Unfavorable Donor Pretransplant APACHE II, SAPS II, and SOFA Scores Are Not Associated With Outcome: Implications for Heart Transplant Donor Selection.

BACKGROUND: The quality of the donor heart and the individual risk of the recipient awaiting heart transplantation are difficult to assess. We investigated whether routinely used intensive care scoring systems can provide additional prognostic information on outcomes after heart transplantation. METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients who underwent heart transplantation were included. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated for donors and recipients. Risk factors such as the donor's cause of death, donor's catecholamine use, dialysis status of the recipient, and smoking pattern of the donor and the recipient were assessed. The association of these parameters with mortality, length of stay on the intensive care unit, and need for invasive ventilation was investigated. RESULTS: The median APACHE II score of the donors was 20 (confidence interval [CI], 19-20), the median SAPS II score was 46 (CI, 45-48), and the median SOFA score was 10 (CI, 9-10). In contrast, the median scores of the recipients were as follows: APACHE II, 7 (CI, 6-8); SAPS II, 13 (CI, 12-14); and SOFA, 1 (CI, 1-2). None of the scores as calculated significantly predicted clinical outcome after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study detected no prognostic impact of donor-related risk factors on outcome after heart transplantation. Our findings support the growing practice of also considering organs from donors with high-risk scores for heart transplantation.

Effect of temperature on platelet adherence.

BACKGROUND: Thrombogenicity is one of the main parameters tested in vitro to evaluate the hemocompatibility of artificial surfaces. While the influence of the temperature on platelet aggregation has been addressed by several studies, the temperature influence on the adherence of platelets to body foreign surfaces as an important aspect of biomedical device handling has not yet been explored. Therefore, we analyzed the influence of two typically applied incubation-temperatures (22°C and 37°C) on the adhesion of platelets to biomaterials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thrombogenicity of three different polymers - medical grade poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) - were studied in an in vitro static test. Platelet adhesion was studied with stringently characterized blood from apparently healthy subjects. Collection of whole blood and preparation of platelet rich plasma (PRP) was carried out at room temperature (22°C). PRP was incubated with the polymers either at 22°C or 37°C. Surface adherent platelets were fixed, fluorescently labelled and assessed by an image-based approach. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Differences in the density of adherent platelets after incubation at 22°C and 37°C occurred on PDMS and PET. Similar levels of adherent platelets were observed on the very thrombogenic PTFE. The covered surface areas per single platelet were analyzed to measure the state of platelet activation and revealed no differences between the two incubation temperatures for any of the analyzed polymers. Irrespective of the observed differences between the low and medium thrombogenic PDMS and PET and the higher variability at 22°C, the thrombogenicity of the three investigated polymers was evaluated being comparable at both incubation temperatures.

The impact of pretransplantation urgency status and the presence of a ventricular assist device on outcome after heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: There are conflicting reports on the posttransplantation morbidity and mortality of patients listed urgently and/or supported by a ventricular assist device (VAD). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes with regard to pretransplantation condition (elective, urgent, VAD). METHODS: All adult recipients between January 1, 2005, and October 31, 2012, were included. Demographics; preoperative, operative, and postoperative data; outpatient follow-up; and donor characteristics were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of a total of 74 patients, 19 were listed urgently, 20 had a Berlin Heart EXCOR BVAD (biventricular assist device) (Berlin Heart, Berlin, Germany) (8 urgent), 7 had a Berlin Heart INCOR left VAD (Berlin Heart, Berlin, Germany) (2 urgent), and 2 had a HeartWare left VAD (HeartWare International, Framingham, Mass, USA) (none urgent). Mean age was 52 ± 12years. The overall 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survival was 90% ± 3%, 79% ± 5%, and 66% ± 7%. There was no difference in survival when comparing urgently listed (95% ± 5%, 84% ± 8%, 74% ± 12%) and elective patients (89% ± 4%, 77% ± 6%, 63% ± 8%; P = .4), and VAD patients (86% ± 6%, 76% ± 8%, 63% ± 11%) and those without mechanical support (93% ± 4%, 81% ± 6%, 69% ± 9%; P = .6). In-hospital outcomes and long-term complications were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that urgent patients and patients on a VAD have a posttransplantation outcome comparable to elective patients and patients without a VAD. These data support the effectiveness of the current practice of listing for heart transplantation.