ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The evolution in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management has been summarised in three iterations of the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines. No study has assessed whether changes in management, as reflected in the changing guidelines, has translated to improved long-term survival in PAH. METHODS: We performed a mixed retrospective/prospective analysis of treatment-naïve, incident PAH patients (n=392) diagnosed at three major centres in Canada from 2009 to 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on their diagnosis date and in accordance with the 2009 and 2015 ESC/ERS guideline iterations. Overall survival was assessed based on date of diagnosis and initial treatment strategy (i.e. monotherapy versus combination therapy). RESULTS: There was a shift towards more aggressive upfront management with combination therapy in Canada after the publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines (10.4% and 30.8% in patients from 2009 to 2015 and 36.0% and 57.4% in patients diagnosed after 2015 for baseline and 2-year follow-up, respectively). A key factor associated with combination therapy after 2015 was higher pulmonary vascular resistance (p=0.009). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in Canada were 89.2%, 75.6% and 56.0%, respectively. Despite changes in management, there was no improvement in long-term survival before and after publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines (p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: There was an increase in the use of initial and sequential combination therapy in Canada after publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines, which was not associated with improved long-term survival. These data highlight the continued difficulties of managing this aggressive pulmonary disease in an era without a cure.
Subject(s)
Cardiology , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension/therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with either the sliding hip screw (SHS) or InterTAN intramedullary device (IT). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Five level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients 55 years of age or older with AO/OTA 31A1 (43) and OA/OTA 31A2 (206) fractures were prospectively enrolled and followed for 12 months. INTERVENTION: Computer generated randomization to either IT (n = 123) or SHS (n = 126). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were used to measure function and motor performance. Secondary outcome measures included femoral shortening, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Demographics, comorbidities, preinjury FIM scores and TUG scores were similar between groups. Patients (17.2%) who received an IT had limb shortening greater than 2 cm compared with 42.9% who received an SHS (P < 0.001). To determine the importance of preinjury function and fracture stability, we analyzed the subgroup of patients with the ability to walk 150 m independently preinjury and an OA/OTA 31A-2 fracture (n = 70). In this subgroup, patients treated with SHS had greater shortening and demonstrated poorer FIM and TUG scores compared with patients treated with an IT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, most patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures can expect similar functional results whether treated with an intramedullary or extramedullary device. However, active, functional patients have an improved outcome when the InterTAN is used to treat their unstable intertrochanteric fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
