ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the readability of informed consent documents (IC) used in an intensive care department and in the Andalusian Healthcare System (AHS). DESIGN: A descriptive study was carried out. SCOPE: The Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary Hospital, and the AHS. INTERVENTIONS: A review and analysis was made of the existing 14 IC models in the Intensive Care Unit and of another 14 IC models offered by the AHS, using the following readability scores: Flesch, Sentence complexity, LEGIN, Fernández-Huerta, Szigriszt and INFLESZ. RESULTS: Twenty-four IC (85.7%) failed to satisfy some of the indexes, while three (10.7%) did not satisfy any of them. Four documents (14.3%) satisfied all the indexes analyzed, and therefore are easy to understand. Flesch score: satisfied by one of the ICU IC (7.1%) and by three of the AHS documents (21.4%). Sentence complexity score: satisfied by 11 of the ICU IC (78.6%) and by 13 of the AHS documents (92.8%). Fernández-Huerta score: satisfied by four of the ICU IC (28.6%) and by 13 of the AHS documents (92.8%). Szigriszt score: satisfied by two of the ICU IC (14.3%) and by 11 of the AHS documents (64.3%). INFLESZ score: satisfied by two of the ICU IC (14.3%) and by 10 of the AHS documents (71.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The documents analyzed are generally difficult to read and understand by most people, and do not satisfy the basic purpose for which they were drafted.
Subject(s)
Comprehension , Informed Consent , HumansABSTRACT
Resumen La rotura de la aorta, independientemente de su localización y etiología, es unaafección extremadamente grave que conduce a la muerte rápidamente. En el momento actualno hay consenso sobre si el tratamiento endovascular de la rotura de la aorta torácica descendentees superior al tratamiento quirúrgico convencional a medio y largo plazo. En esta serie,de 13 casos, describimos nuestra experiencia y evaluamos los resultados en pacientes tratadosde forma endoprotésica desde enero de 2005 hasta enero de 2009 (AU)
Abstract Aortic rupture, independently of its location and etiology, is an extremely seriouscondition that leads to death rapidly. There is currently no consensus on whether endovasculartreatment of the descending thoracic aortic rupture is superior to conventional surgical repair interms of mid-or long-terms outcome. We describe our experience with 13 patients from January2005 to January 2009 to evaluate the results in patients with descending thoracic aortic ruptureundergoing endoprosthetic management (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Angioplasty/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complicationsABSTRACT
Aortic rupture, independently of its location and etiology, is an extremely serious condition that leads to death rapidly. There is currently no consensus on whether endovascular treatment of the descending thoracic aortic rupture is superior to conventional surgical repair in terms of mid-or long-terms outcome. We describe our experience with 13 patients from January 2005 to January 2009 to evaluate the results in patients with descending thoracic aortic rupture undergoing endoprosthetic management.
