Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Accid Emerg Nurs ; 15(2): 101-5, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17451955

ABSTRACT

In this prospective study, medical and nursing health care professionals were asked to visually estimate various fluid volumes. The aims were to assess overall accuracy, and to identify factors that caused error. The effects of fluid volume, colour and clinical experience were analysed. 152 doctors and nurses were shown a selection of containers filled with five different volumes of fluid, each presented in three different colours. Subjects recorded their estimates of volume by filling in a questionnaire. There was considerable variation in accuracy between subjects. Very large standard deviations were noted, and some subjects were found to over-report, to a maximum of 700%. Nurses were more accurate than doctors (p=0.0003). Nurses' accuracy was influenced by fluid colour but not volume, whereas the opposite was true for doctors. Doctors with more than 20 years' clinical experience significantly overestimated volumes compared to their younger colleagues. This effect was not seen with the nursing group. We conclude that visual estimation is unreliable, and recommend against using visual estimation in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids , Clinical Competence/standards , Medical Staff, Hospital , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Physical Examination/standards , Weights and Measures/standards , Adult , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Color , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , England , Humans , Judgment , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Assessment/standards , Nursing Evaluation Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Observer Variation , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Visual Perception
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...