Outcomes of acute esophageal food impaction: success of the push technique.

BACKGROUND: Acute esophageal food impaction (AEFI) is the most common form of esophageal impaction in adults. The current recommendation for management is extraction by using an overtube to protect the airway, which facilitates multiple passages of the endoscope and protects the esophageal mucosa. Typically, AEFI in our patients is treated with the push technique, a method found to be highly successful and without complications. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of AEFI from 1993 to 1998 were identified by computer search of ICD-9 diagnosis code 935.1 (foreign body of the esophagus). Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age, had an acute esophageal foreign body other than food, or if the medical record was incomplete. RESULTS: The analysis included 189 patients: 114 men and 75 women. Of these, 77 (41%) had a Schatzki's ring, 61 (32%) had an esophageal stricture, and 4 (2%) had esophageal cancer. In 47 patients (25%) no obvious structural cause for AEFI was noted at endoscopy. In addition, 67 patients had breaks in the esophageal mucosa. The push technique resolved the food impaction in 184 of 189 (97%) of the patients. In no subgroup was there an instance of perforation, aspiration, or bleeding. Forty-five patients underwent dilation at the time of food disimpaction without complication. CONCLUSIONS: The push technique is both safe and effective in the treatment of AEFI. Dilation at the initial presentation of a patient with AEFI likewise appears to be safe. The push technique is recommended as the initial therapy of choice for AEFI. Dilation at the time of esophageal food disimpaction can be considered if there are no obvious contraindications.

Endoscopic transpapillary drainage of pancreatic abscess: technique and results.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic abscess is one of the serious complications of acute pancreatitis. Traditionally, pancreatic abscess has been treated by operative drainage. Based on experience with endoscopic transpapillary drainage of pseudocysts, a similar technique was used in patients with pancreatic abscess. METHOD: Patients were evaluated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In those with pancreatic abscess communicating with the main pancreatic duct, pancreatic sphincterotomy, saline irrigation of the abscess cavity, and catheter dilation followed by 10F pancreatic stent placement were done. Instillation of gentamicin and nasopancreatic catheter drainage were used in difficult cases. RESULTS: Of 22 patients with pancreatic abscess, 11 underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage with technical success in 10 patients (90%); 8 patients (74%) had resolution of pancreatic abscess, clinically and radiographically. Intracavitary instillation of gentamicin and nasopancreatic catheter drainage were used in 2 patients. Two patients in whom endoscopic transpapillary drainage failed underwent operative drainage with a favorable outcome, and the one patient in whom endoscopic treatment was technically unsuccessful underwent successful percutaneous drainage. One patient had mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic transpapillary drainage is an effective nonoperative therapy for selected cases of pancreatic abscess and is associated with minimal morbidity and no mortality.

Characteristics of best gastroenterology practices.

OBJECTIVE: As health care costs continue to rise, competition among providers is increasing. Although this competition is currently based on price, quality of care will become an increasingly important issue. One popular method to assess quality is by comparing physicians' performance with that of a representative group of physicians, in a process called benchmarking. The purpose of this study was to survey private practice gastroenterologists to identify the practice characteristics, so-called "best practices," associated with high-quality health care delivery to provide data for use as benchmarks. METHODS: Three hundred randomly selected gastroenterology practices were surveyed regarding practice demographics, administration, financial management, and use of outcomes techniques by mail questionnaire. Analogous questionnaires were completed by representatives of the gastroenterology practices comprising the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group, LLC (GMPG). RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-two (61%) of the 300 eligible practices responded to the questionnaire. Increasing differences between survey and benchmark GPMG practices were observed as the complexity of quality measures increased. Among structure measures, the groups were similar. By contrast, significant differences were observed between survey and benchmark groups with regards to outcomes measures such as the use of practice guidelines, continuous quality improvement, and outcomes assessment. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a snapshot of gastroenterology practices across the country and can be used as a benchmark for quality assessment purposes to compare with one's practice, suggesting areas for change or improvement. It seems clear that the defining characteristic of best gastroenterology practices is the demonstration of quality patient care. It also appears that many practices' efforts in this regard could be increased.

Biliary pancreatitis: a review. Emphasizing appropriate endoscopic intervention.

Gallstones are a common cause of acute pancreatitis. This article reviews acute biliary pancreatitis and includes natural history, noting the serious nature of some cases; pathogenesis, identifying transient obstruction as the primary pathogenetic event; diagnosis, including biochemical parameters and imaging; assessment of severity, underlining the importance of early prognostic signs, organ failure, and local complications; and management. Management is reviewed in detail, giving a historical perspective to the role of surgery, highlighting the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy and paying particular attention to the four prospective randomized clinical trials in suggesting which patients are most likely to benefit from early endoscopic evaluation and therapy. Also discussed are additional clinical situations related to biliary pancreatitis in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy play a role. Finally, a suggested endoscopic approach to acute biliary pancreatitis is presented along with an algorithm incorporating severity stratification, principles of endoscopic intervention, and concepts of sterile and infected pancreatic necrosis.

Endoscopic intervention for biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter review.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy of biliary tract leaks was uncommon before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of endoscopic drainage by endoscopic sphincterotomy or stent placement. Various endoscopic therapeutic modalities and long-term follow-up of this problem were studied. METHODS: Members of the Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Group reviewed all patients referred for endoscopic therapy of biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 1990 to 1994. Long-term follow-up was by direct patient contact. RESULTS: Fifty patients were referred for endoscopic therapy of biliary leaks. Abdominal pain was present in 94%. The mean time from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to referral was 6.9 days. Therapy consisted of sphincterotomy only in 6 patients, stent only in 13, and sphincterotomy with stent in 31. Biliary leaks were healed in 44 patients at a mean of 5.4 weeks. A second or third endoscopic procedure was necessary to achieve healing in five patients. Two stent-related complications were noted. Percutaneous or surgical drainage of biliary fluid collections was required in 16 patients. The mean hospital stay for treatment of the leak was 11.1 days after endoscopic therapy. On follow-up (mean 17.5 months), all patients were well except two with mild abdominal discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy, stent placement, or sphincterotomy with stent are effective in healing biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Despite prolonged treatment for the leak, patients did well on long-term follow-up.

Managed care. Evolution and distinguishing features.

Managed care as a system of health care delivery has grown tremendously in popularity in the United States during the past decade in response to demands by employers and government for cost containment, enhanced access, and improved quality. Managed care took root in the 1800s as prepaid health services provided by employers for immigrants coming to the United States to work. The forerunner of modern managed care, prepaid group practice, later was dwarfed by the unbridled development of FFS medicine under indemnity insurance in the post-World War II period and stunted by early reactions of organized medicine. The early health care reform years of the 1960s spawned HMO legislation in the 1970s, which prompted ever-escalating growth in HMO enrollment. Market-driven health reform has prompted the evolution of health care delivery to the modern-day version of managed care. In this system, health care is provided by a limited number of contracted providers at reduced rates of reimbursement. Patients are channeled to these contracted providers, and clinical decision making of these providers is influenced by the MCO through utilization management and quality assurance. Financial risk is shifted from payers and insurance companies to providers to influence further clinical decision making. All of these characteristics of managed care pressure providers toward higher levels of integration and foster greater reliance on management information systems. Gaining a perspective from the history of managed care, understanding managed care's distinguishing features, and dealing effectively with the pressures of these unique characteristics are important in successfully caring for patients, managing the risk structure, and succeeding professionally in this current environment for health care delivery.

Glossary of managed care terms.

The terminology of managed care and healthspeak are confusing and foreign-sounding to many physicians. The acronyms have been described as "thick alphabet soup." A glossary of these terms and acronyms is presented to aid the reader in understanding the articles in this issue.

Optimal timing for stent replacement in malignant biliary tract obstruction.

Endoscopic stent placement has become accepted palliative therapy for malignant biliary tract obstruction. Because stent occlusion remains a significant late complication, prophylactic replacement has been suggested, although the appropriate time interval remains unclear. Patients with malignant biliary strictures who received 10F or 11.5F stents were analyzed with respect to clinical response, occlusion rates at 3 and 6 months, and survival rates. Seventy stents were placed in 50 patients. Pancreatic carcinoma was the most common underlying malignancy. Overall, obstructive symptoms resolved in 94% of cases. Occlusion rates at 3 months (4.2%) and 6 months (10.8%) were not significantly different. Median overall survival averaged 22 weeks. Results were also stratified by underlying diagnosis, with the worst clinical response and survival being seen in the group of patients with metastatic cancer. Findings suggest that the time interval for stent replacement can be extended safely from 3 to 6 months, resulting in decreased patient discomfort and cost and obviating any replacement in that significant percentage of patients who expire before 6 months.

Gallstone pancreatitis: mechanisms and management.

We now have a better understanding of the pathogenesis of gallstone pancreatitis, although many questions and ambiguities remain. What we do know has led to improved tools for diagnosis and therapy.

Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy training for primary care physicians: results of a 5-year experience.

The first 5 years of a flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy (FFS) training program for primary care physicians was analyzed in an attempt to assess clinical competence and develop a procedure learning curve. A total of 47 primary care physicians (26 third-year family practice residents, 15 family practitioners, and 6 internists) were successfully trained in 60-cm FFS by five gastroenterologists. Didactic teaching methods included 5 hours of videotapes, slides, endoscopic models, and the use of a photo atlas. Following a patient demonstration, each trainee completed 25 examinations supervised with a teaching attachment. Criteria used to assess trainee competence included unassisted length of scope insertion and examination duration. Mean depth of scope insertion was 35.9 cm for the first five examinations, increasing to a mean of 51.7 cm for the final five examinations. Average examination duration decreased from 19.1 min for examinations 1 through 5 to 17.0 min for examinations 21 through 25. Out of 1236 examinations, one or more polyps were found in 222 patients (18.0%). Carcinoma was found in 15 of 1236 examinations (1.4%). In summary, experienced endoscopists can teach primary care physicians to perform 60-cm FFS. Completion of 25 supervised cases appears to be adequate for achieving technical competence in flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy.

A supervised training program in flexible sigmoidoscopy: evaluating skills from residency training to clinical practice.

To assess the effectiveness of a training program in flexible sigmoidoscopy for family practice residents, we prospectively studied the performance of four residents during their training and after graduation. One hundred and four training exams performed with the assistance of an experienced gastroenterologist were compared with 118 unassisted post-training, post-residency exams. The mean depth of insertion for the post-training period was 51.1 +/- 1.2 cm, which was significantly greater (P less than .05, Student's t test) than the mean training period depth of 47.6 +/- 1.2 cm. There was no significant difference in the identification of polyps or cancer between the training and post-training periods. The mean duration of an exam was 17.3 +/- 0.6 minutes in the post-training period. No significant complications were encountered in either period. The residency trained family physicians obtained results similar to those reported by trained endoscopists in depth of examination and pathology detected, although their examinations required more time. We conclude that this model of training was effective in the development of flexible sigmoidoscopy procedural skill for family practice residents.

Development of a scoring system to predict mortality from upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Despite the widespread application of endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, there is little evidence of improved survival among those who undergo the procedure. To select high-risk patients who might benefit most from diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, the authors developed and validated a scoring system based on prognostic indicators of increased mortality. The scoring system was developed from the best clinical predictors of mortality, determined in a prospective study of consecutive bleeding patients. The model was then tested in a prospective validation phase at three hospitals. Three main factors in the model predict mortality: bleeding, including hematochezia, drop in hematocrit of 5%, short duration of bleeding, absence of melena, and hypotension; liver disease, manifested by prolonged prothrombin time and encephalopathy; and renal disease. Patients determined to be at high risk for death using the scoring system might be candidates for aggressive management and for therapeutic endoscopy.

An evaluation of performance after informal training in endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy.

Endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy (ERS) has become the treatment of choice for certain disorders of the biliary tract and pancreas. Increased need for ERS has led experienced endoscopists to seek advanced training in this highly skilled procedure, and has resulted in the development of guidelines from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy regarding appropriate experience, skill, and training before performing ERS. This report describes the process by which an endoscopist skilled in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but with no prior training in ERS, acquired appropriate training. Results in the initial 75 patients attempted after training are reported and compared with previously published data. The results suggest that skill comparable to published results was attained through adherence to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and that most technical failures and complications occurred early in the series. The results also reinforce the increasing role of ERS in several disorders of the biliary tract and pancreas.