Testosterone Plasma Concentration is Associated with Insulin Resistance in Male Hypertensive Patients.

Background: Low testosterone levels are a common finding among men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and are inversely related to insulin resistance. Whether this relationship holds true in patients with hypertension, but normal glucose tolerance or prediabetes, is unclear. Methods: We recruited 87 male outpatients with essential arterial hypertension, aged 35-70 years. Anthropometric data were collected, an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) performed, and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score calculated. Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, Luteinizing Hormone, testosterone, Sex Hormone-Binding-Globulin and free-testosterone were measured. The concentrations of sex hormones were compared between normoglucotolerant, prediabetic and diabetic patients. Non-parametric tests were applied as appropriate to verify differences among groups, while multiple linear regression was used to predict the variability of testosterone and free-testosterone. Results: Total serum testosterone concentration was significantly lower in T2DM in comparison to normoglucotolerant subjects (p<0.01) and was inversely related to body mass index (r=- 0.25, p<0.01), waist circumference (r=- 0.27, p<0.01), pre and post-OGTT plasma glucose (r=- 0.4, p<0.0001 and r=- 0.29, p<0.01, respectively), pre and post-OGTT plasma insulin (r=- 0.42, p<0.0001 and r=- 0.42, p<0.0001) and HOMA-IR (r=- 0.46, p<0.0001). Similar associations were observed for free testosterone; HOMA-IR was related to testosterone and free-testosterone even in patients with normal glucose tolerance (r=- 0.47, p<0.01 and r=- 0.34, p<0.05, respectively). At multivariate analysis HOMA-IR was the only variable associated to testosterone (p<0.001) and free-testosterone (p<0.05) plasma concentration. Conclusions: In males with hypertension, the link between insulin sensitivity and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is maintained along the entire spectrum of glucose tolerance.

Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice.

Many anti-diabetic drugs with different mechanisms of action are now available for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sulfonylureas have been extensively used for treatment of type 2 diabetes for nearly 50 years and, even in our times, are widely used for treatment of this devastating chronic illness. Here, we review some of the available data on sulfonylureas, evaluating their mechanism of action and their effects on glycemic control. We can conclude that sulfonylureas are still the most used anti-diabetic agents: maybe this is due to their lower cost, to the possibility of mono-dosing and to the presence of an association with metformin in the same tablet. However, sulfonylureas, especially the older ones, are linked to a greater prevalence of hypoglycemia, and cardiovascular risk; newer prolonged-release preparations of sulfonylureas are undoubtedly safer, mainly due to reducing hypoglycemia, and for this reason should be preferred.

Oral glucose tolerance test-based calculation identifies different glucose intolerance phenotypes within the impaired fasting glucose range.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The conventional oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) cannot detect future diabetics among isolated impaired fasting glucose (is-IFG) nor normal glucose tolerant (NGT) groups. By analyzing the relationship between fasting (FPG) and 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG), the present study identifies is-IFG subjects liable to worsening glucose homeostasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oral glucose tolerance test was carried out in 619 patients suffering from obesity, hypertension or dyslipidemia, whose FPG was in the 100-125 mg/dL range. We calculated the percentage increment of 2hPG with respect to FPG (PG%) in these patients using the formula: ([2hPG - FPG] / FPG) × 100. Differences in ß-cell function within is-IFG patients were assessed by estimated insulin sensitivity index (EISI), first-phase insulin release (1stPH) and 1stPH/1/EISI (1stPHcorrected). RESULTS: Diabetes was diagnosed in 69 patients (11.2%), combined IFG/impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in 185 patients (29.9%) and is-IFG in 365 patients (58.9%). Is-IFG was subdivided into PG% tertile groups: the percentage of females increased from 25% in the lowest to 45.2% in the highest tertile (χ(2) = 18.7, P < 0.001). Moving from the lowest to the highest PG% tertile group, insulin and 2hPG concentrations rose, whereas FPG, EISI, and 1stPHcorrected decreased progressively and significantly. Furthemore, PG% correlated inversely with EISI (r = -0.44, P < 0.0001) and 1stPHcorrected (r = -0.38, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Oral glucose tolerance test does differentiate the great heterogeneity in metabolic disorders of patients with FPG 100-125 mg/dL. Furthermore, PG% can expand the diagnostic power of OGTT in the is-IFG range by distinguishing metabolic phenotypes very likely to herald different clinical risks.

Impaired glucose metabolism in hypertensive patients with/without the metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In hypertension clinics, screening patients for the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is common practice, while performing the cumbersome oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is not. How large is the underestimation of diabetes and prediabetes that ensues is unknown. METHODS: We recruited N=1397 patients with essential arterial hypertension who underwent a 75-g OGTT and were classified as normally glucotolerant (NGT) or having impaired glucose metabolism (IGM), and as affected or not by MetS (ATPIII criteria). The agreement between the OGTT and the ATPIII criteria in attributing a high cardiovascular risk was estimated by matching the categories of MetS and no-MetS with NGT and IGM. RESULTS: n=677/1397 patients (48%) satisfied criteria for MetS, while n=757/1397 (54%) had an IGM. MetS and IGM were both present in n=512/1397 patients (36.6%), and both absent in n=475/1397 (34%). Further n=410/1397 patients (29%) were discordant for the two conditions: n=165/410 (40%) had the MetS but were NGT, and n=245/410 (60%) had IGM but no MetS. Among IGM patients, n=168/757 (22%; of which 45 had no MetS) received a new diagnosis of diabetes based on OGTT criteria. Among all discordant patients, those with IGM and no MetS were more commonly males (p<0.001), and had older age (p<0.001) and lower body mass index (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hypertension, the estimate of the prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes, hence of the global cardiovascular risk, can be seriously flawed unless an OGTT is performed. Our results support a wider use of the OGTT in the management of hypertension.

Expanding the clinical use of standard OGTT: the percentage increment of 2 h with respect to fasting glucose as an index of ß-cell dysfunction.

AIMS: Since glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are determined both by insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion, we investigated whether the percentage increment (PG%) of 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG) over fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is related to validated indexes of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. METHODS: Using Stumvoll's formulas we calculated estimated insulin sensitivity index and first-phase insulin secretion in 1281 subjects who underwent a standard OGTT. The ratio first-phase insulin secretion/(1/estimated insulin sensitivity index) was considered a surrogate index of ß-cell function. For each subject we calculated PG% using the formula: [(2hPG - FPG)/FPG] × 100. For each glucose tolerance group we formed tertiles based on PG% values. RESULTS: In each glucose tolerance group, ß-cell function was better preserved in lower PG% tertiles, demonstrating a correlation between PG% and insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: By a simple calculation, our study allows, expansion of the clinical use of OGTT to recognize subjects liable to further worsening of glucose homeostasis, independent from glucose tolerance groupings.

Primitive hematopoietic stem cells shows a polyclonal pattern in myelodysplastic syndromes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clonal hematopoiesis is the hallmark of myelodysplastic syndromes, but the role played by pluripotent stem cells and progenitor cells in these disorders remains unclear. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight female patients with myelodysplastic syndrome were studied. X-chromosome inactivation patterns were analyzed in peripheral blood granulocytes, T-lymphocytes, single colonies originating from bone marrow progenitors and pluripotent stem cells, using the human androgen receptor locus polymorphism assay. RESULTS: Granulocytes and progenitor cells were monoclonal in 7/8 cases. Immature stem cells showed a non-clonal pattern of X-inactivation and were detectable at diagnosis in the presence of clonal hematopoiesis. T-lymphocyte clonality was heterogeneous. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: In myelodysplastic syndromes, hematopoiesis may be dominated by a neoplastic clone by virtue of its biological advantage over a residual polyclonal, probably still normal, population of immature stem cells still able to grow in vitro.