Revitalizing female fertility: platelet-rich plasma - hype or hope?

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity as an experimental tool in regenerative medicine, with potential applications in reproductive medicine. This review will assess the existing literature on the role of PRP in female fertility enhancement, focusing on ovarian rejuvenation and increased endometrial thickness. PRP is being explored as a treatment for recurrent implantation failure, primary ovarian insufficiency and poor ovarian response. While the influence of PRP on endometrial thickness and implantation success is postulated, its effectiveness remains the subject of debate due to protocol variability and unclear patient selection criteria. This narrative review includes 36 articles published before December 2022, and highlights the lack of comprehensive molecular studies examining the impact of PRP on reproductive capacity. This review underscores the importance of standardizing PRP preparation protocols in reproductive medicine. However, challenges persist, and there is a need for well-planned randomized controlled trials and a deeper understanding of the patient population that would gain the greatest benefit from PRP treatment. Clarifying these aspects is crucial to improve outcomes for low-prognosis patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology.

No difference in morphokinetics between male and female preimplantation embryos from ART.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do morphokinetic parameters vary between male and female preimplantation embryos? DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 175 cycles between March 2018 and June 2021 at two reproductive centres. It included time-lapse data from 92 female and 83 male preimplantation embryos exclusively issued from fresh oocyte donation and undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Only fresh elective single-embryo transfers on day 5 were assessed, and the sex of the embryo was confirmed at birth. The morphokinetic parameters analysed were measured in hours post-insemination (hpi). A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to compare the morphokinetics between embryo sexes and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Following strict inclusion criteria to avoid poor-quality preimplantation embryos, no significant differences were found in morphokinetic parameters when comparing cycles that resulted in female versus male live births for the following: time to pronuclear fading (22.1 ± 2.4 versus 22.4 ± 2.9 hpi; P = 0.52); time to the 2-cell stage (24.6 ± 2.5 versus 25.0 ± 2.5 hpi; P = 0.34); time to the 3-cell stage (35.3 ± 3.3 versus 35.8 ± 3.1 hpi; P = 0.28); time to the 4-cell stage (36.3 ± 3.4 versus 36.9 ± 3.7 hpi; P = 0.20); time to the 5-cell stage (47.9 ± 4.6 versus 48.0 ± 4.8 hpi; P = 0.88); time to the 8-cell stage (54.0 ± 6.5 versus 54.1 ± 6.5 hpi; P = 0.91); time to the start of blastulation (86.3 ± 14.6 versus 85.7 ± 15.5 hpi; P = 0.78); and time to the full blastocyst stage (93.0 ± 16.9 versus 93.2 ± 17.2 hpi; P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in morphokinetics between male and female preimplantation embryos.