[Teleradiology and mammography screening: evaluation of a network with dedicated workstations for reporting]. / Teleradiologie im Mammographie-Screening: Evaluation eines Testnetzes mit dedizierten Befundungsstationen.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of a system that supports a workflow for breast cancer screening by mammography. The time of installation, system reliability and workstation operation were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluated system (Image Diagnost, Munich, Germany) contains 2 diagnostic mammography workstations, a centralized server, and 2 Dicom shuttles for exchanging images via a physically existing network structure. Temporary archiving is possible. A mask designed for the needs of mammography screening facilitates assignment of BIRADS categories. The system automatically compares the categories assigned by a first and second reviewer and decides whether a consensus conference should be held. In the event that a conference is needed, the reviews are transmitted to the mammography expert responsible for the screening program and the consensus conference. Images are transferred via ISDN, Germany's National Research and Education Network (in the following DFN) and a central server between 2 sites which are approx. 100 km apart. We evaluated the duration of installation, the reliability of the system, and the usability of the workstation. Since we used curative mammography for evaluating the system, the patient age was noted for comparison. RESULTS: The system was installed in five days. Once installed, the system functioned without any major breakdowns. Mammography units of 2 manufacturers were able to be connected to the system without difficulty. Mammographies of 151 patients were exchanged between the sites and evaluated by 2 radiologists. 57 % of the patients were in the screening age (50-69 years). 9 exams were classified BIRADS 4a, 2 were 4b and 3 were BIRADS 5. The evaluations were technically perfect in 146/151 cases; hanging protocols had to be altered manually in 6 cases; the window/level had to be manually adjusted in 26/151 cases. Magnification was sufficient in all cases. The system exchanges examinations extremely quickly; up to 100 mammography exams may be evaluated in 1 hr. CONCLUSION: The system supports the workflow given by the German Mammography Screening program both locally and in a network.

Intestinal fluid volumes and transit of dosage forms as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

AIM: The gastrointestinal transit of sequentially administered capsules was investigated in relation to the availability of fluid along the intestinal lumen by magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Water-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 12 healthy subjects during fasting and 1 h after a meal. Specifiable non-disintegrating capsules were administered at 7, 4 and 1 h prior to imaging. RESULTS: While food intake reduced the mean fluid volumes in the small intestine (105 +/- 72 mL vs. 54 +/- 41 mL, P < 0.01) it had no significant effect on the mean fluid volumes in the colon (13 +/- 12 mL vs. 18 +/- 26 mL). The mean number of separated fluid pockets increased in both organs after meal (small intestine: 4 vs. 6, P < 0.05; large intestine: 4 vs. 6, P < 0.05). The distribution of capsules between the small and large intestine was strongly influenced by food (colon: 3 vs. 17 capsules, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that fluid is not homogeneously distributed along the gut, which likely contributes to the individual variability of drug absorption. Furthermore, transport of fluid and solids through the ileocaecal valve is obviously initiated by a meal-induced gastro-ileocaecal reflex.