ABSTRACT
The correct diagnosis and classification of Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is important for therapy and genetic counseling but is made difficult due to the variability of its clinical expression and limitations of laboratory methods. A national registry of VWD patients has been initiated in Spain. The results of a concise survey on the diagnosis of VWD show the frequency of VWD is fivefold greater in Spain than that expected from epidemiological studies in other European countries; this may result from overdiagnosis and/or a higher prevalence of VWD. These results clearly reinforce the need for the Spanish VWD registry. A consensus guideline for optimal treatment of VWD is being elaborated in Spain. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the choice of treatment in responsive VWD patients. Von Willebrand factor concentrates (VWF/factor VIII) are used in individuals nonresponsive to DDAVP, when DDAVP is contraindicated, or in VWD types 2B and 3.
Subject(s)
Surveys and Questionnaires , von Willebrand Diseases/diagnosis , von Willebrand Diseases/drug therapy , Deamino Arginine Vasopressin/therapeutic use , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Spain/epidemiology , von Willebrand Diseases/epidemiology , von Willebrand Factor/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Therapy for von Willebrand disease (VWD) aims to restore the hemostatic function conferred by von Willebrand factor (VWF), which facilitates platelet adhesion and aggregation, and serves to increase potentially low coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma. In patients unresponsive to desmopressin (DDAVP), the preferred treatment is with plasma-derived VWF-containing FVIII concentrates. Only a few of the available VWF/FVIII concentrates have been licensed for use in VWD based on prospective studies. The efficacy of VWF/FVIII concentrates depends on the content and quality of VWF and FVIII. Several studies have demonstrated the variability of the VWF contents, as well as the differences in the VWF multimer patterns (including the high molecular weight VWF multimers that are most effective in restoring hemostasis), among these concentrates. Treating physicians should be aware of these disparities and the potential clinical implications for patients with different VWD subtypes. Dosing has traditionally been calculated based on the FVIII content of the products, although dosing based on VWF functional activity [e.g., VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo)] addresses the primary protein deficiency in VWD patients. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of concentrates dosed according to VWF:RCo. Dosing is generally consistent across VWD subtypes, although patients with severe phenotypes or undergoing major procedures may require more infusions or longer treatment duration. Other considerations for the use of VWF-containing concentrates include laboratory monitoring of efficacy and safety issues such as thrombosis risk and thromboprophylaxis.