ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of acellular xenogeneic dermal matrix graft (AXDM) compared to connective tissue graft (CTG) in treating multiple gingival recessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared AXDM and CTG. The selected studies were subjected to bias risk assessment, data extraction, and meta-analyses. Parameters such as gingival recession height, width, mean percentage of root coverage, and complete root coverage were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven RCTs involving 146 patients were included. The meta-analyses indicated that CTG was statistically superior to AXDM in reducing gingival recession height at the final follow-up (mean difference: -0.104 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.180-0.028, p = 0.008) and width at the final follow-up (mean difference: -0.285 mm, 95% CI: -0.541-0.030, p = 0.029). CTG also demonstrated a significantly higher mean percentage of root coverage at the 6-month follow-up (difference in means: -2.761 mm, 95% CI: -4.932-0.590, p = 0.013) and a higher percentage of complete root coverage at the 6-month follow-up (odds Ratio [OR]: 0.598, 95% CI: 0.4-0.892, p = 0.012) compared to AXDM. However, there was no significant difference in the number of teeth with complete root coverage between CTG and AXDM (OR: 1.610, 95% CI: 0.983-2.636, p = 0.058) and aesthetic outcomes (mean difference: 0.148, 95% CI: -0.277-0.573, p = 0.494). CONCLUSIONS: CTG is more effective than AXDM in treating multiple gingival recessions. This is evidenced by significant reductions in gingival recession height and width, a higher mean percentage of root coverage, and a greater percentage of complete root coverage at the 6-month follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In some clinical situations an alternative to CTG is required for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. AXDM, despite presenting clinical outcomes that are not as satisfactory as CTG, can be used for this purpose.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of two photobiomodulation therapy protocols on bone regeneration in criticalsize bone defects grafted with inorganic bovine bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A critical-size defect was created in 30 adult male rat calvaria, which were divided equally and randomly into three experimental groups (n = 10): (1) DBBM (deproteinized bovine bone mineral); (2) DBBM + PBMT 4 J (4 J; photobiomodulation therapy; GaAlAs, 730 nm, 100 mW, 140 J/cm2); and (3) DBBM + PBMT 6 J (6 J; GaAlAs, 730 nm, 100 mW, 210 J/cm2). Animals were euthanized after 30 days. The neoformed bone area (NBA), linear bone extension (LBE), and area of the remaining particles (ARP) were evaluated. The data were subjected to nonparametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc test to identify differences between the groups (P < .05). RESULTS: The 6 J group showed the highest average NBA (48.57% ± 28.22%) and demonstrated a statistically significant difference in NBA and LBE. A higher mean ARP was found in the DBBM group (38.73 ± 6.95) than in the groups irradiated by photobiomodulation therapy, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The 6 J protocol showed the best results, promoting greater bone formation with greater resorption of residual particles.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , Low-Level Light Therapy , Male , Animals , Cattle , Rats , Wound Healing , MineralsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the healing of bone defects filled with autogenous bone or bioactive glass. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A critical size defect with 5-mm diameter was created on the calvaria of 60 adult male rats divided into 6 groups (n = 10): group C (control), group LLLT (LLLT - GaAlAs, wavelength of 780 nm, power of 100 mW, energy density of 210 J/cm2 per point during 60 seconds/point, in five points, only once, after creation of the surgical defect), group AB (autogenous bone), group AB+LLLT (autogenous bone + LLLT), group BG (bioactive glass), group BG+LLLT (bioactive glass + LLLT). All animals were sacrificed at 30 days after surgery. The areas of newly formed bone (ANFB) and areas of remaining particles (ARP) were calculated in relation to the total area (TA). RESULTS: The highest mean ± SD ANFB was observed for group LLLT (47.67% ± 8.66%), followed by groups AB+LLLT (30.98% ± 16.59%) and BG+LLLT (31.13% ± 16.98%). There was a statistically significant difference in relation to ANFB between group C and the other groups, except for comparison with group BG (Tukey test, P > .05). There was no statistically significant difference in ANFB values between group AB and the other study groups (Tukey test, P > .05), group AB+LLLT and groups BG and BG+LLLT (Tukey test, P > .05), and between groups BG and BG+LLLT (Tukey test, P > .05). The highest mean ± SD ARP was found for group BG (25.15% ± 4.82%), followed by group BG+LLLT (17.06% ± 9.01%), and there was no significant difference between groups (t test, P > .05). CONCLUSION: The LLLT, in the present application protocol, did not increase the area of new bone formation when associated with autogenous bone or bioactive glass.
