Childhood Obesity and Early Body Mass Index Gains Associated with COVID-19 in a Large Rural Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate body mass index (BMI) change among a population of children with a high proportion residing in rural areas across two pandemic time periods. METHODS: Electronic health records were evaluated in a rural health system. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 2-17 years at initial BMI; >2 BMIs during pre-pandemic (January 1, 2018-February 29, 2020); >1 BMI in early pandemic (June 1, 2020-December 31, 2020); and >1 BMI in later pandemic (January 1, 2021-December 31, 2021). Mixed effects linear regression models were used to estimate average monthly rate of change in BMI slope (∆BMI) from pre-pandemic to pandemic and test for effect modification of sex, race/ethnicity, age, BMI, public insurance, and rural address. RESULTS: Among the 40,627 participants, 50.2% were female, 84.6% were non-Hispanic white, 34.9% used public insurance, and 42.5% resided in rural areas. The pre-pandemic proportion of children with overweight, obesity, and severe obesity was 15.6%, 12.8%, and 6.3%, respectively. The ∆BMI nearly doubled during the early pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic period (0.102 vs 0.055 kg/m2), however, ∆BMI in the later pandemic was lower (0.040 vs 0.055 kg/m2). ∆BMI remained higher in the later pandemic for all race categories compared to Non-Hispanic white. Children with public insurance had higher ∆BMI compared to those with private insurance that remained higher in the later pandemic (0.051 vs 0.035 kg/m2). There was no significant difference between ∆BMI for rural and urban children during pandemic periods. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the decreased ∆BMI among children in the later pandemic, prevalence of obesity and severe obesity remain high. Efforts must continue to be made to limit excess weight gain during childhood and to assess the impact of forces like structural and social factors in both etiology and prevention.

Coordination Between Primary Care and Women, Infants, and Children to Prevent Obesity for Infants from Low-Income Families: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Rapid weight gain during infancy is associated with risk for later obesity, yet little research to date has examined the effect of a responsive parenting (RP) intervention with care coordination between pediatric primary care providers and Women, Infants, and Children nutritionists on infant weight. Methods: The Women, Infants, and Children Enhancements to Early Healthy Lifestyles for Baby (WEE Baby) Care study is a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial for mothers and infants (n = 288) designed to examine the effect of a patient-centered RP intervention that used advanced health information technology strategies to coordinate care to reduce rapid infant weight gain compared with standard care. General linear models examined intervention effects on infant conditional weight gain scores, weight-for-age z scores, BMI, and overweight status (BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile) from birth to age 6 months, and mothers' use of food to soothe from age 2 to 6 months. Results: There were no intervention effects on infant conditional weight gain scores or overweight status at 6 months. Infants in the RP intervention had lower mean weight-for-age z scores [M = -0.04, standard error (SE) = 0.04 vs. M = 0.05, SE = 0.04; p = 0.008] and lower mean BMI (M = 16.05, SE = 0.09 vs. M = 16.24, SE = 0.09; p = 0.03) compared with standard care. Mothers' use of emotion-based food to soothe was lower in the RP intervention compared with standard care from age 2 to 6 months [M difference = -0.32, standard deviation (SD) = 0.81 vs. 0.00, SD = 0.90; p = 0.01]. Conclusions: This pragmatic, patient-centered RP intervention did not reduce rapid infant weight gain or overweight but was associated with modestly lower infant BMI and reduced mothers' use of emotion-based food to soothe. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03482908.

Patient-reported outcome measures can advance population health, but is access to instruments and use equitable?

Patient reported outcome measures (PROM) can engage patients and clinicians to improve health outcomes. Their population health impact may be limited by systematic barriers inhibiting access to completion. In this analysis we evaluated the association between individual parent/child characteristics and clinic factors with parental completion of a locally developed PROM, the Early Healthy Lifestyles (EHL) questionnaire. Participants included parent-child dyads who presented at 14 pediatric clinics for regularly scheduled well-child visits (WCV) prior to age 26 months. EHL items include feeding practices, diet, play time, screen exposure, and sleep. Completion was categorized at patient- (i.e., parent-child dyad) and clinic-levels. Parents completed the 15-item EHL in the patient portal before arrival or in the clinic; ninety-three percent of EHL questionnaires were completed in the clinic vs. 7% in the patient portal. High-completers completed EHL for half of WCVs; low-completers completed at least once; and non-completers never completed. Clinics were classified by EHL adoption level (% high completion): High-adoption: >50%; Moderate-adoption: 10%-50%; and Low-adoption: <10%. Individual-level factors had negligible impact on EHL completion within moderate/low EHL adoption sites; high-adoption sites were used to evaluate infant and maternal factors in association with EHL completion using hierarchical logistic regression. Noncompletion of EHL was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with infant use of public insurance (OR = 1.92 [1.42, 2.59]), >1 clinic site for WCV (OR = 1.83 [1.34, 2.50]), non-White birth mother (OR = 1.78 [1.28, 2.47]), and body weight <2,500 grams or gestational age <34 weeks (OR = 1.74 [1.05, 2.90]). The number of WCVs, a proxy for clinic size, was evaluated but was not associated with completion. Findings indicate potential disparities between populations exposed to, completing, and benefitting from these tools.

Advanced Health Information Technologies to Engage Parents, Clinicians, and Community Nutritionists in Coordinating Responsive Parenting Care: Descriptive Case Series of the Women, Infants, and Children Enhancements to Early Healthy Lifestyles for Baby (WEE Baby) Care Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomically disadvantaged newborns receive care from primary care providers (PCPs) and Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) nutritionists. However, care is not coordinated between these settings, which can result in conflicting messages. Stakeholders support an integrated approach that coordinates services between settings with care tailored to patient-centered needs. OBJECTIVE: This analysis describes the usability of advanced health information technologies aiming to engage parents in self-reporting parenting practices, integrate data into electronic health records to inform and facilitate documentation of provided responsive parenting (RP) care, and share data between settings to create opportunities to coordinate care between PCPs and WIC nutritionists. METHODS: Parents and newborns (dyads) who were eligible for WIC care and received pediatric care in a single health system were recruited and randomized to a RP intervention or control group. For the 6-month intervention, electronic systems were created to facilitate documentation, data sharing, and coordination of provided RP care. Prior to PCP visits, parents were prompted to respond to the Early Healthy Lifestyles (EHL) self-assessment tool to capture current RP practices. Responses were integrated into the electronic health record and shared with WIC. Documentation of RP care and an 80-character, free-text comment were shared between WIC and PCPs. A care coordination opportunity existed when the dyad attended a WIC visit and these data were available from the PCP, and vice versa. Care coordination was demonstrated when WIC or PCPs interacted with data and documented RP care provided at the visit. RESULTS: Dyads (N=131) attended 459 PCP (3.5, SD 1.0 per dyad) and 296 WIC (2.3, SD 1.0 per dyad) visits. Parents completed the EHL tool prior to 53.2% (244/459) of PCP visits (1.9, SD 1.2 per dyad), PCPs documented provided RP care at 35.3% (162/459) of visits, and data were shared with WIC following 100% (459/459) of PCP visits. A WIC visit followed a PCP visit 50.3% (231/459) of the time; thus, there were 1.8 (SD 0.8 per dyad) PCP to WIC care coordination opportunities. WIC coordinated care by documenting RP care at 66.7% (154/231) of opportunities (1.2, SD 0.9 per dyad). WIC visits were followed by a PCP visit 58.9% (116/197) of the time; thus, there were 0.9 (SD 0.8 per dyad) WIC to PCP care coordination opportunities. PCPs coordinated care by documenting RP care at 44.0% (51/116) of opportunities (0.4, SD 0.6 per dyad). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the usability of advanced health information technology strategies to collect patient-reported data and share these data between multiple providers. Although PCPs and WIC shared data, WIC nutritionists were more likely to use data and document RP care to coordinate care than PCPs. Variability in timing, sequence, and frequency of visits underscores the need for flexibility in pragmatic studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03482908; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03482908. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12887-018-1263-z.

Integrating and coordinating care between the Women, Infants, and Children Program and pediatricians to improve patient-centered preventive care for healthy growth.

New care delivery models call for integrating health services to coordinate care and improve patient-centeredness. Such models have been embraced to coordinate care with evidence-based strategies to prevent obesity. Both the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program and pediatricians are considered credible sources of preventive guidance, and coordinating these independent siloes would benefit a vulnerable population. Using semistructured focus groups and interviews, we evaluated practices, messaging, and the prospect of integrating and coordinating care. Across Pennsylvania, WIC nutritionists (n = 35), pediatricians (n = 15), and parents (N = 28) of an infant or toddler participated in 2016. Three themes were identified: health assessment data sharing (e.g., iron, growth measures), benefits and barriers to integrated health services, and coordinating care to reduce conflicting educational messages (e.g., breastfeeding, juice, introduction of solids). Stakeholders supported sharing health assessment data and integrating health services as strategies to enhance the quality of care, but were concerned about security and confidentiality. Overall, integrated, coordinated care was perceived to be an acceptable strategy to facilitate consistent, preventive education and improve patient-centeredness.

Bariatric Surgery Patients and Their Families: Health, Physical Activity, and Social Support.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the social environment of bariatric surgery patients in the preoperative period. METHODS: Forty bariatric surgery patients (mean = 46.2 ± 11.2 years), 35 adult cohabitating family members (mean = 45.2 ± 12.7 years), and 15 cohabitating children (mean = 11.5 ± 3.6 years) were recruited from a large rural medical center. Adult participants (patients and family members) completed height, weight, body composition, blood draws, and physical activity assessments (accelerometry), as well as eating behavior and social support inventories before the patient underwent bariatric surgery. Child participants completed demographic, height, and weight assessment only. RESULTS: Over 90 % of adult family members were overweight or obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2, as were 50 % of children (BMI percentile ≥ 85 %). More than one third (37.1 %) of family members met the criteria for moderate to severe insulin resistance. Physical activity measured by accelerometry was moderately correlated between the patient and adult family members (r = 0.46, p = 0.023). Bariatric surgery patients reported high levels of social support from their family members on multiple social support measures. CONCLUSIONS: Many family members of bariatric surgery patients also lived with obesity and related comorbidities, and demonstrate high sedentary behavior. However, patients reported high levels of support from family members, including support in following a healthy diet and engaging in physical activity. Engaging families in behavior change may help bariatric surgery patients and their families to become healthier.