y(14) receptor in platelets and its role in platelet function. The effects of the agonist UDP-glucose were compared with those of sulprostone, a selective EP(3) receptor agonist. Expression of P2Y(14) receptor was investigated by immunoblotting and confocal microscopy. Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and whole blood was measured using light absorbance and platelet counting. VASP phosphorylation was investigated using flow cytometry. Immunoblotting provided evidence for P2Y(14) receptor protein and microscopy confirmed its presence on platelets. Despite this, UDP-glucose (up to 100 muM) did not induce platelet aggregation in either PRP or whole blood, and did not potentiate aggregation induced by other agonists. P2Y(14) did not substitute for P2Y(12) in experiments using the P2Y(12) antagonist AR-C69931. No effect of UDP-glucose was seen on adenylate cyclase activity as measured by VASP phosphorylation. In contrast, sulprostone acting via the EP(3) receptor promoted platelet aggregation with effects on adenylate cyclase activity. EP(3) also partially substituted for P2Y(12) receptor. We have demonstrated the presence of P2Y(14) receptor protein in platelets, but no contribution of this receptor to several measures of platelet function has been observed. Further studies are necessary to determine whether the P2Y(14) receptor in platelets has any functionality.

Enhanced platelet aggregation and activation under conditions of hypothermia.

The effects on platelet function of temperatures attained during hypothermia used in cardiac surgery are controversial. Here we have performed studies on platelet aggregation in whole blood and platelet-rich plasma after stimulation with a range of concentrations of ADP, TRAP, U46619 and PAF at both 28 degrees C and 37 degrees C. Spontaneous aggregation was also measured after addition of saline alone. In citrated blood, spontaneous aggregation was markedly enhanced at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C. Aggregation induced by ADP was also enhanced. Similar results were obtained in hirudinised blood. There was no spontaneous aggregation in PRP but ADP-induced aggregation was enhanced at 28 degrees C. The P2Y12 antagonist AR-C69931 inhibited all spontaneous aggregation at 28 degrees C and reduced all ADP-induced aggregation responses to small, reversible responses. Aspirin had no effect. Aggregation was also enhanced at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C with low but not high concentrations of TRAP and U46619. PAF-induced aggregation was maximal at all concentrations when measured at 28 degrees C, but reversal of aggregation was seen at 37 degrees C. Baseline levels of platelet CD62P and CD63 were significantly enhanced at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C. Expression was significantly increased at 28 degrees C after stimulation with ADP, PAF and TRAP but not after stimulation with U46619. Overall, our results demonstrate an enhancement of platelet function at 28 degrees C compared with 37 degrees C, particularly in the presence of ADP.

Leukocyte count and leukocyte ecto-nucleotidase are major determinants of the effects of adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate on platelet aggregation in human blood.

ADP induces platelet aggregation in human whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). ATP induces aggregation in whole blood only; this involves leukocytes and is mediated by ADP. Here we studied ATP- and ADP-induced aggregation in patients with raised leukocyte counts (mean 46.2x10(3) leukocytes/microl). Platelet aggregation was measured by platelet counting. ATP, ADP and metabolites were measured by HPLC. Aggregation to ADP (1-10 microM) and ATP (10-100 microM) was markedly reduced, but to ATP (1000 microM) was enhanced (all p<0.001). Aggregation to ADP in PRP was normal. Increasing the leukocyte count in normal blood reproduced the findings in the patients. Adding leukocytes (either MNLs or PMNLs) to normal PRP enabled a response to ATP and caused marked inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation. Breakdown of ATP or ADP to AMP and adenosine in leukocyte-rich plasma was rapid (t1/2=4 min) and far higher than in cell-free plasma or PRP. With ATP there was also formation of ADP, maximal at 4 min. The presence of the ectonucleotidase NTPDase1 (CD39) was demonstrated on MNLs (all of the monocytes and a proportion of the lymphocytes) and all PMNLs by flow cytometry. We conclude that leukocytes provide a means of dephosphorylating ATP which enables ATP-induced aggregation via conversion to ADP, but also convert ADP to AMP and adenosine. Platelet aggregation extent is a balance between these activities, and high white cell counts influence this balance.

Inhibitory effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists on TRAP-induced platelet aggregation, procoagulant activity, microparticle formation and intracellular calcium responses in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Thrombin induces platelet aggregation and membrane rearrangements leading to enhanced procoagulant activity and microparticle production, all of which are thought to contribute to thrombus formation in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Clopidogrel, an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist acting at the P2Y(12) receptor, has been shown to provide clinical benefit in ACS. We aimed to investigate the effects of clopidogrel ex vivo and another ADP-antagonist, AR-C69931MX in vitro on thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP)-induced platelet aggregation, procoagulant activity, microparticle formation and [Ca(2+)]i responses in patients with ACS. Measurements were performed in platelet-rich plasma using aggregometry and flow cytometry (n = 12). Clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose plus 75 mg daily) significantly inhibited TRAP-induced aggregation, procoagulant activity (annexin V binding) and microparticle production (all P < 0.05) but not as extensively as AR-C69931MX (400 nmol/l). [Ca(2+)]i responses induced by a combination of TRAP and ADP designed to mimic the physiological effects of released ADP showed that clopidogrel partially and AR-C69931MX completely removed the ADP component of the [Ca(2+)]i responses (n = 6). The results provide new information on the mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of P2Y(12) antagonists in patients with ACS.