ABSTRACT
Background: Research has shown mixed results when comparing in-hospital complications following atrial fibrillation ablation in women compared to men. Objectives: To better quantify sex differences and in-hospital outcomes in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures and identify factors associated with poorer outcomes. Methods: We queried the NIS database from 2016 to 2019 for hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation ablation and excluded patients with any other arrhythmias, ICD/pacemaker placement. We assessed demographics, in-hospital mortality, and complications of women compared to men. Results: Admissions for atrial fibrillation were more common in females than males (849 050 vs. 815 665; p < .001). However, females were less likely to receive ablation (1.65% vs. 2.71%, OR: 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.64, p < .001), which persisted after adjusting for cardiomyopathy (adjusted OR: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.65, p < .001). The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality was not statistically different in univariate analysis (0.39% vs. 0.36%, OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.44-2.72, p = .84), finding that did not change when adjusted for comorbidities (adjusted OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.36-2.49). The complication rate in hospitalized patients following ablation was 8.08%. The total unadjusted complication rate was higher for females than males (9.58% vs. 7.09%, p = .001); however, it was not significant when adjusted for risks (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.99-1.53, p = .06). Conclusion: Female sex is not associated with increased complications or death in a real-world study of catheter ablation when results are adjusted for risks. However, females admitted with atrial fibrillation receive ablation less often than males during hospital admission.
ABSTRACT
We present two cases of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Both examples encourage a broad differential and open mind for chest pain in a young woman. We also highlight a case of SCAD where the patient presented following ventricular fibrillation arrest, a less common though potentially fatal consequence of SCAD.
ABSTRACT
Acquired methaemoglobinaemia is a potentially fatal impairment in oxygen delivery if not recognised early and treated appropriately. Benzocaine used as an anaesthetic for endoscopic procedures is an uncommon but clinically important precipitant of acquired methaemoglobinaemia. We present a case of an elderly woman who developed perioral cyanosis and desaturation 20 min after a transoesophageal echocardiogram. Further evaluation led to the diagnosis of benzocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia and timely treatment with intravenous methylene blue was initiated.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Benzocaine/adverse effects , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Methemoglobinemia/chemically induced , Aged , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Female , Humans , Methemoglobinemia/drug therapy , Methylene Blue/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Standard interviews are used by most residency programs in the United States for assessment of aptitude of the non-cognitive competencies, but variability of interviewer skill, interviewer bias, interviewer leniency or stringency, and context specificity limit reliability. AIM: To investigate reliability and acceptability of five-station multiple mini-interview (MMI) model for resident selection into an internal medicine residency program in the United States. SETTING: One independent academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven applicants and 17 faculty interviewers. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Five, 10-min MMI stations with five different interviewers blinded to the candidate's records and one traditional 20-min interview with the program director. Candidates were rated on two items: interpersonal and communication skills, and overall performance. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Generalizability data showed that the reliability of our process was high (>0.9). The results of anonymous surveys demonstrated that both applicants and interviewers consider the MMI as a fair and more effective tool to evaluate non-cognitive traits, and prefer the MMI to standard interviews. DISCUSSION: The MMI process for residency interviews can generate reliable interview results using only five stations, and it is acceptable and preferred over standard interview modalities by the applicants and faculty members of one US residency program.
