Anaerobic cycling performance characteristics in prepubescent, adolescent and young adult females.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the relationships between short-term power and body dimensions in young females were similar whatever the age of the individuals. A cohort of 189 prepubescent (mean age 9.5 years), adolescent (mean age 14.4 years) and young adult (mean age 18.2 years) females performed three all-out sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer against three braking forces corresponding to applied loads of 25, 50 and 75 g.kg-1 body mass (BM). For each sprint, peak power including flywheel inertia was calculated. Results showed that a braking load of 75 g.kg-1 BM was too high for prepubescent and adolescent girls. Therefore, when measuring short-term cycling performance in heterogeneous female populations, a braking load of 50 g.kg-1 BM (0.495 N.kg-1 BM) is recommended. During growth, cycling peak power (CPP; defined as the highest peak power obtained during the three sprints) increased, as did total BM, fat-free mass (FFM) and lean leg volume (LLV) (P < 0.001). Analysis of covariance revealed that the slopes of the linear relationships between CPP and biometric characteristics were similar in the three groups (P > 0.7 for the CPP/BM and CPP/FFM relationships, and P > 0.2 for the CPP/LLV relationship). However, the adjusted means were always significantly higher in young women (P < 0.001) compared with both of the other groups. Although differences in performance during anaerobic cycling in growing females are primarily dependent upon body dimensions, other as yet undetermined factors may be involved during late adolescence.

Dimensional changes cannot account for all differences in short-term cycling power during growth.

The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent anthropometric characteristics account for cycling peak power during growth. Five hundred and six male subjects aged 7.5-18 years performed three brief maximal sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer. Cycling peak power (CPP) was calculated including the flywheel inertia of the device. Fat-free mass (FFM) and lean leg volume (LLV) were assessed by anthropometry. Anthropometric characteristics increased significantly during growth (p<0.001) but plateaued from about 16 years of age (p > 0.3). The same pattern was observed for CPP, while the time to reach CPP decreased during growth. CPP correlated as highly with LLV as with FFM and both parameters may therefore be interchanged. However, in non weight-bearing exercises, such as cycling, it seems more relevant to "normalise" leg power for LLV. Multiple stepwise regression, using an allometric model, showed that a large part of the variance of CPP was explained by LLV (88.2%, p<0.001). However, age and time to reach peak power also contributed significantly (approximately 3 %, p < 0.001). The prediction of CPP revealed that FFM and age contributed to 92.2% of the total variance of CPP. Because of its practicability, fat-free mass is particularly useful in prospective studies. Although the effects of dimensional changes in CPP during growth are obvious, undetermined qualitative changes of muscle function during maturation must be considered.

Testing peak cycling performance: effects of braking force during growth.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cycling peak power (CPP; flywheel inertia included) and the applied braking force (F(B)) on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer in male children, adolescents, and adults. A total of 520 male subjects aged 8-20 yr performed three brief maximal sprints against three F(B): 0.245, 0.491, and 0.736 N x kg(-1) body mass (BM) (corresponding applied loads: 25 [F(B)25], 50 [F(B)50], and 75 [F(B)75] g x kg(-1) BM). For each F(B), peak power (PP) was measured (PP25, PP50 and PP75). For each subject, the highest PP was defined as CPP. Results showed that PP was dependent on F(B). In young adults PP25 underestimated CPP by more than 10%, and consequently, F(B)25 seemed to be too low for this population. However, in children, PP75 underestimated CPP by about 20%. A F(B) of 0.736 N x kg(-1) BM was definitively too high for the pediatric population. Therefore, the optimal F(B), even corrected for BM, was lower in children than in adults. The influence of growth and maturation on the force-generating capacity of the leg muscles may explain this difference. In this study, however, it was shown that the difference between PP50 and CPP was independent of age for the whole population investigated. Consequently, when flywheel inertia is included, one cycling sprint with a F(B) of 0.495 N x kg(-1) BM (corresponding applied load: 50 g x kg(-1) BM) is a feasible method for testing both children, adolescents, or young adults.