The Fate of the Bent Rod in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

BACKGROUND: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder characterized by brittle bones and long bone deformity. Realignment and intramedullary rodding with telescopic rods are indicated for progressive deformity and can help prevent fractures. Rod bending is a reported complication of telescopic rods and a common indication for revision; however, the fate of bent lower extremity telescopic rods in the setting of OI has not been reported. METHODS: Patients with OI at a single institution who underwent lower extremity telescopic rod placement with at least 1-year follow-up were identified. Bent rods were identified, and for these bone segments, we collected the location and angle of bend, subsequent telescoping, refracture, increasing angulation of bend, and date of revision. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight telescopic rods in 43 patients were identified. Forty-six rods (27.4%) bent during follow-up, with an average angulation of 7.3 (range: 1 to 24) degrees. In patients with severe OI, 15.7% of rods bent compared with 35.7% in nonsevere OI ( P =0.003). The proportion of bent rods was different between independent and nonindependent ambulators (34.1% and 20.5%; P =0.035). Twenty-seven bent rods (58.7%) were revised, with 12 rods (26.0%) revised early (within 90 d). The angulation of rods that were revised early was significantly higher than rods not (14.6 and 4.3 degrees, P <0.001). Of the 34 bent rods not revised early, the average time to revision or final follow-up was 29.1 months. Twenty-five rods (73.5%) continued to telescope, 14 (41.2%) increased in angulation (average 3.2 degrees), and 10 bones (29.4%) refractured. None of the refractures required immediate rod revision. Two bones had multiple refractures. CONCLUSIONS: Bending is a common complication of telescopic rods in the lower extremities of patients with OI. It is more common in independent ambulators and patients with nonsevere OI, possibly because of the increased demand placed on the rods. Rods with a small bend and maintained fixation can telescope and need not be an indication for immediate revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective review.

Ultrasonographic visualization and assessment of the anterolateral ligament.

PURPOSE: Injury to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee has recently received attention as a potential risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, evaluation of the anterolateral ligament is currently difficult, and radiologic data are sparse with regard to the normal appearance of this ligament. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the ALL could be identified and visualized using ultrasonography. METHODS: Ten non-paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees underwent ultrasound by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using a Siemens S2000 Acuson Ultrasound machine with a 14-MHz linear transducer. After first identifying anatomical landmarks by palpation, a thin band of tissue originating in the vicinity of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) origin was identified and followed up distally. The tibia was held at 30° of flexion and internally rotated to verify tightening of the structure. Under ultrasound guidance, 25-gauge hypodermic needles were placed at what were sonographically determined to be the origin and insertion points of the ligament. One-tenth of a CC of aniline blue dye was injected. The specimens were then dissected to confirm the presence and location of the ALL. If an ALL was found, distances between the epicentre of the injected dye and the actual origin and insertion points were calculated. Additionally, ligament length based on dissection images and ultrasound images was calculated. RESULTS: Eight of ten specimens had an anterolateral structure that originated from the lateral femoral epicondyle just posterior and superior to the origin of the FCL and inserted on the lateral plateau approximately halfway between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head. The average length based on ultrasound was 3.8 cm (±.7; range 3.1-4.7) and 4.1 cm (±1.1; range 2.6-6.1) based on dissection. Length based on dissection and ultrasound had minimal agreement (ICC = .308; 95 % confidence interval .257-.382, p = .265). The average width of the structure on dissection was .8 cm (±.24; range .5-1.2). The mean distance from ultrasound-determined origin and insertion points to anatomical origin and insertion based on dissection was 10.9 mm (±2.9, range 7.0-15.8) and 12.5 mm (±5.7 range 3.2-19.3), respectively. Inter-observer reliability was excellent for all measurements based on dissection and ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound was unable to reliably identify the anterolateral structure from its femoral to tibial attachment sites. Distinguishing it from the posterior IT band and anterolateral capsule was challenging, and it is possible that the structure is a thickened band of fascia rather than a true ligament. As a clinical diagnostic tool, ultrasound likely offers little utility in the evaluation of the ALL for injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Femoral Screw Divergence via the Anteromedial Portal Using an Outside-In Retrograde Drill in Bone-Patella Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To assess screw divergence when inserting an interference screw for a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft using an outside-in technique with a retrograde drill to create the femoral tunnel. METHODS: Ten cadaver specimens underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, with 23-mm-deep tunnels created by a retrograde drill outside-in technique. Drilling angles were based on a previous study that established the optimal angles to recreate the anterior cruciate ligament footprint. To ensure that screw insertion angles matched the angle of socket drilling, a marking pen was used to transpose 2 lines on the skin of the anterior knee corresponding to the drill in both the coronal and axial planes with the knee held at 90° of flexion. The femoral-sided bone plug was affixed with a 7 × 23 mm interference screw through an anteromedial portal. Computed tomography scans were used to calculate coronal and sagittal screw-tunnel divergence. RESULTS: The median screw divergence in the coronal plane was 2.79°, with a range of 1.1° to 17.2°. Of 10 specimens, 8 had no divergence (0° to 5°), 0 screws were between 5° and 10°, 1 screw was between 10° and 15°, and 1 screw was between 15° and 20°. The 95% confidence interval was 3.73° to 11.69°. No screws had ≥20° of divergence. In the sagittal plane, the median screw divergence was 5.68°, with a range of 1.2° to 18.7°. Five specimens had no divergence (0° to 5°), 3 screws were between 5° and 10°, 0 screws were between 10° and 15°, and 2 screws were between 15° and 20° of divergence. The 95% confidence interval was 3.73° to 11.69°. No screws had ≥20° of divergence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that 80% of screws diverted less than 5° in the coronal plane. In the sagittal plane, only 50% of screws were found to have divergence of 5° or less. No screw in either plane had divergence of greater than or equal to 20°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When using a retrograde drill, a skin marking technique is a useful aid in placing interference screws with acceptable angles of divergence when using an inside-out technique.

Osteochondral Proximal Tibial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplant.

Knee pain in young, active patients with meniscus-deficient knees and articular cartilage damage can present a challenge to treatment. Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has shown good clinical results as treatment for meniscus deficiency; however, worse outcomes have been observed in patients with significant chondral damage. The development of chondral restorative techniques such as osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) has expanded the population of patients who may benefit from MAT. We present a case of proximal tibial osteochondral and lateral meniscal allograft transplant. This review includes a sample of patient examinations and imaging, followed by a detailed technical description of the case. The technique article concludes with a discussion on the niche combined MAT-OCA procedures occupy in the patient treatment realm.

Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair Augmented With Bioinductive Implant.

Patients with gluteus minimus and medius tears that fail nonoperative management may be indicated for surgical repair; however, structural failure after gluteal tendon repair remains unacceptably high. This is likely related to the limited healing potential of tendinous tissue, which is poorly vascular and heals by formation of fibrocartilaginous scar tissue rather than histologically normal tendon. An emerging option to augment tendon healing is the use of a bioinductive implant that is designed to amplify the host healing response and induce the formation of healthy tendon tissue. Though it is rapidly being adopted for partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears, this implant has not yet been used in the hip. A detailed technical description and a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the technique are provided.

Biological Treatments for Tendon and Ligament Abnormalities: A Critical Analysis Review.

The poor intrinsic healing potential of tendon and ligamentous tissue has driven the search for biological agents that can improve healing, most notably platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and autologous stem cells. Current evidence best supports the use of PRP as treatment for chronic, degenerative tendinopathies such as lateral epicondylitis of the elbow or patellar tendinopathy. It does not support the use of PRP to promote tendon or ligament-to-bone healing in rotator cuff repair or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Clinical evidence regarding the use of autologous stem cells as treatment for tendon and ligament abnormalities is currently limited. However, the initial results appear to be promising, particularly following rotator cuff repair. A major limitation in the evaluation of current data is the lack of standardization in the preparation and composition of PRP, which are often not reported. Future investigators should make an effort to report the method of preparation and final composition of PRP used. Autologous stem cells were most often harvested from bone marrow aspirate but were occasionally derived from dermal tenocyte cells. Recent studies have explored new sources for stem cells, including adipose tissue, peripheral blood, and human amniotic tissue. We expect that clinical data evaluating these treatments will soon emerge.